European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome

Expanding our understanding of Guillain-Barré syndrome: Recent advances and clinical implications

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare yet potentially life-threatening disorder of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), characterized by substantial clinical heterogeneity. Although classified as an autoimmune disease, the immune mechanisms underpinning distinct GBS subtypes remain largely elusive. Traditionally considered primarily antibody-mediated, the pathophysiology of GBS lacks clarity, posing challenges in the development of targeted and effective treatments. Nevertheless, recent investigations have substantially expanded our understanding of the disease, revealing an involvement of autoreactive T cell immunity in a major subtype of GBS patients and opening new biomedical perspectives. This review highlights these discoveries and offers a comprehensive overview of current knowledge about GBS, including ongoing challenges in disease management.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin retreatment amongst Guillain-Barré syndrome patients who poorly responded to initial IVIG cycle: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Small cross-sectional studies and case reports observed improvement after administration of second IVIG dose (SID) amongst Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) patients not responsive to initial IVIG cycle. Nevertheless, recent clinical trial and larger observational studies did not find any positive effects of SID. Instead, an increased risk of thromboembolism and mortality was noted. The conclusions of these studies however were not robust as confounding and selection bias were present.

METHODOLOGY

Two neurologists conducted the search process (KBA and MBP) using the following terms in Medline: [(" Guillain-Barré Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] or GBS or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy or Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy) AND (Poorly Responsive or Poor Prognosis or Progressive)] AND [("Intravenous Immunoglobulin"[MeSH Terms] or IVIG or IGIV) AND (second dose or retreatment or SID)].

RESULTS

Only 7 articles were included in this review. In terms of primary outcomes, although the cross-sectional study found improvement in GBS DS score at 4 weeks (Median GBS DS: 3 vs 5, p = 0.033) and the 2 case series observed improvement after SID, no significant differences between the control and intervention groups were found in the cohort [Early SIV OR: 0.7 (95% CI 0.16-3.04), Late SIV OR: 0.66 (CI: 0.18-2.5)] and clinical trial studies (Adjusted OR: 1.4 (95% CI:0.6-3.3, p = 0.45). Moreover, 4 patients who died in the clinical trial were from the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Based on studies with research designs of higher quality, SID is not effective in the management of GBS patients who poorly responded to initial IVIG. Nevertheless, an adequately powered, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, using GBS-DS of 3 and above after first IVIG dose should be done to effectively establish the efficacy and safety of SID as intervention for this cohort of patients.

Antiganglioside antibody frequency in routine clinical care settings

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Antiganglioside antibodies (AGAs) might be involved in the etiopathogenesis of many neurological diseases, such as Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Available comprehensive reference data regarding AGA positivity rates and cross-responsiveness among AGAs (where one line immunoblot is positive for ≥1 AGA) during routine clinical care are scant.

METHODS

In this 10-year monocentric retrospective study, 3560 immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM line blots (GA Generic Assays' Anti-Ganglioside Dot kit) obtained using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples from 1342 patients were analyzed for AGA positivity in terms of 14 diagnosis categories and AGA cross-responsiveness.

RESULTS

Of all 3560 line blots 158 (4.4%) and of all CSF samples 0.4% (4/924) CSF line blots were AGA positive. For serum IgG, blots with positivity rates higher than the standard deviation of 15.6% were associated with MFS (GD3, GD1a, GT1a and GQ1b) and acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) (GM1, GD1a and GT1a). For serum IgM, blots with positivity rates higher than the standard deviation of 8.1% were associated with AMAN (GM2, GT1a and GQ1b), MFS (GM1, GT1a and GQ1b), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) (GM1, GM2 and GQ1b) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) (GM1). Cross-responsiveness was observed in 39.6% of all positive serum AGA.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for AGAs during routine clinical care rarely led to positive findings, both in serum and even less in CSF, except for the diagnoses AMAN, MFS, MMN and CIDP. Nonspecific findings found as cross-responsiveness between different AGA samples occur frequently, impacting the positivity of most AGA subtypes.

