Novel technique for infraorbital groove correction using multiple twisted polydioxanone thread

Infraorbital Rejuvenation Combined with Thread-Lifting and Non-cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid Injection: A Retrospective, Case-Series Study

BACKGROUND

Infraorbital aging develops during the natural aging process. Various treatment options offer unique benefits, accompanied by diverse side effect profiles, and can be synergistically combined to optimize results. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a comprehensive approach involving non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid injection and smooth absorbable PPDO (poly p-dioxanone) thread insertion for infraorbital rejuvenation.

METHODS

This retrospective case series study enrolled ten female patients with infraorbital aging from March 2022 to April 2023. Clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months posttreatment.

RESULTS

The median Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores evaluated by the operator and blinded evaluator were 1.70 ± 0.42 and 1.80 ± 0.35, respectively, at six months posttreatment. The median Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale determined by the operator was 1.15 ± 0.34 at six months posttreatment, whereas the scores evaluated by the blinded evaluator were 1.15 ± 0.53. At six months after treatment, 50% of patients were satisfied, and an additional 40% reported strong satisfaction with the clinical improvement following treatment. No serious adverse events, such as infections, lumps, irregularities, Tyndall effect, hematoma, or skin necrosis, occurred during the treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PPDO thread insertion and non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid injection yielded satisfactory and effective clinical outcomes with no occurrence of serious adverse events for infraorbital rejuvenation. We anticipate that this study will contribute to the advancement of novel treatment options for infraorbital aging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Modern blepharoplasty: From bench to bedside

The demand for procedures aiming to rejuvenate the upper third part of the face and the periocular region has increased in the past several years. Blepharoplasty is one of the most frequently performed procedures worldwide to date. Surgery is currently the first choice in order to achieve permanent and effective results; however, it is burdened by potential surgical complications feared by patients. There is an increasing trend in individuals to request less invasive, non-surgical, effective, and safe procedures for eyelid treatment. The aim of this minireview is to present a brief overview of non-surgical blepharoplasty techniques that have been reported in the literature in the past 10 years. Numerous modern techniques that provide a rejuvenation of the entire area have been described. Numerous less invasive methods have been proposed in the current literature and in modern-day routine clinical settings. Dermal fillers are a commonly chosen option for providing enhanced aesthetic results, especially considering that volume loss can be one of the main underlying causes of facial and periorbital aging. Deoxycholic acid use may be considered when the problem is represented by periorbital excess fat deposits. The simultaneous excess and loss of elasticity of the skin can be assessed with techniques such as lasers and plasma exeresis. Furthermore, techniques such as platelet-rich plasma injections and the insertion of twisted polydioxanone threads are emerging as viable methods to rejuvenate the periorbital region.

Surgical Correction of Tear Trough Deformity (TTD) with Orbicularis Retaining Ligament Release and Volume Augmentation for Periorbital Rejuvenation: Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Tear trough deformity is a hallmark of periorbital aging. It is not, however, an exclusive feature of old age. While protruding orbital fat results in lower lid bags that are traditionally corrected by excision, correction of TTD can constitute a real challenge requiring volume enhancement in addition to addressing prolapse of orbital fat and descent of cheek tissues. Described therapeutic options include minimally invasive soft tissue augmentation with fillers or structural autologous fat transfer as well as invasive surgical procedures concomitantly with lower lid blepharoplasty or other facial rejuvenation procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six eponyms have been used in the literature to describe the condition: (1) naso-jugal fold, (2) naso-jugal groove, (3) naso-jugal ditch, (4) tear trough, (5) tear trough deformity, and (6) tear trough depression. A separate PubMed database search of each of the 6 terms was conducted in addition to an advanced literature and systematic PICO searches to identify all described clinical retrospective or prospective, comparative or simple cohort studies related to surgical correction of TTD. An additional screening of references of retrieved clinical studies was performed to identify any missed reports.

RESULTS

A total of 435 publications were identified with the initial search. After excluding all none relevant studies, 44 papers were selected for review. 6 additional studies were identified by screening relevant references.

CONCLUSION

Almost all authors agree on the necessity to release the tear trough retaining ligament together with volume enhancement. Transconjunctival and transcutaneous incisions are reported. Most recommend repositioning of the protruding orbital fat for volume enhancement to mostly subperiosteal, or pre-periosteal pockets. Other reported options include pedicled buccal fat pad transposition, segmental fat grafting, and minced micrografts. Internal as well as external fixation of repositioned fat flaps have been described. Despite lack of solid objective evidence, several of these techniques when properly executed for the proper indication in selected patients are reported to result in a rewarding and long-lasting outcome. Unfortunately, it is difficult to determine the most appropriate technique that would universally yield the most pleasant and harmonious facial contour without creating an unnatural puffy appearance. It remains for the surgeon to identify the safe surgical approach that does not compromise lower eyelid function and achieves the most pleasing aesthetic outcome with the least complications and downtime.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Safety Profile of Thread Lifts on the Face and Neck: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

"Thread lifting" has quickly gained popularity as a minimally invasive treatment for facial rejuvenation. However, the effectiveness is questionable, and the safety and adverse effects are often not discussed.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and discuss the adverse effects associated with various types of threads.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies describing the use of thread lifts were identified using a PubMed search. Inclusion criteria included studies in which barbed and nonbarbed threads were used for the face and neck.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine articles consisting of 14,222 patients (14,134 barbed, 81 nonbarbed, and 7 combined cases) were included. The most common side effects overall were facial asymmetry (n = 6,143), edema/tumefaction (n = 453), and ecchymosis (n = 407). Serious adverse effects were rare and consisted of paresthesias, alopecia, and injuries to vessels/glands. Most adverse effects were transient and self-resolving, with the exception of contour irregularities, injuries to vessels/glands, infections, and inflammatory reactions.

CONCLUSION

Most side effects associated with threads were self-resolving, whereas more serious cases subsided with treatment. Future studies are critical to further determine whether thread lifting provides long-lasting, safe, and satisfying results.

A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Incidences of Complications Following Facial Thread-Lifting

BACKGROUND

Facial thread-lifting (FTL) has gained more popularity, but the incidences of complications following FTL remain controversial. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis and systematic review to estimate the incidences of complications and to compare the short- and long-term satisfaction rates following FTL.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library for eligible studies. The primary outcome was the incidences of complications following FTL. The secondary outcome was the satisfaction rate immediately and 6-month after FTL. The pooled incidences of complications and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Swelling was the most commonly reported complication with a pooled incidence of 35%, followed by skin dimpling (10%), paresthesia (6%), thread visibility/palpability (4%), infection (2%), and thread extrusion (2%). Absorbable threads were associated with a significantly lower risk of paresthesia (3.1% vs. 11.7%) and thread extrusion (1.6% vs. 7.6%) than non-absorbable threads. Patients older than 50 years had a significantly higher risk of dimpling (16% vs. 5.6%) and infection (5.9% vs. 0.7%) than their younger counterparts. In addition, the pooled long-term satisfaction rate was significantly decreased compared to it immediately after FTL (88% vs. 98%).

CONCLUSION

Non-absorbable threads and older age of patients are associated with higher risks of complications. Therefore, we recommend a judicious use of non-absorbable threads and FLT in older patients. Furthermore, it should be discussed with patients preoperatively that the rejuvenation effect of FTL may not maintain in the long-term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .