Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids: Updated review

Investigating the impact of botulinum toxin type a on the migration of normal human dermal fibroblasts: An in vitro wound healing assay

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is widely utilized in the management of hypertrophic and keloid scars. One proposed mechanism for scar prevention involves the inhibition of fibroblast migration in scars by BoNT-A. However, the data regarding the effect of BoNT-A on the migration of normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) is limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effect of different types and dilutions of BoNT-A on the migration of NHDF.

METHODS

In vitro scratch wound assay, NHDF cells were cultured, incubated, and subjected to scratching using a sterile tip. Subsequently, the scratched NHDF monolayer was treated with different types of BoNT-A, including onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA), incobotulinumtoxinA (INCO), prabotulinumtoxinA (PRABO), or letibotulinumtoxinA (LETI), at varying concentrations of 10, 20, 25, 40, 50, and 100 units/milliliter (U/mL). Additionally, abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) was administered at concentrations of 33, 50, 66, 71, 100, 150, 300, and 500 U/mL. Normal saline solution (NSS) served as a negative control. The extent of NHDF migration was evaluated by comparing each dilution of BoNT-A with the controls using high-content imaging at the 48-h time point. Furthermore, the viability of the of NHDF was assessed.

RESULTS

The concentrations of 25, 40, and 50 U/mL of ONA (p < 0.001) and 25 U/mL of LETI (p < 0.05) demonstrated significantly inhibited NHDF migration in comparison to the control group. Conversely, all dilutions of PRABO, INCO, and ABO exhibited comparable NHDF migration to that of the control group. Regarding NHDF viability, no significant decrease was observed across any of the BoNT-A types and dilutions.

CONCLUSION

Different types and dilutions of BoNT-A demonstrated variable inhibitory effects on NHDF migration in vitro. The selection of BoNT-A formulation may significantly impact the clinical outcome of scar prevention related to fibroblast migration.

A Comprehensive Review of Non-Surgical Treatments for Hypertrophic and Keloid Scars in Skin of Color

Hypertrophic and keloid scars are fibroproliferative growths resulting from aberrant wound healing. Individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types (FSTs) IV-VI are particularly predisposed to hypertrophic and keloid scarring, yet specific guidelines for these populations are still lacking within the literature. Therefore, this comprehensive review provides a list of various treatments and considerations for hypertrophic and keloid scarring in patients with skin of color. We constructed a comprehensive PubMed search term and performed quadruple-blinded screening on all resulting studies to achieve this objective. Our findings demonstrate 1) the lack of efficacious treatments for raised scars within this population and 2) the need to empirically investigate individualized and multimodal therapeutic options for those with skin of color.

Evaluation of the Effect of Botulinum Toxin A on the Lymphatic Endothelial Cells

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin A (BoTA) is a neurotoxin formed by Clostridium botulinum, with a broad medical application spectrum. While the primary effect of BoTA is on the muscles, the effects of BoTA in other systems including the blood vasculature have already been examined, revealing unexpected actions. However, no studies exist to the best of our knowledge regarding the potential effects of BoTA on the lymphatic vascular system, possessing a critical role in health and disease. Isolated human lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) were cultured in dedicated in vitro culture systems. The analysis including imaging and cell culture approaches as well as molecular biology techniques is performed to examine the LEC alterations occurring upon exposure to different concentrations of BoTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human LECs were cultured and expanded on collagen-coated petri dishes using endothelial basal medium and the commercial product Botox from Allergan as used for all our experiments. Harvested cells were used in various in vitro functional tests to assess the morphologic and functional properties of the BoTA-treated LECs. Gene expression analysis was performed to assess the most important lymphatic system-related genes and pathways.

RESULTS

Concentrations of 1, 5 or 10 U of BoTA did not demonstrate a significant effect regarding the proliferation and migration capacity of the LECs versus untreated controls. Interestingly, even the smallest BoTA dose was found to significantly decrease the cord-like-structure formation capacity of the seeded LECs. Gene expression analysis was used to underpin possible molecular alterations, suggesting no significant effect of BoTA in the modification of gene expression versus the starvation medium control.

CONCLUSION

LECs appear largely unaffected to BoTA treatment, with an isolated effect on the cord-like-structure formation capacity. Further work needs to assess the effect of BoTA on the smooth-muscle-cell-covered collecting lymphatic vessels and the possible aesthetic implications of such an effect, due to edema formation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

Keloids (KD) and hypertrophic scars (HTS), which are quite raised and pigmented and have increased vascularization and cellularity, are formed due to the impaired healing process of cutaneous injuries in some individuals having family history and genetic factors. These scars decrease the quality of life (QOL) of patients greatly, due to the pain, itching, contracture, cosmetic problems, and so on, depending on the location of the scars. Treatment/prevention that will satisfy patients' QOL is still under development. In this article, we review pharmacotherapy for treating KD and HTS, including the prevention of postsurgical recurrence (especially KD). Pharmacotherapy involves monotherapy using a single drug and combination pharmacotherapy using multiple drugs, where drugs are administered orally, topically and/or through intralesional injection. In addition, pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS is sometimes combined with surgical excision and/or with physical therapy such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, radiotherapy including brachytherapy, and silicone gel/sheeting. The results regarding the clinical effectiveness of each mono-pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS are not always consistent but rather scattered among researchers. Multimodal combination pharmacotherapy that targets multiple sites simultaneously is more effective than mono-pharmacotherapy. The literature was searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Online search engines.

