1
|
Panteliodi E, Hudson D. A sense of space in the core of the bore: Enhancing the MRI experience through use of spatial audio. Radiography (Lond) 2024:S1078-8174(24)00193-7. [PMID: 39138028 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) continues to be an imaging technique that causes anxiety and concern for many patients. One longstanding approach that helps many patients is listening to music as a distraction technique during a scan. However, despite improvements in scanner technology itself, the means of providing music in this way has hardly changed, and so there may be opportunity to utilise emerging approaches in audio technology to further enhance the positive effect beyond simple distraction alone. OBJECTIVES The aim of this technical note is to introduce spatial audio and its potential application in the MRI setting to create a sense of space within the confined environment of a scanner. FINDINGS Initial feedback from a few patients indicate that spatial audio music may indeed enhance the perception of space within the MRI scanner, potentially mitigating or lowering feelings of claustrophobia and anxiety. CONCLUSION Spatial audio could enhance the sense of space felt within an MRI scanner, but research is needed to evidence whether this would indeed have an improved effect compared to rot conventional audio. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This technical note sets the stage for further exploration of spatial audio technology within the setting of MRI to help adjust cognitive appraisal and concern over its confined nature. Providing music through this means could be another approach to help patients manage a scan and improve their experience of it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Panteliodi
- InHealth Group, Beechwood Hall, Kingsmead Road, High Wycombe, Bucks, HP11 1JL, UK
| | - D Hudson
- InHealth Group, Beechwood Hall, Kingsmead Road, High Wycombe, Bucks, HP11 1JL, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Behluli E, Preuer HM, Schiefermeier-Mach N, Hornung R, Küchler M, Prokopetz M. Patient-centric comparative analysis of experiences in open upright and conventional closed MRI scanners. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:1258-1264. [PMID: 38991328 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists. RESULTS Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup. CONCLUSION The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Behluli
- Department of Radiological Technologies, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria; Radiological Institute Zurich-Altstetten, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - H M Preuer
- Department of Radiological Technologies, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - N Schiefermeier-Mach
- Unit for Research and Innovation, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - R Hornung
- Radiological Institute Zurich-Altstetten, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Küchler
- Radiological Institute Zurich-Altstetten, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Prokopetz
- Department of Radiological Technologies, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sutherland R, Gross CP, Ma X, Jeong F, Seibert TM, Cooperberg MR, Catalona WJ, Ellis SD, Loeb S, Schulman‐Green D, Leapman MS. 'It Just Makes Sense to Me': A qualitative study exploring patient decision-making and experiences with prostate MRI during active surveillance for prostate cancer. BJUI COMPASS 2024; 5:593-601. [PMID: 38873351 PMCID: PMC11168777 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used in the diagnosis, staging and active surveillance of prostate cancer, little is known about patient perspectives on MRI. Methods We performed a qualitative study consisting of in-depth, semi-structured interviews of patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Interviews focused on experiences with and knowledge of prostate MRI and MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy during active surveillance. We purposively sampled patients who received prostate MRI as part of their clinical care, conducted interviews until reaching thematic saturation and performed conventional content analysis to analyse data. Results Twenty patients aged 51-79 years (mean = 68 years) participated in the study. At diagnosis, 17 (85%) had a Gleason grade group 1, and three (15%) had a grade group 2 tumour. Overall, participants viewed prostate MRI as a valuable tool that accurately localizes and monitors prostate cancer over time, and they considered prostate MRI central to active surveillance monitoring. We identified five thematic categories related to MRI use: (1) the experiential aspects of undergoing an MRI scan; (2) the experience of visualizing one's own prostate and prostate cancer; (3) adequacy of provider explanations of MRI results; (4) confidence in prostate MRI in decision-making; and (5) the role of prostate MRI in longitudinal follow-up, including an interest in using MRI to modify the timing of, or replace, prostate biopsy. Conclusion Patients value prostate MRI as a tool that enhances their confidence in the initial diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer. This work can inform future studies to optimize patient experience, education and counselling during active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cary P. Gross
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research CenterNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Chronic Disease EpidemiologyYale School of Public HealthNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Internal MedicineYale School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Xiaomei Ma
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research CenterNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Chronic Disease EpidemiologyYale School of Public HealthNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Farah Jeong
- Yale School of Public HealthNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Tyler M. Seibert
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied SciencesUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Matthew R. Cooperberg
- Department of UrologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - William J. Catalona
- Department of UrologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Shellie D. Ellis
- Department of Population Health Kansas University Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Departments of Urology and Population HealthNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkUSA
- Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Michael S. Leapman
- Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research CenterNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of Chronic Disease EpidemiologyYale School of Public HealthNew HavenConnecticutUSA
- Department of UrologyYale School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou SP, Wan XC, Wang XD, Zhang XM, Yu YH, Wang WJ. Investigation and analysis of magnetic resonance imaging experience and psychological status of patients. BMC Psychol 2024; 12:115. [PMID: 38429641 PMCID: PMC10908109 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01570-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze factors influencing the service experience of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination and psychological status of patients admitted to a hospital and propose targeted solutions, and optimize the examination process and nursing by analyzing the MRI examination experience and psychological effect on patients. METHODS The MRI examination rooms of two tertiary general hospitals in Haikou City were sampled at random, and 206 patients who met the study criteria were surveyed on site. RESULTS (1) The item with the lowest mean score for patient examination services was whether earplugs were provided to the patient during the examination (B8 = 0.47). (2) Environmental logistics experience (16.83 ± 3.036) received the lowest score among the three service experience dimensions. (3) The average anxiety score of the patients was 5.38. (4) There was a positive correlation between the examination experience and the examination service experience of the patients. (5) Patients with higher monthly income had decreased anxiety (coefficient = -2.334), and MRI examination of the extremities relieved the anxiety (coefficient = -4.782). CONCLUSION The environmental logistics factors, poor service attitude, examination site, and income were the most significant factors affecting the MRI examination experience and psychological status of patients, which can be improved by providing information, enhancing the waiting environment, providing targeted patient education, and evaluating the experience immediately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Ping Zhou
- Nursing Department, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570311, China
| | - Xin-Cui Wan
- Central Sterile Supply Department, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570311, China
| | - Xiao-Dan Wang
- Hainan Medical University International School of Public Health and One Health, No. 3, College Road, Longhua District, Haikou, Hainan Province, 571199, China.
