The effect of socioeconomic factors on patient outcomes in cardiac surgery

Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities Affect Access to High-Volume Centers During Meningioma Treatment

BACKGROUND

Studies examining the relationship among hospital case volume, socioeconomic determinants of health, and patient outcomes are lacking. We sought to evaluate these associations in the surgical management of intracranial meningiomas.

METHODS

We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for patients who underwent craniotomy for the resection of meningioma in 2013. We categorized hospitals into high-volume centers (HVCs) or low-volume centers (LVCs). We compared outcomes in 2016 to assess the potential impact of the Affordable Care Act on health care equity. Primary outcome measures included hospital mortality, length of stay, complications, and disposition.

RESULTS

A total of 10,270 encounters were studied (LVC, n = 5730 [55.8%]; HVC, n = 4340 [44.2%]). Of LVC patients, 62.9% identified as white compared with 70.2% at HVCs (P < 0.01). A higher percentage of patients at LVCs came from the lower 2 quartiles of median household income than did patients at HVCs (49.9% vs. 44.2%; P < 0.001). Higher mortality (1.3% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.041) was found in LVCs. Multivariable regression analysis showed that LVCs were significantly associated with increased complication (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.426, P<0.001) and longer hospital length of stay (odds ratio, -0.05; 95% confidence interval, -0.92 to -0.45; P <0.001). There was a higher proportion of white patients at HVCs in 2016 compared with 2013 (67.9% vs. 72.3%). More patients from top income quartiles (24.2% vs. 40.5%) were treated at HVCs in 2016 compared with 2013.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found notable racial and socioeconomic disparities in LVCs as well as access to HVCs over time. Disparities in meningioma treatment may be persistent and require further study.

Untangling the Complex Multidimensionality of the Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The cardiovascular literature is limited by the lack of consensus on what are the best metrics for reporting social determinants of health (SDH) or social deprivation, and if they should be reported as a single metric or separately by their domains.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on cardiovascular surgeries and procedures was conducted, identifying articles from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023, that studied the relationship between health outcomes after cardiovascular procedures or surgeries and SDH/social deprivation. The cardiovascular procedures/surgeries of interest were coronary and valve surgeries and procedures including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), valve replacement or repair, and transcatheter aortic valve intervention.

RESULTS

After screening 638 articles, we identified 47 papers that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common procedure evaluated was CABG and PCI; 46 of the studies focused on these 2 procedures. Almost all of the articles reported a different metric for SDH/social deprivation (41 different metrics); despite this, all of the metrics showed a consistent relationship with worse outcomes associated with greater degrees of SDH/deprivation. Only 9 reported on the individual domains of SDH/social deprivation; 3 studies showed a discordant relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our systematic review identified numerous articles evaluating the relationship between SDH/social deprivation in cardiovascular disease, there was substantial heterogeneity in which metric was used and how it was reported. This reinforces the need for standards as to the best metrics for SDH/social deprivation as well as best practices for reporting.

Association between hospital racial composition and aortic valve replacement outcomes: A national inpatients sample database analysis

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities exist in the outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, it is unclear whether hospital racial composition contributes to these racial disparities.

METHODS

We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2015 to 2019 to identify patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who received SAVR and TAVI. The Racial/Ethnic Diversity Index (RDI) was used to assess hospital racial composition as the proportion of nonwhite patients to total hospital admissions. Hospitals were categorized into RDI quintiles. Textbook outcome (TO) was defined as no in-hospital mortality, no postoperative complications and no prolonged length of stay (LOS). Multivariable mixed generalized linear models were conducted to assess the association between RDI and post-SAVR and post-TAVI outcomes. Moreover, quantile regression was used to assess the additional cost and length of stay associated with the RDI quintile.

RESULTS

The study included 82,502 SAVR or TAVI performed across 3285 hospitals, with 47.4% isolated SAVR and 52.5% isolated TAVI. After adjustment, quintiles 4 and 5 demonstrated significantly lower odds of TO than the lowest RDI quintile in both the SAVR cohort (quintile 4, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.73-0.85]; quintile 5, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.73-0.86]) and TAVI cohort (quintile 4, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.95]; quintile 5, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.74-0.86]). Despite non-observable differences in in-hospital mortality across all RDI quintiles, the rate of AKI and blood transfusion increased with increasing RDI for both cohorts. Further, Higher RDI quintiles were associated with increased costs and longer LOS. From 2015 to 2019, post-TAVI outcomes improved across all RDI quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals with a higher RDI experienced lower TO achievements, increased AKI, and blood transfusion, along with extended LOS and higher costs. Importantly, post-TAVI outcomes improved from 2015 to 2019 across all RDI groups.

Unplanned readmissions, community socioeconomic factors, and their effects on long-term survival after complex thoracic aortic surgery

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated community socioeconomic factors in patients who had unplanned readmission after undergoing proximal aortic surgery (ascending aorta, aortic root, or arch).

METHODS

Unplanned readmissions for any reason within 60 days of the index procedure were reviewed by race, acuity at presentation, and gender. We also evaluated 3 community socioeconomic factors: poverty, household income, and education. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess long-term survival differences by group (race, acuity, and gender).

RESULTS

Among 2339 patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery during the 20-year study period and were discharged alive, our team identified 146 (6.2%) unplanned readmissions. Compared with White patients, Black patients lived in areas characterized by more widespread poverty (20.8% vs 11.1%; P = .0003), lower income ($42,776 vs $65,193; P = .0007), and fewer residents with a high school diploma (73.7% vs 90.1%; P < .0001). Compared with patients whose index operation was elective, patients who had urgent or emergency index procedures lived in areas with lower income ($54,425 vs $64,846; P = .01) and fewer residents with a high school diploma (81.1% vs 89.2%; P = .005). Community socioeconomic factors did not differ by gender. Four- and 6-year survival estimates were 63.1% and 63.1% for Black patients versus 89.1% and 83.0% for White patients (P = .0009). No significant differences by acuity or gender were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Among readmitted patients, Black patients and patients who had emergency surgery had less favorable community socioeconomic factors and poorer long-term survival. Earlier and more frequent follow-up in these patients should be considered. Developing off-campus clinics and specific postdischarge measures targeting these patients is important.

Socioeconomic disparities in procedural choice and outcomes after aortic valve replacement

Objective

To identify potential socioeconomic disparities in the procedural choice of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and in readmission outcomes after SAVR or TAVR.

Methods

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify a total of 243,691 patients who underwent isolated SAVR and TAVR between January 2016 and December 2018. Patients were stratified according to a tiered socioeconomic status (SES) metric comprising patient factors including education, literacy, housing, employment, insurance status, and neighborhood median income. Multivariable analyses were used to assess the effect of SES on procedural choice and risk-adjusted readmission outcomes.

Results

SAVR (41.4%; 100,833 of 243,619) was performed less frequently than TAVR (58.6%; 142,786 of 243,619). Lower SES was more frequent among patients undergoing SAVR (20.2% [20,379 of 100,833] vs 19.4% [27,791 of 142,786]; P < .001). Along with such variables as small hospital size, drug abuse, arrhythmia, and obesity, lower SES was independently associated with SAVR relative to TAVR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.24). After SAVR, but not after TAVR, lower SES was independently associated with increased readmission at 30 days (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.32), 90 days (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.41), and 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.28; P < .05 for all).

Conclusions

Our study findings indicate that socioeconomic disparities exist in the procedural choice for patients undergoing AVR. Patients with lower SES had increased odds of undergoing SAVR, as well as increased odds of readmission after SAVR, but not after TAVR, supporting that health inequities exist in the surgical care of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.