Cesarean myomectomy in modern obstetrics: More light and fewer shadows

Long-term obstetric, perinatal, and surgical complications in singleton pregnancies following previous cesarean myomectomy: a retrospective multicentric study

Objectives

The safety of cesarean myomectomy has been proven by previous studies. Our study aimed to reveal the long-term perinatal, obstetric, and surgical outcomes of cesarean myomectomy (CM) by comparing different CM techniques.

Material and methods

This retrospective multicentric case-control study involved 7 hospitals and included 226 singleton pregnancies that underwent repeated cesarean section (CS) between 2015 and 2020. Among these pregnancies, 113 of 226 cases had CM (Group A), and 113 had only CS (Group B). Of the 113 cases in which CM was performed, 58 underwent endometrial myomectomy (EM) (Subgroup A1) and 55 underwent serosal myomectomy (SM) (Subgroup A2). The groups were compared in terms of obstetric, perinatal, and surgical outcomes, and fibroid recurrence, myomectomy scar healing rate, and adhesion formation were noted.

Results

There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of maternal age, body mass index, gravidity, parity, and fibroid diameter in previous CS (p > 0.05). In the perinatal and obstetric evaluation of the groups, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of neonatal weight, Apgar score, fetal growth restriction, preterm premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, hypertension in pregnancy, and diabetes mellitus (p > 0.05). The fibroid recurrence rate was 28.3%, and the myomectomy scar good healing rate was 99.1%. There was no difference between the groups in terms of CS duration, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, perioperative blood transfusion rates, febrile morbidity, and prolonged hospitalization (p > 0.05). In terms of adhesion formation, although the adhesion rate of the SM group was higher than that of the EM group, no statistically significant difference was detected between the groups.

Conclusion

This study showed that in pregnancies following CM, obstetrical, perinatal, and surgical outcomes were unaffected. Obstetricians can safely use CM, either the trans-endometrial or serosal technique, as it is a safe and effective method with long-term results.

Risk factors based on myoma characteristics for predicting postoperative complications following cesarean myomectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of myoma characteristics on cesarean myomectomy and to demonstrate its additional advantages.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected from 292 women with myomas who had undergone cesarean section at Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital between 2007 and 2019. We performed subgroup analysis according to the type, weight, number, and size of myomas. Preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, incidence of transfusion, uterine artery embolization, ligation, hysterectomy, and postoperative complications were compared among subgroups.

RESULTS

There were 119 patients who had cesarean myomectomy and 173 who had cesarean section only. An increase in postoperative hospitalization and operation time was observed in the cesarean myomectomy group compared to that in the caesarean section only group (mean difference, 0.7 days, p = 0.01, 13.5 minutes, p <0.001). Estimated blood loss, hemoglobin differences, and transfusion rates were higher in the cesarean myomectomy than in the cesarean section only group. There were no differences in postoperative complications (fever, bladder injury, and ileus) between the two groups. No hysterectomy cases were reported in the cesarean myomectomy group. In subgroup analysis, the larger and heavier the myoma, the higher the risk of bleeding that led to transfusion. Estimated blood loss, differences in hemoglobin, and transfusion rate increased depending on myoma size and weight. A significant increase in postoperative hospitalization was observed in women with larger and heavier myomas. However, there was no statistical difference among the three types of myomas.

CONCLUSION

In cesarean myomectomy, larger (≥ 10 cm), and heavier myomas (≥ 500 g), were associated with postoperative outcomes, but not the number or type of myoma. The safety of cesarean myomectomy is not inferior to that of caesarean section only, considering its positive effects such as gynecological symptom relief and avoidance of the next surgery.

Study on the method of enucleation of anterior uterine fibroids by transverse incision of the lower uterine segment during cesarean section

Introduction

A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of fibroid enucleation in the anterior wall of the uterus by transverse uterine incision during cesarean section.

