Combination of microwave endometrial ablation and postoperative dienogest administration is effective for treating symptomatic adenomyosis

The use of dienogest in treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Adenomyosis is a gynaecological problem that impacts women's quality of life by causing dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and menorrhagia. The search continues for the best medical treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the role of dienogest, an oral progestin, in reducing pain and bleeding associated with adenomyosis. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in January 2024. The primary outcome was pain scores for dysmenorrhea, whereas secondary outcomes were chronic pelvic pain (CPP), uterine volume (UV), and menorrhagia. One comparison was performed comparing outcomes in symptomatic adenomyosis before and after treatment with dienogest. Pooled analysis of included studies reported a statistically significant reduction of dysmenorrhea pain score after dienogest treatment (mean difference -5.86 cm on a 10-cm visual analogue scale, 95 % CI -7.20 to -4.53, I2 = 97 %). Regarding chronic pelvic pain, a meta-analysis of included studies showed a significant decline in pain after treatment (standardized mean difference -2.37, 95 % CI -2.89 to -1.86, I2 = 60 %). However, uterine volume did not differ significantly after treatment (mean difference -4.65 cm3, 95 % CI -43.22 to 33.91). Menorrhagia was improved significantly after treatment (Peto odds ratio 0.07, 95 % CI 0.03 to 0.18). In conclusion, dienogest seems to be effective in controlling painful symptoms and uterine bleeding in women with adenomyosis at short and long-term therapy.

Comparison of efficacy between levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in adenomyosis: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Medical management of adenomyosis is an emerging perspective in modern gynecology. Though levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) effectively relieve symptoms in adenomyosis, neither has been approved for the same indication. Our study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these progestins in treating adenomyosis.

Objective

To study the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS versus DNG in patients with symptomatic adenomyosis.

Design

Open-labeled, parallel, single-centered, randomized clinical trial.

Methods

Patients with adenomyosis-associated pain with or without abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly allocated to either LNG-IUS group or DNG group. The primary outcome was a reduction in painful symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment measured by visual analog scale (VAS) score. Changes in menstrual blood loss (MBL), improvement in quality of life (QoL), and adverse drug reactions were also analyzed.

Results

The VAS score significantly decreased from baseline in both groups. The baseline and post-treatment VAS scores in the LNG-IUS group were 6.41 ± 1.07 and 3.41 ± 1.04 (p = <0.001) and in the DNG group, were 6.41 ± 0.95 and 3.12 ± 1.40 (p = <0.001), respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the LNG-IUS group experienced lighter MBL as compared to the DNG group [27/30 (90%) in the LNG-IUS group versus 17/22 (77.2%) in the DNG group (p = 0.006)]. Both the groups had improvement in QOL scores calculated by the World Heath Organisation QOL scale (WHOQOL BREF) questionnaire; however, it was more pronounced in the DNG group [(28.76 ± 30.47 in the LNG-IUS group versus 48.26 ± 44.91 in the DNG group (p = 0.04)]. Both the agents were safe as there were no reported major adverse drug reactions.

Conclusion

DNG can be an effective and safe alternative to LNG-IUS for the medical management of adenomyosis.

Trial registration

The trial was prospectively registered at the clinical trial registry - India (CTRI) vide CTRI number CTRI/2020/05/025186.

Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy under Real-Time Intraoperative Ultrasound Elastography Guidance: A Case Series and Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the clinical characteristics of 11 patients undergoing laparoscopic adenomyomectomy guided by intraoperative ultrasound elastography and this technique's feasibility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eleven patients undergoing laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using ultrasound elastography for adenomyosis at Kawasaki Medical School Hospital in Okayama, Japan between March 2020 and February 2021 were enrolled. Operative outcomes included operative time, operative bleeding, resected weight, operation complications, percent change in hemoglobin (Hb) values, and uterine volume pre- and postoperatively. Dysmenorrhea improvement was evaluated by changes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores pre- and 6- and 12-months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The median operative time and bleeding volume was 125 min (range, 88-188 min) and 150 mL (10-450 mL), respectively. The median resected weight was 5.0 g (1.5-180 g). No intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions or perioperative complications were observed. The median changes in uterine volume, Hb value, and VAS score were -49% (-65 to -28%), -3% (-11 to 35%), and -80% (-100 to -50%), respectively. The median follow-up period post-surgery was 14 months (7-30 months). Adenomyosis recurrence was not observed in the patients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using ultrasound elastography guidance is minimally invasive and resects as many adenomyotic lesions as possible.

