Delayed interval delivery and survivability of the second twin with and without emergency cerclage in dichorionic diamniotic pregnancy. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There are no systematic reviews analyzing cervical cerclage's role in improving the perinatal outcome of the second twin in dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) pregnancies following a second trimester or very early preterm birth of the first twin.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of rescue cervical cerclage on delaying the delivery of the second twin after the delivery of the first twin in DCDA twin pregnancies. The secondary objective was to analyze the effect of rescue cervical cerclage on the perinatal outcome of the second twin in DCDA pregnancies compared to the non-cerclage group.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Medline databases, and the Cochrane Library. The studies selected were limited to human subjects and published online by December 2023. Two sets of results in this systematic review are described; the first set includes the outcomes of pregnancies with a DCDA twin pregnancy from the cohort of case series. The meta-analysis was performed for the cohort, and a combined narrative report was provided for the second set of results for the case reports.

RESULTS

A literature search resulted in 27 case series and 36 case reports. The case series analysis demonstrated that the mean gestation age of twin 2 at delivery with cervical cerclage (27.5 weeks) compared to those without cervical cerclage (24.4 weeks) was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, analysis of the case series showed that twin 2 with cerclage had a statistically significant increase in latency period (days 44.7 vs 23.67) and birth weight (grams 3320 vs 2460) compared to the group without cerclage (p = -value was 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). It is difficult to draw any significant conclusion with complications of cervical cerclage; however, there were slightly more chorioamnionitis and respiratory distress syndrome in the cerclage group. The case report analysis showed no significant difference with or without cervical cerclage.

CONCLUSIONS

From this review, it can be concluded that in DCDA twin pregnancies, cervical cerclage insertion after the extremely premature delivery or miscarriage of twin 1 may increase the gestational age at delivery, prolong the delivery interval, and increase the birth weight of twin 2. However, a large prospective multicenter randomized control trial should be performed to assess the benefit of cervical cerclage in DCDA twins to improve the delivery interval latency period and perinatal outcome of twin 2 after the delivery of twin 1.

Emergency cervical cerclage in delayed-interval delivery of twin pregnancies: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The protocol for delayed-interval delivery of the second twin in twin pregnancies has not been standardized. Cervical cerclage is often performed, but its use is debated. To conduct a scoping review on cervical cerclage for prolonging the intertwin delivery interval and improving second twin survival and maternal outcomes after preterm delivery or spontaneous abortion of the first twin in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

Seven Chinese and English language databases were searched from inception to March 1, 2023, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Chinese Science Journal Database, and Sinomed. Relevant observational studies that assessed the effectiveness of the use of cervical cerclage in delayed-interval delivery of twins were screened and selected, and raw data were extracted, and descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 102 articles were retrieved. After screening and exclusion of duplicate and irrelevant articles, 22 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were obtained. Studies in which cerclage was performed reported longer intertwin delivery intervals than those that did not perform cerclage, and the difference was statistically significant. The cerclage group also tended to have lower rates of chorioamnionitis and maternal complications, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

After excluding patients with contraindications, emergency cervical cerclage can be considered in cases of spontaneous abortion of the first twin in twin pregnancies to prolong the gestation and improve the prognosis of the remaining fetus until it becomes viable and increases its birth weight.

Delayed interval delivery in a quadruplet pregnancy: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

As the rate of multiple pregnancies increases, delayed interval delivery (DID) is increasingly being implemented to improve perinatal outcomes. But there are no international guidelines for DID in multiple pregnancies. We report a case of DID in a quadruplet pregnancy and review the relevant literature to summarize the management of DID in multiple pregnancies.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 22-year-old woman, 22 2/7 weeks' gestation, with quadruplets, was admitted to the hospital for a first cervical cerclage due to cervical dilation. Twenty-five days later, it was found that the cervix was dilated again, so after removing the cervical cerclage, the first quadruplet was delivered vaginally (25 6/7 weeks), and a second cervical cerclage was performed. Four days later, due to re-dilation of the cervix, after removal of the cervical cerclage, the second quadruplet was delivered vaginally (26 3/7 weeks), followed by a third cervical cerclage. Six days later, the pregnancy was terminated by cesarean section due to fetal distress, and the third and fourth quadruplets were delivered (27 2/7 weeks). The patient had no postoperative complications, and all four infants were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit and discharged successfully.