| | - Xiao-Man Zhang
- Department of Comprehensive Interventional, Hainan General Hospital, Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570311, China
| | - Yun-Han Yu
- International Nursing School, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 571199, China
| | - Wen-Jun Wang
- Office of High Quality Development Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 571000, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iweka E, Holmes S. Addressing the communication needs of cancer patients for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) investigations-A phenomenological study on the experiences of MRI radiographers. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:6-12. [PMID: 37864988 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A higher demand in MRI services could increase the pressure on MRI departments to increase scanning efficiency. This presents the risk of downplaying person-centred care especially for cancer patients with increased communication needs that result from anxiety associated with the nature of their disease. This study explored the experiences of MRI radiographers in addressing the communication needs of cancer patients attending for MRI examinations. METHODS The study adopted a descriptive phenomenological methodology. Single contact interviews were conducted on eight MRI specialist radiographers, and these were recorded and transcribed using Microsoft Teams conferencing platform. Thematic analysis of the transcribed data was done through an inductive approach, breaking down the data into meaningful codes and thereafter, into themes and sub-themes. RESULTS Common themes generated from the interview data included: identified communication needs, approach to communication needs, support for radiographers and factors affecting communication. Experiences of MRI radiographers indicated increased communication needs in anxious cancer patients and approaches adopted in addressing these were mainly through listening and use of empathetic gestures. Some radiographers admitted to using "blocking" strategies to avoid being drawn into emotionally exhausting conversations. Both intrinsic factors such as radiographers' personality and experience; and extrinsic factors such as time constraints, demanding workload, inadequate staffing, and skill mix were noted to influenced MRI radiographers in addressing these communication needs. CONCLUSION Cancer patients can present with communication needs due to anxieties related to their disease. For the radiographer to deal with these needs, adequate support is needed, and necessary steps taken to address the identified influencing factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE MRI departments should encourage enabling environment and services that address communication needs of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Iweka
- Research/Clinical Trials, Radiology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - S Holmes
- Scottish Academy of Breast Imaging (SABI), Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stogiannos N, Pavlopoulou G, Papadopoulos C, Walsh G, Potts B, Moqbel S, Gkaravella A, McNulty J, Simcock C, Gaigg S, Bowler D, Marais K, Cleaver K, Lloyd JH, Dos Reis CS, Malamateniou C. Strategies to improve the magnetic resonance imaging experience for autistic individuals: a cross-sectional study exploring parents and carers' experiences. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1375. [PMID: 38062422 PMCID: PMC10704820 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10333-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autistic individuals encounter numerous barriers in accessing healthcare, including communication difficulties, sensory sensitivities, and a lack of appropriate adjustments. These issues are particularly acute during MRI scans, which involve confined spaces, loud noises, and the necessity to remain still. There remains no unified approach to preparing autistic individuals for MRI procedures. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with parents and carers of autistic individuals in the UK to explore their experiences, barriers, and recommendations concerning MRI scans. The survey collected demographic information and experiential accounts of previous MRI procedures. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while key themes were identified within the qualitative data through inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Sixteen parents/carers participated. The majority reported difficulties with communication, inadequate pre-scan preparation, and insufficient adjustments during MRI scans for their autistic children. Key barriers included an overwhelming sensory environment, radiographers' limited understanding of autism, and anxiety stemming from uncertainties about the procedure. Recommended improvements encompassed accessible communication, pre-visit familiarisation, noise-reduction and sensory adaptations, staff training on autism, and greater flexibility to meet individual needs. CONCLUSIONS There is an urgent need to enhance MRI experiences for autistic individuals. This can be achieved through improved staff knowledge, effective communication strategies, thorough pre-scan preparation, and tailored reasonable adjustments. Co-producing clear MRI guidelines with the autism community could standardise sensitive practices. An individualised approach is crucial for reducing anxiety and facilitating participation. Empowering radiographers through autism-specific education and incorporating insights from autistic individuals and their families could transform MRI experiences and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Stogiannos
- Department of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
- Medical Imaging Department, Corfu General Hospital, Corfu, Greece
| | - Georgia Pavlopoulou
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, University College London, Institute of Education Group for Research in Relationships in NeuroDiversity-GRRAND, London, UK
- Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK
| | - Chris Papadopoulos
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Putteridge Bury Campus, Luton, UK.
| | - Gemma Walsh
- Department of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Ben Potts
- Department of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
- Southampton General Hospital, University Hospitals Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Sarah Moqbel
- Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK
| | | | - Jonathan McNulty
- School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Clare Simcock
- Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sebastian Gaigg
- Department of Psychology, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Dermot Bowler
- Department of Psychology, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Keith Marais
- Community Involvement, University of London, London, UK
| | - Karen Cleaver
- Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Jane Harvey Lloyd
- Department of Specialist Science Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Cláudia Sá Dos Reis
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES- SO), Lausanne, CH, Switzerland
| | - Christina Malamateniou
- Department of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Palm V, Molwitz I, Rischen R, Westphalen K, Kauczor HU, Schreyer AG. [Sustainability and climate protection : Implications on patient-centered care in radiology]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 63:672-678. [PMID: 37561161 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-023-01199-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sustainability and patient-centered radiology (PCR) include a multivariant, complex network of synergic and opportunistic elements. PCR is a subfactor of the social element, climate protection is part of the ecological element, and sustainable economics are part of the financial element. OBJECTIVES We aimed to identify PCR-symbiotic and PCR-opposed elements of sustainability using literature research. This article will provide an overview of the core sustainability elements and innovative concepts for supporting PCR. MATERIALS AND METHODS A digital literature search was carried out to identify scientific publications about sustainability and PCR via Medline. Results are provided as a narrative summary. RESULTS In particular, the social component and parts of the ecological element of sustainability support PCR. Climate protection and a natural environment show a positive correlation with health and patient satisfaction. Patient contact improves the quality of the diagnostic report and promotes satisfaction of patients and radiologists. However, increasing economization is often conditionally compatible with the social core element of sustainability and especially with PCR. Digital tools can ease communication and improve reports in times of increasing workload. CONCLUSION Socially and environmentally sustainable radiology supports the well-being of both employees and patients. Innovative concepts are necessary to balance the ecological elements of sustainability with employees' and patients' interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Palm
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Isabel Molwitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Robert Rischen
- Clinic for Radiology, Muenster University Hospital, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Kerstin Westphalen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (DIR), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas G Schreyer
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hudson DM, Heales C. "I think this could be a big success" - A mixed methods study on practitioner perspectives on the acceptance of a virtual reality tool for preparation in MRI. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29:851-861. [PMID: 37406474 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A key part of a radiographer's role within MRI is providing the required emotional support to help patients succeed with a scan. Being informed is important; whilst information leaflets and videos are commonly used, these can be limited in their representation of the experience. Virtual reality tools are being shown to reasonably replicate a scan experience, having a positive impact on patient satisfaction and anxiety. The aim was to obtain the views of practitioners on the use and implementation of such a tool in practice. METHODS A mixed methods study was conducted looking at the use of a virtual scan experience for patients prior to MRI. Nine radiographers attended two focus group sessions to see the tool and undergo a virtual experience. Following this, a survey based on the technology acceptance model was completed along with a semi-structured discussion about its use. RESULTS Perceived usefulness, ease of use, attitude and intention to use were all positive towards the virtual scan tool. All practitioners saw value in such a tool and how it could be implemented within practice, highlighting areas for improvement and development. CONCLUSION The practitioner's perspective was that access to such a virtual scan experience could be of use to better prepare and support those patients needing extra support before a real scan. Acknowledgement of having time to discuss patient concerns was noted and this could provide a means of doing so away from busy scanning lists whilst not taking up additional time. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Use of VR tools could be a conduit through which trust and rapport are built in advance away from busy scanning lists, thereby not impacting on operational throughput and hindering efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C Heales
