Can ovarian vein embolization cause more harm than good?

Traumatic pelvic fracture with rupture of the ovarian vein - A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Traumatic pelvic fractures are complex injuries often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among the complications of pelvic trauma, rupture of the ovarian vein represents a rare yet potentially life-threatening event. Prompt recognition and appropriate management are essential to mitigate the risk of hemorrhage and associated complications.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 70-year-old woman who sustained a traumatic pelvic fracture following a skiing accident, resulting in rupture of the left ovarian vein. The patient came with the ambulance in the emergency room with lower abdominal tenderness, pelvic pain, but no signs of hemorrhagic shock. Imaging studies confirmed the diagnosis of a pelvic fracture with venous leakage of the left ovarian vein.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

This review synthesizes recent insights into the diagnosis, management, and complications associated with pelvic fractures, with an emphasis on optimizing patient outcomes through a multidisciplinary approach. The analysis incorporates findings from key studies, including those by Wong and Bucknill, Ma Y et al., and Tullington and Blecker, which advocate for the use of advanced diagnostic tools like CT scans and systematic evaluation processes. These studies underline the necessity of precise classification systems such as the Tile classification to guide treatment and predict outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Management of traumatic pelvic fractures with associated vascular injuries requires a multidisciplinary approach involving trauma surgeons, interventional radiologists, and critical care specialists. Early recognition, accurate diagnosis, and timely intervention are paramount in optimizing outcomes and reducing the risk of mortality. This case underscores the importance of prompt intervention and highlights the challenges associated with traumatic pelvic fractures and rupture of the ovarian vein. Further research is warranted to enhance our understanding of optimal management strategies and improve outcomes for patients with these complex injuries.

Surgical and endovascular treatment of pelvic venous disorder: Results of a multicentre retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we investigated the clinical outcomes after gonadal vein resection (GVR) and gonadal vein embolization (GVE) with coils in patients with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD). We also assessed the rates of procedural complications and disease recurrence.

METHODS

Our multicenter retrospective cohort study included 361 female patients with PeVD-related chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and gonadal vein reflux who underwent GVR (n = 184) or GVE with coils (n = 177) from 1999 to 2020. The clinical outcomes (ie, presence and severity of CPP, procedural complications, disease recurrence) were assessed at 1 month and 1, 3, and 5 years after intervention. The pain intensity before and after treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale. All the patients underwent duplex ultrasound after GVR and GVE, and those with persistent CPP and suspected perforation of the gonadal vein by the coils were also evaluated by multiplanar pelvic venography.

RESULTS

GVR and GVE was associated with the reduction or elimination of CPP at 1 month after treatment in 100% and 74% of patients and postprocedural complications in 14% and 37% of patients, respectively (Р < 0.01 for both). The most common complication after either GVR or GVE was pelvic vein thrombosis (11% and 22% patients, respectively; P < .01 between groups). GVE was associated with postembolization syndrome in 20%, coil protrusion in 6%, and coil migration in 1% of patients. The long-term recurrence rate after GVR and GVE was 6% and 16%, respectively (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both GVR and GVE were found to be effective in treating patients with PeVD. However, GVR was associated with better efficacy in the relief of CPP and lower rates of procedural complications and disease recurrence.

Retrospective Analysis of Complications After Gonadal Vein Interventions for Pelvic Venous Disorder

INTRODUCTION

To investigate and compare complications after gonadal vein embolization (GVE) with coils and gonadal vein resection (GVR) in patients with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included 277 female patients with PeVD who underwent GVE with coils (n = 150) or GVR (n = 122) in the period from 2000 to 2020. The participants were selected from a cohort of 4975 patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP), of whom 1107 suffered from the PeVD-related CPP and 305 underwent surgical or endovascular intervention on the gonadal veins. The GVR technique was open retroperitoneal in 92, endoscopic transperitoneal in 18, and retroperitoneal in 12 patients. Clinical outcomes included 30-day complication rates and 3-year PeVD recurrence rates. The pain intensity was assessed before and after the procedure using a visual analogue scale. All patients underwent duplex ultrasound after the procedure, and those with persisting pain and suspected gonadal vein perforation with coil were also examined using computed tomographic venography.

