Strengthening nursing surveillance in general wards: A practice development approach

Acute Care Nurses' Partnership With Patients to Recognise and Respond to Changes in Patients' Clinical States: A Qualitative Study

AIM

To explore and describe acute care nurses' partnership with patients to recognise and respond to changes in patients' clinical states. Acute care nurses' decisions to partner with patients to recognise deterioration in clinical states and to respond by activating a rapid response system improves patient outcomes. Acutely unwell patients can also experience clinical changes that include improvement and deterioration that does not trigger rapid response system activation over the course of hospitalisation from illness and treatment. How acute care nurses partner with patients in response to improvement and deterioration not triggering a rapid response system is not well-understood.

DESIGN

An exploratory, descriptive study underpinned by Tanner's Clinical Judgement Model.

METHODS

Using purposive and quota sampling, 20 nurses with direct patient care responsibilities on one medical and one surgical ward in a large Australian hospital were recruited. Nonparticipant observations followed by semistructured interviews were conducted between January and May of 2021. Nurse-patient interactions were observed for 4 h, and verbally described and recorded. Semistructured interviews were recorded and explored nurses' reasoning behind decisions observed. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified from the data: nurses checking in for changes; nurses forming judgements; and nurses partnering with patients to respond. Acute care nurses promoted subjective assessment based on patients' safety risks. Patients' participation in response to changes was prioritised based on acute care nurses' judgement of safety.

CONCLUSION

Patients receive significant safety benefits when acute care nurses partner with patients in response to their experience of improvement and deterioration during acute illness. Further research should evaluate the sensitivity of subjective cues in patient assessment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

Partnership with patients in assessment and management of improvement and deterioration improves the quality and safety of patient care. Assessment frameworks should equally prioritise the use of objective and subjective cues. Nursing education should promote the safety benefits of patient partnerships in responding to patient changes.

REPORTING METHOD

Equator checklist COREQ.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Data collected included description of patients' interactions with study participants.

The role of the ward nurse in recognition and response to clinical deterioration: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Nurses play a key role in the recognition and response to clinical deterioration.

AIM

The aim of this scoping review was to explore, map and synthesise existing research related to the ward nurses' role in recognising and responding to clinical deterioration.

METHODS

A scoping review was undertaken to identify English only studies focused on the ward nurse's role in recognition and response to clinical deterioration of the hospitalised adult. Search terms included 'clinical deterioration', 'nurses', 'wards', 'general', 'hospital, units' and 'hospitals'. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest and Science Direct databases were searched for eligible studies.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and three major themes were synthesised: (i) recognition of deterioration; (ii) nursing assessment; and, (iii) challenges responding to patient deterioration.

CONCLUSION

The review highlighted significant variability in the ward nurses' role, activities, and skills in assessing, monitoring, managing and escalating care for clinical deterioration.

A facilitator's reflection on the democratizing potential of emancipatory practice development

Emancipatory practice development (ePD) is a practitioner-led research methodology which enables workplace transformation. Underpinned by the critical paradigm, ePD works through facilitation and workplace learning, with people in their local context on practice issues that are significant to them. Its purpose is to embed safe, person-centred learning cultures which transform individuals and workplaces. In this article, we critically reflect on a year-long ePD study in an acute care hospital ward. We explore the challenges of practice change within systems, building collective strength with frontline collaborations and leadership to sustain new learning cultures. Our work advances practice development dialogue through working closely with the underpinning theories. Our critique analyses how ePD can enact and sustain change within a complex system. We argue that ePD works to strengthen safety cultures by challenging antidemocratic practices through communicative action. By opening communicative spaces, ePD enables staff to collectively deliberate and reach consensus. Their raised awareness supports staff to resist ways of working which conspire against safe patient care. Sustainability of practice change is fostered by the co-operative democracies created within the frontline team and meso level enablement. We conclude that the democratising potential of ePDt generates staff agency at the frontline.

