The association between novel clinical factors and gastrointestinal bleeding among patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy

Antithrombotic Strategies With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Long-term outcomes of patients with advanced heart failure treated with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been augmented due to improved durability and hemocompatibility on the backbone of pump engineering enhancements. The incidence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events (pump thrombosis, stroke and nonsurgical bleeding events) are device specific and vary by type of engineered pump. A fully magnetically levitated rotor containing LVAD in concert with use of antithrombotic therapy has successfully overcome an increased risk of pump thrombosis and stroke-risk, albeit with only modest reduction in bleeding events. Modifications to antithrombotic strategies have focused on reduced-dose vitamin K antagonist use or use of direct oral anticoagulants with demonstration of safety and progress in reduction of mucosal bleeding episodes with elimination of antiplatelet agents. This review outlines the current landscape of advances in anticoagulation management in LVAD patients, highlighting the need for ongoing research and cautious application of emerging therapies and technologies.

The Long-Term Survival of LVAD Patients-A TriNetX Database Analysis

Background: Donor shortage limits the utilization of heart transplantation, making it available for only a fraction of the patients on the transplant waiting list. Therefore, continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have evolved as a standard of care for end-stage heart failure. It is imperative therefore to investigate long-term survival in this population. Methods: This study assesses the impact of demographics, infections, comorbidities, types of cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, and end-organ dysfunction on the long-term survival of LVAD recipients. The TriNetX database comprises de-identified patient information across healthcare organizations. The log-rank test assessed post-implant survival effects, while Cox regression was used in the univariate analysis to obtain the Hazard Ratio (HR). All analyses were conducted using the Python programming language and the lifelines library. Results: This study identified CMV, hepatitis A exposure, atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, renal dysfunction, diabetes, COPD, mitral valve disease, and essential hypertension as risk factors that impact long-term survival. Interestingly, hypokalemia seems to have a protective effect and gender does not affect survival significantly. Conclusions: This is the first report of a detailed long-term survival assessment of the LVAD population using a decoded database.

Gastrointestinal bleeding following Heartmate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation: The Michigan Bleeding Risk Model

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) results in frequent hospitalizations and impairs quality of life in durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. Anticipation of these events before implantation could have important implications for patient selection and management.

METHODS

The study population included all adult HeartMate 3 (HM3) primary LVAD recipients enrolled in the STS Intermacs registry from January 2017 to December 2020. Using multivariable modeling methodologies, we investigated the relationships between preimplantation characteristics and postimplant bleeding, bleeding and death, and additional bleeding episodes on subsequent bleeding episodes and created a risk score to predict the likelihood of post-LVAD GIB based solely on preimplantation factors.

RESULTS

Of 6,425 patients who received an HM3 LVAD, 1,010 (15.7%) patients experienced GIB. Thirteen preimplantation factors were independent predictors of post-LVAD GIB. A risk score was created from these factors and calculated for each patient. By 3 years postimplant, GIB occurred in 11%, 26%, and 43% of low-, medium- and high-risk patients, respectively. Experiencing 1 post-LVAD GIB event was associated with an increased risk for further GIB events, with 33.9% of patients experiencing at least 1 recurrence. While post-LVAD GIB was associated with mortality, there was no relationship between number of GIB events and death.

CONCLUSIONS

The Michigan Bleeding Risk Model is a simple tool, which facilitates the prediction of post-LVAD GIB in HM3 recipients using 13 preimplant variables. The implementation of this tool may help in the risk stratification process and may have therapeutic and clinical implications in HM3 LVAD recipients.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in recipients of left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review

The twenty-first century has revolutionized the management of congestive heart failure with the widespread use of left ventricular assist devices and other treatment modalities that improve morbidity and mortality after the failure of medical management. These novel devices come with significant side effects. One of the most common side effects of left ventricular assist devices is the increased frequency of lower gastrointestinal bleeding compared to heart failure patients without left ventricular assist devices. Multiple etiologies of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in such patients have been studied. The decreased amount of von Willebrand factor polymers is now recognized as one of the most common causes of increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices alongside increased arteriovenous malformations. Multiple treatment modalities have been identified to prevent and treat gastrointestinal bleeding in these patients. Since the use of left ventricular assist devices is becoming more prevalent in patients with advanced heart failure, we decided to conduct this systematic review. The article summarizes the incidence, pathophysiology, and management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic events in left ventricular assist device recipients

