Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after previous sternotomy: A propensity-matched analysis

Late Survival After Redo Mitral Operation With Minithoracotomy Compared With Sternotomy

BACKGROUND

The long-term effectiveness of minithoracotomy over redo median sternotomy for reoperative mitral operation is not well described. Here we present long-term survival after reoperative mitral operation based on operative approach.

METHODS

Adults undergoing mitral valve operation with previous sternotomy by redo sternotomy and minithoracotomy were reviewed from our prospectively maintained institutional database from 1997 to 2022. Propensity score matching was performed to compare short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 750 consecutive patients, thoracotomy was performed in 503 (67%). Median follow-up was 5.0 years (interquartile range, 0-23 years). Intraoperatively, sternotomy patients were more likely to have central aortic cannulation (205 of 223 [93%] vs 265 of 481 [56%]), cardioplegic arrest (220 of 223 [99%] vs 124 of 481 [26%]), and mitral valve replacement (190 of 223 [85%] vs 358 of 481 [74%]). Thoracotomy patients were older (63 ± 13 vs 58 ± 14 years) with elective presentation (387 of 503 [77%] vs 128 of 247 [52%]). Sternotomy patients were more likely to have endocarditis (52 of 247 [21%] vs 45 of 503 [9%], P < .001). At 10 years, thoracotomy patients experienced improved survival (52% ± 3% vs 46% ± 4%, P = .004). After propensity matching, 10-year survival was significantly higher for thoracotomy patients compared with sternotomy patients (60% ± 5% vs 42% ± 5%, P = .0006). The greatest difference in survival was at the first 6 months after operation (96% ± 1% vs 81% ± 3%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing reoperative mitral valve operation, minimally invasive right anterior thoracotomy can significantly decrease risk of death in the first 6 months, with durable survival benefit out to 10 years. We present a large single-center series to suggest an important opportunity to durably improve outcomes after reoperative mitral operation through wider use of right minithoracotomy.

Outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for redo mitral valve surgery according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A minimally invasive approach through right mini-thoracotomy for redo mitral valve surgery may improve patients' outcomes compared to median sternotomy. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of both procedures according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC). This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Literature searching was performed in several databases including PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and Proquest up to 28 February 2022. Meta-analysis using proportions or means was applied. A total of 13 retrospective cohort articles were included in this study. The incidence of in-hospital mortality (3% vs 9.2%, OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.58; P ≤ 0.0001), reintervention for bleeding (3.8% vs 5.9%, OR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.32-0.97; P = 0.04), and acute renal failure (5% vs 12%, OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.23-0.65; P = 0.0003) was significantly lower in mini-thoracotomy (MINI) group compared to median sternotomy (STER) group. The incidence of neurologic events (3.4% vs 5.5%, OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.4-1.08; P = 0.1) and arrhythmia (19.5% vs 25.5%, OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.38-1.09; P = 0.1) were also lower in MINI group compared to STER group but was not significant statistically. No significant differences were found in myocardial infarct (1% vs 1%, OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.06-8.85; P = 0.79) between MINI and STER group. A minimally invasive surgery through right mini-thoracotomy is associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital mortality, reintervention for bleeding, and acute renal failure. It is a safe alternative to median sternotomy for redo mitral valve surgery.