Outcomes of redo-isolated tricuspid valve surgery after left-sided valve surgery

Minimally invasive redo tricuspid valve replacement in patient with persistent left superior vena cava

INTRODUCTION

The management of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is still challenging in certain circumstances, especially for patients with anatomical variations. This challenge is even harder for reoperations, which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality risk.

CASE REPORT

We describe a minimally invasive, beating-heart redo tricuspid valve replacement in a 71-years old woman with persistent left superior vena cava.

DISCUSSION

Preoperative planning via CT-scan, teamwork and custom-made management of CPB are crucial for reoperations with anatomical variations. The perfusionist has a pivotal role in constructing and managing the CPB.

CONCLUSION

We describe a strategy achieving the benefits of minimally invasive endoscopic and beating-heart surgery (avoidance of resternotomy risk and associated morbidity, right ventricular protection) in reoperative tricuspid surgery with persistent upper left vena cava.

Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement after Left-Sided Valves Surgery

PURPOSE

This study aimed to show the outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve replacement (ITVR) after left-sided valve surgery (LSVS).

METHODS

Patients who underwent ITVR after LSVS were divided into bioprosthetic tricuspid valve (BTV) and mechanical tricuspid valve (MTV) groups. Clinical data were collected and analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

101 patients were divided into BTV (n = 46) and MTV (n = 55) groups. The mean ages of the BTV and MTV groups were 63.4 ± 8.9 and 52.4 ± 7.6 years, respectively (P <0.01). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (BTV 10.9% vs. MTV 5.5%), early postoperative complications, and long-term tricuspid valve (TV)-related adverse events between these two groups. New-onset renal insufficiency was an independent risk factor for early mortality. Survival rates in the BTV group were 94.8% ± 3.6%, 86.5% ± 6.5%, and 54.2% ± 17.6% and in the MTV group were 96.0% ± 2.8%, 79.0% ± 7.4%, and 59.4% ± 14.8% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively (P = 0.826).

CONCLUSION

The TV prosthesis selection in ITVR after LSVS seems to not affect 30-day mortality and early postoperative complications. Long-term survival and the occurrence of TV-related events were also comparable between these two groups.

A multidisciplinary approach to re-intervention in an Ebstein patient: a case report

Background

Ebstein's anomaly is a rare condition due to incomplete delamination of the tricuspid valve (TV) leaflets with downward displacement of the proximal leaflet attachments. It is associated with a smaller functional right ventricle (RV) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) that is typically treated with TV replacement or repair. However, future re-intervention poses challenges. We describe a multidisciplinary team approach to re-intervention in a pacing-dependant Ebstein patient with severe bioprosthetic TV regurgitation.

Case summary

A 49-year-old female patient underwent bioprosthetic TV replacement for severe TR in Ebstein's. Post-operatively, she developed complete atrioventricular (AV) block necessitating the implantation of a permanent pacemaker which included a coronary sinus (CS) lead as the ventricular lead. Five years later, she presented with syncope due to a failing ventricular pacing lead, and a new RV lead was positioned across the TV bioprosthesis due to the lack of CS options. Two years later, she presented with breathlessness and lethargy with severe TR identified on transthoracic echocardiography. She successfully underwent a percutaneous leadless pacemaker implant, extraction of existing pacing system, and implantation of valve-in-valve TV.

Discussion

Patients with Ebstein's anomaly typically undergo TV repair or replacement. Following surgical intervention, owing to the anatomical location, patients can develop AV block requiring a pacemaker. Pacemaker implantation may involve a CS lead to avoid placing a lead across the new TV in efforts to avoid lead induced TR. Over time, these patients not uncommonly require re-intervention that can be challenging especially in pacing-dependant patients with leads across the TV.

Minimal Access Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Tricuspid valve diseases are a heterogeneous group of pathologies that typically have poor prognoses when treated medically and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality with traditional surgical techniques. Minimal access tricuspid valve surgery may mitigate some of the surgical risks associated with the standard sternotomy approach by limiting pain, reducing blood loss, lowering the risk of wound infections, and shortening hospital stays. In certain patient populations, this may allow for a prompt intervention that could limit the pathologic effects of these diseases. Herein, we review the literature on minimal access tricuspid valve surgery focusing on perioperative planning, technique, and outcomes of minimal access endoscopic and robotic surgery for isolated tricuspid valve disease.

Outcomes of minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve reoperation after left-side valve surgery: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Late severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after left-side valve surgery (LSVS) is not uncommon. However, the tricuspid valve has been deemed the forgotten valve because the isolated TR is well tolerated with medication, and reoperation has a higher rate of adverse events. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, isolated tricuspid valve reoperation (ITVR) via totally endoscopy or transcatheter approach brings the tricuspid valve into spotlight. Our aim is to report the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive ITVR using endoscopic and transcatheter approaches.

METHODS

From October 2020 to October 2021, 21 patients with LSVS history and secondary massive TR underwent minimally invasive ITVR in our institution. Baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes and follow-up results were analyzed, and data between the totally endoscopy approach and the transcatheter approach were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 21 cases, totally endoscopic isolated tricuspid valve surgery (EITVS) accounts for 16 (76.2%) cases, with 14 tricuspid valvuloplasty cases, and 2 tricuspid valve replacement cases; the remaining 5 (23.8%) cases underwent transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). The mean age was (60.0 ± 8.4) years, with 15 (71.4%) being female. Minimally invasive ITVR procedures were 100% successfully performed in all patients without any perioperative mortality, sternotomy conversion, or reoperation. During the median follow-up of 16.8 months (IQR, 13.0-20.6 months), New York Heart Association Class improved significantly from baseline (P = 0.004). TR severity was significantly improved during postoperative and follow-up period (both P < 0.001). Compared with the EITVS group, the TTVR group had a higher clinical risk score [8.00 (8.00, 9.00) vs. 5.00 (3.25, 5.00), P = 0.001], but a higher success rate in reducing TR to less than grade 1+ (100 vs. 43.8%, P = 0.045) at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In our series, minimally invasive ITVR, including EITVS and TTVR, is a safe and feasible option for severe TR after LSVS, and presents excellent early outcomes in selected patients. TTVR is a reliable alternative for patients with high surgical risk. To improve the results of ITVR, it is necessary to improve patient's preoperative status or perform reoperation before the onset of significant right heart failure. Further studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are awaited.