Current and Prospective Treatment of Adenomyosis

(1) Background: Adenomyosis is a poorly understood entity which makes it difficult to standardize treatment. In this paper we review and compare the currently approved medical and surgical treatments of adenomyosis and present the evidence behind them. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify papers related to the different treatments of adenomyosis. The search was limited to the English language. Articles were divided into medical and surgical treatments. (3) Results: Several treatment options have been studied and were found to be effective in the treatment of adenomyosis. (4) Conclusions: Further randomized controlled trials are needed to compare treatment modalities and establish a uniform treatment algorithm for adenomyosis.

Case of adenomyosis causing the activation of the coagulation system after a complete loss of endometrium following microwave endometrial ablation

The formation of microbleed and minute tissue necrosis inside adenomyosis after the shedding of endometrial or endometrial-like tissue within the myometrium during menstruation is receiving attention as a new pathological condition of uterine adenomyosis. These formations might greatly affect coagulation and fibrinolysis function. However, these modulations might occur due to indirect effects of massive hemorrhage from the uterus with adenomyosis. We present a case of adenomyosis in which the patient's coagulation system was markedly activated despite the absence of menstruation due to previous microwave endometrial ablation to prevent massive uterine hemorrhage. Although no uterine bleeding was observed at all, the patient's serum levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex and soluble fibrin were abnormally elevated at the time when she complained of lower abdominal pain. As the first such case in the world, the present case is valuable for showing that the coagulation function can be modified by uterine adenomyosis.

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Combined With Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist or Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in Treating Dysmenorrhea of Severe Adenomyosis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in treating dysmenorrhea in patients with severe adenomyosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 243 patients diagnosed with severe adenomyosis. Patients were divided into H (received HIFU alone), H-G (received HIFU combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist), and H-L (received HIFU combined with LNG-IUS) groups. Their clinical results were compared at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

The effective rates of dysmenorrhea relief in the 3 groups after 3 months were 95.24% in the H group, 98.8% in the H-G group, and 94.74% in the H-L group; those after 6 months were 88.10% in the H group, 95.18% in the H-G group, and 84.21% in the H-L group; those after 12 months were 77.38% in the H group, 79.52% in the H-G group, and 96.05% in the H-L group. There was significant difference in effective rates of dysmenorrhea relief among 3 groups after 12 months of treatment, but not 3 or 6 months. In addition, at 12 months after treatment, there were significant differences in the efficacy of dysmenorrhea between patients of different ages or different ablation rates in group H. However, there was no significant difference in the H-G group and the H-L group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-intensity focused ultrasound alone is effective in alleviating the symptoms of dysmenorrhea in short term. However, HIFU combined with LNG-IUS improves the therapeutic effect for a longer period.

Comparison of dienogest versus combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of women with adenomyosis: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of dienogest with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) for treating adenomyosis-associated symptoms.

METHODS

This was a randomized clinical trial including women with symptomatic adenomyosis conducted from March 1, 2019 to August 1, 2020 at Assiut Woman's Health Hospital, Egypt. Participants were randomly assigned to the dienogest group or COCs group. The primary outcome was the level of adenomyosis-associated pain from before to 6 months after treatment measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). Changes in the uterine bleeding pattern, uterine volume, and uterine artery blood flow were also reported.

RESULTS

The VAS score of pain was significantly decreased in both groups; however, the decreased rate was more pronounced in the dienogest group (3.21 ± 1.18) in comparison with the COCs group (4.92 ± 1.22). Bleeding pattern was improved greatly; uterine volume and uterine artery blood flow decreased significantly in the dienogest group. However, women in the dienogest group reported a higher rate of side effects.

CONCLUSION

Dienogest and COCs are effective in treating adenomyosis-associated symptoms after 6 months of use but dienogest is more effective. The decrease in uterine volume and uterine artery blood flow may be the cause of the treatment effect. Dienogest carries a higher risk of side effects.

CLINICAL TRIAL

gov: NCT03890042.