1
|
Hopia H, Heikkilä J. Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review. Nurs Open 2020; 7:483-494. [PMID: 32089844 PMCID: PMC7024619 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To analyse nursing research based on the CINAHL database to identify research priorities for nursing. Design A scoping literature review was conducted. The CINAHL Plus (EBSCO) Full Text was searched between 2012-2018. Methods Out of 1522 original publications, 91 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were applied. Data were analysed by a thematic analysis method. Results A strong emphasis should be put on development and evaluation of nursing theories and, in addition, randomized controlled trial studies, meta-synthesis, experimental and intervention studies are needed in nursing research. Development of competencies and skills in the nursing profession ought to be studied more extensively and research should be focused on variety fields of nursing practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Hopia
- School of Health and Social StudiesJAMK University of Applied SciencesJyvaskylaFinland
| | - Johanna Heikkilä
- School of Health and Social StudiesJAMK University of Applied Sciences, Research and DevelopmentJyvaskylaFinland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahman MM, Efird JT, Byles JE. Transitioning of older Australian women into and through the long-term care system: a cohort study using linked data. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:286. [PMID: 31651250 PMCID: PMC6814097 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1291-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over two-thirds of older Australians use different types/levels of aged care at some point in later life. Our aims were to estimate transitional probabilities and to identify risk factors influencing the movement between different levels of long-term care. Methods The sample consisted of 9007 women from the 1921-26 birth cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. Transitional probabilities between different levels of long-term care were estimated using a continuous-time Markov model. Results An 11-fold transition rates ratio was observed for the movement from non-user to home and community care (HACC) versus non-user to residential aged care (RAC). The predicted probabilities of remaining in the non-user state, HACC, and RAC after 10 years from the baseline were .28, .24, and .11, respectively. While the corresponding probabilities of dying from these states were .36, .65, and .90. The risk of transitioning from the non-user state to either HACC or RAC was greater for participants who were older at baseline, widowed, living outside of major cities, having difficulties in managing income, or having chronic condition, poor/fair self-rated health, or lower SF-36 scores (p < .05). Conclusion Women spend a substantial period of their later life using long-term care. Typically, this will be in the community setting with a low level of care. The transition to either HACC or RAC was associated with several demographic and health-related factors. Our findings are important for the planning and improvement of long-term care among future generations of older people. Trial registration Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Mijanur Rahman
- Priority Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, West Wing, Level 4, Lot 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia. .,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia. .,Department of Statistics, Comilla University, Comilla, Bangladesh.
| | - Jimmy T Efird
- Priority Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, West Wing, Level 4, Lot 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Julie E Byles
- Priority Research Centre for Generational Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, West Wing, Level 4, Lot 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rayner JA, Fetherstonhaugh D, Cowen S. Research priorities in residential aged care services: A statewide survey. Australas J Ageing 2019; 39:40-47. [PMID: 30980585 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To ascertain the research priorities of staff working in Victorian residential aged care services (RACS). METHOD In October 2016, all 754 Victorian RACS were asked to list three most important research priorities in a confidential postal survey. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse the data. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-two (21.5%) RACS participated. Research priorities, in order of importance, were grouped thematically as workforce issues, strategies to manage residents with dementia and funding to the sector. Staffing numbers and mix, particularly nurse-to-resident ratios, dominated workforce issues. The management of responsive behaviours was highlighted as a pressing clinical issue, and insufficient funding to the sector impacted on most issues reported. CONCLUSIONS The research priorities identified were inter-related. Some were already well researched, suggesting RACS staff have little time and/or limited access to research evidence to inform the care and management of residents, possibly because of inadequate staffing and funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo-Anne Rayner
- Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh
- Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sandra Cowen
- Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lam HR, Chow S, Taylor K, Chow R, Lam H, Bonin K, Rowbottom L, Herrmann N. Challenges of conducting research in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:242. [PMID: 30314472 PMCID: PMC6186062 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0934-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this review is to describe the challenges and barriers to conducting research in long-term care facilities. Methods A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Keywords used included “long term care”, “nursing home”, “research”, “trial”, “challenge” and “barrier”, etc. Resulting references were screened in order to identify relevant studies that reported on challenges derived from first-hand experience of empirical research studies. Challenges were summarized and synthesized. Results Of 1723 references, 39 articles were selected for inclusion. To facilitate understanding we proposed a classification framework of 8 main themes to categorize the research challenges presented in the 39 studies, relating to the characteristics of facility/owner/administrator, resident, staff caregiver, family caregiver, investigator, ethical or legal concerns, methodology, and budgetary considerations. Conclusions Conducting research in long-term care facilities is full of challenges which can be categorized into 8 main themes. Investigators should be aware of all these challenges and specifically address them when planning their studies. Stakeholders should be involved from an early stage and flexibility should be built into both the methodology and research budget. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0934-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen R Lam
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Selina Chow
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.,Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room FG19, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Kate Taylor
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Ronald Chow
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Henry Lam
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Katija Bonin
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Leigha Rowbottom
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Nathan Herrmann
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada. .,Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room FG19, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|