Adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings: A qualitative exploration of nurses and pharmacists' perspectives

Evaluating Greek pharmacists' attitudes and barriers regarding medicines adherence

Adherence constitutes an integral aspect of achieving consistently good clinical results. Understanding pharmacists' perceptions and attitudes, along with existing barriers is essential on the roadmap of enhancing patient adherence. This constitutes the goal of this study.

Methodology

A validated questionnaire was sent to a sample of 280 community pharmacists. Pharmacists were notified both by email and telephone. A response rate of 55% was achieved.

Results

Most pharmacists agree that the identification of patients' suboptimal adherence falls under their professional responsibility and they engage in activities to promote it. There is evidence to support that the most popular interventions were self-management and indirect methods. Specific tools were used to a lesser degree. Finally, the current study illustrated that the most commonly identified barriers were the preference of patients for physicians regarding adherence, lack of information from patients and lack of time.

Conclusion

Although the important role of pharmacists in adherence is ascertained, significant discrepancies in the tools used to control and promote adherence among pharmacists were identified, and also in obstacles faced by themselves and their patients. The interventions should be more consistent and the notion of cooperation among health care professionals should be nurtured.

Institutional ethnography of hemodialysis care: Perspectives of multidisciplinary health care teams in Nepal

Background

Hemodialysis is the most commonly used renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease. The collaborative efforts of multidisciplinary teams comprising nephrologists, nurses, pharmacists, and dietitians play a crucial role in enhancing patient outcomes, improving the quality of care, and reducing treatment costs. However, various factors such as healthcare cost reduction, limited resources, profit-driven systems, organizational structure, and involvement in patient care decisions impact the provision of hemodialysis care by the multidisciplinary teams.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the institutional practices of multidisciplinary teams within a hemodialysis unit.

Methods

This institutional ethnography study was conducted between April 2019 to February 2020 in a hemodialysis unit of a public university hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with ten nurses (including supervisors and incharge), two nephrologists, two dietitians, two pharmacists, and two technicians. Additionally, 167 hours of observation, two focus groups with nurses, analysis of institutional texts, and field notes were conducted. Participants were purposively selected based on their ability to provide diverse information regarding institutional practices in hemodialysis care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed.

Results

The analyzed data were presented in: 1) the context of hemodialysis care, 2) textual practices: the ruling relations of hemodialysis care (staffing, protocol, job description), 3) hemodialysis decision, and 4) institutional support.

Conclusion

Hemodialysis care provided by multidisciplinary teams is constrained by limited resources, particularly in terms of physical space, dialysis machines, nurses, doctors, and dietitians. The hospital's cost-cutting policies lead to reduced investment in patient care equipment, particularly dialysis machines, which significantly impact the workload of nurses and technicians. Insufficient nurse staffing necessitates the provision of other renal care responsibilities, resulting in increased workload, reduced time available for hemodialysis care, and unfinished tasks. The absence of clear job descriptions for hemodialysis care places an additional burden on nurses, who are often required to fulfill the responsibilities of other healthcare teams. Doctors hold the authority in making care decisions, which are subsequently followed by other team members.

Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings - a focus-group study of health care professionals

BACKGROUND

Medication nonadherence is common among patients with hemodialysis, leading to poorer patient outcomes. Health care professionals have an important role in assessing risk of nonadherence and intervening to support adherence. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' and nurses' current medication adherence practices in hemodialysis settings.

METHOD

A generic qualitative design with inductive content analysis and focus group methodology. Focus groups with health care professionals were conducted in four Nephrology Centers, representing three different regions of Denmark. An interview guide was developed in collaboration with 3 patient representatives.

RESULTS

Six focus group interviews involving a total of forty-two health care professionals were conducted. Five main categories were identified; Laboratory tests are the "gold standard" for assessing adherence, suggesting that abnormal results motivated investigation of adherence, Varying practices for supporting adherence, alluding to the impact of individual clinician priority and preference on choice of adherence interventions, Unclear allocation of roles and responsibility, specifically referring to uncertainty in the delegation of roles between physicians and nurses, Navigating time and resource limitations, intimating the resources needed to support medication adherence and Suggestions for future strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest implementing systematic use of validated patient-reported outcome measures for assessing adherence and deprescribing tools to support adherence, as these instruments might identify the patients who are in most need of support and promote patient adherence to their prescribed medications. The findings also point to a need for interdisciplinary clarification of roles and responsibilities regarding medication adherence, with the aim of building a strong collaborative partnership between professions.

Interventions Incorporating Therapeutic Alliance to Improve Hemodialysis Treatment Adherence in Black Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) in the United States: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In the US, Blacks with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have a four-fold higher prevalence rate of hemodialysis treatment and higher subsequent rates of hemodialysis treatment nonadherence and hospitalization compared to their White peers. Nonadherence to prescribed dialysis therapy is an underestimated life-threatening behavior, because of its association with increased morbidity and mortality. Few studies have specified and systematically evaluated targeted methods of increasing hemodialysis treatment adherence among Black hemodialysis patients with added focus on therapeutic alliance, a rewarding patient-centered relationship between patients and providers, based on common goals and objectives. This review seeks to evaluate the state of the science to determine the salience of a therapeutic alliance for the development of effective interventions positively impacting hemodialysis treatment adherence among Black patients.

METHODS

Medline (via PubMed), Embase (OvidSP), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; EBSCOhost), and PsycInfo (ProQuest) databases were used to search for abstracts with the keywords "dialysis", "therapeutic alliance", and "treatment adherence and compliance", including all underlying index terms and alternative variations of terms, in order to cover the entire scope of the field. Only randomized clinical trials and pre/postintervention studies published in the previous 10 years (2009-2019) and including a proportion of Black patients >25% were included for review.

RESULTS

Only three intervention studies met these criteria, for a total aggregated sample of 130 - mean age 58.1 years and 53% female. None of these studies was composed exclusively of Black patients (range 62%-91.3%), nor did they present data specifically for Blacks. Despite the lack of robust data informing strategies to improve hemodialysis adherence among Blacks with ESRD, a limited number of intervention studies have reported positive effects on hemodialysis attendance.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Further research is warranted to fill this significant gap in our understanding of theoretically based, therapeutic alliance-enhanced, and culturally tailored hemodialysis treatment-adherence interventions among Blacks.