A new hemodynamic index to predict late right failure in patients implanted with last generation centrifugal pump

Right Heart Reserve Function Assessed With Fluid Loading Predicts Late Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an effective therapeutic option for advanced heart failure. Late right heart failure (LRHF) is a complication after LVAD implantation that is associated with increasing morbidity and mortality; however, the assessment of right heart function, including right heart reserve function after LVAD implantation, has not been established. We focused on a fluid-loading test with right heart catheterization to evaluate right heart preload reserve function and investigate its impact on LRHF.

METHODS

Patients aged > 18 years who received a continuous-flow LVAD between November 2007 and December 2022 at our institution, and underwent right heart catheterization with saline loading (10 mL/kg for 15 minutes) 1 month after LVAD implantation, were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 cases of LRHF or death (right heart failure [RHF] group) occurred in 149 patients. In the RHF vs the non-RHF groups, the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) at rest (1.8 ± 0.89 vs 2.5 ± 1.4, P = 0.02) and the right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWi) change ratio with saline loading (0.96 ± 0.32 vs 1.1 ± 0.20, P = 0.03) were significantly different. The PAPi at rest and the RVSWi change ratio with saline loading were identified as postoperative risks for LRHF and death. The cohort was divided into 3 groups based on whether the PAPi at rest and the RVSWi change ratio were low. The event-free curve differed significantly among the 3 groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodynamic assessment with saline loading can evaluate the right ventricular preload reserve function of patients with an LVAD. A low RVSWi change with saline loading was a risk factor for LRHF following LVAD implantation.

Right heart failure with left ventricular assist devices: Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative management strategies. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

Right heart failure (RHF) following implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a common and potentially serious condition with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations with an unfavourable effect on patient outcomes. Clinical scores that predict the occurrence of right ventricular (RV) failure have included multiple clinical, biochemical, imaging and haemodynamic parameters. However, unless the right ventricle is overtly dysfunctional with end-organ involvement, prediction of RHF post-LVAD implantation is, in most cases, difficult and inaccurate. For these reasons optimization of RV function in every patient is a reasonable practice aiming at preparing the right ventricle for a new and challenging haemodynamic environment after LVAD implantation. To this end, the institution of diuretics, inotropes and even temporary mechanical circulatory support may improve RV function, thereby preparing it for a better adaptation post-LVAD implantation. Furthermore, meticulous management of patients during the perioperative and immediate postoperative period should facilitate identification of RV failure refractory to medication. When RHF occurs late during chronic LVAD support, this is associated with worse long-term outcomes. Careful monitoring of RV function and characterization of the origination deficit should therefore continue throughout the patient's entire follow-up. Despite the useful information provided by the echocardiogram with respect to RV function, right heart catheterization frequently offers additional support for the assessment and optimization of RV function in LVAD-supported patients. In any patient candidate for LVAD therapy, evaluation and treatment of RV function and failure should be assessed in a multidimensional and multidisciplinary manner.

Association of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors With Clinical Outcomes, Hemodynamics, and Myocardial Remodeling Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure on Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the potential benefits of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) in patients with left ventricular assist device support.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 165 consecutive patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implant and alive at 6-month on support were studied. RAASi status after 6-month visit along with clinical reasons for nonprescription/uptitration were retrospectively assessed. The primary outcome was a composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death between 6 and 24 months after left ventricular assist device implant. Remodeling and hemodynamic outcomes were explored by studying the association of RAASi new prescription/uptitration versus unmodified therapy at 6-month visit with the change in echocardiographic parameters and hemodynamics between 6 and 18 months. After the 6-month visit, 76% of patients were on RAASi. Patients' characteristics among those receiving and not receiving RAASi were mostly similar. Of 85 (52%) patients without RAASi new prescription/uptitration at 6-month visit, 62% had no apparent clinical reason. RAASi were independently associated with the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.16-0.69]). The baseline rates of optimal echocardiographic profile (neutral interventricular septum, mitral regurgitation less than mild, and aortic valve opening) and hemodynamic profile (cardiac index ≥2.2 L/min per m2, wedge pressure <18 mm Hg, and right atrial pressure <12 mm Hg) were similar between groups. At 18 months, patients receiving RAASi new prescription/uptitration at 6 months had higher rates of optimal hemodynamic profile (57.5% versus 37.0%; P=0.032) and trends for higher rates of optimal echocardiographic profile (39.6% versus 22.9%; P=0.055) compared with patients with 6-month unmodified therapy. Optimal 18-month hemodynamic and echocardiographic profiles were associated with the primary outcome (log-rank=0.022 and log-rank=0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RAASi are associated with improved outcomes and improved hemodynamics among mechanically unloaded patients.

