Office treatment of large endometrial polyps using truclear 5C: Feasibility and acceptability

Feasibility of Office-Based Operative Hysteroscopy by a Tissue Removal System Without Anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of operative hysteroscopy by a hysteroscopic tissue removal system (HTRS) without anesthesia in women with endometrial polyps (EP) or retained products of conception (RPOC).

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

PATIENTS

Consenting women aged >18 years diagnosed with EP or RPOC from 9/2022 to 8/2023 confirmed by a prior office hysteroscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

Office-based vaginoscopic operative hysteroscopy without anesthesia using the Mini-Elite Truclear HTRS. Oral misoprostol was prescribed for cervical ripening. The patients rated intraoperative and 5-minute postoperative pain levels on a visual analog scale, with mild pain defined as a score of 0 to 4, moderate as 5 to 7, and severe as 8 to 10. A successful procedure was defined as complete removal of the pathology.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in this pilot study, and 47 (94.0%) procedures were completed successfully, including 21/24 (87.5%) cases of EP and all cases of RPOC (26/26, p = .06). No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. The intraoperative pain levels were rated as mild, moderate, and severe by 26 (52.0%), 16 (32.0%) and 8 (16.0%) patients, respectively. Severe intraoperative pain was more common in nulliparous women and those >10 years from their last vaginal delivery and was not associated with patient age, menopausal status, presence of abnormal uterine bleeding, or pathology size. Severe postoperative pain, reported by 5 (10.0%) patients, was significantly associated with removal of EP compared with RPOC, longer operative time, and nulliparity or >10 years from the last vaginal delivery. The procedure was considered acceptable by 46 (92.0%) patients, and 45 (90.0%) would recommend it to a friend/relative.

CONCLUSIONS

Office-based operative hysteroscopy by the HTRS is successful and well tolerated by most women, especially for RPOC removal.

Anesthesia-free In-office Hysteroscopic Morcellation for Endometrial Polyps: A Prospective Study

Objectives

The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and quality of anesthesia-free in-office hysteroscopic morcellation for the treatment of endometrial polyps.

Materials and Methods

A prospective, single-center, open-label, single-arm clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of hysteroscopic morcellation for endometrial polyps or retained products of conception. All surgical procedures were performed using the TruClear™ 5C system in the office setting without anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the success rate of surgery, defined as the completion of the operation. The secondary endpoints were operating time, fluid deficit, adverse events, pain evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and recurrence rate.

Results

Ninety-five patients underwent hysteroscopic morcellation without anesthesia and received the treatment. The success rate of surgery was 100% (95/95), and the mean operating time was 7.3 min. Adverse events occurred in only 2.1% (2/95), with vasovagal reflex. The mean VAS scores during the procedure ranged from 2.4 to 3.1, and the recurrence rate after 6 months was 2.1% (1/47), with a pregnancy rate of 33% (11/33). When comparing nulliparous and parous patients, the success rate and the operating time were equivalent, and the mean VAS scores during the procedure were both within tolerable levels but significantly higher in nulliparous patients (3.3-4.5 vs. 1.6-1.9, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that anesthesia-free in-office hysteroscopic morcellation for endometrial polyps can be safely performed with feasible quality and only tolerable pain. This less-invasive procedure is expected to become more widespread in future.

Abnormal uterine bleeding: The well-known and the hidden face

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a bleeding from the uterine corpus that is abnormal in regularity, volume, frequency or duration. It encompasses heavy menstrual bleeding, irregular menstrual bleeding and intermenstrual bleeding, which are common symptoms among women of reproductive age, impacting their overall well-being. Menstruation involves interactions between endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, immune cell influx, and changes in endometrial vasculature. These events resemble an inflammatory response with increased vessel permeability, tissue breakdown, and the arrival of innate immune cells. However, the mechanisms of menstrual cessation are poorly understood. AUB can be related to structural causes (polyp, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, malignancy/hyperplasia) and nonstructural conditions (coagulopathy, ovulatory dysfunction, endometrial, iatrogenic). While transvaginal ultrasound is the primary method for the screening of intracavitary lesions, saline infusion sonohysterography is more accurate to detect endometrial polyps and submucous leiomyomas, while hysteroscopy with biopsy remains the reference method for a definitive diagnosis. The main goals in managing AUB are addressing and correcting the underlying primary cause, if possible, and establishing a regular bleeding pattern or amenorrhea, which can be done with antifibrinolytic agents, progestins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists, or surgical interventions, each one with specific indications and limitations. Further research is necessary to assess the effectiveness and the long-term effects of various medical and surgical treatments. Meanwhile, the availability of diagnostic methods such as transvaginal ultrasound and hysteroscopy and the universal distribution of medical treatments for AUB should be prioritized by policymakers to minimize the diagnostic and treatment delay and thus reduce the risk of AUB-related anemia and the need of hysterectomy.

