Transversal approach via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision versus standard approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Transversal approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision (L-RALP) is a novel surgical method for patients with respectable prostate cancer.

METHODS

There were 669 patients with prostate cancer underwent L-RALP or S-RALP which identified from April 2016 to April 2020. The perioperative outcomes, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) scores, sexual function and urinary control ability were included and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

In the 669 patients, 277 of them were included into the final analysis. 151 patients received S-RALP and 126 received L-RALP. Baseline features were balanced. Patients in the S-RALP group had significantly shorter average surgical time (135.93 vs 150.04 min; p < 0.001) than those in L-RALP group. Intraoperative bleeding volume, early postoperative complications rates, postoperative catheter removal time and hospital stays were comparable between two groups. There was no difference in biochemical recurrence at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months of follow-up. Of note, the urinary control function recovers of patients in the L-RALP group was significantly better than those in the S-RALP group. Moreover, patients in the L-RALP group had much better results of EPIC-CP (including urinary control and total score) than those in the S-RALP group at 6 week and 3, 6, 12 and 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both S-RALP and L-RALP were safe and effective with similar long-term clinical outcomes in patients with respectable prostate cancer. Patients received L-RALP had significantly better postoperative outcomes including urinary control, and recovery period.

A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of full economic analyses of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in adults' thoracic and abdominopelvic indications. Authors used Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed to conduct a systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fully published economic articles in English were included. Methodology and reporting quality were assessed using standardized tools. Majority of studies (28/33) were on oncology procedures. Radical prostatectomy was the most reported procedure (16/33). Twenty-eight studies used quality-adjusted life years, and five used complication rates as outcomes. Nine used primary and 24 studies used secondary data. All studies used modeling. In 81% of studies (27/33), RAS was cost-effective or potentially cost-effective compared to comparator procedures, including radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy. Societal perspective, longer-term time-horizon, and larger volumes favored RAS. Cost-drivers were length of stay and equipment cost. From societal and payer perspectives, robotic-assisted surgery is a cost-effective strategy for thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.Clinical trial registration This study is a systematic review with no intervention, not a clinical trial.

Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer

Objective

This study explores the feasibility and safety of the transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision.

Methods

From June 2017 to May 2021, 41 patients aged from 51 to 69 years underwent the transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision (L-RALP). The prostate volume was 22.0-57.8 ml (mean: 36.3 ± 11.1 ml), with a preoperative PSA value of 3.7-12.3 ng/ml (mean: 7.3 ± 1.2 ng/mL). All preoperative Gleason scores were less than or equal to 7 points, and the preoperative TNM stage ranged from T2a to T2b. All patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer by preoperative prostate biopsy or postoperative pathological specimens after prostatectomy. The operation, blood loss, hospitalization, erectile function and postoperative urinary continence were recorded. Patients were defined as continent if they answered "zero pad" per day, and they were invited to fill out The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICI-Q-SF) after the catheter removal at 4 and 24 weeks.

Results

All the operations were completed by robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy without transition to open surgery. The surgery time was 105-131 min (mean: 111.3 ± 14.9 min), with an estimated blood loss of 50-220 ml (mean: 95.5 ± 27.3 ml). The postoperative hospital stay was 3-8 days (mean: 5.2 ± 1.7 days), and the postoperative catheter was removed after 5-7 days (mean: 6.3 ± 1.1 days). After 24 weeks of follow-up, 35 cases (85.4%, 35/41) obtained immediate urinary continence after the catheter removal in 24h. All patients had regained continence 24 weeks postoperatively (100%, 41/41).

Conclusion

The transvesical approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision is a safe and effective surgical technique, beneficial for early continence recovery and erectile function, and it is also suitable for prostate cancer patients after prostate enucleation.

Exercise participation, barriers, and preferences in Korean prostate cancer survivors

Objective: To identify patterns of physical activity (PA) participation, exercise preference, and barriers of stage 2-3 prostate cancer survivors across cancer trajectories based on selected demographic and medical variables.Design: The current study is a descriptive cross-sectional study which included data from a total of 111 prostate cancer survivors, at Shinchon Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. The survey includes PA levels before and after prostate cancer diagnosis, exercise barriers, and preferences.Results: Moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA levels were significantly lower after cancer diagnosis (vigorous PA:41.9 ± 123.1 min/week vs. 4.6 ± 29.8 min/week, p < 0.001; moderate PA: 159.9 ± 240.0 min/week vs. 56.8 ± 129.7 min/week, p < .001) compared to their PA level before cancer diagnosis. Perceived exercise barriers were distinctly different according to participants' age and time since surgery. The two most prevalent exercise barriers among prostate cancer survivors <65 years were lack of time (28.6%) and poor health (26.5%), whereas the exercise barriers for prostate cancer survivors aged ≥65 years were lack of exercise facilities (21.4%) and lack of exercise information (17.9%). Furthermore, within 6 months after surgery, prostate cancer survivors perceived poor health (29.5%) and pain at the surgery site (29.5%) to be the two most prevalent exercise barriers. 6 months after surgery, prostate cancer survivors perceived lack of time (21.3%) and poor health (14.8%) to be the two most prevalent exercise barriers. Walking, pelvic floor and Kegel exercises were three most preferred exercises among prostate cancer survivors in our study, which uniquely differ according to time since surgery.Conclusion: This study showed significant reduction in PA levels among prostate cancer survivors and their perceived exercise barriers were distinct according to their age and time since surgery. Therefore, PA and exercise recommendation should be specific to their personal characteristics such as age and time since surgery.