Targeting Nuclear Mechanics Mitigates the Fibroblast Invasiveness in Pathological Dermal Scars Induced by Matrix Stiffening

Pathological dermal scars such as keloids present significant clinical challenges lacking effective treatment options. Given the distinctive feature of highly stiffened scar tissues, deciphering how matrix mechanics regulate pathological progression can inform new therapeutic strategies. Here, it is shown that pathological dermal scar keloid fibroblasts display unique metamorphoses to stiffened matrix. Compared to normal fibroblasts, keloid fibroblasts show high sensitivity to stiffness rather than biochemical stimulation, activating cytoskeletal-to-nuclear mechanosensing molecules. Notably, keloid fibroblasts on stiff matrices exhibit nuclear softening, concomitant with reduced lamin A/C expression, and disrupted anchoring of lamina-associated chromatin. This nuclear softening, combined with weak adhesion and high contractility, facilitates the invasive migration of keloid fibroblasts through confining matrices. Inhibiting lamin A/C-driven nuclear softening, via lamin A/C overexpression or actin disruption, mitigates such invasiveness of keloid fibroblasts. These findings highlight the significance of the nuclear mechanics of keloid fibroblasts in scar pathogenesis and propose lamin A/C as a potential therapeutic target for managing pathological scars.

Postoperative Scar Management Protocol for Asian Patients

BACKGROUND

Postoperative scar formation remains a morbidity for patients even with the advent of minimally invasive techniques. Furthermore, the significant difference between the Asian and Caucasian skin results in poorer postoperative scar outcomes in Asians, supporting the need for an evidence-based scar management protocol.

METHODS

Following a literature review of the PubMed and the Cochrane databases over the past 10 years, we constructed a novel postoperative scar management protocol for the Asian skin, utilized in a Singaporean tertiary healthcare institution.

RESULTS

We describe a timeline-based scar protocol from the point of skin closure to a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We support the use of intraoperative botulinum toxin for selected high-risk individuals upon skin closure with a follow-up regimen in the postoperative setting. For recalcitrant keloids, we have described a multimodal therapy comprising elements of intralesional steroids, botulinum toxin, lasers, surgery, and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A consolidated postoperative scar management protocol provides the necessary guidance for improved scar outcomes in the Asian skin. There is inherent potential in expanding the protocol to include post-traumatic and burn wounds or support other skin types including the Caucasian skin.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Pharmacotherapy of urethral stricture

Urethral stricture is characterized by the chronic formation of fibrous tissue, leading to the narrowing of the urethral lumen. Despite the availability of various endoscopic treatments, the recurrence of urethral strictures remains a common challenge. Postsurgery pharmacotherapy targeting tissue fibrosis is a promising option for reducing recurrence rates. Although drugs cannot replace surgery, they can be used as adjuvant therapies to improve outcomes. In this regard, many drugs have been proposed based on the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of urethral stricture. Ongoing studies have obtained substantial progress in treating urethral strictures, highlighting the potential for improved drug effectiveness through appropriate clinical delivery methods. Therefore, this review summarizes the latest researches on the mechanisms related to the pathophysiology of urethral stricture and the drugs to provide a theoretical basis and new insights for the effective use and future advancements in drug therapy for urethral stricture.

Comparative Efficacy of Drug Interventions for Keloids: A Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Keloids are common benign skin lesions originating from a disorganized fibroproliferative collagen response; these lesions often lead to both physical and psychological problems. The optimal treatment for keloids is yet to be standardized. Intralesional injection, which is simple and nontraumatic, is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for these lesions. In this study, we compared 5 different drugs (intralesional injections) for the treatment of keloids in terms of efficacy.

METHODS

We systemically searched relevant studies on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Randomized clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), botulinum toxin A (BTA), verapamil, and bleomycin were included in this study.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included a total of 1114 patients from 20 randomized controlled trials. Botulinum toxin A alone and TAC plus 5-FU exhibited significantly better efficacy than did 5-FU, TAC, and verapamil. No significant difference in efficacy between BTA alone and TAC combined with 5-FU was observed. No significant differences were noted in the adverse event rate between BTA, TAC plus 5-FU, 5-FU, and TAC. Furthermore, we performed surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses to predict the rank of each intervention (by efficacy and adverse event rate). The predicted ranking by efficacy was as follows: TAC plus 5-FU, BTA, bleomycin, TAC, 5-FU, and verapamil; the predicted ranking by adverse events was as follows: TAC, 5-FU, TAC plus 5-FU, and BTA. Funnel plot analysis revealed no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin A and TAC plus 5-FU appear to have outstanding therapeutic efficacy for keloids. The rate of adverse events was similar among BTA, TAC, 5-FU, and TAC plus 5-FU. Nonetheless, additional reviews of rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted for further validation of our findings.

Botulinum toxin type A ameliorates rat dorsal root ganglia neuron pyroptosis in postherpetic neuralgia by upregulating cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide to inhibit neutrophil elastase

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) has exhibited efficacy in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) treatment, and this study aims to uncover its underlying mechanisms. Resiniferatoxin (RTX)-induced PHN rats were given BoNT/A. Rat postoperative pain behaviors were assessed by Von Frey test. Cleaved-synaptosomal protein 25 kDa (cl-SNAP-25) or cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide (CAMP) expression in rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) was detected by immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. Healthy rat-derived DRG neurons were transfected, incubated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS)/adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) to stimulate pyroptosis and treated with BoNT/A. The CCK-8, Western blot, ELISA, and qRT-PCR were used to assess the viability, levels of pyroptosis-related proteins proinflammatory cytokine levels, as well as CAMP and ELANE mRNA levels. BoNT/A (30 U/kg) promoted cl-SNAP-25 expression in rat DRG and reversed RTX-induced decrease of rat paw withdrawal thresholds and CAMP expression and increase of pyroptosis-associated protein and inflammatory factor expression in rat DRG. CAMP interacted with ELANE in rat DRG neurons. BoNT/A attenuated LPS/ATP-stimulated inhibition of viability and CAMP expression and upregulation of inflammatory mediators, pyroptosis-related proteins, and ELANE expression in rat DRG neurons, which was counteracted by CAMP silencing. However, ELANE knockdown offset the effect of CAMP silencing in LPS/ATP/BoNT/A-treated rat DRG neurons. On the whole, BoNT/A alleviates rat DRG neuron pyroptosis during PHN by upregulating CAMP to inhibit ELANE.

Botulinum neurotoxins: Future innovations

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are multi-domain proteins whose potent and selective actions on nerve endings have led to innovations in both basic and clinical science. The various BoNT domains are responsible for binding to gangliosides and proteins associated with nerve cell membranes, internalization into the cell, and cleavage of one or more SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins necessary for vesicle docking and fusion. Novel modifications to BoNT molecules, such as the creation of chimeras, helped identify the protein domains responsible for various aspects of BoNT action, such as localized effects. Other molecular modifications have been introduced in attempts to increase the specificity of BoNTs for autonomic or sensory neurons, with the ultimate goal of optimizing therapeutic selectivity. This research, in turn, has led to the development of BoNT-based proteins that can target non-SNARE substrates such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). Still others are developing different BoNT serotypes, subtypes, or variants that are longer- or shorter-acting or have faster onset for various clinical purposes. New formulations of BoNTs that provide convenience for both patients and physicians are under investigation. Novel clinical uses are being evaluated for onabotulinumtoxinA, including in the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation. All these innovations capitalize on the unique properties of BoNTs, which continue to intrigue scientists and clinicians across numerous fields of study.

Transdermal delivery of Protocatechuic aldehyde using hyaluronic acid/gelatin-based microneedles for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars

The formation of hypertrophic scar (HS) involves many pathological processes, such as reduced apoptosis in fibroblasts, excessive collagen deposition by fibroblasts, over-abundant angiogenesis, etc. The therapeutic effects of current treatments targeting one single pathological process are limited. Due to their diverse biological activities, natural products offer a potential solution to this issue. In this study reported herein, we investigated the effects of Protocatechuic aldehyde (PA) on both hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts (HSF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Microneedles (MN) containing PA and hyaluronic acid (HA) or containing PA, HA, and gelatin were prepared by mixing PA stock solution with HA or HA/gelatin at a ratio of 1:10. The HS prevention and treatment outcomes of these HA-PA-MN and HA/gelatin-PA-MN were tested using a rabbit ear HS model. Our data indicate that PA induces apoptosis and reduces collagen deposition in HSF. In addition, PA attenuates VEGF-stimulated angiogenesis of HUVECs. Furthermore, HA-PA-MN or HA/gelatin-PA-MN are able to effectively penetrate the epidermis of the HS tissues and then quickly dissolve, enabling the fast release of PA directly into the dermis of the HS tissues. HA-PA-MN or HA/Gelatin-PA-MN have also been found to effectively prevent or alleviate HS in a rabbit ear HS model. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that PA can be used to prevent and treat HS by simultaneously regulating HSF and HUVECs, which offers a potential novel reagent for HS management.

Biomechanical Regulatory Factors and Therapeutic Targets in Keloid Fibrosis

Keloids are fibroproliferative skin disorder caused by abnormal healing of injured or irritated skin and are characterized by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis and deposition, which results in excessive collagen disorders and calcinosis, increasing the remodeling and stiffness of keloid matrix. The pathogenesis of keloid is very complex, and may include changes in cell function, genetics, inflammation, and other factors. In this review, we aim to discuss the role of biomechanical factors in keloid formation. Mechanical stimulation can lead to excessive proliferation of wound fibroblasts, deposition of ECM, secretion of more pro-fibrosis factors, and continuous increase of keloid matrix stiffness. Matrix mechanics resulting from increased matrix stiffness further activates the fibrotic phenotype of keloid fibroblasts, thus forming a loop that continuously invades the surrounding normal tissue. In this process, mechanical force is one of the initial factors of keloid formation, and matrix mechanics leads to further keloid development. Next, we summarized the mechanotransduction pathways involved in the formation of keloids, such as TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway, integrin signaling pathway, YAP/TAZ signaling pathway, and calcium ion pathway. Finally, some potential biomechanics-based therapeutic concepts and strategies are described in detail. Taken together, these findings underscore the importance of biomechanical factors in the formation and progression of keloids and highlight their regulatory value. These findings may help facilitate the development of pharmacological interventions that can ultimately prevent and reduce keloid formation and progression.

Surgical Considerations In Skin of Colour

For most clinicians undertaking surgery and patients undergoing surgery, the primary aim is the success of the operation being undertaken. The secondary aim is for optimal wound healing with minimal scar formation. The normal wound healing process involves four distinct but overlapping stages: Haemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and remodelling. In some patients the cellular process involved in the proliferation and remodelling stages can be deranged, resulting in the formation of hypertrophic or keloid scars. This is more frequently seen in skin of Colour. Excessive scarring is thought to be first described in the Smith papyrus about 1700 BC. Many years later Mancini (in 1962) and Peacock (in 1970) classified excessive scarring into hypertrophic and keloid scar formation. Clinicians can minimize the risk of these pathological scars developing with good pre-operative, peri-operative/intra-operative and post-operative surgical practices. We review the wound healing processes in association with good surgical principles and practice, discuss how implementing these principles in practice helps in prevention and management of pathological surgical scars such as hypertrophic scars and keloid scars. This review offers a practical step by step clinical guide that can be used by any clinician.

