1
|
Clothier JS, Kobsa S, Praeger J, Bojko M, Dhillon A, Vaidya A, Lee R. Impella 5.5 Bridge to Heart Transplant: An Institutional Series and a Closer Look at Device Removal Technique. ASAIO J 2024; 70:841-847. [PMID: 38502147 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000002193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Limited donor organ availability often necessitates mechanical circulatory support, and recently the Impella 5.5, as a bridge to heart transplant. Of 175 Impella 5.5-supported patients at our institution, 45 underwent transplantation in the largest series to date, for whom we analyzed outcomes. Two methods of complete device explant were evaluated: central Impella transection and removal via axillary graft. Median Impella days were 25 (16-41); median waitlist days were 21 (9-37). Eighty-nine percent (40/45) of patients had device placement via right axillary artery. Seventy-six percent (34/45) underwent central transection for device removal. Four patients (8.9%) required short-term venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA ECMO) postoperatively for primary graft dysfunction (PGD). Two patients (4.4%) suffered postoperative stroke. Five patients (11.1%) required new RRT postoperatively. One patient (2.2%) returned to the operating room (OR) for axillary graft bleeding. A higher chance of procedural complications was found with the axillary removal technique ( p = 0.014). Median intensive care unit (ICU) days, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative days to discharge were 46 (35-63), 59 (49-80), and 18 (15-24), respectively. Ninety-eight percent (44/45) survived to discharge. Thirty-day survival was 95.6% (43/45), with 1 year survival at 90.3% (28/31). Eighty-eight percent (37/42) remain without rejection. In our institutional experience, Impella 5.5 is a safe and reliable bridge to transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica S Clothier
- From the Division of Cardiac Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valdes CA, Bilgili A, Reddy A, Sharaf O, Jimenez-Contreras F, Stinson G, Ahmed M, Vilaro J, Parker AM, Al-Ani MA, Demos D, Aranda J, Bleiweis M, Beaver TM, Jeng EI. Impella 5.5: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2024; 19:380-389. [PMID: 39267391 DOI: 10.1177/15569845241266527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device used for patients in cardiogenic shock. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the device's clinical effectiveness, safety profile, patient outcomes, and relevant procedural considerations. METHODS We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. The search query included articles available from October 6, 2022, through January 13, 2023. Our initial search identified 75 studies. All records were screened by 2 independent reviewers using the Covidence software for adherence to our inclusion criteria, and 8 retrospective cohort studies were identified as appropriate for inclusion. RESULTS Across the included studies, the sample size ranged from 4 to 275, with predominantly male cohorts. Indications for Impella support varied, and the duration of support ranged from 9.8 to 70 days. Overall, Impella support appeared to be associated with favorable survival rates and manageable complications in various patient populations. Complications associated with Impella use included bleeding, stroke, and device malfunctions. Two studies compared prolonged and Food and Drug Administration-approved Impella support, showing similar outcomes and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Impella 5.5 continues to be an attractive option for bridging patients to definitive therapy. Survival during and after Impella 5.5 was favorable for patients regardless of initial indication. However, device use was associated with several important complications, which calls for judicious use and a precontemplated exit strategy. Limitations of this literature review include biases inherent to the retrospective studies included, such as selection and publication bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmet Bilgili
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Akshay Reddy
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Omar Sharaf
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Fabian Jimenez-Contreras
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Griffin Stinson
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mustafa Ahmed
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Juan Vilaro
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Alex M Parker
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mohammad Az Al-Ani
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel Demos
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Juan Aranda
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mark Bleiweis
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas M Beaver
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Eric I Jeng
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kwon JH, Bentley D, Cevasco M, Blumer V, Kanwar MK, Silvestry SC, Daneshmand MA, Abraham J, Shorbaji K, Kilic A. Patient Characteristics and Early Clinical Outcomes With Impella 5.5: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. ASAIO J 2024; 70:557-564. [PMID: 38386980 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000002169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Data regarding outcomes with Impella 5.5 are limited. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize patient and treatment characteristics and early clinical outcomes among patients supported by Impella 5.5. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from September 2019 to March 2023. Studies reporting outcomes in greater than or equal to 5 patients were included for review. Patient characteristics, treatment characteristics, and early clinical outcomes were extracted. Outcomes included adverse events, survival to hospital discharge, and 30 day survival. Random-effect models were used to estimate pooled effects for survival outcomes. Assessment for bias was performed using funnel plots and Egger's tests. Fifteen studies were included for qualitative review, representing 707 patients. Mean duration of support was 9.9 ± 8.2 days. On meta-analysis of 13 studies reporting survival outcomes, survival to hospital discharge was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58-78%), and 30 day survival was 65% (95% CI, 56-74%) among patients with Impella devices predominantly supported by Impella 5.5 (>60%). There was significant study heterogeneity for these outcomes. Among 294 patients with Impella 5.5 only, survival to discharge was 78% (95% CI, 72-82%) with no significant study heterogeneity. This data present early benchmarks for outcomes with Impella 5.5 as clinical experience with these devices accrues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie H Kwon