CONCLUSION

This case emphasizes that comprehensive management of delayed interval delivery can improve perinatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies, including anti-infection, tocolytic therapy, practice to promote fetal lung, and cervical cerclage.

Delayed Interval Delivery in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes in Dichorionic Triamniotic Triplets: Ethical Considerations for Maternal Health Case Report

Background

Although there are numerous studies on delayed interval delivery in twins, this study is one of few reporting on preterm premature rupture of membranes in triplets and even fewer on dichorionic triamniotic triplet twins. The case presented here highlights the important interplay between informed consent and patient autonomy. Case Presentation. A 37-year-old woman gravida 1, para 0 with a dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy experienced preterm premature rupture of membranes of the singleton triplet at 15 weeks and six days of gestation. Delayed interval delivery was offered to the parents, who chose to continue the pregnancy while acknowledging the risks for maternal and foetal health. The patient was treated with prophylactic intravenous antibiotics and discharged on oral antibiotics after an eight-day admission. Two days after being discharged, she was readmitted with clinical signs of chorioamnionitis. Within six hours, the preterm premature rupture of membranes singleton was delivered. Three days later, she again presented to the hospital with preterm premature rupture of membranes of one of the dichorionic twins. After discussion with the maternal foetal medicine team, the parents chose to terminate the pregnancy. Delayed interval delivery was not successful in this patient, and it is unclear at which gestational age it is too early to offer expectant management.

Conclusions

The case affirmed the very poor foetal survival rate when the first delivery occurs at under 20 weeks' gestation. A standardised management of delayed interval delivery should be established to assist with consistent parental counselling.

Association of Cerclage with Composite Adverse Outcomes among Women Delivered at 36 Weeks or Later

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes among singletons delivered at 36 weeks or later with cerclage during index pregnancy versus those without cerclage.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study utilized the U.S. vital statistics datasets from 2011 to 2013. Inclusion criteria were women with nonanomalous singletons, with and without cerclage placement, without diabetes or hypertensive disorders, and delivered at 36 to 41 weeks. The coprimary outcomes were composite maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Composite maternal adverse outcome included admission to intensive care unit, maternal transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, or unplanned operating room procedure. Composite neonatal adverse outcome included Apgar score less than 5 at 5 minutes, assisted ventilation for more than 6 hours, neonatal seizure, birth injury, or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes were chorioamnionitis and cesarean delivery. Multivariable Poisson's regression models with error variance were used while adjusting for confounders. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 8,508,228 women who met inclusion criteria, 0.2% had a cerclage and reached 36 weeks. Composite maternal (aRR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.76-2.36) and neonatal (aRR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.47) adverse outcomes were significantly higher among those with cerclage than those without cerclage. Chorioamnionitis (aRR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.30-1.67) and cesarean delivery (aRR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.08-1.12) were also significantly higher in women with cerclage than those without cerclage.

CONCLUSION

There is an association between increased composite maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes among women with cerclage who delivered at 36 to 41 weeks as compared with those without cerclage.

KEY POINTS

· Cerclage is associated with increased composite maternal adverse outcome in women at 36-41 weeks.. · Cerclage is associated with increased composite neonatal adverse outcome in women at 36-41 weeks.. · Increased chorioamnionitis and cesarean delivery rates are associated with cerclage in women at 36-41 weeks..

