Impact of distance from implant center on mechanical circulatory device patient outcomes

Intersection of social determinants of health with ventricular assist device therapy: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDOH) may influence the clinical management of patients with heart failure. Further research is warranted on the relationship between SDOH and Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) therapy for heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize the state of knowledge on the intersection of SDOH with VAD therapy.

METHODS

Guided by Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, this literature search captured three concepts of interest including VAD therapy, SDOH, and their domains of intersection with patient selection, decision-making, treatment outcome, and resource allocation. CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched in March 2023. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed publications in English, published between 2006 and 2023, conducted in the United States, and examined VAD therapy in the context of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years).

RESULTS

22 quantitative studies meeting the inclusion criteria informed the conceptualization of SDOH using the Healthy People 2030 framework. Four themes captured how the identified SDOH intersected with different processes relating to VAD therapy: patient decision-making, healthcare access and resource allocation, patient selection, and treatment outcomes. Most studies addressed the intersection of SDOH with healthcare access and treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights substantial gaps in understanding how SDOH intersect with patient and patient selection for VAD. More research using mixed methods designs is warranted. On an institutional level, addressing bias and discrimination may have mitigated health disparities with treatment outcomes, but further research is needed for implementing system-wide change. Standardized assessment of SDOH is recommended throughout clinical practice from patient selection to outpatient VAD care.

Travel distance and outcomes after surgical aortic valve among veterans

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between travel distance and postoperative length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition among veterans undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing SAVR, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at VA Boston Healthcare (January 1, 2005-December 31, 2015).

STUDY DESIGN

Postoperative LOS and discharge disposition were compared for SAVR patients based on travel distance to the facility: <100 miles or ≥100 miles. Multivariable regression was performed to ascertain factors associated with LOS and home discharge.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Data were collected via chart review. All patients undergoing SAVR at our institution who primarily resided within the defined region were included.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Of 597 patients studied, 327 patients underwent isolated SAVR; 270 patients underwent SAVR/CABG. Overall median (IQR) distance between the patient's residence and the hospital was 49.95 miles (27.41-129.94 miles); 190 patients (32%) resided further than 100 miles away. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebrovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, or prior myocardial infarction between groups. Overall LOS (IQR) was 9 (7-13) days and did not differ between groups (p = 0.18). The proportion of patients discharged home was higher among patients who resided more than 100 miles from the hospital (71% vs. 58%, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, residing further than 100 miles from the hospital was independently associated with home discharge (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.09-2.48). Travel distance was not associated with LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our institutional experience, potential concerns of longer hospital stay or discharge to other inpatient facilities for geographically distanced patients undergoing SAVR do not appear supported. Continued examination of the drivers underlying the marked shift of veterans to the private sector appears warranted.

Impact of socioeconomic disparities on major lower extremity revascularization complications

INTRODUCTION

Low socioeconomic status (SES), distance lived from hospital, and insurance status are well documented in the literature to increase the risk of post-operative morbidity and mortality for some disease processes however there is a paucity of data regarding how this association impacts patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study aimed to evaluate if SES, distance lived from hospital, and insurance status increased the risk of developing major graft failure in patients undergoing revascularization procedures for symptomatic PAD in a prospective, observation study.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study, all patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization (endovascular or open) were included from December 2020 to February 2022. Demographic factors, insurance status, operative details, and median income and distance from hospital were documented through chart review. Complications were defined as thrombosis/occlusion of the revascularized vessel or bypass graft or infection of the distal wound or surgical incision wound. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed comparing patients that developed complications and those that did not. This project was undertaken at the Massachusetts General Hospital and was governed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB: 2020P000263) all patients agreed to participation via informed written consent prior to enrollment in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were enrolled in the study of which 94 underwent successful revascularization procedures. Of those 94 patients, 38 (40.4%) underwent open bypass, 39 (41.5%) underwent endovascular revascularization, and 17 (18.1%) underwent a hybrid approach. There were no significant differences in post-operative outcomes between operative approaches. Twenty-five patients (28.7%) experienced major revascularization complications as defined as re-occlusion of the treated vessel/thrombosis of the bypass graft (n = 13) or development of post-operative infection (n = 12). There was no significant difference in median income ($75,295 vs $87,757, p = NS), distance lived from hospital, (27.4 miles vs. 29.7 miles, p = NS), or type of insurance (private 24% vs 26%, government 76% vs 73%, p = NS between patients that experienced complications versus those that did not have complications. These findings suggest the risk of major graft failure is independent of a patient's socioeconomic status, distance lived from hospital, or insurance type in patients undergoing revascularization procedures for PAD.

CONCLUSION

While socioeconomic factors impact access to and have a known association with negative outcomes, complications in patients with PAD appear to be independent of these factors. To mitigate the negative outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease, a focus should be on patient risk factors and modifiable medical factors that contribute to adverse outcomes.