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Dana Bentley
- Principle Scientific Affairs, Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts
| | - Marisa Cevasco
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vanessa Blumer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Manreet K Kanwar
- Cardiovascular Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Mani A Daneshmand
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jacob Abraham
- Center for Cardiovascular Analytics, Research and Data Science, Providence Heart Institute, Providence Research Network, Portland, Oregon
| | - Khaled Shorbaji
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Arman Kilic
- From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chrysakis N, Magouliotis DE, Spiliopoulos K, Athanasiou T, Briasoulis A, Triposkiadis F, Skoularigis J, Xanthopoulos A. Heart Transplantation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:558. [PMID: 38256691 PMCID: PMC10816008 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HTx) remains the last therapeutic resort for patients with advanced heart failure. The present work is a clinically focused review discussing current issues in heart transplantation. Several factors have been associated with the outcome of HTx, such as ABO and HLA compatibility, graft size, ischemic time, age, infections, and the cause of death, as well as imaging and laboratory tests. In 2018, UNOS changed the organ allocation policy for HTx. The aim of this change was to prioritize patients with a more severe clinical condition resulting in a reduction in mortality of people on the waiting list. Advanced heart failure and resistant angina are among the main indications of HTx, whereas active infection, peripheral vascular disease, malignancies, and increased body mass index (BMI) are important contraindications. The main complications of HTx include graft rejection, graft angiopathy, primary graft failure, infection, neoplasms, and retransplantation. Recent advances in the field of HTx include the first two porcine-to-human xenotransplantations, the inclusion of hepatitis C donors, donation after circulatory death, novel monitoring for acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, and advances in donor heart preservation and transportation. Lastly, novel immunosuppression therapies such as daratumumab, belatacept, IL 6 directed therapy, and IgG endopeptidase have shown promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Chrysakis
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (N.C.); (F.T.)
| | | | - Kyriakos Spiliopoulos
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece (K.S.); (T.A.)
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece (K.S.); (T.A.)
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Filippos Triposkiadis
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (N.C.); (F.T.)
| | - John Skoularigis
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (N.C.); (F.T.)
| | - Andrew Xanthopoulos
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (N.C.); (F.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhatt HV, Fritz AV, Feinman JW, Subramani S, Malhotra AK, Townsley MM, Weiner MM, Sharma A, Teixeira MT, Lee J, Linganna RE, Waldron NH, Shapiro AB, Mckeon J, Hanada S, Ramakrishna H, Martin AK. The Year in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2023. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:16-28. [PMID: 38040533 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
This special article is the 16th in an annual series for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor-in-chief, Dr. Kaplan, and the editorial board for the opportunity to continue this series, namely the research highlights of the past year in the specialty of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiology. The major themes selected for 2023 are outlined in this introduction, and each highlight is reviewed in detail in the main article. The literature highlights in the specialty for 2023 begin with an update on perioperative rehabilitation in cardiothoracic surgery, with a focus on novel methods to best assess patients in the preoperative and postoperative periods, and the impact of rehabilitation on outcomes. The second major theme is focused on cardiac surgery, with the authors discussing new insights into inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, coronary revascularization surgery, and discussion of causes of coronary graft failure after surgery. The third theme is focused on cardiothoracic transplantation, with discussions focusing on bridge-to-transplantation strategies. The fourth theme is focused on mechanical circulatory support, with discussions focusing on both temporary and durable support. The fifth and final theme is an update on medical cardiology, with a focus on outcomes of invasive approaches to heart disease. The themes selected for this article are only a few of the diverse advances in the specialty during 2023. These highlights will inform the reader of key updates on various topics, leading to improved perioperative outcomes for patients with cardiothoracic and vascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Himani V Bhatt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ashley Virginia Fritz
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Jared W Feinman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sudhakar Subramani
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - Anita K Malhotra
- Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA
| | - Matthew M Townsley
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL; Bruno Pediatric Heart Center, Children's of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
| | - Menachem M Weiner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Archit Sharma
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - Miguel T Teixeira
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jennifer Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Regina E Linganna
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nathan H Waldron
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Anna Bovill Shapiro
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - John Mckeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Satoshi Hanada
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - Harish Ramakrishna
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Archer Kilbourne Martin
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
| |
Collapse
|