Transforming nursing assessment in acute hospitals: A cluster randomised controlled trial of an evidence-based nursing core assessment (the ENCORE trial)

BACKGROUND

Patient safety is threatened when early signs of clinical deterioration are missed or not acted upon. This research began as a clinical-academic partnership established around a shared concern of nursing physical assessment practices on general wards and delayed recognition of clinical deterioration. The outcome was the development of a complex intervention facilitated at the ward level for proactive nursing surveillance.

METHODS

The evidence-based nursing core assessment (ENCORE) trial was a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial. We hypothesised that ward intervention would reduce the incidence of patient rescue events (medical emergency team activations) and serious adverse events. We randomised 29 general wards in a 1:2 allocation, across 5 Australian hospitals to intervention (n = 10) and usual care wards (n = 19). Skilled facilitation over 12 months enabled practitioner-led, ward-level practice change for proactive nursing surveillance. The primary outcome was the rate of medical emergency team activations and secondary outcomes were unplanned intensive care unit admissions, on-ward resuscitations, and unexpected deaths. Outcomes were prospectively collected for 6 months following the initial 6 months of implementation. Analysis was at the patient level using generalised linear mixed models to account for clustering by ward.

RESULTS

We analysed 29,385 patient admissions to intervention (n = 11,792) and control (n = 17,593) wards. Adjusted models for overall effects suggested the intervention increased the rate of medical emergency team activations (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.314; 95 % confidence interval 0.975, 1.773), although the confidence interval was compatible with a marginal decrease to a substantial increase in rate. Confidence intervals for secondary outcomes included a range of plausible effects from benefit to harm. However, considerable heterogeneity was observed in intervention effects by patient comorbidity. Among patients with few comorbid conditions in the intervention arm there was a lower medical emergency team activation rate and decreased odds of unexpected death. Among patients with multimorbidity in the intervention arm there were higher rates of medical emergency team activation and intensive care unit admissions.

CONCLUSION

Trial outcomes have refined our assumptions about the impact of the ENCORE intervention. The intervention appears to have protective effects for patients with low complexity where frontline teams can respond locally. It also appears to have redistributed medical emergency team activations and unplanned intensive care unit admissions, mobilising higher rates of rescue for patients with multimorbidity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12618001903279 (Date of registration: 22/11/2018; First participant recruited: 01/02/2019).

Surveillance and patient safety in nursing research: A bibliometric analysis from 1993 to 2023

AIMS

To identify and characterize the thematic foci, structure and evolution of nursing research on surveillance and patient safety.

DESIGN

Bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

Bibliometric methods were employed to analyse 1145 articles, using Bibliometrix and VOSviewer software.

DATA SOURCE

The Scopus bibliographic database was searched on April 7, 2023.

RESULTS

A keyword co-occurrence analysis found the most frequently occurring keywords to be: patient safety, nursing, nurses, adverse events, monitoring, critical care, quality improvement, vital signs, safety, alarm fatigue, education, nursing care, surveillance, clinical alarms, failure to rescue, evidence-based practice, acute care, clinical deterioration, communication, intensive care. Network mapping, clustering and time-tracking of the keywords revealed the focal themes, structure and evolution of the research field.

CONCLUSION

By assessing critical areas of the nursing research field, this study extends and enriches the current discourse on surveillance and patient safety for nursing researchers and practitioners. Critical challenges still have to be met by nurses, however, including the failure to rescue deteriorating patients. Further knowledge and understanding of surveillance and patient safety must be successfully translated from research to practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION

This study highlights the gaps in nursing knowledge with regard to surveillance and patient safety and encourages nursing professionals to turn to evidence-based surveillance practices.

IMPACT

In addressing the problem of surveillance and its effect on patient safety, this study found that, in most clinical care settings, preventing failures to rescue and adverse patient outcomes still remains a challenge for the nursing profession. This study should have an impact on nursing academics' future research themes and on nursing professionals' future clinical practices.

REPORTING METHOD

Relevant EQUATOR guidelines have been adhered to by employing recognized bibliometric reporting methods.

