Individual and mutual predictors of marital satisfaction among prostate cancer patients and their spouses

Development and assessment of a self-management intervention for urinary incontinence among patients with prostate cancer: protocol for a randomized feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence is a common complication among patients with prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Guided by social cognitive theory and a framework for the recovery of health and well-being, we propose to develop and test a self-management intervention for patients with prostate cancer who experience urinary incontinence after undergoing radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

In this study, a self-management intervention for urinary incontinence (SMI-UI) is developed, comprising a mobile self-management application, a self-management handbook, and professional support. The feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of this intervention will be assessed. Patient data from the urology departments of two hospitals will be collected through convenience sampling by adopting an experimental, parallel, and random assignment research design. Patients experiencing urinary incontinence after undergoing radical prostatectomy will be invited to participate. After completing the pretest questionnaire, patients will be randomly divided into the experimental and attention control groups. The experimental group will undergo a 12-week SMI-UI, whereas the attention control group will receive an intervention consisting of a single dietetic education information package. The two groups will be tested 12 and 16 weeks after the pretest. In this study, we recorded the sociodemographic and clinical variables; recruitment rate; retention rate; satisfaction with the intervention; cancer-related self-efficacy; urination symptoms and disturbance; social participation and satisfaction; resilience; and demoralization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05335967 [date of registration 04-04-2022].

The marital relationship and health-related quality of life of prostate cancer patients and their spouses: A prospective, longitudinal study

AIMS

This study aims to measure any changes in the marital relationship during the first year after a diagnosis of prostate cancer, identify the demographic characteristics that influenced such changes, and measure changes related to health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

BACKGROUND

Knowledge is limited on the impact of a diagnosis of prostate cancer on the marital relationship and HRQoL of patients and their spouses.

DESIGN

A 1-year longitudinal study.

METHODS

Data were collected from five Finnish hospitals between October 2013 and January 2017. Of the 350 recruited couples (N = 700), 179 patients and 166 spouses completed the Marital Questionnaire and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1 year after diagnosis.

RESULTS

No major changes were found in the marital relationship during the follow-up period. The spouses reported statistically significant changes in their marital relationships, but the patients did not. Furthermore, changes in the marital relationship were not associated with the patients' HRQoL. Among spouses, emotional well-being was associated with changes in the marital relationship.

CONCLUSION

The marital relationship was relevant in terms of the spouses' HRQoL during the first year after a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Nurses and other healthcare providers should assess counselling and support provided to spouses individually.

The Chinese version of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale for gynaecological cancer patients and their partners: Translation and psychometric evaluation

Objective

The objective of the study was to translate the revised dyadic adjustment scale into Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties in gynaecological cancer patients and their male partners.

Methods

A cross-sectional design with a random subsample re-tested at the one-week interval was adopted. Gynaecological cancer patients and their partners were asked to complete the Chinese version of the revised dyadic adjustment and quality of marriage index. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, structural validity and known-group validity was assessed.

Results

A total of 252 participants (i.e., 126 female patients and 126 male partners) were recruited. The Chinese version of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α ​= ​0.85), test–retest reliability (r ​= ​0.88), known group validity and adequate convergent validity with a significant positive correlation (r ​= ​0.60) with the Quality of Marriage Index. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable model fit to a second-order three-factor structure (GFI ​= ​0.913, RMR ​= ​0.046, CFI ​= ​0.932).

Conclusions

The Chinese version of revised dyadic adjustment demonstrated good reliability and acceptable validity in gynaecological cancer patients and male partners. The scale can be used to assess the effectiveness of clinical nursing services for couples on their relationship and to compare marital satisfaction and adjustment between China and other parts of the world.

Couples coping with advanced prostate cancer: An explorative study on treatment decision making, mental deterioration, partnership, and psychological burden

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of spouses and the relevance of quality of life (QoL) and life expectancy (LE) in the treatment decision-making process of patients with advanced prostate cancer (CaP). We also addressed the role of possible mental deterioration, partnership quality, QoL, distress, anxiety, and depression in patients and their spouses.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

This was a cross-sectional non-interventional explorative study. We administered questionnaires to 96 patients with advanced CaPand their spouses. Both patients and their spouses were asked about the influence of the spouses on treatment decision making, if they prefer quality of life or life expectancy as main goal of treatment and the perceived deterioration of the patients' mental abilities. Additional questionnaires were used to assess medical history, partnership, global quality of life, distress, depression, and anxiety. We performed statistical tests to compare patients with spouses and correlations to detect associations between variables.

RESULTS

The spouses (65 ± 9 years) were significantly younger than the patients (69 ± 9 years). Ninety-five percent of the patients and 91% of the spouses reported that the spouses were involved in making treatment decisions. There was a high similarity within couples with regard to their preference for QoL or LE during treatment. Between couples, this preference differed markedly. Emotional control and motivation were the areas most commonly reported to have deteriorated among patients' mental abilities. The quality of the partnership was rated as being higher than average by both partners. Among the spouses, the quality of partnership correlated significantly with the preference for LE with regard to treatment decision making. Patients and spouses reported high psychological burdens in all areas, with higher levels of distress and anxiety in spouses (P< 0.01). Reduced quality of life and greater distress, depression, and anxiety were significantly correlated with the amount of deterioration of the patients' mental abilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Spouses of patients with advanced CaP seem to respond to different aspects of the disease by adjusting both their involvement in treatment decision making and their preferred goal of treatment. Due to mental deterioration in the patients and pronounced anxiety in their spouses, we suggest that it is important for the attending physician to provide detailed information and support to both partners. Overall, the high-stress situation seems to affect both partners to similar degrees.