Clinical evaluation of a new hand-driven hysteroscopic tissue removal device, Resectr™ 5fr, for the resection of endometrial polyps in an office setting

PURPOSE

A first clinical evaluation of a new hand-driven hysteroscopic tissue removal device, Resectr™ 5fr, for office polypectomy without any anesthesia.

METHODS

Women with at least one small endometrial polyp were eligible. Hysteroscopic polypectomy was performed using the Resectr™ 5fr in an office setting, without any anesthesia.

RESULTS

One hundred and two hysteroscopic polypectomies were included in the analysis. The median installation time was 1.9 min (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-2.1). The median time to complete polyp removal was 1.2 min (95% CI 0.8-1.6). The median surgeon's safety, practical, and comfort scores on a 5-point Likert scale were high (5 (5-5), 5 (4-5), and 5 (4-5), respectively). Women's pain score was low (median 1 (0-3)), whereas the satisfaction rate was high (median 5 (5-5)), both on a 5-point Likert scale. There were two conversions (hysteroscopic scissors (n = 1), a new Resectr™ 5fr device (n = 1)). There was one incomplete procedure (tissue hardness).

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic removal of small polyps, using the [Formula: see text] 5fr in an office setting is feasible in terms of installation and resection time. Surgeon's practical, comfort, and safety scores are high, whereas women report low pain scores and high satisfaction rates.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Clinical Trial Registry (NTR 7119, NL6923): https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6923 . Date of registration: 27/03/2018.

Outpatient Hysteroscopic Polypectomy-A Retrospective Study Comparing Rigid and Semirigid Office Hysteroscopes

Endometrial polyps are one of the most common pathological conditions in gynecology. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective study was to compare patients' pain perception during an operative hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy in an outpatient setting with two different hysteroscopes (rigid and semirigid) and to identify some clinical and intraoperative characteristics that are related to worsening pain during the procedure. We included women that underwent, at the same time as an diagnostic hysteroscopy, the complete removal of an endometrial polyp (using the see-and-treat strategy) without any kind of analgesia. A total of 166 patients were enrolled, of which 102 patients underwent a polypectomy with a semirigid hysteroscope and 64 patients underwent the procedure with a rigid hysteroscope. No differences were found during the diagnostic step; on the contrary, after the operative procedure, a statistically significant greater degree of pain was reported when the semirigid hysteroscope was used. Cervical stenosis and menopausal status were risk factors for pain both in the diagnostic step and in the operative one. Our results confirm that operative hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy in an outpatient setting is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated procedure and indicate that it might be better tolerated if a rigid rather than semirigid instrument is used.

Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal or hysteroscopic morcellator: understanding the past to predict the future. A narrative review

Background

In recent years, the available evidence revealed that mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal (mHTR) systems represent a safe and effective alternative to conventional operative resectoscopic hysteroscopy to treat a diverse spectrum of intrauterine pathology including endometrial polyps, uterine myomas, removal of placental remnants and to perform targeted endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation. This innovative technology simultaneously cuts and removes the tissue, allowing one to perform the procedure in a safer, faster and more effective way compared to conventional resectoscopic surgery.

Objective

To review currently available scientific evidence concerning the use of mechanical hysteroscopic morcellators and highlight relevant aspects of the technology.

Material and Methods

A narrative review was conducted analysing the available literature regarding hysteroscopic tissue removal systems.