A Retrospective and Anatomical Study Describing the Injection of Botulinum Neurotoxins in the Depressor Anguli Oris

SUMMARY

The depressor anguli oris acts to lower the lateral corners of the mouth and can cause an individual to appear sad or angry and contribute to the development of the labiomental folds. Many patients can benefit from the injection of small amounts of botulinum neurotoxin into the depressor anguli oris to enable the lip elevators to reposition the corners of the mouth. Although effective, the procedure is off-label, and the proximity of the depressor anguli oris to the depressor labii inferioris, particularly inferiorly, can lead to inadvertent treatment of the latter, resulting in lip asymmetry. The authors have taken a threefold approach to establish a depressor anguli oris injection technique that provides optimal aesthetic outcomes with a low incidence of adverse events. This involved, first, reviewing the limited existing literature for studies discussing depressor anguli oris anatomy and botulinum neurotoxin treatment technique; second, supplementing information from the published literature with information from cadaver dissections to demonstrate the relationship between the depressor anguli oris and surrounding anatomical structures; and third, performing a retrospective chart review of 275 patients treated with the authors' three-point injection technique. Combining data from published studies, cadaver dissections, and clinical experience, the authors demonstrate that a three-point technique performed in the upper half of the depressor anguli oris is associated with good clinical outcome and avoids common side effects related to injection or spread of neurotoxin to adjacent muscles.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A 2020 Update of the Algorithms Published 10 Years Ago

BACKGROUND

In 2010, this Journal published my comprehensive review of the literature on hypertrophic scars and keloids. In that article, I presented evidence-based algorithms for the prevention and treatment of these refractory pathologic scars. In the ensuing decade, substantial progress has been made in the field, including many new randomized controlled trials. To reflect this, I have updated my review.

METHODS

All studies were evaluated for methodologic quality. Baseline characteristics of patients were extracted along with the interventions and their outcomes. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and comprehensive reviews were included if available.

RESULTS

Risk factors that promote hypertrophic scar and keloid growth include local factors (tension on the wound/scar), systemic factors (e.g., hypertension), genetic factors (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms), and lifestyle factors. Treatment of hypertrophic scars depends on scar contracture severity: if severe, surgery is the first choice. If not, conservative therapies are indicated. Keloid treatment depends on whether they are small and single or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) or multimodal conservative therapy. For large and multiple keloids, volume- and number-reducing surgery is a choice. Regardless of the treatment(s), patients should be followed up over the long term. Conservative therapies, including gel sheets, tape fixation, topical and injected external agents, oral agents, and makeup therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized controlled trials on pathologic scar management have increased markedly over the past decade. Although these studies suffer from various limitations, they have greatly improved hypertrophic scar and keloid management. Future high-quality trials are likely to improve the current hypertrophic scar and keloid treatment algorithms further.

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A for Scar Prevention After Breast Augmentation: A Randomized Double-Blind Intraindividual Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A benefits postsurgical scar prevention by reducing wound edge tension and inhibiting in vitro scar tissue fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of botulinum toxin Type A (BTX) in improving inframammary scar appearance after primary breast augmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed with 27 participants receiving primary augmentation mammoplasty with inframammary incisions. After skin closure, intradermal injections of BTX were administered to 1 (treated) side of the inframammary incision. The contralateral side was the control. Scars were evaluated at 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and multispectral imaging analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 patients completed the study. There were no significant subjective differences between the treated and control sides except the patient's treated side had significantly higher scores than the control side at 9 months. The treated side showed significantly smaller scar widths at 6 months and 9 months (p < .001) and better scar surface textures at 9 months (p = .003) than the control side.

CONCLUSION

Subjectively, intradermal BTX injection immediately after breast augmentation skin closure caused no significant differences. Objectively, scar width and texture significantly improved at 6 months and 9 months.

"Identification of Essential Assessment Criteria in Facial Botulinum Toxin Injections"

INTRODUCTION

Facial botulinum toxin injections represent the most commonly performed aesthetic non-surgical procedures by plastic surgeons; however, post-graduate programs remain devoid of objective tools to adequately assess competence in trainees. In this study, the authors employ the Delphi methodology to establish a list of essential assessment criteria in facial botulinum toxin injections.

METHODS

A list of 10 suggested criteria was generated through a literature search and in consultation with an expert plastic surgeon. A panel of content experts was selected to which an online survey was administered; skills were ranked for their relevance using a 1-10 Likert scale. Recommendations for additional skills were solicited and survey rounds were repeated until consensus was achieved. The latter was a measure of panelist reliability and assessed using Cronbach α (≥0.8); skills with a rating of 7 or above were taken to be essential.

RESULTS

The survey process was successful at achieving consensus following two rounds of survey administration. Twenty-one participants completed the first round representing a response rate of 38%. Percent agreement among the panel was 83% and Cronbach α was computed as 0.78, necessitating further rounds. The response rate in the second round was 90%; one additional skill was added; percent agreement and Cronbach α improved to 88% and 0.87, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nine assessment criteria were identified as essential in facial botulinum toxin injections; these findings provide the groundwork necessary for the development of an objective assessment tool for the more appropriate training of marginalized aesthetic procedures in plastic surgery.

