Value of top-hat procedure in management of squamous intraepithelial lesion

Recurrent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Excision Procedure Versus Loop Procedure With Top Hat

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate single-pass loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP-SP) versus LEEP with top hat (LEEP-TH) in terms of treatment failure defined as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology within 2 years' follow-up.

METHODS

This single-institution cohort study used a prospectively collected cervical dysplasia database including all patients who underwent LEEP-SP or LEEP-TH for biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia between 2005 and 2019.

RESULTS

Of 340 patients included, 178 underwent LEEP-SP and 162 LEEP-TH. The LEEP-TH patients were more likely to be older (mean age, 40.4 vs 36.5 years; p < .001) and have a positive preprocedure endocervical sampling (68.5% vs 11.8%; p < .001). Positive margins were found in 23 LEEP-SP (12.9%) and in 25 LEEP-TH (15.4%; p = .507). There was no significant difference in depth of excision between LEEP-SP (13.21 ± 23.19 mm) and LEEP-TH (17.37 ± 28.26 mm; p = .138). At 2 years, there was no difference in the rates of HSIL cytology (5.2% vs 6.3%; p = .698), any positive human papillomavirus test, or HSIL cytology (25% vs 15%; p = .284). The 57 patients undergoing repeat excision were more likely to be older (mean age, 40.95 vs 37.52 years; p = .023), have had a LEEP-TH (26.3% vs 73.7%; p < .001), and have initial cytologic HSIL (64.9% vs 35.0%; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-institution study, there is no difference in the rate of recurrent HSIL in patients undergoing LEEP-SP versus LEEP-TH. A LEEP-TH may have limited additional benefit over a LEEP-SP in the treatment of cervical HSIL.

2023 Canadian Colposcopy Guideline: A Risk-Based Approach to Management and Surveillance of Cervical Dysplasia

This guideline provides evidence-based guidance on the risk-based management of cervical dysplasia in the colposcopy setting in the context of primary HPV-based screening and HPV testing in colposcopy. Colposcopy management of special populations is also discussed. The guideline was developed by a working group in collaboration with the Gynecologic Oncology Society of Canada (GOC), Society of Colposcopists of Canada (SCC) and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC). The literature informing these guidelines was obtained through a systematic review of the relevant literature via a multi-step search process led by information specialists. The literature was reviewed up to June 2021 with manual searches of relevant national guidelines and more recent publications. Quality of the evidence and strength of recommendations was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The intended users of this guideline include gynecologists, colposcopists, screening programs and healthcare facilities. Implementation of the recommendations is intended to promote equitable and standardized care for all people undergoing colposcopy in Canada. The risk-based approach aims to improve personalized care and reduce over-/under-treatment in colposcopy.

Predictors of treatment failure after top-hat procedure in squamous intraepithelial lesion

AIM

The value of top-hat procedure during loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for squamous intraepithelial lesions had remained controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether top-hat specimens positive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on histopathology can serve as an independent risk factor to predict treatment failure.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent LEEP and top-hat procedures in Peking University First Hospital between 2011 and 2016 and collected their follow-up data until January 2019. We compared the pathological risk factor of treatment failure. Multivariate analysis was carried out to clarify the independent determinant of treatment failure. A Cox model was used to assess the influence of different variables on cumulative treatment failure rates.

RESULTS

This study included 295 cases for short-term treatment failure, and among them, 178 cases were used to study the long-term. The presence of CIN in top-hat was relevant to short-term treatment failure (OR = 9.64, 95% CI 2.55-36.4) despite a clear margin. On multivariate analysis, top-hat result (OR = 3.58, 95% CI 1.30-9.89), age ≥ 50 (OR = 10.2, 95%CI 3.64-28.3) and post-treatment HPV 16/18 infection (OR = 2.35, 95%CI 1.19-4.63) were independent risk factors in predicting short-term failure. In the Cox model, these factors were also associated with higher cumulative failure rates.

CONCLUSION

The current study supported the predictive value of top-hat procedure in short-term failure after LEEP. Typically, women with positive top-hat need closer follow-up despite their negative margin status. Older women with positive top-hat findings and HPV 16/18 infections after the treatment suffer a higher risk of short-term failure.