Low‐frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for lung protection: A randomized controlled trial

Low Frequency Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass to Protect Postoperative Lung Function in Cardiac Valvular Surgery: The PROTECTION Phase II Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers pulmonary injury. In this trial we assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of low frequency ventilation (LFV) during CPB in patients undergoing valvular surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with severe mitral or aortic valve disease were randomized to either LFV or usual care. Primary outcomes included release of generic inflammatory and vascular biomarkers and the lung-specific biomarker sRAGE (soluble receptor for advance glycation end products) up to 24 hours postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary function tests and 6-minute walking test up to 8 weeks postdischarge. Sixty-three patients were randomized (33 LFV versus 30 usual care). Mean age was 66.8 years and 30% were female. LFV was associated with changes of sRAGE (soluble receptor for advance glycation end products) levels (geometric mean ratio, 3.05; [95% CI, 1.13-8.24] 10 minutes post CPB, and 1.07 [95% CI, 0.64-1.79], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.55-1.27], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.42-1.07], and 0.62 [95% CI, 0.45-0.85] at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours post CPB respectively). No changes were observed for any of the generic biomarkers. Respiratory index soon after surgery (mean difference, -0.61 [95% CI, -1.24 to 0.015] 10 minutes post end of CPB), forced expiratory volume after 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio (0.050 [95% CI, 0.007-0.093] at 6 to 8 weeks pos-surgery), Forced vital capacity alone (95% CI, -0.191 L [-0.394 to 0.012]) and 6-minute walking test score at discharge (63.2 m [95% CI, 12.9-113.6]) were better preserved in the LFV group. No other differences were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LFV during CPB in patients undergoing valvular surgery was feasible and safe and was associated with changes in sRAGE levels along with better preserved lung function and walking performance. These observations warrant further investigation in larger future studies.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique Identifier: ISRCTN75795633.

Flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass - A single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Multifactorial comparison of flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in terms of oxygenation in cardiac surgery patients after chest closure.

DESIGN

Prospective, non-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Operating theatre at an university hospital, Austria.

PATIENTS

Patients scheduled for elective, open, on-pump, cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to either individualized FCV (compliance guided end-expiratory and peak pressure setting) or control of PCV (compliance guided end-expiratory pressure setting and tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg) for the duration of surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measure was oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) 15 min after intraoperative chest closure. Secondary endpoints included CO2-removal assessed as required minute volume to achieve normocapnia and lung tissue aeration assessed by Hounsfield unit distribution in postoperative computed tomography scans.

MAIN RESULTS

Between April 2020 and April 2021 56 patients were enrolled and 50 included in the primary analysis (mean age 70 years, 38 (76%) men). Oxygenation, assessed by PaO2/FiO2, was significantly higher in the FCV group (n = 24) compared to the control group (PCV, n = 26) (356 vs. 309, median difference (MD) 46 (95% CI 3 to 90) mmHg; p = 0.038). Additionally, the minute volume required to obtain normocapnia was significantly lower in the FCV group (4.0 vs. 6.1, MD -2.0 (95% CI -2.5 to -1.5) l/min; p < 0.001) and correlated with a significantly lower exposure to mechanical power (5.1 vs. 9.8, MD -5.1 (95% CI -6.2 to -4.0) J/min; p < 0.001). Evaluation of lung tissue aeration revealed a significantly reduced amount of non-aerated lung tissue in FCV compared to PCV (5 vs. 7, MD -3 (95% CI -4 to -1) %; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing on-pump, cardiac surgery individualized FCV significantly improved oxygenation and lung tissue aeration compared to PCV. In addition, carbon dioxide removal was accomplished at a lower minute volume leading to reduced applied mechanical power.

Elements not Graded in the Cardiac Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines Might Improve Postoperative Outcome: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERPs) are protocols involving the whole patient surgical journey. These protocols are based on multimodal, multidisciplinary, evidence-based, and patient-centered approaches aimed at improving patient recovery after a surgical intervention. Such programs have shown striking positive results in different surgical specialties. However, only a few research groups have incorporated preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative evidence-based interventions in bundles used to standardize care and build cardiac surgery ERPs. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recently published evidence-based recommendations for perioperative care in cardiac surgery. Their recommendations included 22 perioperative interventions that may be part of any cardiac ERP. However, various components integrated in already-published cardiac ERPs were neither graded nor reported in these recommendations. The goals of the current review are to present published cardiac ERPs and their effects on patient outcomes and reported components incorporated into these ERPs and to discuss the objectives and scope of cardiac ERPs.

Multi-omic analysis of the effects of low frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Heart surgery with cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with lung ischemia leading to injury and inflammation. It has been suggested this is a result of the lungs being kept deflated throughout the duration of CPB. Low frequency ventilation (LFV) during CPB has been proposed to reduce lung dysfunction.

METHODS

We used a semi-biased multi-omic approach to analyse lung biopsies taken before and after CPB from 37 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery randomised to both lungs left collapsed or using LFV for the duration of CPB. We also examined inflammatory and oxidative stress markers from blood samples from the same patients.

RESULTS

30 genes were induced when the lungs were left collapsed and 80 by LFV. Post-surgery 26 genes were significantly higher in the LFV vs. lungs left collapsed, including genes associated with inflammation (e.g. IL6 and IL8) and hypoxia/ischemia (e.g. HIF1A, IER3 and FOS). Relatively few changes in protein levels were detected, perhaps reflecting the early time point or the importance of post-translational modifications. However, pathway analysis of proteomic data indicated that LFV was associated with increased "cellular component morphogenesis" and a decrease in "blood circulation". Lipidomic analysis did not identify any lipids significantly altered by either intervention.

DISCUSSION

Taken together these data indicate the keeping both lungs collapsed during CPB significantly induces lung damage, oxidative stress and inflammation. LFV during CPB increases these deleterious effects, potentially through prolonged surgery time, further decreasing blood flow to the lungs and enhancing hypoxia/ischemia.