RESULTS

A substantial pelvic pain relief was achieved within 30 d after GVE and GVR in 73% and 100% patients, accordingly (Р = 0.001). Complications after GVE were identified in 85 (56%) patients. The major complications included pelvic vein thrombosis (PVT) and calf deep vein thrombosis (24%), postembolization syndrome (22%), and coil protrusion (5.3%). Complications after GVR occurred in 14 (11%) patients and consisted of PVT (10%) and ileus (1.6%). The 3-year recurrence rates after GVE and GVR were 11% and 5%, accordingly (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PeVD, the gonadal vein embolization with coils is associated with a high complication rate, which can be reduced with further development of the GVE technique, the use of new embolic agents, and the selection of a treatment method based on the patient's body composition.

Efficacy of endovascular treatment of pelvic varicose veins: A single-center retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of endovascular embolization of pelvic varicose veins in the treatment of pelvic venous disorders (PeVD).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was performed, including 156 women referred to the Erasmus University Medical Center between January 2011 and October 2020 for an evaluation of PeVD. Data on presenting symptoms, clinical workup, treatment, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary end point was resolution of symptoms after treatment. Secondary outcomes were correlation between symptoms at presentation and relief of symptoms after treatment, minor or major procedural complications, recurrences, and additional treatments needed.

RESULTS

Ninety patients underwent a pelvic phlebography, of which 75 received embolization of pelvic varicose veins. Median follow-up after phlebography was 13.2 months (interquartile range, 6.0-40.1 months). Of the treated patients, 53 (70.7%) had partial or complete relief of symptoms. Forty-six women (61.3%) who received embolization of pelvic varicose veins required additional treatments for leg and/or vulvar varicose veins.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that endovascular embolization of pelvic varicose veins can be an effective treatment for PeVDs. However, additional treatments are often required for leg and/or vulvar varicose veins.

Comprehensive overview of the venous disorder known as pelvic congestion syndrome

Pelvic venous disorders (PeVD) also known as Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS) affect a great number of women worldwide and often remain undiagnosed. Gynecological symptoms caused by vascular background demand a holistic approach for appropriate diagnosis. This is a relevant cause of chronic pelvic pain and atypical varicose veins. The diagnosis is based on imaging studies and their correlation with clinical presentation. Although the aetiology of PCS still remains unclear, it may result from a combination of factors including genetic predisposition, anatomical abnormalities, hormonal factors, damage to the vein wall, valve dysfunction, reverse blood flow, hypertension and dilatation. The following paper describes an in-depth overview of anatomy, pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of PCS. In recent years, minimally invasive interventions have become the method of first choice for the treatment of this condition. The efficacy of a percutaneous approach is high and it is rarely associated with serious complications.Key MessagesPelvic venous disorders demand a holistic approach for appropriate diagnosis.This article takes an in-depth look at existing therapies of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome and pathophysiology of this condition.Embolisation is an effective and safe treatment option.

The Effect of Venoactive Drug Therapy on the Development and Severity of Post-Embolization Syndrome in Endovascular Interventions on the Gonadal Veins

Objective. To evaluate the incidence of post-embolization syndrome (PES) and the effect of venoactive therapy on its development, severity, and duration after endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV) with coils in patients with pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Materials and Methods. We analyzed the outcomes of EEGV with coils in 70 female patients who received (n = 38; group 1) or did not receive (n = 32; group 2) treatment with a venoactive drug (VAD) before and after the procedure. Assessments of the EEGV efficacy and for possible signs of PES were done on days 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 after the intervention. All patients underwent transvaginal and transabdominal duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) after EEGV. In addition, patients with PES were examined using the computed tomography of the pelvic veins in the postprocedural period. Results. Technical success of EEGV was achieved in 100% of patients. Pelvic venous pain (PVP) reduction after EEGV was observed in 77.1% of patients. The PES was diagnosed in 18.6% of cases (10.5% in group 1 vs. 28.1% in group 2, p > 0.05). In three patients of group 1, the protrusion of coils was suspected and eventually verified during the resection of the left gonadal vein with coils. The group 1 patients had less severe post-embolization pain (6.2 ± 0.4 vs. 7.8 ± 0.3 scores in group 2; p = 0.009) and three times shorter duration of PES (5.0 ± 1.2 vs. 16.2 ± 2.7 days; p = 0.003). No significant differences in the diameters of gonadal veins, side of embolization, and number of coils were revealed between patients with and without PES. The rate of parametrium vein thrombosis was found to be significantly higher in patients with PES than in those without PES (30.7% vs. 18.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusion. The PES is a frequent complication of EEGV with coils and occurs in 18.6% of patients. Venoactive treatment does not effect the incidence of this complication but reduces the PES severity and duration.

