A prospective multicenter clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid-based filler with Tri-Hyal technology in the treatment of lips and the perioral area

Hyperdilute Calcium Hydroxylapatite for the Treatment of Perioral Rhytids: A Pilot Study

Background

The perioral region plays a crucial role in facial aesthetics and is susceptible to age-related changes, such as wrinkles and fine lines due to its dynamic nature. Type I collagen is crucial in providing structural integrity and resilience to the skin. Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA-CMC) is a widely used dermal filler whose particles stimulate fibroblastic responses within the skin. When diluted, CaHA-CMC has emerged as a useful treatment for collagen stimulation.

Objectives

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperdilute CaHA-CMC at a 1:3 ratio, specifically administered in the perioral area, to assess its impact on deep rhytids and overall skin quality.

Methods

Females aged 40 to 70 years with moderate-to-severe wrinkles in the perioral region based on a validated wrinkle scale were injected with hyperdilute CaHA-CMC throughout the perioral region at 2 separate injection intervals (Weeks 1 and 8). This was followed by an injection of hyaluronic acid (CPM-HA22.5) into the perioral region at Week 16. The primary endpoint was a ≥1-point improvement from baseline on the wrinkle grading scale.

Results

Twelve female participants were treated. Investigator and patient ratings based on the 5-point Merz perioral/lip wrinkle grading scale showed at least 1 grade improvement in 83% of the patients with a P-value of .0156. A majority of both investigators and patients rated their lip wrinkles as improved in appearance compared with their baseline.

Conclusions

Hyperdilute CaHa-CMC at a 1:3 dilution may be a safe and effective treatment for improving the depth and overall appearance of perioral rhytids.

Level of Evidence 4

A Cross-Sectional Survey on Pain Management in Dermal Filler Injections from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers injection is a common procedure in patients with cosmetic needs. Concomitant pain is a major complaint among patients undergoing HA filler injections. Relevant research is limited and there is no consensus on pain management of dermal filler injection.

OBJECTIVES

To assist physicians in determining a more appropriate treatment approach, and to better provide treatment suggestions.

METHODS

A nationwide (China) cross-sectional survey was conducted using questionnaires designed for physicians and patients, respectively. A total of 62 semi-structured questionnaires were administered to aesthetic physicians via face-to-face interview, whereas 123 online-based questionnaires were collected from patients who have ever undergone HA treatment. The collected questionnaire information was analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.

RESULTS

42 (67.74%) physicians observed that over 50% of their patients were concerned about pain during injection. 101 (82.11%) of patients were concerned about impending pain ≥5 points (a total score is 10) before injection. For preferred pain relief modalities, 48 (77.42%) physicians would choose a hyaluronic acid dermal filler with lidocaine, and 82 (66.67%) patients would choose anesthetic-containing products. 59 (95.16%) physicians who injected lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid found patients had a comfortable treatment experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain management during hyaluronic acid dermal fillers injection is important from both perspectives of physicians and patients. This survey showed that compared with other analgesic methods, lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid has offered a more satisfying experience. It also provides insights to physicians and patients in pain management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Treatment of the Nasolabial Fold Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Filler with eXcellent Three-Dimensional Reticulation (XTR™) Technology: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

The physicochemical characteristics of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers can affect the outcome of minimally invasive aesthetic treatments. The effect of a novel HA-based filler manufactured with a novel 3D structure (XTRTM technology) was assessed in the nasolabial fold.

Patients and Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent treatment of the nasolabial fold with a novel HA filler in our clinic. Treatment outcome was assessed at 3 and 6 months with wrinkle score, GAIS, and VAS.

Results

Eighteen patients were injected with the novel HA filler in the nasolabial fold. At six months, mean wrinkle scores were improved on both sides compared to baseline. GAIS and VAS were high at three and six months.

Conclusion

The HA-based filler manufactured with XTRTM technology is safe and effective in treating the nasolabial fold. Good aesthetic results were seen for up to 6 months. Patient satisfaction was high during the entire follow-up.

Comparison the Effect of Conventional and Nanofat Injection Methods on Nasolabial Fold Lipofilling: A Case- Control Study

Background

Nasolabial folds are a common sign of aging, accompanied by various manifestations such as skin and tissue loosening, wrinkles, lip corner drooping, mandibular angle loss, platysmal bands, and skin pigmentation changes. Limited research has explored Nanofat injection methods. this study was done with the aim of comparing the effect of fat injection by two methods, conventional and Nanofat, in nasolabial folds.

Method

The study conducted in 2020-2021 at the skin clinic in Ilam, western Iran was a case-control study. Participants were divided into two groups, and lipofilling procedures were performed using conventional and nanofat methods with autologous fat. Data collection utilized a researcher-made questionnaire and radiographic results. Follow-up visits occurred on the 30th, 90th, and 180th days to assess complications and recovery rates. After 6 months, participant's photographs were taken and compared with pre-intervention photographs using the GIAS criteria. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS22 version software.

Results

The average age of the participants was 37.80±8.30 yr. The treatment response in the conventional fat injection group was significantly better than the nanofat group (P<0.05). Both groups were satisfied with the treatment methods, but high satisfaction was reported in the conventional group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion

Both methods of improving wrinkles were effective, but the improvement and response to treatment in the conventional method was better than the Nanofat method, and its effect was felt by the participants for an average period of 3 months.

Long-Term Efficacy and Tolerability of a Medium G' HA Filler with Tri-Hyal Technology on the Rejuvenation of the Mobile Facial Zone

Purpose

Injectable hyaluronic acid-based fillers are commonly used for the correction of skin contour irregularities and to smooth skin depressions formed by volume loss during the aging process. These fillers are particularly efficient to restore perioral skin depressions/wrinkles or to correct topographical anomalies. The European directives require a continuous evaluation of the performance of these medical devices, particularly for CE marked products.

Methods

An 18-month prospective randomized single-blind study for the efficacy and safety of ART FILLER Universal (AFU) was performed on the lips, the nasolabial folds, and the marionettes lines. The evaluations were performed on 153 subjects enrolled in this study. The efficacy, the longevity, and the safety were evaluated for the injected areas via area specific clinical scoring after a single injection with the filler and with no re-touch.

Results

We showed here that filler injection induced potent improvements of volume restoration after a single injection on all the treated areas. These beneficial properties of the filler were significant 3 weeks after injection and during the whole study period. Moreover, injections of the filler were well tolerated by the subjects. The recorded adverse events are routinely seen with HA fillers for face volume corrections, and most of these local reactions resolved within 14 days.

Conclusion

AFU was well tolerated and showed a continuous efficacy for at least 18 months, in exploratory analyses.