Treatment-Related Fluctuation in Guillain-Barre Syndrome With the Acute Motor-Sensory Axonal Neuropathy (AMSAN) Variant: A Case Report

We present the case of a 60-year-old male patient with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) who experienced treatment-related fluctuations (TRF) with a history of ayahuasca consumption. The patient presented to the neurological emergency department without a history of infection (upper respiratory tract or diarrhea) or vaccination in the past four weeks, but 14 days prior, the patient had consumed ayahuasca. Upon admission, the patient exhibited progressive weakness in all four limbs, with no cranial nerve involvement, a muscle strength Medical Research Council (MRC) score of 36/60, and generalized areflexia. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed slightly elevated protein levels at 50 mg/dL and a cell count of 2 (lumbar puncture was performed three days after the onset of symptoms). Neurophysiological studies met the criteria for the acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) variant. A diagnosis of GBS was established, Brighton criteria grade 1. The patient received treatment with intravenous human immunoglobulin, resulting in improvement with an MRC score of 48/60 at discharge. However, on day 10, he returned with worsening muscle strength (MRC score of 20/60), necessitating ventilatory support. TRF was considered, and retreatment with human immunoglobulin was initiated.

Combined Central and Peripheral Demyelination (CCPD) Associated with MOG Antibodies: Report of Four New Cases and Narrative Review of the Literature

Background/Objectives: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is exclusively expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and is found on the outer surface of oligodendrocytes. Antibodies to MOG are associated with CNS demyelination, whereas peripheral nervous system (PNS) demyelination is seldom reported to be related to MOG-IgG. Methods: The database of patients seen in our neurological academic center was searched for MOG-IgG seropositivity and concomitant demyelinating polyneuropathy. For the purpose of the review, in March 2024, we searched for case reports and case series in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria were MOG-IgG seropositivity and demyelinating polyneuropathy. Exclusion criteria were type of publication other than case reports and case series, unconfirmed diagnosis of demyelinating polyneuropathy, and other diseases causing demyelination in either the CNS or PNS. Critical appraisal of the selected case reports and case series was realized by JBI. Results: Four new cases were identified with MOG-IgG and confirmed demyelinating polyneuropathy. This review identified 22 cases that have been published since 2018. Clinical, imaging, neurophysiological, and immunological characteristics, as well as treatment options and outcomes are presented and compared to those of other cases with combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD). Conclusions: The pathogenetic mechanism is unclear; thus, different hypotheses are discussed. New case reporting and large cohort studies will help further the exploration of the underlying mechanism and guide more effective therapeutic interventions.

New chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/Guillain-Barré syndrome guidelines - impact on clinical practise

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is no diagnostic biomarker that can reliably detect Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Diagnosis relies upon integrating key clinical characteristics and relevant supportive data. Consequently, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are common. Diagnostic criteria have proven valuable resources to improve diagnosis, but are underutilized during routine clinical care.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2021, the EAN/PNS CIDP criteria was published, and were followed by the EAN/PNS GBS criteria in 2023. Both guidelines utilized GRADE methodology to formulate evidence-based recommendations that are intended to be used by adult and paediatric clinicians across diverse care settings to optimize diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes during routine clinical care.

SUMMARY

The EAN/PNS GBS and CIDP criteria detail specific clinical, electrophysiological, and laboratory features that raise diagnostic confidence, and call attention to diagnostic mimics. The sensitivity of EAN/PNS and other modern criteria to detect GBS and CIDP is high, but utilization during clinical practice is low. Complexity is one factor limiting widespread application. Strategies are needed to optimize criteria adoption during routine clinical care such that GBS and CIDP diagnosis can be achieved with greater speed and accuracy.

Neurophysiological and Ultrasound Correlations in Guillain Barré Syndrome and CIDP-Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are inflammatory polyneuropathies with an autoimmune etiology. These diseases differ mainly in the timing of their course but also in certain clinical differences. Electroneurography and electromyography are crucial for fulfilling the primary (for CIDP) and secondary (for GBS) diagnostic criteria. High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) is recognized as a complementary method in the diagnosis of CIDP and GBS.

AIM

The aim of this study was to present the neurophysiological and ultrasound findings of patients with clinically diagnosed inflammatory neuropathies (GBS and CIDP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We collected data from clinically confirmed patients with GBS (3 persons) and CIDP (6 persons). The neurography and high-resolution ultrasound examinations according to the UPSS scale were performed.

RESULTS

The neurography tests of GBS and CIDP patients showed mainly demyelinating lesions of the examined nerves, often with abnormal F-wave recordings. Examination using HRUS in GBS patients showed mild and regional nerve swelling with hypoechoic bundles with a predilection for proximal segments and cervical spinal nerve roots. In contrast, CIDP patients had diffused nerve swelling with hypoechoic bundles of greater severity and extent than those with GBS.

CONCLUSION

Neurophysiological tests and HRUS of peripheral nerves, plexi, and roots performed together can be very valuable, complementary diagnostic methods for the early diagnosis and effective treatment of inflammatory polyneuropathies.

Pathologic RFC1 repeat expansions do not contribute to the development of inflammatory neuropathies

Biallelic expansions of the AAGGG repeat in the replication factor C subunit 1 (RFC1) have recently been described to be responsible for cerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome. This genetic alteration has also allowed genetic classification in up to one-third of cases with idiopathic sensory neuropathy. Here, we screened a well-characterized cohort of inflammatory neuropathy patients for RFC1 repeat expansions to explore whether RFC1 was increased from background rates and possibly involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory neuropathy. A total of 259 individuals with inflammatory neuropathy and 243 healthy controls were screened for the AAGGG repeat expansion using short-range flanking PCR and repeat-primed PCR. Cases without amplifiable PCR product on flanking PCR and positive repeat-primed PCR were also tested for the mostly non-pathogenic expansions of the AAAGG and AAAAG repeat units. None of the patients showed biallelic AAGGG expansion of RFC1, and their carrier frequency for AAGGG was comparable with controls [n = 27 (5.2%) and n = 23 (4.7%), respectively; P > 0.5]. Data suggest that the pathologic expansions of AAGGG repeats do not contribute to the development of inflammatory neuropathies nor lead to misdiagnosed cases. Accordingly, routine genetic screening for RFC1 repeat expansion is not indicated in this patient population.

Effect of the Task Approach, Airway Clearance, Kinesthetic Exercise (TASKS) Paediatric Rehabilitation Protocol on Miller-Fisher Syndrome Variant of Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Case Report

Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS) is a rare variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) with varying incidence rates geographically. MFS is primarily diagnosed based on clinical features, such as ataxia and areflexia, although other neurological symptoms may also present. A case of MFS has been presented, characterized by complaints of ataxia, areflexia, bilateral foot and hand pain and difficulty in swallowing. In this regard, a paediatric rehabilitation approach has been adopted, utilizing outcome measures, such as the Erasmus Guillain-Barre Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score-Kids, WeeFIM and paediatric balance scale, in addition to clinical evaluation. It is worth noting that the presented case demonstrates the importance of accurately diagnosing and treating this rare neurological condition MFS. Through the implementation of appropriate rehabilitation strategies, it is possible to enhance patients' quality of life.

A Rare Presentation of Guillain-Barré Syndrome With Associated Horner Syndrome: A Case Report

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy involving the peripheral nervous system. Autonomic dysfunctions are well-known complications of GBS and are major contributors to mortality. Autonomic dysfunctions are classically described during the acute phase of illness. In the literature, Horner syndrome as a manifestation of GBS has been reported in very few cases. Here, we describe a case of GBS with an acute presentation of flaccid paraparesis associated with unilateral Horner syndrome. Detecting the cause of acute flaccid paraparesis with unilateral Horner syndrome poses a diagnostic challenge, making it crucial for clinicians to maintain a heightened awareness for distinguishing between GBS and its variants, as well as other potential mimics.

Evaluating yield and utilization of ganglioside antibody testing in clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ganglioside antibodies can help diagnose distinct acute and chronic inflammatory neuropathies including axonal variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome, Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS), multifocal motor neuropathy, and chronic sensory ataxic neuropathies. Because ganglioside antibody testing may be routinely ordered in patients with suspected inflammatory neuropathy, we sought to evaluate its yield and utilization in clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients at London Health Sciences Centre who underwent ganglioside antibody testing between April 2019 and August 2023. The disease phenotype was determined for each patient, and the proportion of all tests that yielded a true-positive result was calculated. Ganglioside antibody positivity was classified as a true-positive result if the disease phenotype was robustly associated with the detected ganglioside antibody and there was no other more likely diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 92 patients who underwent ganglioside antibody testing. One patient (1%) was classified as having a true-positive result; this patient had GQ1b-IgG positivity with MFS. Among 92 patients tested, 20 patients (22%) had a disease phenotype that was considered to be robustly associated with ganglioside antibody positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The yield of ganglioside antibody testing in clinical practice is low. We found that this testing is frequently ordered in patients with disease phenotypes that are not robustly associated with ganglioside antibody positivity, indicating that suboptimal test utilization is a primary contributor to its low yield. Restricting ganglioside antibody testing to patients with characteristic disease phenotypes would be valuable to improving yield and utilization of this testing.