- Medical Imaging, Department of Health and Care Professions, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rossi A, Prochowski Iamurri A, Diano D, Oboldi D, Sintuzzi E, Maurizio L, Andalò A, Cavallucci M, Ferroni F, Amadori E, Barone D, Petralia G. Patient centered radiology: investigating 3 Tesla whole body MRI acceptance in cancer patients. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023:10.1007/s11547-023-01665-y. [PMID: 37395842 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01665-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is a promising emerging imaging technology for detecting bone and soft tissue pathology, especially in the onco-hematological field. This study aims to evaluate cancer patients' experience of WB-MRI performed on a 3T scanner compared to other diagnostic total body examinations. MATERIAL AND METHOD In this prospective committee-approved study, patients completed a questionnaire in person (n = 134) after undergoing a WB-MRI scan to collect data on their physical and psychological reactions during the scan, the global satisfaction level, and preference for other types of MRI or computed tomography (CT), or positron emission tomography (PET/CT). Of all patients who had performed a CT or PET/CT the previous year, 61.9% had already undergone an MRI. The most common symptoms reported were: 38.1% perceived a localized increase in temperature and 34.4% numbness and tingling of the limbs. The scan time averaged 45 min and was well tolerated by most patients (112, 85.5%). Overall, WB-MRI was appreciated by the majority (121/134-90.3%) of patients who said they would probably undergo the procedure again. Patients preferred the WB-MRI in 68.7% of cases (92/134), followed by CT in 15.7% of cases (21/134) and by PET/CT in 7.4% (10/134), with 8.4% (11/134) of patients without any preference. The preference for imaging modalities was age-dependent (p = 0.011), while (p > 0.05) was independent of sex and a primary cancer site. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate a high degree of WB-MRI acceptance from a patient's point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Rossi
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Andrea Prochowski Iamurri
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
| | - Danila Diano
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Devil Oboldi
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Emanuele Sintuzzi
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Laghi Maurizio
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Alice Andalò
- Data Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Martina Cavallucci
- Data Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Fabio Ferroni
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Elena Amadori
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Domenico Barone
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Farinha MN, Semedo CS, Diniz AM, Herédia V. Individual and Contextual Variables as Predictors of MRI-Related Perceived Anxiety. Behav Sci (Basel) 2023; 13:458. [PMID: 37366710 DOI: 10.3390/bs13060458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates patient anxiety (PA) and, therefore, it is important to understand individual and contextual variables that may cause it. In study one, we explored those anxiety predictors. In study two, we examined the effect of the experience of MRI on PA comparing anxiety pre- to post-MRI. METHODS PA was measured with an anxiety and stress scale in an interview format. Data collection occurred at a public hospital with MRI outpatients aged 18 or older. In study one (n = 204), participants answered the questionnaire immediately after experiencing the MRI and the data were analyzed through structural equation modeling. In study two (n = 242), participants answered the questionnaire before and after the examination and the data were analyzed through Bayesian statistics. RESULTS Being female, having a higher education level (EL), and not receiving information about the examination predicts higher PA after MRI. Patients with prior information have a decrease in PA from pre- to post-MRI. Those who do not have no change in PA. In low-educated patients, PA also decreases and no changes occur in highly educated patients. CONCLUSION This study provides health professionals with valuable indicators about patients who are more likely to perceive and express anxiety during MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarida N Farinha
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Évora, 7000-803 Évora, Portugal
| | - Carla S Semedo
- Research Centre in Education and Psychology (CIEP-UÉ), Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University de Évora, 7000-803 Évora, Portugal
| | - António M Diniz
- Research Centre in Education and Psychology (CIEP-UÉ), Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University de Évora, 7000-803 Évora, Portugal
| | - Vasco Herédia
- Radiology Department, Hospital do Espírito Santo, EPE, Évora and Affidea-Évora, 9500-370 Évora, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paalimäki-Paakki K, Virtanen M, Henner A, Vähänikkilä H, Nieminen MT, Schroderus-Salo T, Kääriäinen M. Effects of a 360° virtual counselling environment on patient anxiety and CCTA process time: A randomised controlled trial. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29 Suppl 1:S13-S23. [PMID: 36280541 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigated whether a 360° virtual counselling environment (360°VCE) was more effective at decreasing patients' anxiety than routine standard of care counselling for patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and if there was any difference in the process times for both of these groups. METHODS A total of 86 patients underwent CCTA in this randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The 360°VCE was developed using spherical panoramic images and non-immersive 360° technology. The primary outcome, anxiety, was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The secondary outcome, CCTA process time, was measured from the time of arrival in the department until end of examination. RESULTS Pre-scan anxiety was lower among patients in the 360°VCE group immediately before CCTA in comparison to patients in the control group (p = 0.015). Women demonstrated higher levels of anxiety than men in both groups. No between-group differences were discerned in CCTA process time. CONCLUSION Access to 360°VCE can reduce patients' pre-CCTA anxiety levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The presented results can be used to improve patient counselling and care, reduce anxiety among patients undergoing CCTA, and optimise the CCTA examination procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoliina Paalimäki-Paakki
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Degree Programme of Radiography and Radiation Therapy, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland.
| | - Mari Virtanen
- School of Rehabilitation and Examination, Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anja Henner
- Degree Programme of Radiography and Radiation Therapy, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland
| | - Hannu Vähänikkilä
- Northern Finland Birth Cohorts, Arctic Biobank, Infrastructure for Population Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Miika T Nieminen
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tanja Schroderus-Salo
- Degree Programme of Radiography and Radiation Therapy, Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland
| | - Maria Kääriäinen
- Research Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Webster L, Boutry C, Gledhill J, Willis A, Bates P, Morriss R. To have and to hold: An exploratory qualitative study exploring why research participants with treatment-resistant depression undergoing transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment requested copies of their research brain MRI scans. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2023; 54:S95-S103. [PMID: 37019815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There has been little research providing an in-depth exploration of the reasons behind research participants, particularly in mental health settings, requesting copies of their research data, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. BRIGhTMIND is a large double blind randomised controlled trial using functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging to create personalised targets for transcranial magnetic stimulation delivery, and a number of trial participants requested copies of these scans. METHODS Seven participants involved in the BRIGhTMIND trial completed semi-structured interviews exploring their reasons behind their request for copies of their MRI scans. The qualitative data was co-analysed between researchers and patient and public involvement and engagement representatives using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS The interviews produced consistent themes concerning curiosity to visualise their MRI scans, and the hope that their participation would result in a better understanding of the nature and future treatment of depression. Concerns around the rights to access their own personal health data emerged as a clear theme as did their own ability to interpret any radiological information. DISCUSSION This study provides insight into the reasons why research participants with depression would like to retain copies of their MRI scans and the perceived role that such techniques may have for improving research and neuromodulation treatments in depression. Such first-hand experiential accounts emphasises the importance of listening to participants perspectives and lived experience, in order to improve research and health outcomes. Future research could aim to provide greater verbal and written information for participants, including details about the accessibility to their MRI scans, the difference between research and clinical MRI scans, and educational materials to help with the interpretation of MRI images.
