1
|
Wurcel AG, Suzuki J, Schranz AJ, Eaton EF, Cortes-Penfield N, Baddour LM. Strategies to Improve Patient-Centered Care for Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis: JACC Focus Seminar 2/4. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:1338-1347. [PMID: 38569764 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Drug use-associated infective endocarditis (DUA-IE) is a major cause of illness and death for people with substance use disorder (SUD). Investigations to date have largely focused on advancing the care of patients with DUA-IE and included drug use disorder treatment, decisions about surgery, and choice of antibiotics during the period of hospitalization. Transitions from hospital to outpatient care are relatively unstudied and frequently a key factor of uncontrolled infection, continued substance use, and death. In this paper, we review the evidence supporting cross-disciplinary care for people with DUA-IE and highlight domains that need further clinician, institutional, and research investment in clinicians and institutions. We highlight best practices for treating people with DUA-IE, with a focus on addressing health disparities, meeting health-related social needs, and policy changes that can support care for people with DUA-IE in the hospital and when transitioning to the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alysse G Wurcel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Joji Suzuki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Asher J Schranz
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ellen F Eaton
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Larry M Baddour
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hogan KJ, Sylvester CB, Wall MJ, Rosengart TK, Coselli JS, Moon MR, Chatterjee S, Ghanta RK. Outcomes after bioprosthetic versus mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in the United States. JTCVS OPEN 2024; 17:74-83. [PMID: 38420540 PMCID: PMC10897669 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Objective In patients who underwent mitral valve replacement for infectious endocarditis, we evaluated the association of prosthesis choice with readmission rates and causes (the primary outcomes), as well as with in-hospital mortality, cost, and length of stay (the secondary outcomes). Methods Patients with infectious endocarditis who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement from January 2016 to December 2018 were identified in the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database and stratified by valve type. Propensity score matching was used to compare adjusted outcomes. Results A weighted total of 4206 patients with infectious endocarditis underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (n = 3132) and mechanical mitral valve replacement (n = 1074) during the study period. Patients in the bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement group were older than those in the mechanical mitral valve replacement group (median 57 vs 46 y, P < .001). After propensity matching, the bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement group (n = 1068) had similar in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs compared with the mechanical mitral valve replacement group (n = 1056). Overall, 90-day readmission rates were high (28.9%) and comparable for bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (30.5%) and mechanical mitral valve replacement (27.5%, P = .4). Likewise, there was no difference in readmissions over a calendar year by prosthesis type. Readmissions for infection and bleeding were common for both bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and mechanical mitral valve replacement groups. Conclusions Outcomes and readmission rates were similar for mechanical mitral valve replacement and bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in infectious endocarditis, suggesting that valve choice should not be determined by endocarditis status. Additionally, strategies to mitigate readmission for infection and bleeding are needed for both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie J. Hogan
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Tex
| | - Christopher B. Sylvester
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Matthew J. Wall
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Todd K. Rosengart
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| | - Joseph S. Coselli
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| | - Marc R. Moon
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| | - Subhasis Chatterjee
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| | - Ravi K. Ghanta
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Commentary: Aortic allograft for endocarditis: Prevention of recurrent infection or reconstructive solution? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:1318-1320. [PMID: 34059342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
4
|
Agrawal A, Arockiam AD, Jamil Y, El Dahdah J, Honnekeri B, Chedid El Helou M, Kassab J, Wang TKM. Contemporary risk models for infective endocarditis surgery: a narrative review. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2023; 17:17539447231193291. [PMID: 37646184 PMCID: PMC10469256 DOI: 10.1177/17539447231193291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Infective endocarditis is a complex heterogeneous condition involving the infection of the endocardium and heart valves, leading to severe complications, including death. Surgery is often indicated in patients with infective endocarditis but is associated with elevated risk compared with other forms of cardiac surgery. Risk models play an important role in many cardiac surgeries as they can help inform clinicians and patients regarding procedural risk, decision-making to proceed or not, and influence perioperative management; however, they remain under-utilized in the infective endocarditis settings. Another crucial role of such risk models is to assess predicted versus found mortality, thereby allowing an assessment of institutional performance in infective endocarditis surgery. Traditionally, general cardiac surgery risk models such as European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), EuroSCORE II, and Society of Thoracic Surgeon's score have been applied to endocarditis surgery. However, there has been the development of many endocarditis surgery-specific scores over the last decade. This review aims to discuss clinical characteristics and applications of all contemporary risk scores in the setting of surgical treatment of infective endocarditis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Agrawal
- Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aro Daniela Arockiam
- Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yasser Jamil
- Yale-Waterbury, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Waterbury, CT, USA
| | - Joseph El Dahdah
- Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bianca Honnekeri
- Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michel Chedid El Helou
- Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph Kassab
- Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tom Kai Ming Wang
- Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Main Campus, J1-5, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ogami T, Kliner DE, Toma C, Serna-Gallegos D, Wang Y, Brown JA, Yousef S, Sultan I. Readmission with infective endocarditis within 90 days following transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 101:170-177. [PMID: 36478377 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continues to be the most common modality of treating aortic stenosis in the United States. While infective endocarditis (IE) and its outcomes have been well documented after surgical aortic valve replacement, the incidence and outcomes of early IE after TAVI have not been well described. METHODS All patients who underwent TAVI from 2012 through 2018 were identified using the National Readmission Database. Among them, patients who underwent TAVI at the index admission and readmitted within 90 days were included. Patients who died or had IE during the index admission were excluded. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients readmitted with IE (IE group) and those without (non-IE group). RESULTS A total of 168,283 patients were readmitted to a hospital within 90 days after TAVI. The median age of the IE group and non-IE group were 81 and 82 years old, respectively (p = 0.21). Of those, 525 (0.3%) were readmitted with IE. The median time from TAVI to readmission was 20 days. During readmissions, 11.6% of the IE group died while only 3.15% of the non-IE group experienced death (p < 0.001). The most common causative organism of IE was enterococcus (22.1%). Multivariable analysis revealed that congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, dialysis, concomitant valve disease, Medicaid, and discharge to a facility were independently associated with readmission with IE within 90 days. CONCLUSION The incidence of readmission with IE is low after TAVI. However, the mortality was markedly high during readmissions. Surgical intervention was rarely performed for IE during the first admission. Enterococcus was the most common organism observed in IE after TAVI. DISCLOSURE IS receives institutional research support from Abbott, Atricure, cryolife, and Medtronic. None related to this manuscript. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Ogami
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dustin E Kliner
- Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Catalin Toma
- Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Derek Serna-Gallegos
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yisi Wang
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James A Brown
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah Yousef
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diagnosis and Management of Infective Endocarditis in People Who Inject Drugs: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79:2037-2057. [PMID: 35589166 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis has been increasing rapidly over the last decade. Patients with drug use-associated infective endocarditis present an increasingly common clinical challenge with poor long-term outcomes and high reinfection and readmission rates. Their care raises issues unique to this population, including antibiotic selection and administration, indications for and ethical issues surrounding surgical intervention, and importantly management of the underlying substance use disorder to minimize the risk of reinfection. Successful treatment of these patients requires a broad understanding of these concerns. A multidisciplinary, collaborative approach providing a holistic approach to treating both the acute infection along with effectively addressing substance use disorder is needed to improve short-term and longer-term outcomes.
Collapse
|