Isolated tricuspid valve surgery-Repair versus replacement: A meta-analysis

Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Review of Current Interventional Management

Tricuspid regurgitation is a common yet clinically complex problem, traditionally managed with diuretic therapy with no observable mortality benefit. Older studies on surgical intervention observed poor outcomes; however, this clinical reasoning predates current surgical approaches and novel transcatheter technology. The tricuspid apparatus is a complex structure that poses a technical challenge for surgeons and interventional cardiologists. Recent advances in surgical techniques and transcatheter therapy, particularly edge-to-edge repair devices, have demonstrated promising results for safety, reduction in tricuspid regurgitation, and improving quality of life. We review the clinical, imaging, and hemodynamic findings that characterize patients who should be considered for intervention, alongside the rapidly evolving approaches to interventional management.

Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Tricuspid Regurgitation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has emerged as a widely accepted procedure for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as gauged by echocardiographic parameters and clinical outcomes. Our study aims to assess TR severity and other echocardiographic outcomes in patients undergoing TEER with TriClip, MitraClip, and PASCAL devices. A literature search of 5 databases was performed until 1st June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies with moderate to severe (grade III-V) TR patients undergoing isolated TEER were considered eligible. Echocardiographic, and quality of life determining outcomes such as improvement in TR severity grade ≥3, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥3, procedural success, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), and adverse outcomes were analyzed. Grade assessment was performed and studies were assessed for risk of bias and publication bias. We included 15 studies (14 observational and 1 RCT) in our paper. Analysis revealed a substantial reduction in TR volume (P < 0.00001), TR grading (P < 0.00001), tricuspid annular diameter (P < 0.00001), proximal isovelocity surface area radius (P < 0.00001), effective regurgitant orifice area (P < 0.00001), and improvement in NYHA class (P < 0.00001) at 30 days from baseline, postprocedurally. A significant increase in 6MWD at 1 year (P = 0.001) was also recorded. No significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.87), fractional area change (P = 0.37), or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P = 0.76) were observed. TEER procedural success was 97%. TEER produced a significant reduction in TR grade and volume, NYHA class, 6MWD, and showed prominent procedural success. Large scale RCTs comparing the TEER devices are needed to strengthen the present findings.

Comparison of outcomes between transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and surgical tricuspid valve replacement or repair in patients with tricuspid insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, but with limited treatment options. The objective of this study is to compare the demographic characteristics, complications, and outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) versus surgical tricuspid valve replacement (STVR) or surgical tricuspid valve repair (STVr), using real-world data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our study analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2018 and identified 92, 86, and 84 patients with tricuspid insufficiency who underwent STVr, STVR, and TTVr, respectively. The mean ages of patients who received STVr, STVR, and TTVr were 65.03 years, 66.3 years, and 71.09 years, respectively, with TTVr patients significantly older than those who received STVr (P < 0.05). Patients who received STVr or STVR had higher mortality rates (8.7% and 3.5%, respectively) compared to those who received TTVr (1.2%). Patients who underwent STVr or STVR were also more likely to experience perioperative complications, including third-degree atrioventricular block (8.7% STVr vs. 1.2% TTVr, P = 0.329; 38.4% STVR vs. 1.2% TTVr, P < 0.05), respiratory failure (5.4% STVr vs. 1.2% TTVr, P = 0.369; 15.1% STVR vs. 1.2% TTVr, P < 0.05), respiratory complications (6.5% STVr vs. 1.2% TTVr, P = 0.372; 19.8% STVR vs. 1.2% TTVr, P < 0.05), acute kidney injury (40.2% STVr vs. 27.4% TTVr, P = 0.367; 34.9% STVR vs. 27.4% TTVr, P = 0.617), and fluid and electrolyte disorders (44.6% STVr vs. 22.6% TTVr, P = 0.1332; 50% STVR vs. 22.6% TTVr, P < 0.05). In addition, the average cost of care and the average length of hospital stay were higher for patients who underwent STVr or STVR than for those who received TTVr (USD$37995 ± 356008.523 STVr vs. USD$198397 ± 188943.082 TTVr, P < 0.05; USD$470948 ± 614177.568 STVR vs. USD$198397 ± 188943.082 TTVr, P < 0.05; 15.4 ± 15.19 STVr vs. 9.6 ± 10.21 days TTVr, P = 0.267; 24.7 ± 28.81 STVR vs. 9.6 ± 10.21 days TTVr, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TTVr has shown to have favorable outcomes compared to STVr or STVR, but more research and clinical trials are required to help formulate evidence-based guidelines for the role of catheter-based management in tricuspid valve disease.

Management of Volume Overload in Severe Atrial-Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Improved Feasibility of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

Patients with tricuspid regurgitation are often referred late in their disease course and present with volume overload, which is a detrimental factor leading to right-sided chamber dilatation and dysfunction. Treatment of volume overload can 1) improve patient functional status; 2) avoid repeated invasive examinations; and 3) establish eligibility for transcatheter tricuspid intervention. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Minimal Access Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Tricuspid valve diseases are a heterogeneous group of pathologies that typically have poor prognoses when treated medically and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality with traditional surgical techniques. Minimal access tricuspid valve surgery may mitigate some of the surgical risks associated with the standard sternotomy approach by limiting pain, reducing blood loss, lowering the risk of wound infections, and shortening hospital stays. In certain patient populations, this may allow for a prompt intervention that could limit the pathologic effects of these diseases. Herein, we review the literature on minimal access tricuspid valve surgery focusing on perioperative planning, technique, and outcomes of minimal access endoscopic and robotic surgery for isolated tricuspid valve disease.

Shedding some light on tricuspid intervention

BACKGROUND

More than 1.6 million Americans have at least moderate to severe valvular tricuspid regurgitation, yet fewer than 8000 tricuspid valve operations are performed annually in the USA. The undertreatment for isolated tricuspid regurgitation might be related to the fact that in the past years no clear guidelines on 'how' and 'when' to treat tricuspid regurgitation were issued.

AIMS

Sarris-Michopoulos and colleagues carried out a meta-analysis with the aim to investigate the role of tricuspid valve repair versus tricuspid valve replacement in patients with isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Outcomes of patients with first-time surgery for isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation without previous left-sided valve surgery were reviewed. Ten studies were included with a total of 1407 patients.

RESULTS

Authors concluded that patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair showed less 30-days mortality than replacement along with a reduced need for post-operaitve permanent pacemaker implantation rate.

DISCUSSION

Decision on whether to treat or not tricuspid valve is demanding, particularly in the context of the newest percutaneous technologies. Before intervention, careful evaluation of both tricuspid valve and right ventricle must be performed. Nevertheless, intervention, should not be deferred when clinically indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings form this meta-analysis suggest that reparative surgery, perhaps in an early stage, may be beneficial in selected cohort of patients.