Collapse
|
13
|
Pennington P, Weinstock-Guttman B, Kolb C, Jakimovski D, Sacca K, Benedict RHB, Eckert S, Stecker M, Lizarraga A, Dwyer MG, Schumacher CB, Bergsland N, Picco P, Bernitsas E, Zabad R, Pardo G, Negroski D, Belkin M, Hojnacki D, Zivadinov R. Communicating the relevance of neurodegeneration and brain atrophy to multiple sclerosis patients: patient, provider and researcher perspectives. J Neurol 2023; 270:1095-1119. [PMID: 36376729 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11405-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) atrophy provides valuable additional evidence of an ongoing neurodegeneration independent of lesion accrual in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). However, there are limitations for interpretation of CNS volume changes at individual patient-level. Patients are receiving information on the topic of atrophy through various sources, including media, patient support groups and conferences, and discussions with their providers. Whether or not the topic of CNS atrophy should be proactively discussed with PwMS during office appointments is currently controversial. This commentary/perspective article represents perspectives of PwMS, providers and researchers with recommendations for minimizing confusion and anxiety, and facilitating proactive discussion about brain atrophy, as an upcoming routine measure in evaluating disease progression and treatment response monitoring. The following recommendations were created based on application of patient's and provider's surveys, and various workshops held over a period of 2 years: (1) PwMS should receive basic information on understanding of brain functional anatomy, and explanation of inflammation and neurodegeneration; (2) the expertise for atrophy measurements should be characterized as evolving; (3) quality patient education materials on these topics should be provided; (4) the need for standardization of MRI exams has to be explained and communicated; (5) providers should discuss background on volumetric changes, including references to normal aging; (6) the limitations of brain volume assessments at an individual-level should be explained; (7) the timing and language used to convey this information should be individualized based on the patient's background and disease status; (8) a discussion guide may be a very helpful resource for use by providers/staff to support these discussions; (9) understanding the role of brain atrophy and other MRI metrics may elicit greater patient satisfaction and acceptance of the value of therapies that have proven efficacy around these outcomes; (10) the areas that represent possibilities for positive self-management of MS symptoms that foster hope for improvement should be emphasized, and in particular regarding use of physical and mental exercise that build or maintain brain reserve through increased network efficiency, and (11) an additional time during clinical visits should be allotted to discuss these topics, including creation of specific educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Pennington
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Channa Kolb
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Dejan Jakimovski
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
| | - Katherine Sacca
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ralph H B Benedict
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Svetlana Eckert
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Marc Stecker
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Alexis Lizarraga
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Michael G Dwyer
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.,Center for Biomedical Imaging at Clinical Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Carol B Schumacher
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Niels Bergsland
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.,IRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Patricia Picco
- Advisory Council, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Rana Zabad
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Gabriel Pardo
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Martin Belkin
- Michigan Institute for Neurological Disorders (MIND), Farmington Hills, MI, USA
| | - David Hojnacki
- Department of Neurology, Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Robert Zivadinov
- Department of Neurology, Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 100 High Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. .,Center for Biomedical Imaging at Clinical Translational Science Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Effects of video-based patient preparation for MRI on clinical processes and patient experience. Eur J Radiol 2023; 158:110621. [PMID: 36463704 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether video-based informational or relaxational preparation reduces the number of unexpected patient-related events and scan duration more efficiently, and to assess how patients evaluate the interventions. METHODS We randomized 142 adult patients (mean age: 48 ± 16 years) to three groups. The control group (n = 48, 33.8 %) received standard care. The intervention groups watched an informational (n = 50, 35.2 %) or relaxational (n = 44, 31.0 %) video while awaiting their MRI examination. We recorded scan duration, number of motion artifacts/sequence repetitions, and patient-related incidents (e.g., interruptions, premature termination). Subjective evaluation of the interventions was provided by the patients after MRI completion. RESULTS Mean scan duration for the control, relaxation, and information group was 39.38 ± 16.62 min, 32.59 ± 11.67 min, and 34.54 ± 11.91 min. Compared to the control group, scan duration was significantly shorter in the relaxation, but not in the information group (relaxation vs control: p =.019; information vs control: p =.082). The information and relaxation group did not differ significantly (p =.704). In 35 (24.6 %) patients, one or more sequences were repeated; incidents occurred in six (4.2 %) patients. Neither the frequency of repeated sequences nor incidents differed between the groups (all p >.239). Patients evaluated both videos very positively; the information video received even better evaluations (all p <.027). CONCLUSION Additional preparation, especially information, is perceived very positively by patients and at least relaxational preparation may have a positive impact on clinical operations.
Collapse
|
15
|
Madl JEM, Sturmbauer SC, Janka R, Bay S, Rohleder N. Preparing patients according to their individual coping style improves patient experience of magnetic resonance imaging. J Behav Med 2022; 45:841-854. [PMID: 36074316 PMCID: PMC9674768 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00361-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
MRI-related anxiety is present in 30% of patients and may evoke motion artifacts/failed scans, which impair clinical efficiency. It is unclear how patient anxiety can be countered most effectively. Habitual preferences for coping with stressful situations by focusing or distracting one’s attention thereof (coping style) may play a key role in this context. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two patient-preparation videos with informational vs. relaxational content and to determine whether the fit between content and coping style affects effectivity. The sample consisted of 142 patients (M = 48.31 ± 15.81 years). Key outcomes were anxiety, and cortisol as a physiological stress marker. When not considering coping style, neither intervention improved the patients’ reaction; only patient preparation that matched the patients’ coping style was associated with an earlier reduction of anxiety. This suggests that considering individual preferences for patient preparation may be more effective than a one-size-fits-all approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janika E M Madl
- Chair of Health Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstr. 49a, 91052, Erlangen, Germany. .,Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Allee am Röthelheimpark 21, 91052, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Sarah C Sturmbauer
- Chair of Health Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstr. 49a, 91052, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rolf Janka
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Susanne Bay
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Allee am Röthelheimpark 21, 91052, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Rohleder
- Chair of Health Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstr. 49a, 91052, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schreyer AG, Schneider K, Dendl LM, Jaehn P, Molwitz I, Westphalen K, Holmberg C. Patient Centered Radiology - An Introduction in Form of a Narrative Review. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:873-881. [PMID: 35196713 DOI: 10.1055/a-1735-3552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient centered radiology represents a crucial aspect for modern sustainable radiology. The definition of patient-centered consists of a focus on patients' individual values and wishes with a respectful integration in medical decisions. In this narrative review we try to give a practical introduction into this complex topic with the extension to a person-centered radiology, which additionally encompasses values and wishes of radiological and other medical colleagues. METHODS Medline search between 2010 and 2021 using "patient-centered radiology" with additional subjective selection of articles for this narrative review. RESULTS Regarding patients' experiences the main literature focus were patients' fears of examinations (movement restrictions, uncertainty). Most patients would prefer a direct communication with the radiologist after the examination. Regarding interdisciplinary communication the radiological expertise and quality is highly appreciated; however, there was a general wish for more structured- or itemized reporting. Concerning working conditions radiologists were satisfied despite high psychosocial working pressure. CONCLUSION Most of the literature on this topic consists of surveys evaluating the current state. Studies on interventions such as improved information before examinations or patient-readable reports are still scarce. There is a dilemma between an increasing radiological workload and the simultaneous wish for more patient-centered approaches such as direct radiologist-patient communications in the daily routine. Still on our way to a more value-based radiology we have to focus on patient communications and a patient-centered medicine. KEY POINTS · Patient centered radiology has a focus on the integration of patients' individual values and wishes in their decisions.. · Radiologists are clinicians, who an additional diagnostic and therapeutic surplus for patients and referring physicians.. · The recent literature on this topic consists basically on the evaluation of the current status.. · Most patients prefer a direct communication with the radiologist.. · To gain a "value based" radiology we to focus on an optimized communication with patients and referring physicians.. CITATION FORMAT · Schreyer AG, Schneider K, Dendl LM et al. Patient Centered Radiology - An Introduction in Form of a Narrative Review. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 873 - 881.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas G Schreyer
