Is TEVAR really needed for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection?

Risk Factors Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and risk factors for poor prognosis after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

Clinical records for patients with TBAD presenting to a medical center between March 1, 2012 and July 31, 2020 were reviewed. Clinical data including demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were obtained from electronic medical records. Comparative analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. A logistic regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors in patients with TBAD after TEVAR.

RESULTS

TEVAR was performed on all 170 patients with TBAD, and poor prognosis was identified in 28.2% (48/170) of cases. Patients with a poor prognosis were younger (38.5 [32.0, 53.8] years vs. 55.0 [48.0, 62.0] years, P < 0.001), had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (138.5 [127.8, 152.8] mm Hg vs. 132.0 [120.8, 145.3] mm Hg, P = 0.013) and more complicated aortic dissection patients (19 [60.4] vs. 71 [41.8], P = 0.029) than those without a poor prognosis. According to the results of binary logic regression analysis, the possibility of a poor prognosis after TEVAR decreased with each 10 years increase in age (odds ratio: 0.464, 95% confidence interval: 0.327-0.658, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an association between younger age and a poor prognosis after TEVAR in patients with TBAD, with the condition that those with poor prognoses have higher SBP and more complicated cases. In younger patients, postoperative follow-up should be more frequent, and complications should be managed in time.

Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta Combined with Drug Therapy in Acute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection

Objective

This study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) combined with Best Medical Therapy (BMT) in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

Methods

Using the random method, 90 patients admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and January 2020 with acute uncomplicated TBAD were randomly divided into a control group and a study group, with 45 cases in each of the groups. The effectiveness of BMT combined with TEVAR treatment was compared.

Results

The incidence of recent adverse reactions did not differ significantly between the two groups. Compared to the control group, the 1-year survival rate and 2-year survival rate of patients in the study group were considerably higher. In order to examine the relationship between survival and time, the Kaplan-Meier curve was used. Both groups reached the median survival time after 24 months of follow-up. The expected survival time of the study group was longer than that of the control group. False lumen thrombosis or absence of thrombus was significantly more prevalent in the study group than in the control group.

Conclusion

For patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD, BMT combined with TEVAR can significantly improve the long-term survival rate and increase the expected survival time.