Delayed interval delivery of preterm multiples: experience from a large specialized twin center

Objective: Preterm delivery is a recognized complication of twins and higher order multiple pregnancies. Delayed interval delivery is a rarely used management option for pre- or peri-viable preterm labor in these pregnancies. We describe the management and outcomes of 7 delayed interval deliveries over an 8-year period in a large specialized twin center.Study design: A retrospective cohort study of all delayed interval deliveries of preterm multiples from 2009 to 2016, defined as >24 h between deliveries of twins 1 and 2.Results: During the study period there were 68,845 deliveries with 1377 multiple pregnancies comprising 1331 sets of twins and 46 sets of higher-order multiples. 7 of these were identified as being delayed interval deliveries - 6 twin pregnancies and 1 triplet pregnancy. The mean gestation of delivery of the first infant was 23 + 4 weeks (range 22 + 3 to 30 + 0 weeks) with a mean interval of 10 days (range 1.5-39 days). Outcomes for the first infant delivered were poor, with 5 out of 7 (71%) dying from extreme prematurity. However, out of the remaining twins or triplets, 5/8 (62%) survived. The mean gestation of delivery of the remaining infant (or infants in the triplets) was 25 + 0 weeks (range 23 + 0 to 30 + 2 weeks). Only one mother (16%) developed clinical chorioamnionitis requiring iatrogenic delivery of the remaining infant with subsequent neonatal death due to extreme prematurity. There were no cases of severe maternal morbidity - however, there was one maternal death in the cohort due to an amniotic fluid embolism. The neonatal follow up of the surviving infants to date is mostly normal.Conclusion: Delayed interval deliveries can offer hope for survival for the remaining infant(s) with an acceptable risk profile to the mother. Close clinical and laboratory monitoring is essential to reduce the risk of severe maternal morbidity.

Effect of delayed interval delivery of remaining fetus(es) in multiple pregnancies on survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of the pregnancy after delivery of the first fetus during a second-trimester miscarriage or very early preterm birth has not been well defined.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether delayed interval delivery of the remaining fetus(es) in twins/triplets is associated with improved survival, when compared with immediate delivery, after miscarriage or very preterm birth of the first fetus in multiple pregnancy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched through January 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (STUDY DESIGN, POPULATIONS, AND INTERVENTIONS): The following eligibility criteria applied: full-text original article; included at least 5 cases of delayed interval delivery for remaining fetus(es); and reported the survival rate of the first-born and the remaining fetus(es).

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

K.W.C. and W.W. searched, screened, and reviewed the articles. The quality of the studies was assessed according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist. If possible, data were stratified for assigned chorionicity. Effect sizes were pooled through a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2295 published article and abstracts were identified. Only 16 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 492 pregnancies (432 twins [88%], 56 triplets [11%], 3 quadruplets and 1 quintuplets) showed that delayed interval delivery significantly improved the perinatal survival of remaining fetus(es) compared with the first born (odds ratio, 5.22, 95% confidence interval, 2.95-9.25, I² = 53%), before 20+0 weeks (odds ratio, 6.32, 95% confidence interval, 1.99-20.13, I² = 0%), between 20+0 and 23+6 weeks (odds ratio, 3.31, 95% confidence interval, 1.95-5.63, I² = 0%), and after 24+0 weeks (odds ratio, 1.92, 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.05, I² = 0%), in dichorionic twin pregnancy (odds ratio, 14.89, 95% confidence interval, 6.19-35.84, I² = 0%), and unselected triplet pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.33, 95% confidence interval, 1.02-5.32, I² = 0%. ). Among the survivors, there were no significant differences in the short-term and long-term neonatal morbidities between the first-born and the remaining fetus(es). Serious maternal morbidity was reported in 39% of pregnancy after delayed interval delivery (71 of 183). In addition, 2 cases were managed by postpartum hysterectomy and 1 reported postoperative uterovaginal fistula. There were no recorded cases of maternal mortality.

CONCLUSION

Delayed interval delivery when a fetus has delivered in a multiple pregnancy is an effective management option to increase the survival rate of the remaining fetus(es). About 39% of women may experience morbidity following this management option.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of delayed interval delivery in cerclage: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Delayed delivery is sometimes selectively performed in twin pregnancy when the first birth occurs inevitably in order to improve the prognosis and decrease the morbidity and mortality of the second twin. The aim of this study is to explore the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies in which cerclage is carried out following the loss of first fetus in twin gestation for delayed interval delivery.