AIMS

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have reduced the mortality of patients with advanced heart failure both as bridge-to-transplant and as destination therapy. However, LVADs are associated with various complications, including bleedings, which affect the prognosis. The aim of the study was to explore the prevalence, management, and outcomes of haemorrhagic adverse events in LVAD recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective, single-centre, cohort study including all patients who received an LVAD from January 2008 to December 2019 in our tertiary centre (Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France). Bleeding events, death, and heart transplantation were collected from electronic medical files. Eighty-eight patients were included, and 43 (49%) presented at least one bleeding event. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was the most frequent (n = 21, 24%), followed by epistaxis (n = 12, 14%) and intracranial haemorrhage (n = 9, 10%). Bleeding events were associated with increased mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-9.3, P < 0.01], particularly in case of intracranial haemorrhage (HR 14.6, 95% CI 4.2-51.1, P < 0.0001). GI bleedings were associated with a trend towards increased mortality (HR 3.0, 95% CI 0.9-9.3, P = 0.05). Each bleeding episode multiplied the risk of death by 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.7, P < 0.01). Finally, only early bleedings (<9 months post-implantation) had an impact on mortality (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6-11.1, P < 0.01). Therapeutic management was mainly based on temporary interruption of anticoagulation and permanent interruption of antiplatelet therapy. Invasive management was rarely performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Haemorrhagic events in LVAD recipients are frequent and associated with increased mortality. GI bleedings are the most frequent, and intracranial haemorrhages the most associated with mortality. Management remains empirical requiring more research.

Retrospective Review of Secondary Prevention Strategies for Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Associated Clinical Outcomes in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is one of the most common bleeding complications associated with Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD). Currently, there is no strong evidence or clear guidance for which secondary GIB prophylaxis strategy should be implemented after the discontinuation of aspirin.

METHODS

Our single-center study describes the outcomes of 26 LVAD patients who experienced a total of 49 GIB events, these individuals were either in Group-1) lower INR target range or Group-2) lower INR target plus a hemostatic agent as the secondary prophylaxis strategy. Each GIB event was considered an independent event. Outcomes assessed were bleeding reoccurrence rates, time to next GIB, acute GIB strategies, GIB-free days, thromboembolic events, survival, coagulation, and hematologic parameters.

RESULTS

GIB reoccurrence rates were not statistically different, Group-1) 9 (40.9%) vs Group-2) 15 (55.6%), p = 0.308. Danazol was utilized 81.5% of the time as the designated hemostatic agent. Additionally, no significant differences were observed with all of our secondary outcome measures for bleeding, ischemic events, or survival.

CONCLUSION

While our study was not powered to assess the clinical outcomes related to survival and thromboembolic events, no discernable increased risk of ischemic events including pump thrombosis was observed. Our data suggest that a lower INR target range plus danazol does not confer any additional benefit over a lower INR target range only approach. The results of this report are hypothesis-generating and additional studies are warranted to elucidate the optimal antithrombotic strategy and role of hemostatic agents in reducing the risk of recurrent GIB events.

Initial endoscopic intervention is not associated with reduced risk of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in left ventricular assist device patients

Background

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for mechanical support of end-stage heart failure. Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) confers a significant morbidity in LVAD patients, with rates of up to 30% at 5 years. We assessed predictors of index and recurrent GIB (rGIB) in LVAD patients to risk stratify patients and evaluate if endoscopic approach and intervention at index GIB impacted rGIB.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all LVAD patients at our institution from 01/01/2006 to 31/10/2016 was completed. Predictors for index and recurrent GIB were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was created using only statistically significant dependent variables and adjusted for demographic variables.

Results

A total of 77/214 (36%) patients developed GIB, and 38/214 (17.8%) developed rGIB. Destination therapy (P=0.01), longer duration of LVAD (P=0.03), and low albumin (<3.5 g/dL) (P<0.001) were associated with increased risk of index GIB. Charlson Comorbidity Index, heart failure etiology, and Medicare were predictors of index GIB on univariate analysis, but this was not seen on multivariate analysis. Performing an endoscopy with/without intervention, non- angioectasia lesions, and location of bleeding were not statistically significant predictors of rGIB. Longer duration of hospitalization appeared to be protective for rGIB on univariate analysis.

Conclusions

Index endoscopy and intervention is not associated with reduced risk of rGIB in LVAD patients. Several independent factors are associated with the risk of index GIB. Albumin is a potentially modifiable risk factor, and likely contributes to bleeding through poor nutrition. It is a surrogate marker for systemic illness, and may have pharmacologic implications.