Changes in quality of life and lower urinary tract symptoms over time in cancer patients after a total prostatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to clarify associations between and changes over time in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients after a total prostatectomy.

METHODS

The subjects were cancer patients who had undergone total prostatectomy and had participated in non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case-control studies with outcomes of changes over time in LUTS or QOL. Fourteen studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to preoperatively, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)-a LUTS indicator-yielded the following, 3 months after operation (MD [95% confidence interval, CI] = -0.27 [-2.22 to 1.68], p = .7855), 6 months after operation (MD [95% CI] = -2.12 [-3.04 to -1.20], p < .0001), and 12 months after operation (MD [95% CI] = -2.27 [-2.63 to -1.92], p < .0001), demonstrating significant decrease and, therefore, improvement of symptoms after 6 months. International Prostate Symptom Score-Quality of Life (IPSS-QOL), a QOL indicator, was significantly reduced at 12 months after surgery, indicating improved QOL (MD [95% CI] = -0.49 [-0.87 to -0.11], p = .0107), but there was heterogeneity between different studies (I² = 89.19%). A cumulative meta-analysis showed a tendency for greater improvements in IPSS-QOL at 12 months after surgery, the older the mean age and the higher the mean pre-surgery IPSS. Factors of age, prostate volume, and pre-surgery IPSS were related to postoperative LUTS; exacerbation of both urinary incontinence and urinary tract obstruction was related to QOL.

CONCLUSION

While LUTS improves over time after total prostatectomy, it takes 6 to 12 months after surgery. As there is an association between LUTS and QOL, support to promote self-management of LUTS is important.

Men's perceptions of the impact of the physical consequences of a radical prostatectomy on their quality of life: a qualitative systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To identify men's perceptions of the impact of the physical consequences of a radical prostatectomy on their quality of life.

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer and second most common cause of cancer death of men in the Western world. Compared to other prostate cancer treatments, trials report worse urinary incontinence and sexual function and similar bowel function among men with prostate-specific antigen detected prostate cancer who underwent radicalized prostatectomy.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review included men of all ages and nationalities who had undergone a radical prostatectomy as treatment for any stage of prostate cancer. It considered studies that investigated:Any setting where the topic was addressed with participants meeting the inclusion criteria was included. The review considered studies that focused on qualitative data including, but not limited to: phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography and action research. Studies were included if they reported results relating to one or more of the phenomena of interest. Studies not written in English were excluded.

METHODS

The search strategy aimed to find published studies from six databases from database inception to November 2017. Methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using the standardized JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. For data extraction, the standardized Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) data extraction tool was used. A meta-aggregation was undertaken and the final synthesis of the findings was reached through discussion. Results are presented as five aggregated qualitative syntheses.

RESULTS

Nineteen qualitative studies were included in the review. The five synthesized findings were: CONCLUSIONS:: Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are significant side-effects of radical prostatectomy which have a negative impact on men's quality of life for which they feel ill prepared, and physical and psychosocial support is essential.

Nursing performance in robotic surgeries: integrative review

OBJECTIVE

To know the scientific production on the performance of the nursing staff in robotic surgeries, identifying the role of the nurse in the three perioperative periods.

METHODS

Integrative review, search in the databases National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Scientific Electronic Library Online and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, performed from June to September, 2017; 17 selected articles met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Most articles were published in foreign journals in English, nine in the United States, classified with evidence level of 4 and 5. The role of nursing in the perioperative period was identified, related mainly to patient safety. The most mentioned perioperative period in the articles was the intraoperative, with greater concern in the positioning of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The nursing performance and patient safety in robotic surgeries are similar to the ones in major surgeries, requiring from the patient a specific knowledge on the setting and preparation of the robot.

Development of an ICF-based questionnaire for urinary and/or fecal incontinence (ICF-IAF): The male patients' perspective using focus groups

AIMS

This study seeks to explore barriers faced by and resources available to male patients with urinary (UI) and/or fecal incontinence (FI) based on the ICF framework. As a result, this study contributes to the development of the ICF-Incontinence Assessment Form (ICF-IAF), which is designed to be a standardized planning and evaluation tool for interventions in a multidisciplinary setting.

METHODS

A mixed-method sequential design that places emphasis on the quantitative approach was considered appropriate for this study. Focus group interviews (FG) were chosen to collect data. Data were analysed with deductive content analysis and themes identified during FG were linked to the most corresponding ICF categories by two raters. Cohen's κ was calculated to determine interrater reliability.

