1
|
Connor C, Sato T, Bianchi DW, Fenton K, Somani E, Turriff A, Berkman B, Hendriks S. Comparing the Introduction and Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States: An Integrative Review. Prenat Diagn 2025. [PMID: 39812652 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that NIPT's implementation differed widely across countries but offer limited insight into what shaped these differences. To address this gap, we conducted an in-depth analysis of how NIPT was incorporated into prenatal care in the US, the Netherlands, and Japan-countries with similar economic status-to identify actionable lessons. We conducted an integrative literature review on the process of introducing and implementing NIPT, stakeholders' roles, documented considerations in the decision to introduce NIPT, implementation choices, and NIPT uptake. We included 184 sources, including white and gray literature and non-English sources. We identified 17 considerations that were documented to have influenced the decision whether to introduce NIPT across five domains: clinical considerations, ethical considerations and societal values, financial considerations, demand and capacity and applicable oversight. Fewer factors seem to have been considered in the US as compared to Japan or the Netherlands. Countries subsequently made choices on how to implement NIPT-we identified 35 such choices. While most of the identified choices were eventually considered by all three countries, they made different decisions (e.g., on out-of-pocket costs). In 2022, the estimated proportion of pregnant persons who used NIPT was 58% in the Netherlands, 49% in the US, and 9% in Japan. While differences in cultural values, population characteristics, and healthcare systems explain some variation, we identified other more adaptable aspects of the decision-making process (e.g., oversight) that may be useful for countries introducing NIPT or similar technologies to consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Connor
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Taisuke Sato
- Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Diana W Bianchi
- Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathleen Fenton
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elika Somani
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Amy Turriff
- Prenatal Genomics and Fetal Therapy Section, Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Benjamin Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Saskia Hendriks
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jwa SC, Namba A, Tamaru S, Kuwahara A, Sago H, Ishihara O, Kamei Y. Down syndrome live births following assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a nationwide survey between 2007 and 2016. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:1625-1631. [PMID: 35597856 PMCID: PMC9365909 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02501-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and prenatal genetic testing have become more widespread in line with an increase in maternal age. However, the effect of the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in April 2013 on pregnancy outcomes in Japan, including the prevalence of Down syndrome live births following ART, has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome live births following ART in Japan. METHODS This population-based retrospective study used the Japanese nationwide ART registry. All clinical pregnancies resulting in live births, stillbirths, and termination of pregnancy (TOP) following ART from 2007 to 2016 were included. Pregnancy outcomes involving infants with Down syndrome were evaluated. RESULTS Among 351,808 pregnancies, the proportion of mothers with advanced age increased significantly from 2007 to 2016 (from 49.5 to 62.4% and 8.9 to 17.8% for mothers aged ≥ 35 and ≥ 40 years, respectively). The proportion of live births with Down syndrome was 77.3% in 2007, which remained consistent until 2012, but then decreased significantly to 45.1% after 2013 (P < 0.001). The prevalence of Down syndrome live births increased up to 2012 (19.5/10,000 live births), decreased significantly in 2013 (12.1/10,000 live births), and then remained almost stable (11.1-14.7/10,000 live births). CONCLUSION The introduction of NIPT balanced the prevalence of Down syndrome live births following ART with recent increasing maternal age in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Chik Jwa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, 38, Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan.
| | - Akira Namba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, 38, Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tamaru
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, 38, Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| | - Akira Kuwahara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Sago
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1, Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan
| | - Osamu Ishihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, 38, Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Kamei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, 38, Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamura S, Sasaki A, Ogawa K, Kato K, Sago H. Periconceptional folic acid intake and disturbing factors: A single-center study in Japan. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2022; 62:42-46. [PMID: 34750867 DOI: 10.1111/cga.12449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We investigated folic acid (FA) intake and disturbing factors in pregnant women who visited our center in 2017. Among 1531 pregnant women, 45.1% of women initiated FA supplementation before pregnancy. The risk of failure of supplementation was significantly lower among women of ≥35 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.43) and 30-34 years of age (aOR: 0.59) in comparison to women of <30 years of age, and among those conceived with timing/artificial insemination of husband (aOR 0.47) and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (aOR 0.32) in comparison to those conceived naturally. The risk among those with 1 (aOR 1.44) or ≥2 previous deliveries (aOR 2.75) was significantly higher in comparison to nulliparous women. Young, multiparous women, and those with natural conception should be targeted to promote preconceptional FA intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Kamura
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyushu University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Aiko Sasaki
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Ogawa
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoko Kato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyushu University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Sago
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nishiyama M, Ogawa K, Hasegawa F, Sekido Y, Sasaki A, Akaishi R, Tachibana Y, Umehara N, Wada S, Ozawa N, Sago H. Pregnant women's opinions toward prenatal pretest genetic counseling in Japan. J Hum Genet 2021; 66:659-669. [PMID: 33486503 PMCID: PMC7825380 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-021-00902-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In-person models of genetic counseling (GC) have been the common method in Japan for pregnant women to receive GC. However, recent increases in the number of pregnant women considering undergoing prenatal testing have made it challenging to retain individualized in-person care. To explore pregnant women’s opinions toward pretest GC models and the ideal time duration, a self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted for women at their first prenatal visit. A total of 114 valid respondents (93.4%) were included in the analyses. Of these, 80.7% of women preferred in-person GC, followed by classroom (9.6%), group (3.5%), and telegenetic-based GC (2.6%). Women with experience in undergoing prenatal testing significantly did not prefer in-person GC (p = 0.05). Sixty-two women (54.4%) preferred a duration of 15–29 min for pretest GC sessions, followed by 30–59 min (28.9%) and <15 min (14.9%). Women’s preference of ≥30 min in length was significantly associated with anhedonia, singleton pregnancies, acquaintance with people with trisomy 21, and awareness of prenatal testing. Women who were unaware of the need for agreement with the partner for prenatal testing and who did not know the average life expectancy of a trisomy 21 patient significantly preferred <15 min in length over other durations. While the majority of women preferred in-person GC for <30 min, their preferences varied by their background characteristics, experiences, attitudes, and knowledge. These findings will help establish a prenatal GC system offering a choice of GC models in Japan; however, further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miyuki Nishiyama
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kohei Ogawa
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fuyuki Hasegawa
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Sekido
- Department of Psychosocial Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aiko Sasaki
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rina Akaishi
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Tachibana
- Division of Infant and Toddler Mental Health, Department of Psychosocial Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nagayoshi Umehara
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiji Wada
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Ozawa
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Sago
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|