Methods

The medical history, surgical data, preoperative and postoperative changes in the blood system, and complications of 90 pregnant women who underwent myomectomy of the anterior uterine wall during cesarean section at the second Department of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Fujian Province were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

No significant differences were noted in the leiomyoma number, pathological type, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin level, perioperative bleeding incidence, blood transfusion frequency, postoperative fever incidence, and duration of lochia between the study and control groups. The proportion of large fibroids was slightly higher in the study group than in the control group (p < 0.05), and the operation time and average hospitalization time were slightly longer in the study group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The distribution of type III–V fibroids was slightly more in the study group than in the control group (p < 0.05), and the distribution of type VI fibroids in the study group was less than that in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Fibroid enucleation is safe and effective in the anterior wall of the uterus through the lower uterine transverse incision in cesarean section. It has the potential to reduce the risk of pelvic and intrauterine adhesions in the future.

Large Uterine Fibroids in Pregnancy with Successful Caesarean Myomectomy

Uterine fibroid is the commonest benign tumour of the female reproductive tract. It occurs in 20–40% of women, whereas the estimated incidence in pregnancy is 0.1–3.9%. Uterine fibroid in pregnancy is usually asymptomatic with complications occurring in 10–30% of cases. The first line of management is conservative with counselling for myomectomy after delivery. However, in the presence of intractable symptoms, both antepartum myomectomy and caesarean myomectomy have been reported to be successfully performed in carefully selected cases. We report a case of large subserous uterine fibroid in pregnancy that was referred to our centre at 14 weeks of gestation. She developed generalized body weakness, backache, and breathlessness at 27 weeks gestation. Thus, she was admitted and managed conservatively for eight weeks with significant relief of symptoms. She eventually had a caesarean myomectomy at 35 weeks of gestation; the outcome was a live female baby with a birth weight of 2.3 kg and a large subserous fibroid weighing 9.5 kg. We can therefore say that caesarean myomectomy can be safely performed in carefully selected cases.

Management in cases of large uterine myomas in pregnancy

Objectives

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors in women of procreative age. The effects of their occurrence affect the course of pregnancy by increasing the frequency of abortions, premature delivery or premature abruption of the placenta. Medical treatment includes clinical observation, pharmacological pain control, myomectomy during pregnancy or perinatal hysterectomy.

Case presentation

We present a survey of literature and the case of a pregnant woman with an enormous uterine fibroid 23×13×16 cm on the basis of which a diagnostic-therapeutic scheme for tumors of the reproductive organs during pregnancy has been developed.

Conclusions

The study presents improved recommendations for management the pregnancies in presence of the uterine myomas based on clinical practice.

Myomectomy during cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of myomectomy during delivery by cesarean section (CS) in pregnant women with uterine fibroids.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of pregnant women diagnosed to have uterine fibroids during index pregnancy. Women who underwent myomectomy during CS (study group; n = 91) were compared with women in whom myomectomy was not performed during CS (control group; n = 87).

RESULTS

No significant difference between both groups in the amount of blood transfusion and postoperative hemoglobin level. The operative time was significantly higher in the myomectomy group than in the control group (80.22 ± 13.06 vs 56.67 ± 8.85 min; P <  0.001). Also, the postoperative hospital stay period was significantly higher in the myomectomy group (P <  0.001).

CONCLUSION

Myomectomy during CS can be performed safely without increase in the peripartum maternal morbidities. It only may prolong the operative time and postoperative hospital stay period but it may have many benefits including avoiding another operation to remove fibroids.

Feasibility and safety of performing cesarean myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To examine the feasibility and safety of performing cesarean myomectomy on pregnant women with myomas compared to cesarean section only.

METHODS

We retrieved English articles in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to April 2020. Observational studies including the comparison of patients who underwent cesarean myomectomy and cesarean section, as well as those reporting perioperative outcomes were selected. Data extraction was conducted using RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies comprising 8,016 women were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 3,955 underwent cesarean myomectomy, while 4,061 underwent cesarean section only. Cesarean myomectomies were associated with a greater decline in mean hemoglobin (mean difference [MD] 0.20 g/dL, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.06, 0.35, p = .007), greater incidence of hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.06, 2.01, p = .02), greater volume of blood loss (MD 45.54 ml, 95% CI 2.68, 88.41, p = .04), higher transfusion rate (OR 1.47 95%CI 1.09, 1.99, p = .01), longer operation duration (MD 10.40 min, 95% CI 8.54, 12.25, p < .001), or longer postoperative hospitalization (MD 0.18 d, 95% CI 0.12, 0.24, p < .001), compared to those who underwent cesarean section only. There was no statistical difference in postoperative fever rates (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.77, 1.62).