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Germany
| | - Katharina Schneider
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Germany
| | - Lena Marie Dendl
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Germany
| | - Philipp Jaehn
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Germany
| | - Isabel Molwitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Westphalen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a. d. Havel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hudson DM, Heales C, Meertens R. Review of claustrophobia incidence in MRI: A service evaluation of current rates across a multi-centre service. Radiography (Lond) 2022; 28:780-787. [PMID: 35279401 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic Resonance Imaging remains an anxious experience for many, often exhibiting as fear of enclosed spaces. A useful metric to assess its prevalence and impact in practice is premature termination due to claustrophobia. Incidence varies and depends on many factors such as the physical nature of the imaging equipment and examination being undertaken, as well as the patient themselves. METHODS Scan appointment data from between April 2019-March 2021 was extracted and reviewed. Analysis included the type of scanner used, patient age, sex, examination area, funding source, attendance and completion status. Binomial logistic regression was performed to look for any relevant predictors of failure to scan due to claustrophobia. RESULTS Overall incidence of incomplete examinations due to claustrophobia was 0.76%. Whilst the majority of scans were performed on conventional systems, those undergoing Open scans were over three times more likely to fail a scan due to claustrophobia, whilst those undergoing UpRight scanning were half as likely. Likelihood of claustrophobia increases with females, those between 45-64years of age, funded by the NHS and entering the scanner head first or having a head scan. CONCLUSION Incidence of incomplete scanning is below 1% but with the potential for further reduction with implementation and use of improved scanner design and technology. Understanding the impact of other variables is also useful to raise awareness of those at greater risk of claustrophobia. However, there are wider influences beyond data alone to consider and account for. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Whilst occurrence of claustrophobia is low, there remains a cost impact, as well as an importance in understanding the patient experience. Drawing on operational data can help provide a limited, generalised view to support service improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C Heales
- Medical Imaging, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| | - R Meertens
- Medical Imaging, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hudson DM, Heales C, Vine SJ. Radiographer Perspectives on current occurrence and management of claustrophobia in MRI. Radiography (Lond) 2021; 28:154-161. [PMID: 34657799 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is well known to be a source of anxiety for patients, commonly appearing as claustrophobia. One of the main reasons for this is due to the physical nature of the scanner itself. Despite technological improvements, there is lacking evidence on whether these improvements have resulted in a reduction in claustrophobia and anxiety in the clinical setting. Background anxiety associated with the current COVID-19 pandemic may also have shown an increase in prevalence. Therefore, the aim of this study was to survey MRI radiographers on their perspectives on the occurrence and management of claustrophobia in modern day clinical practice. METHODS Following ethical approval, an online survey was used to gather the opinions of MRI radiographers. This used closed ranking questions as well as open responses to gain insight into how this issue may be presenting in practice, preferences in management, and barriers to providing support. RESULTS Responses provide an up-to-date view on how radiographers perceive both displays of anxiety and associated impacts on patient outcome, the considered sources of anxiety, the use and effectiveness of support strategies, barriers to providing this support, and views on how COVID-19 has impacted on practice. CONCLUSION The study provides a current view from radiographers on their experience of claustrophobia in practice. It shows that this remains a regular part of practice within the modality. Therefore, for MRI radiographers managing this is an essential component of their role. Communication and interaction with the patient are recognised as important, although time is a barrier to always being able to provide patient centred care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Ongoing support is needed for both patients and radiographers to improve experience within MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C Heales
- Medical Imaging, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| | - S J Vine
- College of Sports and Health Sciences, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hudson DM, Heales C, Vine SJ. Scoping review: How is virtual reality being used as a tool to support the experience of undergoing Magnetic resonance imaging? Radiography (Lond) 2021; 28:199-207. [PMID: 34304960 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Undergoing a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan continues to be a source of anxiety and concern for many patients. Various interventions have been developed and are used in regular clinical practice to support patients through the procedure. A novel approach which is gaining traction is that of virtual reality (VR) as a tool to support patient experience in MRI. This scoping review considers how it is currently being used and developed and discusses how effective it may be. KEY FINDINGS The eight papers found show a range of approaches being used; as a preparatory tool, exposure therapy or distraction technique. All of which show general positive influence on patient anxiety, compliance, and acceptability. The more recent, but limited number of papers, show this to be a developing field. CONCLUSION The potential for the use of VR lies in its ability to closely replicate the real world as a preparatory and exposure technique for those likely to experience concerns over the MRI procedure itself. The reality of the virtual environment also provides opportunity to spend time coaching patients in advance without the need to take up actual scanner time, thereby providing a safe space in which preparation and support can be given. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE It is argued that a better understanding of the theoretical basis on which VR may be working would further help development and implementation in clinical practice. This could then support a truly patient-centred approach to management of claustrophobia and associated anxieties related to MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C Heales
- Medical Imaging, College of Medicine and Health, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| | - S J Vine
- College of Sports and Health Sciences, Exeter University, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Belloni E, Tentoni S, Puci MV, Bortolotto C, Bottinelli O, Cellina M, Gibelli D, Rosti C, Oliva G, Montomoli C, Preda L, Calliada F, Scagnelli P. Patient Perception of Musculoskeletal MR: A Survey Research. Curr Med Imaging 2020; 16:1154-1160. [PMID: 33135611 DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666200107105743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) exams, patients need to lie still in a noisy and enclosed environment for a long time. This condition, together with the anxiety burden related to the possible implications of the scan results, can entail a diagnostic outcome of poor quality. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the personal perception and experience of adult patients undergoing unenhanced musculoskeletal MR. METHODS Consecutive outpatients undergoing unenhanced MR of spine, knee or shoulder were asked to respond to a 10-item questionnaire at the end of the exam. RESULTS 263 patients (54% males, mean age 50.6 ±15.8 years, range 18-83 years) completed the questionnaire. Patients declared that the most disturbing elements of the exam were forced immobility and noise (30% in both cases). Females perceived significantly higher degree of anxiety than males (56% vs. 21%, p<0.001). Exam duration was correctly perceived by 83% of the population. Patients' satisfaction was generally high (mean above 9 over 10). CONCLUSION Explanations and clarifications given before the exam were considered satisfactory by the patients. Despite some negative aspects such as noise, immobility and anxiety especially in females, patients' satisfaction with our service was high, as well as the willingness to return.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Belloni
- Department of Radiology, Civil Hospital, Vigevano, Pavia Province, Italy
| | - Stefania Tentoni
- National Research Council, Institute of Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies “Enrico Magenes”, Pavia, Italy
| | - Mariangela Valentina Puci
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Chandra Bortolotto
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Olivia Bottinelli
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michaela Cellina
- Radiology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Gibelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Rosti
- Department of Radiology, Civil Hospital, Vigevano, Pavia Province, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Oliva
- Radiology Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Montomoli
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy,Diagnostic Imaging Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Calliada
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy,Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
