Electrical stimulation structurally affects the tissues of the rectum and anus of nulliparous rats

Non-retentive faecal incontinence in children: Conventional therapy alone or combined electrical stimulation

AIMS

To compare the effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) with conventional therapy and conventional therapy alone on improvement of faecal incontinence (FI) symptoms in a number of children with functional non-retentive FI.

METHODS

Data of 28 children with FI were accepted for this retrospective study. The case group (n = 14) underwent FES + conventional therapy and the control group (n = 14) received conventional therapy only. Data of children with faecal retention, inflammatory, anatomic, metabolic and neurological disorders were excluded. Children were assessed with a paediatric FI score questionnaire, and a bowel habit diary both before treatment sessions, after they ended, and after 6 months. A FI quality of life questionnaire was completed before and after treatment for all children.

RESULTS

Full response to the treatment (100% reduction in FI episodes) was significantly observed in 8/14 (57.1%) of children in the case group compared to 2/14 (14.2%) of children in the control group after the ending of treatment sessions (P = 0.005). The baseline mean ± SD of FI episodes per week was 3.7 ± 2.1 among both groups which significantly decreased after the ending of treatment sessions in the case group compared to the control group (1.4 ± 2.1 vs 3 ± 2.7; P = 0.05). Mean ± SD of FI score was significantly reduced in the case group compared to the controls after the ending of treatment sessions (3.9 ± 4.5 vs 8 ± 4.7; P = 0.02) and maintained after 6 months (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional electrical stimulation is a safe, effective, non-invasive, inexpensive, reproducible and easy-to-use modality for treatment of functional non-retentive faecal incintinence in children.

Perspectives on the Therapeutic Effects of Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review

Pelvic, perineal, and nervous lesions, which derive principally from pregnancy and childbirth, may lead to pelvic floor dysfunctions, such as organ prolapses and lesions in the nerves and muscles due to muscle expansion and physiology. It is estimated that 70% of women affected by this clinical picture have symptoms that do not respond to the classical treatments with antimuscarinic and anticholinergic drugs. Therefore, resorting to efficient alternatives and less invasive methods is necessary to assist this public health problem that predominantly affects the female population, which is more susceptible to the risk factors. This study aimed to perform an updated and comprehensive literature review focused on the effects of pelvic floor electrical stimulation, considering new perspectives such as a correlation between electric current and site of intervention and other molecular aspects, different from the present reviews that predominantly evaluate urodynamic aspects. For that purpose, PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were used to perform the search, and the Methodi ordinatio method was applied. With well-researched therapeutic effects, electrical stimulation induced promising results in histological, nervous, and molecular evaluations and spinal processes, which showed beneficial results and revealed new perspectives on ways to evoke responses in the lower urinary tract in a non-invasive way. Thus, it is possible to conclude that this type of intervention may be a non-invasive alternative to treat pelvic and perineal dysfunctions.

Comparative Efficacy of Transcutaneous Functional Electrical Stimulation With or Without Biofeedback Therapy on Functional Non-retentive Fecal Incontinence in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

We compared the effects of transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (TFES) and biofeedback therapy with TFES alone in a cohort of children with functional non-retentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI).

METHODS

This prospective, single-center randomized clinical trial was performed on 40 children with FNRFI. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal treatment groups. Group A (n = 20) underwent TFES + biofeedback therapy, and group B (n = 20) received TFES alone. All patients were assessed with a pediatric fecal incontinence (FI) score questionnaire, a visual pain score, and a bowel habit diary both before and at the end of treatment sessions and also at 6 months of follow-up. In addition, a FI quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire was recorded for all patients before and 6 months after the treatment.

RESULTS

FI significantly improved in 13/20 (65%) patients in group A and 11/20 (55%) patients in group B (P < 0.05). A significant reduction in FI score was seen in each group at the end of treatment sessions and maintained at 6 months of follow-up (P < 0.05). A significant improvement in FI-QoL scores was seen in both groups at 6 months of follow-up in which there was no significant difference in terms of FI-QoL scores improvement between both groups after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of electrical stimulation in combination with other treatment methods improves symptoms in patients with FNRFI who are refractory to conventional treatment.

Usefulness of An Anal Sphincter Injury Mouse Model by Means of a Balloon Catheter and a New Method of Evaluating Anal Sphincter Function

Background

The incidence of fecal incontinence is ~2%, and the associated symptoms significantly impact daily life. New treatment methods including electrical stimulation and regenerative therapy using stem cells for fecal incontinence have been reported. We explored the usefulness of an anal sphincter injury mouse model by means of a balloon catheter and focused on the defecation status of mice as a novel method for evaluating anal function. We examined the utility of the mouse model of anal sphincter injury and the efficacy of electrical stimulation as a treatment modality using this model.

Methods

A 10-mm balloon catheter was used to create an anal sphincter injury model in mice. Sphincter function was evaluated in the noninjured (n = 4), injured (n = 4), noninjured electrical stimulation (n = 4), and injured electrical stimulation (n = 4) groups. Defecation status (defecation frequency in 24 h and fecal weight per stool) and pathological evaluation were used for comparison.

Results

The defecation frequency increased and the fecal weight per stool decreased significantly in the anal sphincter injury model. Pathological evaluation revealed that anal sphincter tears occurred the day after the injury. Meanwhile, the defecation frequency improved on d 7, and the fecal weight per stool gradually normalized to that of the control group and exhibited significant sphincter muscle hypertrophy in the electrical stimulation group.

Conclusion

Anal sphincter injury using a balloon catheter in mice allowed us to create a uniform model. The evaluation of defecation status in mice is a useful method for comparatively evaluating anal function.

Sacral Neuromodulation Changes Pelvic Floor Activity in Overactive Bladder Patients-Possible New Insights in Mechanism of Action: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if electrodiagnostic tools can advance the understanding in the effect of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) on pelvic floor activity, more specifically if SNM induces changes in pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single tertiary center, prospective study (October 2017-May 2018) including patients with overactive bladder syndrome undergoing SNM. Electromyography of the PFM was recorded using the Multiple Array Probe Leiden. The procedure consisted of consecutive stimulations of the lead electrodes with increasing intensity (1-3, 5, 7, 10 V). Recordings were made after electrode placement (T0) and three weeks of SNM (T1). Patients with >50% improvement were defined as responders, others as nonresponders. For the analyses, the highest electrical PFM response (EPFMR), defined as the peak-to-peak amplitude of the muscle response, was identified for each intensity. The sensitivity (intensity where the first EPFMR was registered and the normalized EPFMR as percentage of maximum EPFMR) and the evolution (EMFPR changes over time) were analyzed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were analyzed (nine responders, five nonresponders). For nonresponders, the PFM was significantly less sensitive to stimulation after three weeks (T0: 1.7 V, T1: 2.6 V). The normalized EPFMR was (significantly) lower after three weeks for the ipsilateral side of the PFM for the clinically relevant voltages (1 V: 36%-23%; p = 0.024, 2 V: 56%-29%; p = 0.00001; 3 V: 63%-37%; p = 0.0002). For the nonresponders, the mean EPFMR was significantly lower at 8/12 locations at T1 (T0: 109 μV, T1: 58 μV; mean p = 0.013, range <0.0001-0.0867). For responders, the sensitivity and evolution did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to describe in detail the neurophysiological characteristics of the PFM, and the changes over time upon sacral spinal root stimulation, in responders and nonresponders to SNM. More research is needed to investigate the full potential of EPFMR as a response indicator.