Postembolization syndrome in endovascular interventions on the gonadal veins

OBJECTIVE

The present study evaluated the incidence of postembolization syndrome (PES) after endovascular coil embolization of the gonadal veins (EEGV) in patients with pelvic congestion syndrome and investigated the appropriate medical treatment.

METHODS

EEGV was performed in 70 female patients with pelvic congestion syndrome (left-sided in 58, right-sided in 3, and bilateral in 9 patients). For embolization, 0.035-in. coils with an 8- to 12-mm diameter and 10- to 20-cm length were used. Assessments of the EEGV results and possible PES symptoms were performed on days 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 after the procedure and included transvaginal and transabdominal duplex ultrasound scanning of the pelvic veins and at the embolization site.

RESULTS

PES had manifested with increased pelvic pain, tenderness along the embolized vein, and hyperthermia ≤37.5°C to 37.8°C and had developed in 14 patients (20%). For PES treatment, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (diclofenac, 75 mg daily for 3-7 days; mean, 4.2 ± 1.1 days) and a venoactive drug (micronized purified flavonoid fraction, 1000 mg daily for 2 months) were used. Medical treatment was associated with a significant reduction in PES symptoms in all patients within 14 days and complete resolution by day 30 after embolization. duplex ultrasound scanning revealed thrombosis of parametrial veins in 12 of 56 patients (21.4%) with successful EEGV and 3 of 14 patients (21.4%) with PES.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who have undergone EEGV, increased pelvic pain, the occurrence of tenderness along the embolized vein, and the presence of hyperthermia should be considered as PES manifestations. In our study, PES occurred in 20% of the treated patients.

Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal veins in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal vein in the treatment of patients with pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS).

METHODS

We evaluated the treatment outcomes in 95 patients with PCS who underwent endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV) (group 1, n = 67) or endoscopic resection of the gonadal veins (ERGV) (group 2; n = 28). A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of EEGV and ERGV in the treatment of PCS included assessments of their effects on pelvic venous pain, pelvic venous reflux, diameter of the pelvic veins, and restoration of daily activity, as well as treatment safety assessment. Clinical examinations and ultrasound studies of the pelvic veins were repeated at 1, 10, and 30 days, and 36 months after EEGV and ERGV. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale and the Von Korff questionnaire.

RESULTS

A decrease in pelvic venous pain intensity was observed at 3.6 ± 1.4 days after EEGV and 2.5 ± 0.8 days after ERGV (P = .49 between the groups). At 1 month after the intervention, a complete relief of pelvic pain was reported by 52 and 25 patients in the EEGV and ERGV groups, respectively. The rates of valvular incompetence of the uterine veins were decreased from 85% in both groups at baseline to 3% in group 1 and 0% in group 2 at 36 months after the intervention, respectively. In the early postprocedural period, pain in the femoral or jugular vein puncture site was reported by eight patients (12%) who underwent EEGV (2.2 ± 0.7 scores). Postembolization syndrome was diagnosed in 13 patients (19.4%). After ERGV, all patients experienced pain in the area of the surgical wound, with a severity of 3.9 ± 0.5 scores. Hematoma at the puncture site of the main vein was observed in 6% of patients after EEGV. Protrusion of coils was identified in three patients (4.5%). The VTE incidence was four times greater in group 1 vs group 2 (14 vs 3 patients; P < .05). The relative risk of this complication after EEGV was 1.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.146-1.732). In two patients (7.1%) after the bilateral laparoscopic resection of the gonadal veins, an ileus developed. No complications of anesthesia were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular and endoscopic techniques for decreasing blood flow through the gonadal veins are effective and safe in treating the PCS. The obvious advantages of EEGV are minimal injury and possibility to perform procedure under local anesthesia. The ERGV is associated with at least similar and, in some cases, even superior outcomes, in the terms of significantly (P < .05) shorter time to the postprocedural pain relief and avoiding postembolization syndrome.