CONCLUSION

Hemorrhage represents a risk factor which should not be overlooked by surgeons performing cesarean myomectomy. Intramural myomas, myomas ≥7 cm in size, and multiple myomas are associated with more intraoperative hemorrhage and prolonged operation duration. We suggest that, with appropriate hemostatic techniques and when performed by experienced surgeons, cesarean myomectomy may be safe and feasible in selected patients with myomas, regardless of size and locations, except if they are located at the cornual or close to large vessels, and in the absence of uterine atony during surgery.

Cesarean Myomectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Background

Recent literature supports the removal of myomas during cesarean section, which traditionally was considered a relative contraindication, given a higher complication rate. This study is to share our experience of cesarean myomectomy in the last decade.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database, from January 2008 to December 2017, at a tertiary care level teaching institution. All patients who underwent myomectomy during cesarean section were included. There were no exclusions.

Results

A total of twenty patients underwent myoma removal along with the cesarean operation during this period with a mean age of 30 years. Majority of patients were nulliparous (70%). Common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (40%) and hypothyroidism (20%). Mean size of myomas were 5.33 cm (± 2.08), and the number varied from one to three. The most common location was the posterior surface of the uterus with the commonest variety being subserous. Most patients were discharged on the fifth postoperative day.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that cesarean myomectomy to be a safe and feasible procedure in experienced hands. It offers the advantage of avoiding a second surgery in selected patients.

The incidence of and risk factors for complications when removing a single uterine fibroid during cesarean section: a retrospective study with use of two comparison groups

Purpose: To determine the incidence of and risk factors for perioperative complications in women with a single uterine fibroid, who had a cesarean myomectomy (CM).Methods: This was a retrospective study of women who had a CM between 2015-2016. They were compared versus women who had a cesarean section (CS) alone and nonpregnant women who had a laparotomic myomectomy (LM).Results: We identified 44 CM women, 51 CS patients, and 44 LM women. Those with a CM in most cases had subserosal at the anterior uterine wall and near the lower uterine segment (LUS), as most frequent fibroids; moreover, they had, on average, 18 min longer surgery duration versus CS alone. CM did not affect the Apgar scores and the incidence of minor and major complications was 36.4% and 29.5%, with the most frequent being postoperative anemia (36.4%) and intraoperative hemorrhage (29.5%). No significant differences were reported on both minor and major complications in the three groups. The following variables were found to be significant predictors in univariate logistic regression analysis for the occurrence of major complications in women who had a CM: the fibroid size (OR = 1.040, 95%CI: 1.014-1.066, p = .002), and duration of surgery (OR = 1.059, 5%CI:1.012-1.108, p = .013). The fibroid diameter cut-off was 75.0 mm (sensitivity 69.2%; specificity 90.3%), and the surgery duration was 87.5 min (sensitivity 53.8%; specificity 93.5%).Conclusion: CM appears safe, with no additional risks when compared to CS alone and LM in the women of reproductive age.

Cesarean Myomectomy: Necessity or Opportunity?

Fibroids in pregnancy are increasingly common, due to advanced maternal age, better diagnostic tools and use of assisted reproductive techniques. Cesarean section (CS) is the commonest mode of delivery in these patients. Cesarean myomectomy (CM) is the term used to describe the removal of fibroids at CS; it has always been a controversial topic, with two schools of thought. Some obstetricians advise against it due to the traditional fear of massive obstetric hemorrhage and its attendant complications. However, recent literature advocates elective or opportunistic myomectomy in well-selected cases during CS. This is especially valuable in low-resource settings where the patient may be spared a repeat surgery and problems of anesthesia and cost associated with it. This review examines the recent published data on CM, its indications, technique, safety and applicability in modern obstetrics.