Median sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery: To block, or not? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effect of continuous bilateral parasternal block with lidocaine on patient-controlled analgesia opioid requirement and recovery after open heart surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled trial

Background

We hypothesised that a continuous 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine at 2×35 mg h-1 would decrease pain and the inflammatory response after sternotomy for open heart surgery, subsequently improving quality of recovery.

Methods

We randomly allocated 45 participants to a 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine or saline commencing after wound closure. The primary outcome was the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption at 72 h. Secondary outcomes included total morphine requirement, pain, peak expiratory flow, and serum interleukin-6 concentration. In addition, we used an eHealth platform for a 3-month follow-up of pain, analgesic use, and Quality of Recovery-15 scores.

Results

The 72-h PCA morphine requirement was significantly lower in the lidocaine than the saline group (10 mg [inter-quartile range: 5-19 mg] and 28.2 mg [inter-quartile range: 16-42.5 mg], respectively; P=0.014). The total morphine requirement (including morphine administered before the start of PCA) was significantly lower at 24, 48, and 72 h. Pain was well controlled with no difference in pain scores between treatment groups. The peak expiratory flow was lower in the lidocaine group at 72 h. Interleukin-6 concentrations showed no difference at 24, 48, or 72 h. Quality of Recovery-15 scores did not differ between treatment groups at any time during the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusions

After sternotomy for open heart surgery, a 72-h bilateral parasternal lidocaine infusion significantly decreased PCA and total morphine requirement. However, neither signs of decreased inflammatory response nor an improvement in recovery was seen.

Clinical trial registration

EudraCT number 2018-004672-35.

Perioperative Cannabinoids Significantly Reduce Postoperative Opioid Requirements in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Background Opioids, commonly used to control pain associated with surgery, are known to prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay. A wide range of adjunctive strategies are currently utilized to reduce postoperative pain, such as local and regional nerve blocks, nerve cryoablation, and adjunctive medications. We hypothesized that dronabinol (a synthetic cannabinoid) in conjunction with standard opioid pain management will reduce opioid requirements to manage postoperative pain. Methods Sixty-eight patients who underwent isolated first-time coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to either the control group, who received only standard opioid-based analgesia, or the dronabinol group, who received dronabinol (a synthetic cannabinoid) in addition to standard opioid-based analgesia. Dronabinol was given in the preoperative unit, before extubation in the ICU, and after extubation on the first postoperative day. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were compared under an IRB-approved protocol. The primary endpoints were the postoperative opioid requirement, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay, and the secondary endpoints were the duration of inotropic support needed, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the change in LVEF. This study was undertaken at Northwest Medical Center, Tucson, AZ, USA. Results Sixty-eight patients were randomized to either the control group (n = 37) or the dronabinol group (n = 31). Groups were similar in terms of demographic features and comorbidities. The total postoperative opioid requirement was significantly lower in the dronabinol group [39.62 vs 23.68 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), p = 0.0037], representing a 40% reduction. Duration of mechanical ventilation (7.03 vs 6.03h, p = 0.5004), ICU length of stay (71.43 vs 63.77h, p = 0.4227), and inotropic support requirement (0.6757 vs 0.6129 days, p = 0.7333) were similar in the control and the dronabinol groups. However, there was a trend towards lower durations in each endpoint in the dronabinol group. Interestingly, a significantly better preoperative to postoperative LVEF change was observed in the dronabinol group (3.51% vs 6.45%, p = 0.0451). Conclusions Our study found a 40% reduction in opioid use and a significantly greater improvement in LVEF in patients treated with adjunctive dronabinol. Mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay, and inotropic support requirement tended to be lower in the dronabinol group, though did not reach statistical significance. The results of this study, although limited by sample size, are very encouraging and validate our ongoing investigation.

Fascial plane blocks for cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review

In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the limitations and risks associated with the overreliance on opioids in various surgical procedures, including cardiothoracic surgery.This shift on pain management toward reducing reliance on opioids, together with need to improve patient outcomes, alleviate suffering, gain early mobilization after surgery, reduce hospital stay, and improve patient satisfaction and functional recovery, has led to the development and widespread implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.In this context, fascial plane blocks are emerging as part of a multimodal analgesic in cardiac surgery and as alternatives to conventional neuraxial blocks for thoracic surgery, and there is a growing body of evidence suggesting their effectiveness and safety in providing pain relief for these procedures. In this review, we discuss the most common fascial plane block techniques used in the field of cardiothoracic surgery, offering a comprehensive overview of regional anesthesia techniques and presenting the latest evidence on the use of chest wall plane blocks specifically in this surgical setting.

Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Traditional multimodal analgesic strategies have several contraindications in cardiac surgery patients, forcing clinicians to use alternative options. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks, anesthetizing the anterior cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, are being explored as a straightforward method to treat pain after sternotomy. We sought to evaluate the literature on the effects of superficial parasternal blocks on pain control after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases for RCTs evaluating superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy published from inception to 11 March 2022. The prespecified primary outcome was opioid consumption at 12 hr. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessments, development, and evaluations. Outcomes were analyzed with a random-effects model. All subgroups were prespecified.

RESULTS

We reviewed 1,275 citations. Eleven RCTs, comprising 756 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only one study reported the prespecified primary outcome, precluding the possibility of meta-analysis. This study reported a reduction in opioid consumption (-11.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.2 to -14.1) There was a reduction in opioid consumption at 24 hr (-7.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% CI,  -5.6 to -8.7; five trials; 436 participants; moderate certainty evidence). All five studies measuring complications reported that none were detected, which included a sample of 196 blocks.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests a potential benefit of using superficial parasternal blocks to improve acute postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy. Future studies specifying dosing regimens and adjuncts are required.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022306914); first submitted 22 March 2022.

Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians-A Narrative Review

Multi-modal analgesic strategies, including regional anesthesia techniques, have been shown to contribute to a reduction in the use of opioids and associated side effects in the perioperative setting. Consequently, those so-called multi-modal approaches are recommended and have become the state of the art in perioperative medicine. In the majority of intensive care units (ICUs), however, mono-modal opioid-based analgesic strategies are still the standard of care. The evidence guiding the application of regional anesthesia in the ICU is scarce because possible complications, especially associated with neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques, are often feared in critically ill patients. However, chest and abdominal wall analgesia in particular is often insufficiently treated by opioid-based analgesic regimes. This review summarizes the available evidence and gives recommendations for peripheral regional analgesia approaches as valuable complements in the repertoire of intensive care physicians' analgesic portfolios.

Evaluation of the Effect of New Multimodal Analgesia Regimen for Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Single-Center Clinical Study

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of multimodal regimen by paracetamol, gabapentin, ketamine, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine and sufentanil among cardiac surgery patients, and compare the analgesia efficacy with conventional sufentanil-based regimen.

Design

A single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Setting

One participating center, the cardiovascular center of the major integrated teaching hospital.

Participants

A total of 115 patients were assessed for eligibility: 108 patients were randomized, 7 cases were excluded.

Interventions

The control group (group T) received conventional anesthesia management. Interventions in the multimodal group (group M) were as follows in addition to the standard of care: gabapentin and acetaminophen 1 hour before surgery; ketamine for induction and to maintain anesthesia with lidocaine and dexmedetomide. Ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine were added to routine sedatives postoperatively in group M.

Measurements and Main Results

The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on coughing made no significant difference (68.5% vs 64.8%, P=0.683). Group M had significantly less sufentanil use (135.72µg vs 94.85µg, P=0.000) and lower rescue analgesia rate (31.5% vs 57.4%, P=0.007). There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic pain, PONV, dizziness, inflammation index, mechanical ventilation time, length of stay, and complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

Our multimodal regimen in cardiac surgery is feasible, but was not superior to traditional sufentanil-based regimen in the aspects of analgesia effects; however, it did reduce perioperative opioid consumption along with rescue analgesia rate. Moreover, it showed the same length of stay and the incidences of postoperative complications.

Retrospective Evaluation of Fascial Plane Blocks in Cardiac Surgery With Median Sternotomy in a Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cardiac surgery typically causes moderate to severe postoperative pain and discomfort. Inadequate pain management in the early postoperative period leads to pulmonary complications. The length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and the hospital is typically prolonged. As a component of multimodal analgesia regimens, fascial plane blocks have become more popular. In our clinic, serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB), pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I-II), and pectointercostal nerve fascial plane blocks (PIFB) are performed by ultrasonography. We wished to evaluate the postoperative visual pain scale, initial additional analgesic agent requirement time, extubation time, morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent open heart surgery with fascial plane blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients over 18 years who underwent open heart surgery with sternotomy between 01 September 2021 and 15 June 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Only patients with chest wall blocks placed at the end of surgery were included in the study. In Group 1, the PECS II block was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery in the operating room. In Group 2, SAPB was placed on the chest tube side and bilateral PIFBs were placed at the end of surgery. Data regarding patient demographics, anesthesia method applied, amount of opioid used intraoperatively, cardiopulmonary bypass time, anesthesia and surgery time, postoperative extubation time, mechanical ventilation time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of patients at rest and movement at 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 48th hours post-extubation, time to and type of first postoperative analgesic, postoperative complications, length of cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) stay and hospital length of stay were recorded from hospital records.

RESULTS

 The data of a total of 46 patients (Group 1: PECS II block + PIFB, n=20; Group 2: SAPB+ PIFB, n=26) were analyzed retrospectively. There was no difference in demographic variables between the groups. Intraoperative opioid usage, operation time, Cardiopulmonary bypass time, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, extubation time, ICU discharge time, and length of hospital stay were not statistically different between the groups. The first rescue analgesic requirement time was longer in group 2 than in group 1 but not statistically significant (18.76±15.36 h vs 12.62±10.61 h, p=0.162). The post-extubation VAS scores at rest and movement at the 6th hour were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (1.73±1.28 vs 3.15±2.10, respectively, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

In our study, the VAS scores at the 6th hour were lower in SAPB + PIFB group than in PECS II + PIFB group. As these blocks can be easy to apply, we thought these combinations could be an alternative for pain relief in cardiac surgery. Prospective randomized studies are needed with a large number of patients.