Surgical aspects of venous pelvic pain treatment

This review presents modern information on the anatomy of pelvic veins, mechanisms of development of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) and venous pelvic pain (VPP), methods for verifying the venous nature of pelvic pain, as well as opportunities of various surgical interventions on the gonadal veins in treatment of PCS and relief of its most severe symptom, VPP. A comparative analysis of resection and embolization treatment methods and their effects on VPP, as well as rates of postprocedural complications, was carried out. The issues of elimination of specific compression syndromes causing occurrence of VPP, by using open, endoscopic and endovascular techniques are addressed.

The Effect of a Subsequent Pregnancy After Ovarian Vein Embolization in Patients with Infertility Caused by Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To report the effect of pregnancy on patients who have undergone pelvic vein embolization with pelvic congestion syndrome, which was suspected to be the only cause of infertility.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from a total of 12 women (mean age: 36.5 ± 4.3 years, range: 29-45 years) were collected between May 2013 and June 2016. Transvenous embolization with fibre platinum coils combined with anhydrous alcohol was performed in unilateral or bilateral ovarian veins after the diagnosis of venous varices confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound or pelvic venography. The follow-up time was 2-3 years. The primary outcomes of this study were the technical procedure and clinical effect, especially the pregnancy rate and complications.

RESULTS

The successful embolization rate was 100% with no significant complications during or after embolization. Ovarian vein embolization was performed unilaterally (7/12, 58.3%) or bilaterally (5/12, 41.7%). A total of 66.7% (8/12) of women had a subsequent pregnancy and complete pelvic pain relief, and 33.3% (4/12) of patients had partial pain relief. The numeric pain perception scores improved from 6.7 ± 1.1 to 2.7 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ovarian varices may be associated with infertility in some patients, and embolization of ovarian varices is a safe and effective method for those trying to become pregnant.

Is the endovascular embolization of tributaries of the internal iliac veins essential in the treatment of isolated pelvic-perineal reflux?

Aim: The aim of study was to investigate the opportunities of local phlebectomy in the elimination of isolated pelvic-perineal reflux (PPR), as well as to determine the feasibility of endovascular embolization of the tributaries of internal iliac veins in PPR. Clinical trial no. NCT01598051.Materials and methods: The work is based on the results of examination and treatment of 43 female patients with varicose veins of the pelvis, perineum, and lower extremities. Patients had no signs of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). All patients underwent duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) and ovariography with pelvic phlebography (OPP). For the elimination of PPR, local phlebectomy was performed in the major labia and perineal area, with maximal possible mobilization of the vessel within the operative wound (33 patients). In 10 patients with isolated varicose transformation of the superficial veins on the posterior thigh, mini-phlebectomy was performed using the Varady phlebectomy extractors.Results and discussion: The varicose syndrome of the external genitalia, perineum, and posterior thigh was successfully treated in 100% of patients. Findings suggest that thorough mobilization and excision of the veins of the pudendal labia, perineum, and subcutaneous veins of the thigh is a reliable method for eliminating the pathological reflux from the intrapelvic veins to the superficial veins of the perineum and lower extremities. No recurrences of vulvar, perineal varices or dilation of the veins of the lower extremities were observed in 100% of patients over the 3-year follow-up period.Conclusion: Local phlebectomy is an effective technique for eliminating the isolated PPR in patients with varicose transformation of intrapelvic, vulvar, or perineal veins. Endovascular embolization of the tributaries of the internal iliac veins is not an essential component in the treatment of PPR. The present study has a limitation due to the absence of patients with PCS. The effectiveness of phlebectomy in the treatment of isolated PPR was studied.