METHODS

Three cases of delayed-interval delivery of dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies were reported in our center between 2017 and 2018 and were retrospectively analyzed. Once the first twin was delivered, the second twin was left in utero and the patient underwent in utero percutaneous umbilical cord ligation, antibiotics, tocolytic therapy and cervical cerclage.

RESULTS

Mean gestational age at delivery of the first fetuses was 21.6 ± 2.9 weeks and 24.8 ± 4.0 weeks for the remaining fetuses, respectively. The mean interval of the delay was 22 days (4-50 days). Mortality of the first fetus was 66.7%, and the retained one was 33.3%. In general, maternal outcome was good, one patient experienced postpartum hemorrhage and placenta accreta. However neonatal aftermath was generally not favorable, probably due to extreme prematurity.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical cerclage after the first delivery could prolong the pregnancy until an adequate gestational age at which an enhanced prognosis and better perinatal outcome for the second twin can be achieved.

Cerclage for women with twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE DATA

This study was conducted to estimate whether cerclage could extend the prolongation of pregnancy, reduce the risk of preterm birth, and improve perinatal outcomes in women with twin pregnancies.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing the efficacy of cerclage with no cerclage for women with twin pregnancies.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The following databases were searched for all published studies that compared cerclage placement with expectant management in twin pregnancies from inception to July 2018: Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Each report was reviewed for inclusion or exclusion standard, and data extraction was performed by 2 authors independently.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies with 1211 women that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Our outcomes indicated that cerclage placement for twin pregnancies with a cervical length of <15 mm was associated with significant prolongation of pregnancy by a mean difference of 3.89 weeks of gestation (95% confidence interval, 2.19-5.59; P=.000; I²=0%) and a reduction of preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.99; P=.040; I²=0%), <34 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.75; P=.000; I²=0%) and <32 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.90; P=.010; I²=0%), compared with those pregnancies in the control group. For women with a dilated cervix of >10 mm, cerclage placement was associated with significant prolongation of pregnancy by a mean difference of 6.78 weeks of gestation (95% confidence interval, 5.32-8.24; P=.000; I²=0%); a reduction of preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.69; P=.000; I²=28%), <32 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.65; P=.000; I²=14%), <28 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.85; P=.030; I²=80%), and <24 weeks of gestation (risk ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.67; P=.001; I²=24%), and improvement of perinatal outcomes compared with those in the control group. However, for twin pregnancies with a normal cervical length (eg, cerclage for an indication for women with a history of preterm birth or twin alone), the efficacy of cerclage placement was less certain because of the limited data.

CONCLUSION

Our metaanalysis indicates that cerclage placement is beneficial for the reduction of preterm birth and the prolongation of pregnancy in twin pregnancies with a cervical length of <15 mm or dilated cervix of >10 mm. However, the benefit of history-indicated or twin alone-indicated cerclage is less certain in twin pregnancies with normal cervical length according to current literature. Further high-quality studies were needed to confirm the findings.

Delayed-Interval Delivery of Twin Gestation via Cesarean Section: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Multifetal pregnancies are at high risk for preterm delivery. Under certain circumstances, delayed vaginal delivery of the second twin is performed to improve morbidity and mortality. Most of the information on optimal management of delayed-interval delivery comes from published case reports in which the first twin was delivered vaginally. This case report is unique in that twin A was delivered via cesarean section. CASE REPORT Our patient was a 21-year-old G2P1, with dichorionic diamniotic twins of unknown gestational age, with prenatal care at a different facility, who presented with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and cord prolapse. Twin A, with an estimated weight by ultrasound of 528 g, was delivered via cesarean section and twin B was left in utero until the patient went into preterm labor 10 days later. Obstetrical management included tocolytic protocol from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study trial, preterm prelabor rupture of membrane antibiotics with broad-spectrum coverage, and judicious use of fetal lung maturity steroids and magnesium sulfate. CONCLUSIONS This case is important as we have demonstrated that cesarean section in the setting of delayed-interval delivery may be an option to improve survival at the limits of viability. We also discussed our treatment approach and how we delayed delivery of the second twin by 10 days. Unexpectedly, the surviving twin was the one born first, at 22 4/7 weeks determined 2 days after birth by prenatal records.