King S, Woodley J, Walsh N. A systematic review of non-pharmacologic interventions to reduce anxiety in adults in advance of diagnostic imaging procedures. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 27:688-697. [PMID: 33028496 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Anticipation of a diagnostic imaging (DI) procedure, particularly one involving advanced technology, can provoke feelings of anxiety in patients. Anxiolytics (anxiety reducing drugs) can be used to reduce pre-procedural anxiety in patients, however there are several known disadvantages to this approach. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate any preparatory non-pharmacological interventions used to reduce patient anxiety in advance of DI procedures. KEY FINDINGS Database searches revealed twelve studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. A narrative synthesis identified three intervention categories: patient information/education, cognitive strategies (i.e. guided imagery, breathing techniques, imaginative visualisation) and music therapy. CONCLUSION The current review demonstrates that despite the existence of a number of studies providing some evidence for the effectiveness of a range of anxiety reducing interventions for patients prior to DI, the small number and overall low quality of studies identified makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the application of a specific intervention in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The majority of interventions included in this review were shown to be practical for inclusion in the clinical setting and did have some positive effect on patient anxiety levels. As a result those professionals working with adults undergoing advanced technology DI procedures may consider implementing some of the strategies that have been discussed within their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S King
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
| | - J Woodley
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - N Walsh
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bolejko A, Hagell P. Effects of an information booklet on patient anxiety and satisfaction with information in magnetic resonance imaging: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 27:162-167. [PMID: 32753258 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important modality in diagnostics and treatment follow-up. However, MRI can be perceived as unpleasant even though the examination is non-invasive. Patients' knowledge of the MRI procedure is usually scarce, which may enhance patient anxiety at examination. We investigated the effects on anxiety and satisfaction with an information booklet on MRI compared to a placebo booklet delivered to adult patients prior to their first MRI examination. METHODS This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 197 patients. The intervention group (n = 95) received a booklet about MRI prior to the examination, whereas the control group (n = 102) received a placebo booklet of the same size and layout but containing general information. The State Trait Anxiety Inventory with supplementary questions from the Quality from the Patient's Perspective questionnaire were used as patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS Anxiety did not differ between the groups, either prior to MRI or during the examination, but those who received the placebo booklet were at higher risk of experiencing high anxiety prior to the MRI examination (odds ratio 2.64; P = 0.029). The intervention group was more satisfied with the information received (P = 0.044), and a majority of participants in both groups (≥87%) considered it important to obtain information on the MRI procedure. CONCLUSION Written MRI information decreases the risk of high anxiety levels before MRI and improves patient satisfaction with the information. Further research is needed to investigate whether written information prior to MRI is beneficial not only from the perspective of the patient but may also be cost-effective. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Written MRI information prior to the examination is recommended in radiography care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bolejko
- Department of Translational Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Carl Bertil Laurells gata 9, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - P Hagell
- The PRO-CARE Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Elmetorpsvägen 15, 291 88, Kristianstad, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bellhouse S, Brown S, Dubec M, Taylor S, Hales R, Whiteside L, Yorke J, Faivre-Finn C. Introducing magnetic resonance imaging into the lung cancer radiotherapy workflow - An assessment of patient experience. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 27:14-23. [PMID: 32451307 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast to computed tomography (CT), the current standard imaging modality for planning radiotherapy treatment. Improved soft tissue contrast could reduce uncertainties in identifying tumour and surrounding healthy tissues, potentially leading to improved outcomes in patients with lung cancer. This study explored patient experience of MR treatment planning scans in addition to a CT scan. METHODS Participants were recruited to the 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Delineation of Organs At Risk and Target Volumes in Lung Cancer Patients (MR-Lung)' study at a UK specialist cancer centre. Participants completed their standard of care radiotherapy planning CT scan and two additional MRI scans. Baseline and post-scan questionnaires were completed assessing anxiety and claustrophobia. Motion artefact during MRI was assessed by a modified visual grading analysis. Sixteen participants completed semi-structured interviews; transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS 29 people (66% female; aged 54-89 years) participated. Nineteen participants completed all imaging and 10 participants withdrew before completion. There was minimal adverse impact on state and scan-specific anxiety levels from completing the MRI scans. Completers experienced significantly less scan-specific anxiety during MRI 1 compared to non-completers (U = 33, z = -1.98, p < 0.05). 78% of those who withdrew during or post MRI 1 were positioned 'arms up'. Motion artefact negatively impacted image quality in 34% of scans. Participants commonly reported concerns during MRI; noise, claustrophobia and pain in upper limbs. CONCLUSION Two thirds of participants tolerated two additional MR scans with minimal adverse impact on anxiety levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patient arm positioning and comfort ought to be considered when introducing MR-Linac systems. A screening tool to identify those at high risk of non-completion should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bellhouse
- Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - S Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - M Dubec
- Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK; Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Taylor
- Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - R Hales
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - L Whiteside
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - J Yorke
- Christie Patient Centred Research (CPCR), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - C Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Piippo‐Huotari O, Funk E, Geijer H, Anderzén‐Carlsson A. Patients' and radiographers' experiences of dose reducing abdominal compression in radiographic examinations-A qualitative study. Nurs Open 2020; 7:680-689. [PMID: 32257255 PMCID: PMC7113525 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To describe patients' and radiographers' experiences of abdominal compression using conventional and patient-controlled compression methods. Design Qualitative descriptive design. Methods Forty-five patients who had used both a conventional and a patient-controlled compression device answered questionnaires. Five radiographers were interviewed. The data-collection took place between September 2015 and February 2017. Data were analysed by qualitative content analysis. Results Patient-controlled compression was preferred by slightly more patients because of fear of pain due to excessively hard pressure, maintaining control over the pressure and shorter duration. It was more comfortable, and patients felt they could participate in the examinations. Conventional compression was preferred by some because of more stable pressure and uncertainty of own capacity to provide the optimal compression. Discomfort was more often mentioned concerning the conventional compression method. The radiographers experienced the patient-controlled method as less time-consuming and more comfortable, but uncertainty about correct compression technique and its effect on radiation dose and image quality was reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oili Piippo‐Huotari
- Department of RadiologyFaculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
- School of Health SciencesFaculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
| | - Eva Funk
- School of Health SciencesFaculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
| | - Håkan Geijer
- Department of RadiologyFaculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
| | - Agneta Anderzén‐Carlsson
- University Health Care Research CenterFaculty of Medicine and HealthÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ahlander BM, Engvall J, Ericsson E. Anxiety during magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in relation to scanner design and size. Radiography (Lond) 2020; 26:110-116. [PMID: 32052788 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging in closed-bore scanners sometimes provokes anxiety but closed-bore designs have gradually become wider and shorter. Open scanners may be easier to tolerate. The aim was to compare patient anxiety during MRI between bore diameters of 60 cm and 70 cm, and to determine the current level of patient anxiety and experience in open scanners in a clinical setrting. METHODS Consecutive patients referred for examination of the spine in 60 cm and 70 cm bores and one open scanner participated. Four established/validated questionnaires, answered before, directly after (N = 155) and one week after (N = 109) the MRI-examination were used, measuring anxiety, fear and depression. RESULTS No difference was found in the patient scores of anxiety between the 60 cm and the 70 cm scanners on the examination day. At follow-up, patients in the 70 cm bore rated their examination experience better (p < 0.025), compared to patients in the 60 cm bore. Patients in the open scanner rated higher levels of anxiety (p < 0.001) before, directly after and one week after the examination, compared to the closed bore scanners. CONCLUSION Scanners with a 70 cm diameter bore seem more tolerable than those with a 60 cm bore. Patients referred to the open scanner had on average a higher tendency to express anxiety. Still, patient anxiety in MRI is challenging and further research required. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patients prefer to be examined in 70 cm bore scanners compared with 60 cm. If open scanners aren't available extended support may be necessary for the most anxious patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B M Ahlander
- Ryhov County Hospital, SE-551 85 Jönköping, Sweden.