The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Injections in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving Scar Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Scars exposed on the body surface lead to a large psychological burden on patients. However, no satisfactory scar treatments exist. Botulinum toxin type A is a neurotoxin that has been widely applied in the plastic and cosmetic surgery field. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin in scar management.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections in preventing postoperative scars and improving scars quality and were published prior to Dec. 29, 2020. The outcome indicators were the visual analog scale score, Vancouver scar scale score, Stony Brook scar evaluation scales score, scar width, patient self-assessment results, and complications.

RESULTS

Seventeen randomized controlled trials with a total of 633 cases were identified in this meta-analysis. The quantitative synthesis results showed that compared with the control group, the botulinum toxin group had a significantly lower VSS score (MD = -0.97, 95%CI = -1.56 to -0.39, p = 0.001), higher VAS score (MD = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.04 to 1.47, p < 0.00001), thinner scar width (MD = -0.25, 95%CI = -0.37 to -0.12, p < 0.0001) and higher patient satisfaction (RR = 3.38 95%CI = 1.45 to 7.89, p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that botulinum toxin injections can significantly improve cosmetic appearance and postoperative scar quality. At the therapeutic dose, no significant complications were observed, indicating that botulinum toxin injections are safe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Botulinum toxin A promotes the transdifferentiation of primary keloid myofibroblasts into adipocyte-like cells

Keloid is a type of unusually raised scar. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) has a great application potential in keloids treatment. Here, we investigated the functional role of BTX-A in keloids. We separated keloid tissues and normal skin tissues from keloid patients and found that the expression of myofibroblast markers, α-SMA, Collagen I, and Collagen III was increased in the keloid tissues as compared with normal skin tissues. Keloid fibroblasts derived from keloid tissues were treated with TGF-β1 to induce the differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. The keloid myofibroblasts displayed a significant up-regulation of α-SMA. BTX-A enhanced the expression of adipocyte markers, PPARγ and C/EBPα, and increased the accumulation of lipid droplets, and reduced the expression of α-SMA, Collagen I, and Collagen III in the keloid myofibroblasts. Moreover, BTX-A enhanced the expression of BMP4 and p-smad1/5/8. Noggin (BMP4 antagonist) treatment reversed BTX-A-mediated increase of PPARγ and C/EBPα expression and lipid droplets, and down-regulation of α-SMA, Collagen I, and Collagen III in primary keloid myofibroblasts. In conclusion, BTX-A promoted the transdifferentiation of primary keloid myofibroblasts into adipocyte-like cells, which may attribute to activate BMP4/Smad signalling pathway. Thus, this study provides new insights into the mechanism of BTX-A in keloid.

Comparison of endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin and steroids immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection to prevent esophageal stricture: a prospective cohort study

Background: Widespread endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early esophageal cancer patients is closely associated with esophageal stricture, which dramatically reduces patients' quality of life and increases huge medical burdens. Endoscopic injection of steroid was proved as a protective method for post-ESD strictures. Other materials such as botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) may be potential candidates. We conducted this prospective cohort study to compare the efficacy and feasibility of endoscopic injection of BTX-A and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for the prevention of esophageal stricture.

Methods: Seventy-eight patients with esophageal mucosal defects of more than two thirds of the circumference were successively enrolled and divided into 3 groups: BTX-A group (group A, n=26), TA group (group B, n=16) and control group (group C, n=36). Patients in group A were immediately injected with BTX-A after ESD, in group B were immediately injected with TA and in group C received ESD only. Endoscopy was performed when patients reported dysphagia symptoms and at 6 and 12 weeks post-ESD in patients without symptoms. Patients who experienced post-ESD esophageal strictures in all groups received bougie dilation. All patients were followed up for one year.

Results: The proportion of patients developing stricture in BTX-A group was 30.00% (intention to treat analysis, 9/30) and 26.92% (per protocol analysis, 7/26), in TA group was 40.90% (intention to treat analysis, 9/22) and 43.75% (per protocol analysis, 7/16), and in control group was 84.21% (intention to treat analysis, 32/38) and 83.33% (per protocol analysis, 30/36) (p<0.001). When further comparing between each of the two groups, the incidence of esophageal stricture was lower in BTX-A group than that in control group (p<0.001), and lower in TA group than that in control group (p=0.004). Furthermore, in entire circumference mucosal defect subgroup, the esophageal stricture was significantly lower in BTX-A group than that in TA group (33.3% vs 100%, p=0.0454).

Conclusions: Endoscopic injection of BTX-A and TA were effective in preventing post-ESD esophageal strictures and BTX-A injection was particularly effective in entire circumference mucosal defect patients. Multi-centered, randomized prospective study with larger sample size should be conducted. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100042970, registered 1 February 2021, retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx)

Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in preventing and treating scars in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous studies have used botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) to improve postoperative and hypertrophic scars; however, there is lack of detailed verification on the safety and effectiveness of this approach. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of BTXA on postoperative hypertrophic scars and its influence on cytokine expression in animal models. A computerised search of different databases was performed, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang, up to 10 March 2021. A meta-analysis was performed using R 4.0.0 based on hypertrophic index, epithelialisation time, wound area, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. Eleven studies were included. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference in hypertrophic index (standardised mean difference [SMD] = -2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.50 to -1.76, P < .01), wound area (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI: -1.24 to 0.16, P < .01), and VEGF expression (SMD = -2.56, 95% CI: -3.50 to -1.62, P < .01). This study shows that BTXA is safe and effective in preventing and treating scar hypertrophy in animal models, but excessive doses of BTXA and BTXA to treat large areas should be avoided.