In-silico hemodynamic ramp testing of ventricular assist device implanted patients using acausal cardiovascular-VAD modeling

BACKGROUND

While cardiovascular system and mechanical circulatory support devices are efficiently model the effect of disease and assistance, they can also lend valuable insights into clinical procedures. This study demonstrates the use of a CVS-VAD model for an invasive procedure; hemodynamic ramp testing, in-silico.

METHODS

The CVS model is developed using validated models in literature, using Simscape™. An analytically derived pump model is calibrated for the HeartWare VAD. Dilated cardiomyopathy is used as an illustrative example of heart failure, and heart failure patients are created virtually by calibrating the model with requisite disease parameters obtained from published patient data. A clinically applied ramp study protocol is adopted whereby speed optimization is performed following clinically accepted hemodynamic normalization criteria. Trends in hemodynamic variables in response to pump speed increments are obtained. Optimal speed ranges are obtained for the three virtual patients based on target values of central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac output (CO), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) for hemodynamic stabilization.

RESULTS

Appreciable speed changes in the mild case (300 rpm), slight changes in the moderate case (100 rpm), and no changes in the simulated severe case are possible.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates a novel application of cardiovascular modeling using an open-source acausal model, which can be potentially beneficial for medical education and research.

Late Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Contemporary Insights and Future Perspectives

Late right heart failure (RHF) is increasingly recognized in patients with long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and is associated with decreased survival and increased incidence of adverse events such as gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke. Progression of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction to clinical syndrome of late RHF in patients supported with LVAD is dependent on the severity of pre-existing RV dysfunction, persistent or worsening left- or right-sided valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, inadequate or excessive left ventricular unloading, and/or progression of the underlying cardiac disease. RHF likely represents a continuum of risk with early presentation and progression to late RHF. However, de novo RHF develops in a subset of patients leading to increased diuretic requirement, arrhythmias, renal and hepatic dysfunction, and heart failure hospitalizations. The distinction between isolated late RHF and RHF due to left-sided contributions is lacking in registry studies and should be the focus of future registry data collection. Potential management strategies include optimization of RV preload and afterload, neurohormonal blockade, LVAD speed optimization, and treatment of concomitant valvular disease. In this review, the authors discuss definition, pathophysiology, prevention, and management of late RHF.

Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a persistent problem

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an option for bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Right heart failure (RHF) remains a complication after LVAD implantation that portends high morbidity and mortality, despite advances in LVAD technology. Definitions of RHF vary, but generally include the need for inotropic or pulmonary vasodilator support, or potential right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support. This review covers the complex pathophysiology of RHF related to underlying myocardial dysfunction, interventricular dependence, and RV afterload, as well as treatment strategies to curtail this challenging problem.

Late-onset right ventricular failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: case presentation and review of the literature

With the widespread use of implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), right ventricular failure (RVF) has become a serious problem that becomes apparent several weeks or later after LVAD implantation. However, there are no marked preoperative signs of RVF. This is called late-onset RVF and is currently a major problem leading to long-term complications following implantable LVAD use. Pathogenically, this could be the result of left ventricular suction by LVAD that causes the septum shift to the left ventricular side. This causes a change in morphology of the right ventricle, resulting in impaired right ventricular function. Aortic insufficiency and ventricular arrhythmia, which are also important as long-term complications after LVAD implantation, are considered to be closely involved in the onset and progression of RVF. Once late-onset RVF develops, exercise capacity declines and inotrope administration may be required. Late-onset RVF was also reported to be significantly associated with increased mortality. Several predictors of RVF have been proposed such as preoperative left ventricular diastolic dimension <64 mm, tricuspid valve annulus diameter ≥41 mm, and so on. However, some reports identified no predictors. The basic treatment strategy for late-onset RVF is to optimize volume status by administering diuretics and ensuring inotrope as needed. β-blockers and antiarrhythmic agents often need to be reduced in terms of dosage or even discontinued because these might reduce right ventricular function. Although their efficacy is unclear, pulmonary vasodilators may be used to reduce right ventricular afterload. It is better to decrease the rotation speed of LVAD to minimize the displacement of the septum; however, this is often difficult because the required flow rate cannot be secured. Progress in the prevention and management of late-onset RVF is required because the number of patients who require longer-term LVAD support will increase with the spread of LVAD use as destination therapy.