Global longitudinal strain to determine optimal timing for surgery in primary mitral regurgitation: A systematic review

Primary mitral regurgitation: Toward a better quantification on left ventricular consequences

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and ejection fraction (LVEF) are the parameters to look for when discussing repair in asymptomatic patients with a primary mitral regurgitation (PMR). Loading conditions are altering LV-function quantification. LV-myocardial work (LVMW) is a method based on pressure-strain loops.

HYPOTHESIS

We sought to evaluate the additive value of the LVMW for predicting clinical events in patients with PMR.

METHODS

103 patients (66% men, median age 57 years) with asymptomatic severe PMR were explored at rest and during an exercise stress echocardiography. LV myocardial global work index (GWI), constructive work (GCW), wasted work (GWW), and work efficiency (GWE) were measured with speckle-tracking echocardiography at rest and low workload. The indication for surgery was based on the heart teams' decision. The median follow-up was 670 days.

RESULTS

Clinical events occurred for 50 patients (48.5%) with a median of event-free survival distribution of 289 days. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) at rest was 32.61 ± 8.56 mmHg and did not predict the risk of event like LVEF and LVESD. Changes in, GLS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval (Cl): 0.36-0.83; p = .005), GWI (HR 1.01; 95% Cl: 1.00-1.02; p = .002) and GCW (HR 1.85; 95% Cl: 1.28-2.68; p = .001) in addition to Left Atrial Volume Index (HR 1.73; 95% CI: 1.28 - 2.33; p < 0,001) were independent predictors of events.

CONCLUSION

Changes in myocardial work indices related to low-dose exercise are relevant to best predict PMR patient prognosis It might help to better select patient's candidate for "early-surgery."

Sex Differences in Epidemiology, Morphology, Mechanisms, and Treatment of Mitral Valve Regurgitation

Sex-related disparities have been recognized in incidence, pathological findings, pathophysiological mechanisms, and diagnostic pathways of non-rheumatic mitral regurgitation. Furthermore, access to treatments and outcomes for surgical and interventional therapies among women and men appears to be different. Despite this, current European and US guidelines have identified common diagnostic and therapeutic pathways that do not consider patient sex in decision-making. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on sex-related differences in non-rheumatic mitral regurgitation, particularly regarding incidence, imaging modalities, surgical-derived evidence, and outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, with the goal of informing clinicians about sex-specific challenges to consider when making treatment decisions for patients with mitral regurgitation.