| | - J Engvall
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; Center of Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
| | - E Ericsson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Science, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Taylor SA, Mallett S, Miles A, Morris S, Quinn L, Clarke CS, Beare S, Bridgewater J, Goh V, Janes S, Koh DM, Morton A, Navani N, Oliver A, Padhani A, Punwani S, Rockall A, Halligan S. Whole-body MRI compared with standard pathways for staging metastatic disease in lung and colorectal cancer: the Streamline diagnostic accuracy studies. Health Technol Assess 2019; 23:1-270. [PMID: 31855148 PMCID: PMC6936168 DOI: 10.3310/hta23660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging is advocated as an alternative to standard pathways for staging cancer. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to compare diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, patient acceptability, observer variability and cost-effectiveness of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and standard pathways in staging newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer (Streamline L) and colorectal cancer (Streamline C). DESIGN The design was a prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING The setting was 16 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with histologically proven or suspected colorectal (Streamline C) or non-small-cell lung cancer (Streamline L). INTERVENTIONS Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging. Standard staging investigations (e.g. computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography). REFERENCE STANDARD Consensus panel decision using 12-month follow-up data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was per-patient sensitivity difference between whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and standard staging pathways for metastasis. Secondary outcomes included differences in specificity, the nature of the first major treatment decision, time and number of tests to complete staging, patient experience and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS Streamline C - 299 participants were included. Per-patient sensitivity for metastatic disease was 67% (95% confidence interval 56% to 78%) and 63% (95% confidence interval 51% to 74%) for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and standard pathways, respectively, a difference in sensitivity of 4% (95% confidence interval -5% to 13%; p = 0.51). Specificity was 95% (95% confidence interval 92% to 97%) and 93% (95% confidence interval 90% to 96%) respectively, a difference of 2% (95% confidence interval -2% to 6%). Pathway treatment decisions agreed with the multidisciplinary team treatment decision in 96% and 95% of cases, respectively, a difference of 1% (95% confidence interval -2% to 4%). Time for staging was 8 days (95% confidence interval 6 to 9 days) and 13 days (95% confidence interval 11 to 15 days) for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and standard pathways, respectively, a difference of 5 days (95% confidence interval 3 to 7 days). The whole-body magnetic resonance imaging pathway was cheaper than the standard staging pathway: £216 (95% confidence interval £211 to £221) versus £285 (95% confidence interval £260 to £310). Streamline L - 187 participants were included. Per-patient sensitivity for metastatic disease was 50% (95% confidence interval 37% to 63%) and 54% (95% confidence interval 41% to 67%) for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and standard pathways, respectively, a difference in sensitivity of 4% (95% confidence interval -7% to 15%; p = 0.73). Specificity was 93% (95% confidence interval 88% to 96%) and 95% (95% confidence interval 91% to 98%), respectively, a difference of 2% (95% confidence interval -2% to 7%). Pathway treatment decisions agreed with the multidisciplinary team treatment decision in 98% and 99% of cases, respectively, a difference of 1% (95% confidence interval -2% to 4%). Time for staging was 13 days (95% confidence interval 12 to 14 days) and 19 days (95% confidence interval 17 to 21 days) for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and standard pathways, respectively, a difference of 6 days (95% confidence interval 4 to 8 days). The whole-body magnetic resonance imaging pathway was cheaper than the standard staging pathway: £317 (95% confidence interval £273 to £361) versus £620 (95% confidence interval £574 to £666). Participants generally found whole-body magnetic resonance imaging more burdensome than standard imaging but most participants preferred the whole-body magnetic resonance imaging staging pathway if it reduced time to staging and/or number of tests. LIMITATIONS Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging was interpreted by practitioners blinded to other clinical data, which may not fully reflect how it is used in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS In colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer, the whole-body magnetic resonance imaging staging pathway has similar accuracy to standard staging pathways, is generally preferred by patients, improves staging efficiency and has lower staging costs. Future work should address the utility of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for treatment response assessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN43958015 and ISRCTN50436483. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 66. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Susan Mallett
- Institute of Applied Health Research, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anne Miles
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Quinn
- Institute of Applied Health Research, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, and Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sandy Beare
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Vicky Goh
- Department of Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sam Janes
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - Alison Morton
- c/o Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neal Navani
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alfred Oliver
- c/o Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anwar Padhani
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Steve Halligan
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Engels K, Schiffmann I, Weierstall R, Rahn AC, Daubmann A, Pust G, Chard D, Lukas C, Scheiderbauer J, Stellmann J, Heesen C. Emotions towards magnetic resonance imaging in people with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 139:497-504. [PMID: 30802931 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) often have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. While MRI can help guide MS management, it may be a source of anxiety for pwMS. We aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire on the "EMotions and Attitudes towards MRI" (MRI-EMA). MATERIAL AND METHODS The questionnaire was developed, tested in two samples of pwMS and validated in a sample of n = 457 pwMS using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS EFA revealed four factors underlying the questionnaire: fear of MRI scan, fear of MRI results, feeling of control over the disease and feeling of competence in the patient-physician encounter. CFA confirmed the model fit. Receiving the MRI results, but not undergoing the procedure was associated with anxiety. Seeing MRI results gave participants a feeling of control over the disease. Only 50% felt competent to discuss MRI findings with their physician. Fear of MRI results was especially high and feeling of competence low in participants with a short disease duration and little MRI experience. CONCLUSION PwMS do not feel competent when discussing the role, MRI plays in their care. Receiving MRI results caused anxiety and provides some pwMS with a-perhaps false-feeling of control over the disease. The MRI-EMA constitutes a new tool for the assessments of pwMS' feelings towards MRI, that can be applied in future research and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Engels
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Insa Schiffmann
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
- Department of Neurology University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany
| | | | - Anne Christin Rahn
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Anne Daubmann
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Gesa Pust
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Declan Chard
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation University College London (UCL) Institute of Neurology London UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre London UK
| | - Carsten Lukas
- Department of Neuroradiology, St. Josef‐Hospital Ruhr University Bochum Germany
| | | | - Jan‐Patrick Stellmann
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
- Department of Neurology University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany
| | - Christoph Heesen
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
- Department of Neurology University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Naidoo K, Lawrence H, Stein C. The concept of caring amongst first year diagnostic radiography students: Original research. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2018; 71:163-168. [PMID: 30290319 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Student radiographers start their work integrated learning from their first year of studying and they are in constant contact with patients. Based on this interaction, it is imperative for all diagnostic radiography students to be caring professionals. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of caring amongst diagnostic student radiographers by exploring and describing their experiences of caring in the clinical environment. A qualitative, exploratory, descriptive and contextual research design was utilized. Focus group interviews were conducted with first year diagnostic radiography students. Purposive sampling was used to ensure information rich data was obtained. In keeping with qualitative research, participants were interviewed until data saturation was reached. Appreciative inquiry was used as an interview technique to encourage storytelling and to engage in narrative - rich communication. The 4-D model of appreciative inquiry, namely; Discovery, Dream, Destiny and Design, formed the basis for the interview questions. Data was analysed and coded and themes were created based on the interpretation of the data. Three themes were identified as being; caring as an integral part of a career choice, unpreparedness for interpersonal interactions and barriers and enablers for the development of a caring identity. Participants expressed an idealistic vision of what caring means to them as a student radiographer. Participants felt unprepared for their daily interpersonal interactions with patients and other staff. Recommendations to radiography educators would be to engage in more role-playing exercises, reflective practices and peer discussions.
