Long-term outcomes of elderly patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular support

Elderly Patients With Higher Acuity Have Similar Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes as Younger Patients at a Nontransplant Center

Although left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with acceptable survival, previous reports have demonstrated that advanced age is associated with increased short-term mortality. Because age is a relative contraindication to transplantation, nontransplant centers tend to implant a disproportionate number of elderly patients. We undertook this study to evaluate the impact of advanced age on LVAD outcomes at a nontransplant center. We conducted a retrospective review of all LVAD implants at our center from 2017 to 2022. Primary stratification was by age >70 years. The primary outcome was survival as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The risk of 1-year mortality was further evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. From 2017 to 2022, 93 patients underwent LVAD implantation. The mean age was 65.03 ± 11.28 years, with a median age of 68 (60 to 73) years. Most patients were INTERMACS 1 or 2 (71 patients; 76.34%). When stratified by age, 41 patients (44.09%) were aged ≥70 years. Patients aged ≥70 years had similar 30-day (96.15% vs 100.00%, p = 0.213), 1-year (90.05% vs 84.00%, p = 0.444), and 2-year survival (82.03% vs 84.00%, p = 0.870). When only the INTERMACS 1 and 2 patients with higher acuity were included, there was still no difference in 30-day, 1-year, or 2-year survival. On multivariable analysis, age >70 years was not associated with an increased hazard of 1-year mortality (0.90 [0.22 to 3.67], p = 0.878). In conclusion, in carefully selected patients, age >70 years is not associated with increased short-term mortality. Age alone should not be a contraindication to LVAD therapy.

Time Spent Engaging in Health Care Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to examine a novel patient-centered metric of time spent engaging in left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-related clinical care outside the home.

BACKGROUND

Although LVAD implantation can improve survival and functional capacity in patients with advanced heart failure, this may occur at the expense of significant time spent engaging in LVAD-related health care activities.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively assessed consecutive patients at a single center who received a continuous-flow LVAD between May 9, 2008, and December 31, 2019, and queried health care encounters after implantation, including all inpatient encounters and LVAD-related ambulatory encounters. Patient-level time metrics were determined, including the total number of days with any health care encounter, and the total estimated time spent receiving care. The primary outcome was the proportion (%) of days alive with an LVAD spent engaged in at least 1 health care encounter. The secondary outcome was the proportion (%) of total time alive with an LVAD spent receiving care.

RESULTS

Among 373 patients, the median number of days alive with LVAD was 390 (IQR: 158-840 days). Patients had a median number of 88 (IQR: 45-161) days with ≥1 health care encounter, accounting for 23.2% (IQR: 16.3%-32.4%) of their days alive with an LVAD. A median 6.0% (IQR: 2.1%-14.1%) and 15.0% (IQR: 10.7%-20.0%) of total days alive were spent in inpatient and ambulatory encounters, respectively. Patients spent a median of 592 (IQR: 197-1,257) hours receiving care, accounting for 5.6% (IQR: 2.2%-12.7%) of their total time alive with an LVAD.

CONCLUSIONS

LVAD patients spent more than 1 of every 5 days engaging in health care. Our findings may inform strategies to improve efficiency of postdischarge care delivery and expectations for post-treatment care.

Mechanical circulatory support devices in geriatric patients: more than just age

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, such as left ventricular assist device and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the elderly have been rapidly increasing in various clinical settings over the past two decades. This review briefly summarizes recent literature on the role and outcomes of such mechanical circulatory support devices use in the elderly.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elderly patients are receiving increasing number of LVADs with improved survival and quality-of-life outcomes, despite multiple comorbidities. ECMO is a viable option in elderly patients but they have a higher risk of mortality after both VA ECMO and VV ECMO support. However, comorbidities, clinical presentation and timing of ECMO initiation seems to have a greater impact on prognosis than for younger patients.

SUMMARY

MCS device use continue to rise in the elderly population. Meticulously selected elderly patients could be successfully supported with MCS devices with favorable outcomes and acceptable mortality and complication rate.

Effect of preoperative erector spinae muscles mass on postoperative outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Frailty influences the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Recently, erector spinae muscle (ESM) mass has been proposed as a parameter to assess frailty accurately. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative ESM mass is associated with short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with LVAD.

METHODS

A total of 119 consecutive patients with LVAD were enrolled between January 2010 and October 2017 at a single heart center. The ESM area, ESM index, and Hounsfield units (HU) of the ESM were calculated by computed tomography for preoperative ESM mass evaluation. We then statistically evaluated the in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), duration of hospital stay, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, ESM mass indicated no effect on all clinical outcomes. In addition, the ESM area presented a weak but significant negative linear correlation only with the duration of hospital stay (r = -0.21, p < .05). In contrast, the Model For End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and preoperative venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) were significant predictive factors for in-hospital mortality (MELD score: p < .001, hazard ratio [HR] 1.1; preoperative va-ECMO: p < .01, HR 2.72) and MACE (MELD score: p < .001, HR 1.07; preoperative va-ECMO: p < .005, HR 2.62).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative ESM mass might predict the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. In contrast, it had no effect on MACE, in-hospital mortality, or long-term survival in this study.