Main outcome measures

Characteristics of available mHTR systems, procedures they are used for, their performance including safety aspects and their comparison.

Results

A total of 7 hysteroscopic morcellators were identified. The diameter of the external sheet ranged from 5.25 to 9.0 mm, optics ranged from 0.8 to 6.3 mm with 0o angle. The cutter device diameter ranged from 2.9 to 4.5 mm most of them with rotation and reciprocation.

Conclusion

We conclude that the adoption of mHTR has shown to reduce operating time, simultaneously cutting and suctioning tissue fragments avoiding the need for multiple removal and reinsertions of the device into the uterine cavity as well as reducing the volume of distension media required to complete the procedure compared to using the hysteroscopic resectoscope.

A Mini-Review of Office Hysteroscopic Techniques for Endometrial Tissue Sampling in Postmenopausal Bleeding

Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a common cause for a gynecological visit. Endometrial cancer risk varies from 3% to 25% in women with PMB. There is a significant concern of malignancy of the endometrium and the endocervical canal by a physician in postmenopausal women, and hence, most prefer operating room hysteroscopies with dilation and curettage (D & C) compared to in-office procedures. With increased availablility of miniaturized instruments such as mini- resectoscope and tissue removal systems, there is high likelihood of blind D & C being replaced by hysteroscopic- guided targetted biopsy or visual D & C. The cost-effectiveness of office hysteroscopy is also well demonstrated. In December 2020, an electronic search was performed of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library to look for articles on office hysteroscopic biopsy techniques in postmenopausal women from 2010 to 2020. Relevant studies were included where various office hysteroscopic techniques are used for endometrial sampling in PMB. Studies with 5 Fr scissors, biopsy forceps, crocodile forceps, cup forceps, bipolar electrode, in-office tissue removal system (morcellator), flexible hysteroscope, and mini-resectoscope were included. Standard reference was used as an adequate endometrial sample for histology. The objective of this review is to explore the current evidence on different office hysteroscopic techniques available for endometrial tissue sampling in PMB.

Endometrial polyps. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated practice guideline for the management of patients with endometrial polyps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A committee of six expert researchers draw the recommendations according to AGREE II Reporting Guideline. An electronic search was performed querying the following databases MEDLINE (accessed through PubMed), Scopus, PROSPERO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), Scielo.br, Google Scholar, from inception to May 2020. A combination of text-words and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) regarding endometrial polyps, diagnosis, management and treatment was used. Trials were assessed for methodologic rigor and graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force classification system.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) should be the imaging modality of choice for the detection of endometrial polyps in woman of fertile age (level B). Its accuracy increases when color-doppler, 3D investigation and contrast are used (level B). Dilation and Curettage (D&C) should be avoided for the diagnosis and management of polyps (level A). In office hysteroscopy showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in infertile patients with suspected endometrial polyps (level B). Polyps might alter endometrial receptivity, and embryo implantation reducing pregnancy rates (level C). Hysteroscopic polypectomy is feasible and safe with negligeble risk of intrauterine adhesion formation (level B). Polypectomy does not compromise reproductive outcomes from subsequent IVF procedures but the removal of polyps as a routine practice in sub-fertile women is not currently supported by the evidence (level B). Cost-effectiveness analysis suggest performing office polypectomy in women desiring to conceive (level B). Saline infused sonohysterography is highly accurate in detecting polyps in asymptomatic postmenopausal women (level B). Postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding and suspected endometrial polyp should be offered diagnostic hysteroscopy with hysteroscopic polypectomy if endometrial polyps are present (level B). In-office hysteroscopy has the highest diagnostic accuracy with high cost-benefits ratio for premalignant and malignant pathologies of the uterine cavity (level B). Due to risk of malignancy, histopathological analysis of the polyp is mandatory (level B). Blind D&C should be avoided due to inaccuracy for the diagnosis of focal endometrial pathology (level A). Expectant management is not recommended in symptomatic patients especially in postmenopausal women (level B). In case of atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma on a polyp, hysterectomy is recommended in all post-menopausal patients and in premenopausal patients without desire of future fertility (level B). Asymptomatic endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women should be removed in case of large diameter (> 2 cm) or in patients with risk factors for endometrial carcinoma (level B). Excision of polyps smaller than 2 cm in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients has no impact on cost-effectiveness or survival (level B). Removal of asymptomatic polyps in premenopausal women should be considered in patients with risk factors for endometrial cancer (level B).