Nursing surveillance of respiratory adverse events among hospitalized adults: A systematic review to guide evidence-based practice

BACKGROUND

Nursing surveillance (NS) involves the purposeful, ongoing acquisition, interpretation, and synthesis of patient data for clinical decision-making. Surveillance is used to identify patients with early signs of distress and prevent adverse events. The processes that support and measure the outcomes of nursing surveillance are not clearly specified.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the impact of NS on respiratory adverse events for adult hospitalized patients.

METHODS

The PRISMA model guided this systematic search of Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), Nursing & Allied Health (ProQuest), and PubMed databases for articles published between 1990 and 2019. Search terms included nursing surveillance, data points typically attributed to nursing surveillance, adult hospitalized patients, and adverse respiratory events. The protocol for this review was registered as PROSPERO: CRD42020147557.

RESULTS

Of the 2907 references screened, 67 full-text articles were reviewed and 10 were eligible for inclusion. Research on nursing surveillance in the presence of respiratory deterioration is limited. Six studies used assessment tools that were generated from early warning scores, and four used research or institutionally designed trigger criteria. Surveillance, like other types of nursing care, was difficult to isolate and measure. Although components of surveillance were described in the selected studies, the nurse's role was not explicitly identified. Further research is required to highlight the role nursing surveillance plays in clinical decision-making to keep patients safe.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

The attributes of NS provide a useful intervention guide for the hospitalized patient at risk of deterioration. Early warning score techniques provide empirical evidence for identifying patients at risk of deterioration. The findings of this study provide evidence of the significance for research focused on the attributes of NS relative to responding to patients at risk of deterioration.

Nursing surveillance: A concept analysis

AIM

To provide a framework to assess and evaluate nursing surveillance of patients.

BACKGROUND

The Nursing Interventions Classifications define surveillance as the purposeful and ongoing acquisition, interpretation, and synthesis of patient data for clinical decision making and is essential for improving patient safety.

DATA SOURCE

The existing literature was searched using CINAHL, OVID, EmCare, and 11 ScienceDirect databases.

METHODS

The Walker and Avant method was used to analyze the concept of surveillance.

RESULTS

Technology that facilitates surveillance in the community is ubiquitous in acute care settings. Nurses caring for patients use a tremendous volume of patient data to inform their clinical decision-making. Five attributes are associated with nursing surveillance: systematic process, pattern recognition, coordinated communication, the anticipation of problems of instability, and decision making. Surveillance is dynamic and extends over time. Antecedents to nursing surveillance include sufficient nurse education, nurse expertise, nurse staffing, as well as an organizational culture that supports nursing surveillance. When nursing surveillance is present, patient safety is enhanced and adverse events that harm patients are reduced. The concept of nursing surveillance is complex and defies empirical measurement, though it is possible to measure the attributes and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing surveillance is essential to the safe management of complex patient cases. Surveillance is more than monitoring or simple patient observation. Monitoring is an essential part of surveillance but incorporating the critical attributes of surveillance lead to improved patient outcomes.

Building safety cultures at the frontline: An emancipatory Practice Development approach for strengthening nursing surveillance on an acute care ward

AIM

To evaluate an emancipatory Practice Development approach for strengthening nursing surveillance on a single medical-surgical ward.

BACKGROUND

Registered nurses keep patients safe in acute care settings through the complex process of nursing surveillance. Our interest was understanding how frontline teams can build safety cultures that enable proactive nursing surveillance in acute care wards.

DESIGN

A year-long emancipatory Practice Development project.

METHODS

A collaborative relationship was established around a shared interest of nursing surveillance capacity and researcher embedded on a medical-surgical ward. Critical analysis of workplace observations and reflection with staff generated key sites for collective action. Ward engagement was supported by creative Practice Development methods including holistic facilitation, critical reflection and action learning. An action learning set was established with a group of clinical nurses, facilitating practitioner-led change initiatives which strengthened nursing surveillance and workplace learning. Evaluation supported an iterative approach, building on what worked in an acute care context. Immersive researcher evaluation, drawing on multiple data sources, generated an analysis of how ward nursing surveillance capacity can be strengthened. COREQ criteria guided reporting.