RESULTS

Four FG were conducted with a total of 13 male participants. The mean age of the participants was 74.7 years. A total of 73 barriers and resources on the second ICF level (body functions 26, body structures five, activities and participation 26 and environmental factors 16), whereby four categories were not sufficiently covered by the ICF, could be identified. The κ score for the two raters was 0.82.

CONCLUSIONS

While barriers are fundamental factors affecting patients, this study found that resources are as important and should not be overlooked in the conventional treatment in both UI and FI-specific assessments.

Men's experiences after prostatectomy: A meta-synthesis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to critically analyze, interpret, and synthesize the literature on men's experiences after prostatectomy.

DESIGN

A meta-synthesis was conducted.

DATA SOURCES

Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AgeLine, and Sociological Abstract) were searched from the earliest year to 2016. From initial searches with main keywords (prostatectomy and qualitative study), 642 abstracts were retrieved. Based on inclusion criteria (English-language published qualitative study focusing on the experience of men after prostatectomy), this meta-synthesis included 15 studies.

REVIEW METHODS

Components of meta-study (meta-data-analysis, meta-method, and meta-theory) were employed to analyze, interpret, and synthesize the results of included studies. Three authors independently appraised the methodological quality of the included studies using a combined appraisal tool (The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist and Paterson et al.'s Primary Research Appraisal Tool). The Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research Statement was used to strengthen the completeness of reporting.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria and quality appraisal guidelines, however, most did not identify or relate their findings to theory. Through meta-synthesis, five themes emerged: facing a life-changing situation, experiencing changes and their impact, striving to manage and adjust to changes, coping with masculinity, and anticipating the future.

CONCLUSIONS

After prostatectomy, men experienced physical, psychological, and social changes. Many men are physically and psychologically ill-prepared and suffer from lack of information and support. Health care providers need to be sensitive to men's needs including perceptions of masculinity, realize the importance of support as an essential component of men's adaptation post-prostatectomy, and provide comprehensive and individualized patient-centered interventions. Future studies need to use rigorous research methods, clearly identify methodological approaches, and consider employing or developing theory.

Developing and evaluating Robocare; an innovative, nurse-led robotic prostatectomy care pathway

PURPOSE

A Robotic Prostatectomy Care Pathway ("Robocare"), aiming to prepare men for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and manage side-effects and long-term follow-up in a multidisciplinary fashion was established. The pathway enhances patient care by providing adequate information and support and optimizes efficiency by reducing length of stay and minimizing hospital visits. Our study assesses the pathway for patient satisfaction, co-ordination of care between disciplines, length of stay and readmission rates.

METHOD

We analysed our database of all patients undergoing RARP with Robocare between July 2012 and December 2013 at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia (PMCC). Compliance, Length of Stay and Postoperative Course were analysed. Patient satisfaction was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall 124 patients underwent RARP with 105 (85%) being discharged day 1 post-op (mean 1.3 days). Post-operative support phone calls were received by >95% of patients. Thereafter, 74 patients (60%) were followed in the long-term follow-up phone clinic. Twenty-nine complications were identified of which 19 (66%) were resolved by the nurse specialist. Eighteen patients had psychologist, 44 sexual health and 44 physiotherapist referral. Patient satisfaction in 74 (60%) returned surveys revealed 71 (96%) being well/very well supported.

CONCLUSIONS

The Robocare pathway is safe with high patient satisfaction. It contributes to reducing post-operative length of stay and readmission rates as well as the outpatient follow-up. A true multidisciplinary approach that is nurse-led likely improves care and outcomes for RARP patients and may lower impact on hospital resources.

The lived experience of men with advanced cancer in relation to their perceptions of masculinity: a qualitative phenomenological study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this exploratory research was to understand how men experience their advanced cancer in relation to their perceptions of masculinity.

BACKGROUND

There are differences in the way men and women experience illness and health care. There are inequalities in incidence and morbidities of many diseases as well as differences in rates of help-seeking behaviours. Theories on masculinity offer some explanation towards this. Men's experiences of advanced cancer in relation to masculinity are under reported, published literature suggests that there are certain issues or men dealing with advanced disease that justify investigation.

DESIGN

A Qualitative approach using a Husserlian Phenomenological design was conducted.

SAMPLE

Eight men (aged 26-68) all with advanced cancer, defined as advanced or metastatic disease for which the patient had exhausted all standard therapeutic options.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were conducted to capture narratives of the experiences of men. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's seven stage framework.

RESULTS

Themes included thwarted ambition, changing expectations, protection and provision, stoicism and coping, images of illness versus images of masculinity, importance of being a fighter and loss.

CONCLUSION

Findings showed that the experiences of these men were complex and should be handled sensitively. Ideas for gender-specific interventions and further research were developed from the findings in relation to current literature.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

A better understanding and awareness of this in this context will help nurses to consider more subtle challenges that these patients may be dealing with that in turn could affect how they cope with the burden of cancer.