Comparison of endometrial polyp recurrence in fertile women after office hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy using two widely spread techniques

AIM

To compare the recurrence of benign endometrial polyps after office hysteroscopic polypectomy performed with a bipolar electrode (BE) or a small diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal system (HTRs).

METHODS

From July 2018 to December 2019 we evaluated the charts of 114 asymptomatic fertile women who underwent office hysteroscopic polypectomy, 1 year before, for a single large benign endometrial polyp (size between 10 and 20 mm) using a 4 mm continuous flow hysteroscope with a BE or a 5 mm HTRs. Patients, divided into two groups according to surgical procedure, each performed exclusively by one expert gynecologist, were scheduled for a 12-month postoperative transvaginal sonography to evaluate the recurrence of endometrial polyps.

RESULTS

Forty-eight women of the BE group and 42 of the HTRs group were considered for the 1-year transvaginal sonography follow-up. Five polyps were identified in the BE group and three in the HTRs group (5/48 vs 3/42, P = n.s.). All polyps were removed hysteroscopically (in three out of five and in two out of three cases, respectively, in the same places of the previous polypectomy) and evaluated as 'benign' by the pathologist.

CONCLUSION

Office hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy with small HTRs compared to BE revealed at a 1-year follow-up no difference in terms of complete removal and recurrence of polyps. HTRs polypectomy resulted in less pain and significantly quicker time of procedure compared to BE. This data should be kept in mind for patient comfort any time hysteroscopic polypectomy is planned in an office setting.

Extending cervicoplastic surgery: an alternative technique to overcome the limitation of office hysteroscopy

Our objective is to show a feasible approach to the hysteroscopic procedures when the cervical canal has a diameter smaller than the lesion. Our study is designed as a case series and illustration of the surgical hysteroscopic technique. A group of patients (n = 37) underwent office hysteroscopy in Regional Reference Center for Hysteroscopy Service at Palagi Hospital, Florence, Italy, to see and treat an endometrial polyp with unfavorable cervical conditions between January 2019 and December 2019. An office hysteroscopy in outpatient setting with vaginoscopic approach was performed in women with unfavorable cervical conditions. Fiber-based 3.5-mm hysteroscope, with 5F electrosurgery unit and 5F bipolar electrode, was used to perform the cervicoplasty in order to enlarge the cervical canal from internal to external os, following by the removal of the endometrial polyp with the excision of the base only without slicing. After 90 days, a follow-up hysteroscopy was performed. The procedure was performed successfully in 89.2% of patients.

The surgical technique of cervicoplastic allows to perform an operative procedure without analgesia/sedation or anesthesia or blind cervical dilation, reducing the risk of complications and costs. Furthermore, cervicoplasty allowed the removal en bloc of the endocavitary lesion in all cases. At the follow-up hysteroscopy, the cervical passage was straight and smooth, without lesions repaired in all patients. Cervicoplasty is a technique which allows to perfume an ease and comfortable hysteroscopic procedure even in patients with unfavorable cervical canal. Due to the widening of the diameter of the cervical canal, intracavitary lesions are removed intact resulting in an optimal pathological evaluation.

Updates in office hysteroscopy: a practical decalogue to perform a correct procedure

Nowadays, hysteroscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathologies as it represents a safe and minimally invasive procedure that allows the visualization of the entire uterine cavity. Numerous technological innovations have occurred over the past few years, contributing to the development and widespread use of this technique. In particular, the new small-diameter hysteroscopes are equipped with an operating channel in which different mechanical instruments can be inserted, and they allow not only to examine the cervical canal and uterine cavity but also to perform biopsies or treat benign diseases in a relatively short time without anesthesia and in an outpatient setting. In this scenario, the operator must be able to perform hysteroscopy in the correct way to make this procedure increasingly safe and painless for the patient. This review aims to describe the ten steps to perform a correct office hysteroscopy, starting from patient counseling to the therapy after the procedure.