Treatment of Wound Healing with Sequential Therapy to Accelerate Recovery and Inhibit Scar Hyperplasia: A Case Report

Study Design/Patients and Methods

A 19-year-old male was reported to have a postoperative facial trauma suture as a result of being involved in a car accident. Red light-emitting diode (LED) therapy (20 min, 96 J/cm², 633 nm), Botulinum Toxin Type A 36 IU injection, BroadBand Light and Er:YAG laser at various stages of wound healing were applied as the sequential therapy.

Results

Since the correction was promptly apparent and acceptable, the treatment proved secure and efficacious for repairing wound healing.

Conclusion

Clinically sequential therapy has demonstrated marked improvement in our case. Scar sequential therapy may offer a new strategy for wound healing recovery.

Use of Botulinum Toxin in Treating Rosacea: A Systematic Review

Background

Rosacea is a chronic skin disorder characterized by erythema, flushing, telangiectasia, papules and pustules, phymatous changes, and ocular involvement. The aim of this study was to examine all published research articles in which botulinum toxin was used to treat rosacea and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science database were used to identify articles eligible for systematic review on March 26, 2021. Prospective or retrospective studies which directly used botulinum toxin to treat rosacea were included and reviewed.

Results

Nine studies were included in this systematic review. Two were randomized controlled trials, graded as Level 2 for the quality of evidence. The total number of participants was 130, and the number of participants in each study ranged from 1 to 25. The improvement was observed in all studies in signs and symptoms compared with baseline. Adverse events were transitory and self-limited.

Conclusion

Botulinum toxin could have overall satisfying efficacy and safety in the treatment of rosacea, though limited by small sample size, imperfect study design, and short follow-up visits.

Botulinum toxin type a intralesional monotherapy for treating human hypertrophic scar in a dose-dependent manner: In an animal model

BACKGROUND

The effect of Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in treating or preventing a hypertrophic scar (HS) had been reported in clinical studies. However, the dose-effect relationship remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To study the dose-effect relationship of BTX-A intralesional monotherapy treating human HS.

METHODS

Six HS tissues were collected from six patients. Each tissue was segmented into 24 specimens and split into four groups: negative control (group A), 0.5U BTX-A (group B), 1U BTX-A (group C), and 2U BTX-A (group D). Six nude mice, each was prepared by implanting four specimens (one from each group) into the back for a total of 24 specimens. The process mentioned above were repeated six times. A re-entry operation was performed to obtain the specimens after 8 weeks. The weight of HS, the expression of decorin and TGF-β₁, the proliferation, and migration ability of hypertrophic scar fibroblasts (HSFBs) were compared among groups.

RESULTS

The weight of HS, the expression of decorin and TGF-β₁, the proliferation, and migration ability of HSFBs showed significant differences in groups C and D as compared to group A; there has been no statistical significance in group B.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A showed significant therapeutic efficacy when compared with the negative control group in a dose-dependent manner. BTX-A can reduce the weight of HS, upregulate the expression of decorin, downregulate the expression of TGF-β₁, and inhibit HSFBs proliferation and migration ability. This study indicates that BTX-A intralesional monotherapy treating HS should reach a threshold dose to achieve an effective treatment, and a high dose of BTX-A is more effective than a low dose.

Combination Treatment of Intra/Perilesional Botulinum Toxin-A Injection and Ablative Fractional Laser for Better Clinical Outcomes of Hypertrophic Fibrotic Thyroidectomy Scars Following Fractional Ablative Laser Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Recent reports have shown that intralesional botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) works on scar cosmesis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combination treatment of laser and BTX-A injection and compare the effects of conventional intralesional injection and intra- and perilesional BTX-A injection on fibrotic thyroidectomy scars.

METHODS

Patients with fibrotic thyroidectomy scars showing insufficient responses to previous ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment were enrolled. Combination treatment with AFL and BTX-A injection was performed. Patients who received intra/perilesional BTX-A injections were classified into group A. Group B was patients in whom the injection was performed only intralesionally. The improvement was assessed based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients was included. Statistically significant improvement in pliability and total VSS score after the combination treatment were observed in overall patient group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that pliability, height, and total VSS improved significantly in group A. In group B, only pliability significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A injection combined with AFL can provide better relief for the previously treated fibrotic thyroidectomy scars. Injection of BTX-A not only into the scar itself, but also into perilesional muscles that can exert tension on the scar site may provide additional benefit in flattening scar height.

Botulinum toxin in treating Hailey-Hailey disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hailey-Hailey disease is a rare disorder characterized by recurrent painful blistering, erosions, maceration in the intertriginous regions. Botulinum toxin has been used in the treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease.

AIMS

This study aimed to examine all published articles on botulinum toxin in the treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease, and to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were used to identify eligible articles on August 8, 2020. The searching strategy was "(Hailey Hailey or Hailey-Hailey or pemphigus) and botulinum."

RESULTS

Sixteen articles including 38 patients described the use of botulinum toxin in treating Hailey-Hailey disease. Only one case had no response, while the other patients all had partial or complete remission. No side effects were reported. Nine articles including 10 patients mainly described other treatment options, and the patients were only treated with botulinum toxin previously. Their responses to botulinum toxin were limited: one was mild improvement, one was partial response, and the other eight failed.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin is not almighty, but a promising alternative option. We recommend botulinum toxin as an adjuvant or supplemental treatment modality for severe and recalcitrant Hailey-Hailey disease. Larger studies are warranted to confirm its efficacy, safety, long-term effects, and cost performance.

Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of botulinum toxin A injection on improving facial scars: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A injection is an established method of treatment. Clinical practitioners use it widely in their practice to prevent the occurrence of facial scars. However, the effectiveness and safeness of has not been comprehensively established. The objective of the current systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using botulinum toxin A injection to improve facial scars.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review involves browsing a number of electronic databases to search for related articles. The search will include databases in both English (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Spocus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Chinese (WanFang database, China Nation Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP database), the periods of searching will be from inception till the 15th of September 2020. Completing the search in databases allows to consider randomized controlled studies that compares botulinum toxin A interventions to any comparison interventions in those who have facial scars. The review will be inclusive of papers in both languages, English and Chinese. The independent screening of studies for eligibility is conducted by 2 independent authors. Discussion was used to resolve discrepancies between the authors. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool V.2.0 is adopted for evaluating the methodological quality of each study. Data extraction was performed by 2 independent authors. For dichotomous outcomes, the were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For continuous outcomes the results were expressed as the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI. The statistical analysis of the present study is carried out in RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

This study will output a comprehensive synthesis of existing evidence in relation to botulinum toxin A. Moreover, the results will also provide an interpretation of the effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin A.

CONCLUSION

The present review contributes to the existing body of knowledge by adding more evidence to evaluate if botulinum toxin A is effective and safe to be used as an intervention for improving facial scars.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/94TXP (https://osf.io/94TXP/).

Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection for Mammoplasty and Abdominoplasty Scar Management: A Split-Scar Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Scars are inevitable results of surgical procedures, and prevention of them is still a major problem in the field of cosmetic surgery. Although various studies have been performed on botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injection for the prevention of hypertrophic scars, the exact mechanism remains unclear.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blinded, randomized study was performed on 19 patients who underwent mammoplasty and abdominoplasty surgery in Razi Hospital from October 2018 to December 2019. Single session of treatment was performed, where XEOMIN was allocated to one half of the scar and 0.9% saline to the control half. 3 and 6 months later, scars were assessed using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES).

RESULTS

In total, 19 patients who completed the study were analyzed. mSBSES at the third month (P value < 0.001; 3.34 ± 1.59 vs 1.5 ± 1.36) and the sixth month (P value < 0.001; 4.89 ± 1.83 vs 2.39 ± 1.82) showed a significant difference between the treatment and control groups. In the subset analysis, there was significant difference between BoNT-A and control in all four items including width, height, color, and scar visibility at months 3 and 6, and the BoNT-A-treated sides had higher scores in all items.

CONCLUSION

BoNT-A has a significant effect on scar prevention due to mammoplasty and abdominoplasty compared to placebo and results in decreased erythema, height, width and reduces incision line visibility. Moreover, its effect increases significantly over time from months 3 to 6.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Prevention of scar hyperplasia in the skin by conotoxin: A prospective review

Scars are often considered to be skin problems that affect beauty. The tension acting on the edge of the wound is the main factor causing the scar hyperplasia. At present, the clinical use of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) around the wound to cause transient muscle paralysis reduce the muscle movement around the wound and wound tension to prevent scar hyperplasia during wound healing. But the use of BTX-A to prevent scarring requires the use of a syringe. The syringe can cause trauma and pain when it pricks the skin for BTX-A injection. The conotoxin which is secreted by the poison glands on the inside of the venom tube and capsule of the snail provides a simple and effective way to prevent skin scar hyperplasia. We reviewed the classification of conotoxin, the conotoxin's mechanism of preventing scar hyperplasia, and the research direction of conotoxin in the future and provided reference for promoting the application of conotoxin in preventing skin scar hyperplasia.

Efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser alone compared with combined Nd:YAG laser with intralesional steroid or botulinum toxin A in the treatment of hypertrophic scars

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nd:YAG laser alone or in combination with intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A or intralesional injection of steroid in treatment of hypertrophic scars. This study included 45 patients with hypertrophic scars who were randomly divided into three equal groups. All participants received 4 sessions of Nd:YAG laser at 4-week intervals. Immediately after the laser treatment, patients in group II were assigned to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide, and those in group III were assigned to intralesional botulinum toxin type A. All patients were followed up monthly for 3 months after the last session for any recurrence, or side effects. Clinical evaluation of the cases was done by Vancouver Scar Scale. Hypertrophic scars in the three groups showed a significant improvement (p < 0.001) compared with before treatment in all variables (except for pigmentation) and also a significant improvement in pruritus, pain, and patient relief. The highest percentage of improvements was seen in patients treated with Nd:YAG laser combined with intralesional steroid in all variables according to Vancouver Scar Scale. The degree of improvement was negatively correlated with the patients' age. The three treatment modalities were effective, safe with minimal side effects. Nd:YAG laser followed by intralesional injection of Triamcinolone acetonide had the highest percentage of Vancouver Scar Scale reduction. Combination therapy of Nd:YAG laser with intralesional injection of either Triamcinolone acetonide or Botox revealed better results than using Nd:YAG as a single therapeutic modality for HTS.

