Prognostic significance of co‐existent adenomyosis on outcomes and tumor characteristics of endometrial cancer: A meta‐analysis

Molecular Signature of Endometrial Cancer with Coexistent Adenomyosis: A Multicentric Exploratory Analysis

Adenomyosis has been associated with better survival outcomes in women with endometrial cancer. However, although the endometrial cancer patients' risk stratification has been revolutionized by molecular findings, the impact of the molecular signature on the favorable prognosis of endometrial cancer patients with coexistent adenomyosis is unknown. The aim of our study was to compare the prevalence of molecular groups at poor and intermediate prognosis between endometrial cancer patients with and without coexistent adenomyosis. A multicentric, observational, retrospective, cohort study was performed to assess the differences in the prevalence of p53-abnormal expression (p53-abn) and mismatch repair protein-deficient expression (MMR-d) signatures between endometrial cancer patients with and without coexistent adenomyosis. A total of 147 endometrial cancer patients were included in the study: 38 in the adenomyosis group and 109 in the no adenomyosis group. A total of 37 patients showed the MMR-d signature (12 in the adenomyosis group and 25 in the no adenomyosis group), while 12 showed the p53-abn signature (3 in the adenomyosis group and 9 in the no adenomyosis group). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of p53-abn (p = 1.000) and MMR-d (p = 0.2880) signatures between endometrial cancer patients with and without coexistent adenomyosis. In conclusion, the molecular signature does not appear to explain the better prognosis associated with coexistent adenomyosis in endometrial cancer patients. Further investigation of these findings is necessary through future larger studies.

Effect of coexisting adenomyosis on tumour characteristics and prognosis of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer, with and without associated adenomyosis. PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant observational studies. The pooled effect sizes were reported as either hazards ratio (HR) for survival-related outcomes or as odds ratio (OR) for other categorical outcomes. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was reported for continuous outcomes. All the analyses used the random effects model. A total of 21 studies (N = 46,420) were included. Compared to endometrial cancer patients without adenomyosis, patients with associated adenomyosis had improved overall 5-year survival (OS) (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.79) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.82). Disease-specific survival was statistically similar in patients with and without adenomyosis (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.05). Among patients with adenomyosis, the risk of having an advanced tumour grade (Grade 2 or 3) was lower (OR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.62) and a risk of having International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I or II was higher (OR 2.23, 95% CI: 1.65, 3.01). Patients with adenomyosis had lower risk of tumour invasion of adnexa, cervical stromal invasion, deep myometrial involvement (DMI), lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) and peritoneal invasion. Presence of adenomyosis in patients with endometrial cancer is associated with favourable tumour characteristics and may improve the survival.

Adenomyosis as a Risk Factor for Myometrial or Endometrial Neoplasms—Review

Adenomyosis is a common benign gynecological condition, defined as an extension of endometrial tissue into the myometrium. Some studies suggest that adenomyosis could be a favorable prediction factor associated with survival outcomes in endometrial cancer. The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the current knowledge regarding adenomyosis and a possible molecular mechanism of carcinogenesis in adenomyotic lesions. In addition, the long-term prognosis for patients with endometrial cancer and coexisting adenomyosis (and endometriosis) was a key point of the research. The current literature was reviewed by searching PubMed, using the following phrases: “adenomyosis and endometrial cancer” and “malignant transformation of adenomyosis”. According to the literature, genetic mutations, epigenetic changes, and inactivation of specific tumor suppressor genes in adenomyosis are still poorly understood. Data regarding the influence of adenomyosis on survival outcomes in endometrial cancer seem to be contradictory and require further clinical and molecular investigation.

Impact of adenomyosis on the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer

Background

Despite the high prevalence of adenomyosis in hysterectomy specimens of endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients, the relationship between adenomyosis and EC prognosis appears unclear.

Objective

To assess the prognostic value of coexistent adenomyosis in patients with EC.

Methods

A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed by searching six electronic databases for studies reporting data on prognosis of EC patients with and without coexistent adenomyosis. Studies with patient selection based on prognostic factors were excluded. Pooled univariate hazard ratio (HR) analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DRF) were performed, using EC patients without adenomyosis as a control group. For DFS, pooled multivariate HR analysis was also evaluable.

Results

Three studies of 2505 EC patients (553 with and 1952 without adenomyosis) were included. Compared with EC patients without adenomyosis, EC patients with coexistent adenomyosis showed a pooled HR of 0.533 (CI 95%, 0.329–0.864) for OS at univariate analysis; 0.536 (CI 95%, 0.334–0.859) for DFS at univariate analysis; and 0.875 (CI 95%, 0.331–2.315) for DFS at multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

In EC patients with coexistent adenomyosis, the risk of death is halved compared with EC patients without adenomyosis. However, the independence of this association needs to be verified in future studies.

The risk of death is halved in EC patients with coexistent adenomyosis compared with EC patients without adenomyosis, whereas the risk of EC recurrence does not appear to be affected.