Recurrent brain tumor with hydrocephalus in pregnancy

Awake craniotomy during pregnancy: A systematic review of the published literature

Neurosurgical pathologies in pregnancy pose significant complications for the patient and fetus, and physiological stressors during anesthesia and surgery may lead to maternal and fetal complications. Awake craniotomy (AC) can preserve neurological functions while reducing exposure to anesthetic medications. We reviewed the literature investigating AC during pregnancy. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from the inception to February 7th, 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Studies in English investigating AC in pregnant patients were included in the final analysis. Nine studies composed of nine pregnant patients and ten fetuses (one twin-gestating patient) were included. Glioma was the most common pathology reported in six (66.7%) patients. The frontal lobe was the most involved region (4 cases, 44.4%), followed by the frontoparietal region (2 cases, 22.2%). The awake-awake-awake approach was the most common protocol in seven (77.8%) studies. The shortest operation time was two hours, whereas the longest one was eight hours and 29 min. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 13.6 ± 6.5 (2-22) and 19.6 ± 6.9 (9-30) weeks at craniotomy. Seven (77.8%) studies employed intraoperative fetal heart rate monitoring. None of the AC procedures was converted to general anesthesia. Ten healthy babies were delivered from patients who underwent AC. In experienced hands, AC for resection of cranial lesions of eloquent areas in pregnant patients is safe and feasible and does not alter the pregnancy outcome.

Neuroimaging During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

New onset or exacerbation of preexisting neurologic symptoms during pregnancy often necessitates brain or spinal cord imaging. Magnetic resonance techniques are preferred imaging modalities during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Ionizing radiation with computed tomography and intravenous contrast material with magnetic resonance or computed tomography should be avoided during pregnancy. New onset of headaches in the last trimester or in the postpartum period may indicate cerebrovascular disease or a mass lesion, for which brain imaging is necessary. The continuum of cerebrovascular complications of pregnancy and enlarging lesions may produce neurologic symptoms later in pregnancy and after delivery, necessitating imaging.

Patterns of Interaction Between Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma and Pregnancy: An Institutional Case Series

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of pregnancy in patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) constitutes a unique therapeutic challenge. Owing to the rarity of cases, there is a dearth of information in existing literature.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients with a diagnosis of LGG and pregnancy at some point during their illness. Clinical course and obstetrical outcomes were reviewed. A volumetric analysis of tumor growth rate in association with pregnancy was performed.

RESULTS

Of 15 women identified, 13 (86.7%) had a prepregnancy LGG diagnosis. Of the 2 patients in whom LGG was diagnosed during pregnancy, one underwent upfront surgery, and the other had watchful waiting with resection after 60 weeks. Nine patients (60.0%) remained asymptomatic during pregnancy, while 5 (33.3%) experienced recurrence of seizures. There was one case of transformation of an astrocytoma to glioblastoma during the third trimester, which was resected emergently. In 10 cases, progression occurred after pregnancy at a median interval of 24.2 months (interquartile range 6.6-37.5 months), with progression within 6 months of delivery in 2 cases. Mean (SD) growth rate during pregnancy was 7.8 (22.2) mm/year compared with 0.62 (1.12) mm/year before pregnancy and 0.29 (1.18) mm/year after pregnancy; the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.306).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy was associated with clinical deterioration in one third of patients. No significant change in growth rate was identified. Time to progression and malignant dedifferentiation were unaffected. Patients with LGG wishing to pursue pregnancy should be counseled regarding the risk of complications, and if pregnancy is pursued, close neurological and obstetrical follow-up is recommended.

Multidisciplinary Therapy Managed Recurrent Glioblastoma in a BRAF-V600E Mutant Pregnant Female: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant intracranial tumor in adults. However, the overall management of GBM in pregnancy is rarely reported. How to balance the therapeutic benefits to the mother and risks to the fetus remains hugely challenging for clinicians. The application of specific targeting therapy combined with conventional treatment sheds light on a longer lifetime for the patients suffering from GBM. Case Presentation: We present a pregnant female at 20 weeks gestation diagnosed with GBM. Surgical resection was initially performed without adjuvant therapy, and the tumor recurred de novo 2 months later. A secondary craniotomy and cesarean section were performed simultaneously at 32 weeks gestation, both the patient and infant were survived. She was subsequently treated with traditional chemo-radiotherapy. No other identified genetic alterations indicating an optimistic prognosis were detected except for BRAF V600E mutation. Thus, the BRAF inhibitor was placed on her with achieving a good clinical outcome of more than 2-year survival without recurrence. Conclusion: Personalized multidisciplinary therapy should be considered when GBMs occur in pregnancy. Response to the therapy in this presenting case suggests that BRAF V600E mutation is a favorable biomarker for GBM. The mortality of GBM might be reduced through genetic testing and targeted treatment. However, more studies must be conducted to confirm our observation.

Clinical challenges of glioma and pregnancy: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

This review aims to summarize challenges in clinical management of concomitant gliomas and pregnancy and provides suggestions for this management based on current literature.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies on glioma and pregnancy. Observational studies and articles describing expert opinions on clinical management were included. The strength of evidence was categorized as arguments from observational studies, consensus in expert opinions, or single expert opinions. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

27 studies were selected, including 316 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 202) and known (n = 114) gliomas during pregnancy. The median sample size was 6 (range 1-65, interquartile range 1-9). Few recommendations originated from observational studies; the remaining arguments originated from consensus in expert opinions.

CONCLUSION

Findings from observational studies of adequate quality include (1) There is no known effect of pregnancy on survival in low-grade glioma patients; (2) Pregnancy can provoke clinical deterioration and tumor growth on MRI; (3) In stable women at term, there is no benefit of cesarean section over vaginal delivery, with respect to adverse events in mother or child. Unanswered questions include when pregnancy should be discouraged, what best monitoring schedule is for both mother and fetus, and if and how chemo- and radiation therapy can be safely administered during pregnancy. A multicenter individual patient level meta-analysis collecting granular information on clinical management and related outcomes is needed to provide scientific evidence for clinical decision-making in pregnant glioma patients.

Imaging of Headache in Pregnancy

Pregnant women are most likely to have primary headaches, such as migraine and tension-type headaches, which can be diagnosed and treated without brain imaging. Primary headaches may even start de novo during pregnancy, especially in the first few months. However, when the headache occurs late in pregnancy or in the peripartum period, secondary causes of headaches need to be considered and evaluated by brain and/or vascular imaging, generally using magnetic resonance techniques. There is considerable overlap between the cerebrovascular complications of pregnancy, including preeclampsia/eclampsia, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), and both hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes; although, their imaging may be distinctive. Imaging is necessary to distinguish between arterial and venous pathology causing headache in the peripartum patient, as there can be similar presenting symptoms. Mass lesions, both neoplastic and inflammatory, can enlarge and produce headaches and neurological symptoms late in pregnancy.