Assessment of laser-assisted delivery vs intralesional injection of botulinum toxin A in treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids

Keloids and hypertrophic scars could impair the psychological, physical, and cosmetic aspects of the patient's quality of life. Unfortunately, there is no curative treatment available till now. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralesional vs topical botulinum toxin A combined with Fractional CO₂ laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Twenty patients with Keloids and hypertrophic scars were enrolled in the study. Each scar was divided into two halves, one subjected to intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A once a month for 4 months and the other was subjected to four sessions of CO₂ laser therapy at 1 month interval followed by topical application of botulinum toxin A. Significant improvement was noted in Vancouver Scar Scale in hypertrophic scars in laser group than intralesional botulinum toxin A. In keloid cases, the improvement was significantly higher with intralesional botulinum toxin A. Clinical improvement showed significant negative correlation with scar duration and size. Botulinum toxin A is a promising treatment for hypertrophic scars and keloids. The use of fractional CO₂ laser as a mode of delivery enhanced the efficacy of botox in hypertrophic scars.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving the Cosmetic Appearance of Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Scars with poor cosmesis that develop after wound healing may affect normal life.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in preventing postoperative hypertrophic scars or keloids.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to February 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of BTXA in preventing hypertrophic scars or keloids. The primary outcome measures included the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, scar width, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs involving 497 cases (372 patients) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant differences in the VAS score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.55, P < .00001), VSS score (WMD = -1.02, 95% CI = -1.72 to -0.32, P = .004), scar width (WMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.29 to -0.08, P = .0008), and patient satisfaction (relative risk = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.49, P = .01). Four studies reported trivial adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that BTXA was more effective than the control treatment in preventing postoperative scars and improving the cosmetic appearance of facial scars for East Asians, and no serious adverse events were found during the follow-up period. However, there was insufficient evidence to support the use of BTXA for the prevention of scars in patients from other ethnic groups and regions or scars in non-facial areas.

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Improving Scar Quality and Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A-induced "chemoimmobilization" has long been utilized for improved scar quality and wound healing; however, current evidence is limited to small studies, and evidence-based information is inadequate to make well-informed decisions.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) to improve scars and wound healing.

METHODS

The authors searched databases, including Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of surgical scars and wounds treated with BTA vs those treated with blank or placebo controls. The Visual Analog Scale, Vancouver Scar Score, scar width, and reported patient satisfaction were utilized in evaluating outcomes. Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs involved a total of 486 cases (374 patients). Quantitative synthesis suggested that compared with the control group, patients in the BTA treatment group had significantly higher Visual Analog Scale scores (mean difference [MD] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 1.55), lower Vancouver Scar Scores (MD = -1.62, 95% CI: -2.49 to -0.75, P = 0.0003), and thinner scars (MD = -0.15, 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.11, P < 0.00001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the BTA group than in the control group (risk ratio: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.49, P = 0.01). Trivial adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of RCTs provides reliable evidence that BTA injection is superior to placebo or blank control group in improving scar quality and wound healing in the face and neck for Asians, and negative outcomes for BTA treatment in these patients include only trivial adverse events. However, inadequate evidence supports utilization of BTA in Caucasians for primary surgical scars or for scars in locations other than the face and neck. Further studies on the standardized injection regimen and technique of BTA are warranted for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1

Differential Effects of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Botulinum Toxin-A Injection on Postburn Contractures and Gait Kinematics in Burn Children

Postburn contracture is a complex and multifactorial problem that requires intensive inputs from the burn care staff. This study endeavored to evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and botulinum toxin-A for treating the postburn plantar flexion contracture and optimizing ankle kinematics in burn children. Thirty-eight children with burns and plantar flexion contracture were randomized to receive the standard physical rehabilitation program (control group; n = 13), unfocused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (0.2 mJ/mm2) once a week over four consecutive weeks in addition to the standard physical rehabilitation (n = 12), or botulinum toxin-A injection (0.5–2 U/kg/muscle group with maximum dose of 12 U/kg/body weight) once at entry besides the standard physical rehabilitation (n = 13). Dorsiflexion active range of motion and ankle kinematics were measured before and immediately after treatment. The posttreatment dorsiflexion active range of motion increased significantly in the extracorporeal shockwave therapy group (P = .025) and botulinum toxin-A group (P = .04) when compared to the control group. Likewise, the initial stance–dorsiflexion, stance-maximum dorsiflexion, and swing-peak dorsiflexion angle improved significantly in the extracorporeal shockwave therapy group (P ˂ .001, P = .005, and P = .002, respectively) and botulinum toxin-A group (P = .004, P = .012, and P ˂ .001, respectively) compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed between the extracorporeal shockwave therapy and botulinum toxin-A groups with respect to any of the measured variables. To conclude, extracorporeal shockwave therapy and botulinum toxin-A injection could be effectively used to treat postburn plantar flexion contracture and to optimize the ankle kinematics during walking in children, without preference for either of them.

Successful Treatment of Intralesional Bleomycin in Keloids of Vietnamese Population

BACKGROUND:

Keloid is an overactive condition of the skin tissue to early lesions characterised by proliferation of fibroblasts, excessive collagen production in the lesion. Treatment of keloids is a big challenge because of the poor response rate and high risk of recurrence after treatment. We found that bleomycin offers promise in the treatment of keloids.

AIM:

To evaluate the efficacy of bleomycin injected in the injury for keloids treatment.

METHODS:

The treatment was carried out in 55 patients having 120 keloids of different sizes and locations. Average treatments were 4 times.

RESULTS:

Complete flattening was 70.8%, highly significant flattening was 8.3%, no patient of minimal flattening. Systemic side-effects of bleomycin were not evaluated, but local side-effects were mainly pains (100%), blisters (78.3%), ulceration (5.8%), and hyperpigmentation (56.7%).

CONCLUSION:

The percentage of patients recurring 6, 12, 15, 18 months after the last treatment were 3.8, 15.4, 45.5, 50%, respectively.