Mitral valve repair with artificial chords: Tips and tricks

Survival and Durability of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: Insights from Different Repair Techniques

This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MIMVR) in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation, focusing on survival, mitral valve repair failure, and re-operation rates. A cohort of patients undergoing three primary repair techniques-quadrangular resection, edge-to-edge repair, and artificial chordae implantation-was analyzed using time-to-event methods. The overall survival rates at 1, 10, and 20 years were high and comparable among the techniques, indicating effective long-term benefits of MIMVR. However, freedom from recurrence of moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) ≥ 2 was significantly higher in the quadrangular resection and edge-to-edge groups compared to the artificial chordae group. No significant differences were observed for recurrent MR ≥ 3. Re-operation rates were low and similar across all techniques, underscoring the durability of MIMVR. Pre-discharge residual MR ≥ 2 was identified as a strong predictor of long-term repair failure. These findings confirm the effectiveness of MIMVR, with all techniques demonstrating excellent long-term survival and durability.

Mitral valve repair with leaflet resection versus preservation for degenerative posterior leaflet prolapse

OBJECTIVES

The optimal technique for repairing posterior mitral valve leaflet prolapse remains undetermined. We aimed to compare leaflet resection and neochordae implantation in patients undergoing mitral valve repair for posterior leaflet prolapse, focusing on transmitral pressure gradient and recurrence of mitral regurgitation.

METHODS

We enrolled patients undergoing mitral valve repair using either leaflet resection or neochordae implantation for single-segment prolapse of posterior mitral valve leaflet between 2000 and 2021 at our institution. Longitudinal outcomes were evaluated after adjustments with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting. Repeat echocardiographic measurements (n = 3473, 5.4/patient) of transmitral pressure gradient and significant (moderate or severe) mitral regurgitation recurrence were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effect models. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the size and type of prosthesis.

RESULTS

Among 639 patients, leaflet resection was used in 479 (75.0%) and neochordae implantation was used in 160 (25.0%). In the inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting adjusted cohort, the risk of death (P = .623) and mitral valve reoperation (P = .340) did not significantly differ between the 2 groups during a median follow-up of 97.3 months. Echocardiographic data showed comparable mean (at 5 years, 3.8 vs 4.0 mm Hg; P = .442) and peak (9.6 vs 10.4 mm Hg; P = .131) pressure gradients between groups, which persisted in most subgroup analyses. However, neochordae implantation was associated with a higher probability of significant mitral regurgitation recurrence compared with leaflet resection (at 5 years, 16.1% vs 7.0%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Leaflet resection yielded similar clinical outcomes and transmitral pressure gradients compared with neochordae implantation after mitral valve repair, with a lower mitral regurgitation recurrence rate. These findings underscore the need to reassess the efficacy of neochordae implantation relative to leaflet resection.

Mitral Valve Repair-The Development and Rise of Options in the Veterinary World

Both open surgical repair and a hybrid-interventional option are now available for mitral valve repair (MVR) at select veterinary centers worldwide, making the need for awareness of options and the intricacies around case selection of increasing importance. This article will overview both options currently available and their current stages of progress.