Abdelazim and Shikanova suggested protocol of Ain Shams and West Kazakhstan Universities for management of delayed-interval delivery of the second twin: Case report

Background

The incidence of multiple gestations increased after the assisted reproductive techniques. Preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes are the most common complications of multiple gestations. Traditionally, if one fetus is delivered preterm in twin pregnancies, the situation is managed by delivery of the second fetus. Recently, there are reported cases of delayed-interval delivery (DID) of the second twin, with good outcome without established protocol for management of such cases. This report presents the protocol suggested by Abdelazim and Shikanova for the management of DID of the remaining second twin.

Conclusion

The birth weight and the survival rate increased after Abdelazim and Shikanova suggested protocol for management of DID of the remaining second twin without any maternal risks or complications. DID should be done in tertiary centers after informing the parents about the possible risks of keeping the live second twin in the hostile intrauterine environment.

Successful delayed-interval delivery performed 128 days after the vaginal delivery of the first fetus in a twin pregnancy

There has been a significant increase in the number of multiple pregnancies that are associated with a high risk of preterm delivery among Korean women. However, to date, delayed-interval delivery in women with multiple pregnancy is rare. We report a case of delayed-interval delivery performed 128 days after the vaginal delivery of the first fetus in a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy. The patient presented with vaginal leakage of amniotic fluid at 16 weeks of gestation and was diagnosed with a preterm premature rupture of membranes. Three days later, the first twin was delivered, but the neonate died soon after. The second twin remained in utero, and we decided to retain the fetus in utero to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with a preterm birth. The patient was managed with antibiotics and tocolytics. Cervical cerclage was not performed. The second twin was delivered vaginally at 34 weeks and 5 days of gestation, 128 days after the delivery of the first-born fetus. This neonate was healthy and showed normal development during the 1-year follow-up period. Based on our experience with this case, we propose that delayed-interval delivery may improve perinatal survival and decrease morbidity in the second neonate in highly selected cases.

Obstetric Management of Delayed-Interval Delivery

The delayed-interval delivery is a rare, flexible and complex procedure. In light of these facts, there is no consensus on the best approach to achieve it successfully. This case report is of an asynchronous delivery, in a twin pregnancy, with a 32-day interval between births of siblings. Our obstetric management at a critical gestational age improved the outcome of the second newborn. The probability of success of delayed-interval delivery depends on the proper selection of the candidates, the appropriate active management and the continuous monitoring for early detection of complications.

•

Asynchronous delivery may be lifesaving for the second twin.

•

The proper selection of candidates for delayed-interval delivery is crucial.

•

The success depends on the individualized management.

•

Continuous monitoring is essential for early detection of complications.

Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness of physical examination-indicated cerclage in the setting of second-trimester cervical dilatation by systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 1966 and 2014 that evaluated cervical cerclage for the treatment of cervical insufficiency.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The search yielded 6,314 citations. We included cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing cerclage placement with expectant management of women with cervical dilatation between 14 and 27 weeks of gestation. Two investigators independently reviewed each citation for inclusion or exclusion and discordant decisions were arbitrated by a third reviewer. Summary estimates were reported as the mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous variables or relative risk and with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis was used, depending on heterogeneity.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Ten studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. One was a randomized controlled trial, two were prospective cohort studies, and the remaining seven were retrospective cohort studies. Of the 757 women, 485 (64%) underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage placement and 272 (36%) were expectantly managed. Cerclage was associated with increased neonatal survival (71% compared with 43%; relative risk 1.65, 95% CI 1.19-2.28) and prolongation of pregnancy (mean difference 33.98 days, 95% CI 17.88-50.08).

CONCLUSION

Physical examination-indicated cerclage is associated with a significant increase in neonatal survival and prolongation of pregnancy of approximately 1 month when compared with no such cerclage. The strength of this conclusion is limited by the potential for bias in the included studies.