Collapse
|
29
|
The experience of patients participating in a small randomised control trial that explored two different interventions to reduce anxiety prior to an MRI scan. Radiography (Lond) 2018; 24:130-136. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
30
|
Ahlander BM, Engvall J, Maret E, Ericsson E. Positive effect on patient experience of video information given prior to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: A clinical trial. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27:1250-1261. [PMID: 29149455 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of video information given before cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging on patient anxiety and to compare patient experiences of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging versus myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. To evaluate whether additional information has an impact on motion artefacts. BACKGROUND Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy are technically advanced methods for the evaluation of heart diseases. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered to be painless, patients may experience anxiety due to the closed environment. DESIGN A prospective randomised intervention study, not registered. METHODS The sample (n = 148) consisted of 97 patients referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, randomised to receive either video information in addition to standard text-information (CMR-video/n = 49) or standard text-information alone (CMR-standard/n = 48). A third group undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (n = 51) was compared with the cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging-standard group. Anxiety was evaluated before, immediately after the procedure and 1 week later. Five questionnaires were used: Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, MRI Fear Survey Schedule and the MRI-Anxiety Questionnaire. Motion artefacts were evaluated by three observers, blinded to the information given. Data were collected between April 2015-April 2016. The study followed the CONSORT guidelines. RESULT The CMR-video group scored lower (better) than the cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging-standard group in the factor Relaxation (p = .039) but not in the factor Anxiety. Anxiety levels were lower during scintigraphic examinations compared to the CMR-standard group (p < .001). No difference was found regarding motion artefacts between CMR-video and CMR-standard. CONCLUSION Patient ability to relax during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging increased by adding video information prior the exam, which is important in relation to perceived quality in nursing. No effect was seen on motion artefacts. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Video information prior to examinations can be an easy and time effective method to help patients cooperate in imaging procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Engvall
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center of Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Eva Maret
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Ericsson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Science, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Evans R, Taylor S, Janes S, Halligan S, Morton A, Navani N, Oliver A, Rockall A, Teague J, Miles A. Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016391. [PMID: 28882915 PMCID: PMC5588966 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the experience and acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) staging compared with standard scans among patients with highly suspected or known colorectal or lung cancer. DESIGN Qualitative study using one-to-one interviews with thematic analysis. SETTING Patients recruited from 10 hospitals in London, East and South East England between March 2013 and July 2014. PARTICIPANTS 51 patients (31 male, age range 40-89 years), with varying levels of social deprivation, were recruited consecutively from two parallel clinical trials comparing the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of WB-MRI with standard scans for staging colorectal and lung cancer ('Streamline-C' and 'Streamline-L'). WB-MRI was offered as an additional scan as part of the trials. RESULTS In general WB-MRI presented a greater challenge than standard scans, although all but four patients completed the WB-MRI. Key challenges were enclosed space, noise and scan duration; reduced patient tolerance was associated with claustrophobia, pulmonary symptoms and existing comorbidities. Coping strategies facilitated scan tolerance and were grouped into (1) those intended to help with physical and emotional challenges, and (2) those focused on motivation to complete the scan, for example focusing on health benefit. Our study suggests that good staff communication could reduce anxiety and boost coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS Although WB-MRI was perceived as more challenging than standard scans, it was sufficiently acceptable and tolerated by most patients to potentially replace them if appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN43958015 and ISRCTN50436483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Evans
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Taylor
- Division of Medicine, Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Janes
- Division of Medicine, Lungs for Living Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steve Halligan
- Division of Medicine, Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Morton
- C/O National Cancer Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Navani
- Division of Medicine, Lungs for Living Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alf Oliver
- C/O National Cancer Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Teague
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Clinical Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Miles
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis: a mixed-methods study. Clin Rheumatol 2017; 37:2261-2268. [PMID: 28730270 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3760-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to understand the patient experience of musculoskeletal imaging tests for investigation of inflammatory arthritis and factors that contribute to this experience. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 33 patients who had a recent peripheral joint musculoskeletal imaging test for investigation of inflammatory arthritis. Data from these interviews were used to generate an 18-item questionnaire which was posted to rheumatology clinic patients within 6 weeks of peripheral joint imaging. Variables associated with the overall experience of the test were analysed using stepwise linear regression. Analysis of the interviews identified six themes: knowledge about the test, awareness of potential harm, the role of imaging in clinical care, discomfort, experience of waiting and 'seeing is believing'. Completed questionnaires were available from 132 patients. In regression analysis, a strong negative association was observed between the 'discomfort during the test' item and the overall experience of the test (standardised beta -0.35, p < 0.001). 'Staff made the experience better' (0.26, p < 0.001) and 'information provided' (0.28, p < 0.001) were positively associated with the overall experience of the test. For those who viewed their images, 'looking at the images with my doctor made me feel more involved in my care' (0.24, p = 0.022) was also associated positively with overall experience. Factors before, during and after a musculoskeletal imaging test contribute to the patient experience. The overall experience is most influenced by patient discomfort and interactions with staff during the test, information provided and viewing images to improve patient involvement in clinical care.
Collapse
|
33
|
Mendat CC, Mislan D, Hession-Kunz L. Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9:359-364. [PMID: 28572739 PMCID: PMC5441667 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s129817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
A sample size of 280 certified mammography technologists were surveyed to understand what factors affect patient discomfort during breast imaging. Given mammography technologists' level of patient involvement, they are uniquely positioned to observe factors that affect patient comfort. The findings suggest that according to technologists, multiple factors, including patient ethnicity, breast density, previous biopsy and lumpectomy experience, as well as psychological factors, impact breast discomfort during mammography. Additionally, with respect to imaging protocols, technologists attributed 80% of moderate-to-extreme discomfort to "length of compression time" (27%) and "compression force" (53%). Technologists also attributed "pinching at chest wall" and "hard edges of breast platform" to "very high" discomfort significantly more times (P<0.05) than "coolness and edges of paddle". These findings confirm some of what has been reported to date and challenge other findings. Given that recent decline in breast cancer mortality has been attributed to improvements in early detection and treatment, approaches to reduce discomfort should be considered in order to promote screening compliance. Although more research is needed, it is apparent that the patient experience of comfort and pain during mammography is an area warranting increased research and solutions.
Collapse
|
34
|
Relationship between anxiety level and radiological investigation. Comparison among different diagnostic imaging exams in a prospective single-center study. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2016; 121:763-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0664-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
35
|
|
36
|
Patient-initiated breath-holds in MRI: an alternative for reducing respiratory artifacts and improving image quality. Clin Imaging 2015; 39:619-22. [PMID: 25555833 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2014] [Revised: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate MRI image quality using two different breath-hold techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty patients remitted for MRI, 2D-dual gradient echo acquisition of the liver conducted two separate breath-hold acquisitions in randomized order, operator-instructed and patient-initiated. The images were reviewed by two radiologists. RESULTS There were no significant differences in image quality between the two breath-hold techniques either in overall image quality or respiratory motion artifacts. This assessment was equal and concordant for both radiologists. CONCLUSION In terms of image quality, the patient self-initiated breath-hold was shown to be an equal alternative to conventional breath-hold imaging.
Collapse
|