Trends and outcomes of device-related 30-day readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) improve morbidity and mortality in end-stage heart failure patients, but high rates of readmissions remain a problem after implantation. We aimed to assess the incidence, trends, outcomes, and predictors of device-related 30-day readmissions after LVAD implantation.

METHODS

The National Readmission Database was used to identify patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2012 and 2017 and those with 30-day readmissions.

RESULTS

The analysis included a total of 16499 adults who survived the index hospitalization for LVAD implantation. Among those, 28.1% were readmitted at 30 days, and the readmission rate has been grossly stable during the study period. Most of the readmissions occurred in the first 15 days after discharge from the index admission. The most frequent cause of readmissions was gastrointestinal bleeding (14.9% of readmissions), followed by heart failure, arrhythmias, device infection, and device thrombosis. Among reasons for readmission, intracranial bleeding was associated with highest mortality (37.6%), followed by device thrombosis (13.1%), and ischemic stroke (7.6%). Intracranial bleeding and device thrombosis were associated with lengthier stay (20.4 and 15.5 days, respectively). Readmission rates for gastrointestinal bleeding decreased, whereas device infection increased. Multivariate logistic regression model revealed the length of stay, oxygen dependence, gastrointestinal bleeding at index admission, depression and ECMO, private insurance as independent predictors of 30-day readmission.

CONCLUSION

Over one-fourth of LVAD recipients have 30-day readmissions, with most of them occurring within 15 days. Most frequent cause of readmission was gastrointestinal bleeding, which was associated with the lowest in-hospital mortality among other complications.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Mechanical Cardiac Support

BACKGROUND

Mechanical cardiac support (MCS) is a lifesaving therapy option in patients with heart failure and other medical disorders. However, there is an associated risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The goal of this study was to determine GIB incidence and associated risk factors.

METHODS

All patients at one institution from 2009 to 2018 under durable and nondurable support were retrospectively reviewed for GIB during their MCS period. Clinical records were evaluated for patient demographics, GIB characteristics, and interventions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare patient groups.

RESULTS

A total of 427 patients were reviewed, with 111 (25.9%) patients representing 218 episodes of GIB during our study period. The incidence rate from support initiation to GIB was 44.9% by 6 months and 60.6% in 12 months, occurring at a mean of 216.7 days. Higher rates of bleeding were found in patients with hypertension (82% vs 71.5%; P = .03) and diabetes mellitus (62.2% vs 38.3%; P < .0001), as well as pulmonary (48.7% vs 35.4%; P = .014), hepatic (21.6% vs 10.4%; P = .003), and renal disease (48.7% vs 37.3%; P = .037). Endoscopy revealed an upper GI source in 56% (n = 123) of bleeds. The most common etiology of bleeding included angiodysplasia/vascular malformation (35.7%). Therapeutic intervention was performed in 109 (50%) cases, with only 1 surgical intervention.

DISCUSSION

Overall, GIB can be a significant adverse event in patients under mechanical cardiac support, so proper management of anticoagulation and early endoscopy evaluation remains of great importance.

Outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a tertiary care experience

Background and study aims  Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement is a therapeutic modality for patients with end-stage heart failure. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common complication following LVAD implantation. The aim of this study was to report our experience in management and outcomes of gastrointestinal bleeding in a large cohort of patients with LVADs. Patients and methods  We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at the University of Rochester Medical Center from January 2008 to June 2017. Data were collected on patient characteristics, clinical aspects of gastrointestinal bleeding events, and procedural interventions. A Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to identify potential risk factors for a gastrointestinal bleeding event. Results  During the study period, 345 patients underwent LVAD implantation. Of these, 125 patients (36.2 %) experienced 297 gastrointestinal bleeding events resulting in 533 endoscopic procedures. The diagnostic yield of endoscopy in determining a bleeding source was 49.5 %. If required, therapeutic interventions were successful in achieving homeostasis in 96.2 % of procedures. Our 30-day overall post-procedure adverse event (AE) rate was 6.6 %. Procedure-related (bleeding, infection, and perforation) AEs were very minimal (2.8 %). A Cox proportional hazard model indicated that older age at implant, female sex, African-American race, diabetes mellitus, and pulmonary hypertension were statistically significant predictors of a gastrointestinal bleeding event following LVAD implantation. Conclusions  LVAD patients have a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy was able to safely locate a bleeding lesion in approximately half of our patients and was successful in treating bleeding lesions in a majority of the cases.