RESULTS

The ward moved through a turbulent and transformative process of resistance and retreat towards a new learning culture where nursing surveillance was visible and valued. Staff developed and sustained innovations including the 'My MET Call series', a 'Shared GCS initiative', an enhanced 'Team Safety Huddle', and staff-led Practice Development workshops. These new practices affirmed nurses' agency, asserted nurses' clinical knowledge, positioned nurses to participate in team decision-making and humanised care.

CONCLUSION

Working collaboratively with frontline staff enabled bottom-up sustainable innovation to strengthen nursing surveillance capacity where it mattered most, at the point of care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Emancipatory Practice Development enables the profound impact of small-scale, microsystem level practice transformation. It is an accessible methodology for clinical teams to develop effective workplace cultures.

A narrative review of paracetamol-induced hypotension: Keeping the patient safe

Aim

To understand the prevalence and epidemiology of paracetamol‐induced hypotension and clinical implications for contemporaneous practice.

Design

Narrative review.

Methods

In May and June 2020, an open‐date literature search of English publications indexed in ProQuest, PubMed, and EBSCO was conducted with the search terms ‘acetaminophen’ and ‘hypotension’ and related search combinations (‘paracetamol’, ‘propacetamol’, ‘low blood pressure’, ‘fever’, ‘sepsis’, and ‘shock’) to identify peer‐reviewed publications of blood pressure changes after paracetamol administration in humans.

Results

A pattern of blood pressure reduction following the administration of paracetamol is demonstrated in the 27 studies included in this review. Haemodynamic intervention often followed persistent blood pressure reduction, and was greatest in febrile critically ill patients who received parenteral paracetamol.

Impact of Hospital Nurses' Perception on Clinical Alarms and Patient Safety Culture on Alarm Management Practice

This study aimed to identify the impact of nurses' perception of clinical alarms and patient safety culture on alarm management. Additionally, we aimed to describe the importance of clinical alarm issues. The data were collected from 21 August to 10 September 2020. The study participants were 116 nurses working in a tertiary acute care hospital in Korea. The self-report questionnaire included general characteristics, clinical alarm issues, nurses' alarm perception, patient safety culture, and alarm management practice. The mean age of nurses was 28.04 ± 4.06 years, with 5.71 ± 4.35 years of total clinical experience. For the importance of alarm issues, frequent false alarms leading to reduced attention or response was the most important issue. Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that a higher level of nurses' perceived patient safety culture was the strongest predictor of better alarm management practice (p < 0.001), followed by their perception of clinical alarms (p = 0.034). In addition, female nurses (p = 0.004), charge nurses (p = 0.013), and nurses who work less than 40 h per week (p = 0.008) were more likely to work better in alarm management practice. Future studies are needed to develop standardized alarm management guidelines by improving nurses' positive perceptions of clinical alarms and patient safety culture.

Clinical cues used by nurses to recognize changes in patients' clinical states: A systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to examine the clinical cues used by acute care nurses to recognize changes in clinical states of adult medical and surgical patients that occurred as usual consequence of acute illness and treatment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and checklist were followed. Four databases and reference lists of included studies were searched: from 1,049 studies, 38 were included. There were 26 subjective and 147 objective cues identified; only 6% of all cues described improvements in patients' clinical states. The most common clinical cues used were heart rate, blood pressure and temperature. Many studies (n = 31) focused on only one element of assessment, such as physiological stability, pain, or cognition. There was a paucity of studies detailing the complexity of acute care nurses' assessment practices as they would occur in clinical practice and a disproportionate focus on the objective assessment of deterioration. Studies are needed to understand the full breadth of cues acute care nurses use to recognize clinical change that includes both improvement and deterioration.