Development and validation of a real-time method characterizing spontaneous pain in women with dysmenorrhea

Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials

Despite the importance of menstruation and the menstrual cycle to health, human rights, and sociocultural and economic wellbeing, the study of menstrual health suffers from a lack of funding, and research remains fractured across many disciplines. We sought to systematically review validated approaches to measure four aspects of changes to the menstrual cycle-bleeding, blood, pain, and perceptions-caused by any source and used within any field. We then evaluated the measure quality and utility for clinical trials of the identified instruments. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and four instrument databases and included peer-reviewed articles published between 2006 and 2023 that reported on the development or validation of instruments assessing menstrual changes using quantitative or mixed-methods methodology. From a total of 8,490 articles, 8,316 were excluded, yielding 174 articles reporting on 94 instruments. Almost half of articles were from the United States or United Kingdom and over half of instruments were only in English, Spanish, French, or Portuguese. Most instruments measured bleeding parameters, uterine pain, or perceptions, but few assessed characteristics of blood. Nearly 60% of instruments were developed for populations with menstrual or gynecologic disorders or symptoms. Most instruments had fair or good measure quality or clinical trial utility; however, most instruments lacked evidence on responsiveness, question sensitivity and/or transferability, and only three instruments had good scores of both quality and utility. Although we took a novel, transdisciplinary approach, our systematic review found important gaps in the literature and instrument landscape, pointing towards a need to examine the menstrual cycle in a more comprehensive, inclusive, and standardized way. Our findings can inform the development of new or modified instruments, which-if used across the many fields that study menstrual health and within clinical trials-can contribute to a more systemic and holistic understanding of menstruation and the menstrual cycle.

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging-based investigation of the role of perfusion and oxygen availability in menstrual pain

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms responsible for menstrual pain are poorly understood. However, dynamic, noninvasive pelvic imaging of menstrual pain sufferers could aid in identifying therapeutic targets and testing novel treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To study the mechanisms responsible for menstrual pain, we analyzed ultrasonographic and complementary functional magnetic resonance imaging parameters in dysmenorrhea sufferers and pain-free controls under multiple conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging on participants with and those without dysmenorrhea during menses and outside menses. To clarify whether regional changes in oxygen availability and perfusion occur, functional magnetic resonance imaging R2∗ measurements of the endometrium and myometrium were obtained. R2∗ measurements are calculated nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation rates sensitive to the paramagnetic properties of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. We also compared parameters before and after an analgesic dose of naproxen sodium. In addition, we performed similar measurements with Doppler ultrasonography to identify if changes in uterine arterial velocity occurred during menstrual cramping in real time. Mixed model statistics were performed to account for within-subject effects across conditions. Corrections for multiple comparisons were made with a false discovery rate adjustment.

RESULTS

During menstruation, a notable increase in R2∗ values, indicative of tissue ischemia, was observed in both the myometrium (beta ± standard error of the mean, 15.74±2.29 s-1; P=.001; q=.002) and the endometrium (26.37±9.33 s-1; P=.005; q=.008) of participants who experienced dysmenorrhea. A similar increase was noted in the myometrium (28.89±2.85 s-1; P=.001; q=.002) and endometrium (75.50±2.57 s-1; P=.001; q=.003) of pain-free controls. Post hoc analyses revealed that the R2∗ values during menstruation were significantly higher among the pain-free controls (myometrium, P=.008; endometrium, P=.043). Although naproxen sodium increased the endometrial R2∗ values among participants with dysmenorrhea (48.29±15.78 s-1; P=.005; q=.008), it decreased myometrial R2∗ values among pain-free controls. The Doppler findings were consistent with the functional magnetic resonance imaging (-8.62±3.25 s-1; P=.008; q=.011). The pulsatility index (-0.42±0.14; P=.004; q=.004) and resistance index (-0.042±0.012; P=.001; q=.001) decreased during menses when compared with the measurements outside of menses, and the effects were significantly reversed by naproxen sodium. Naproxen sodium had the opposite effect in pain-free controls. There were no significant real-time changes in the pulsatility index, resistance index, peak systolic velocity, or minimum diastolic velocity during episodes of symptomatic menstrual cramping.

CONCLUSION

Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler metrics suggest that participants with dysmenorrhea have better perfusion and oxygen availability than pain-free controls. Naproxen sodium's therapeutic mechanism is associated with relative reductions in uterine perfusion and oxygen availability. An opposite pharmacologic effect was observed in pain-free controls. During menstrual cramping, there is insufficient evidence of episodic impaired uterine perfusion. Thus, prostaglandins may have protective vasoconstrictive effects in pain-free controls and opposite effects in participants with dysmenorrhea.

Scientific Knowledge Graph of Dysmenorrhea: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2001 to 2021

Purpose

This study aims to help researchers master the most active hotspots and trends quickly through bibliometric analysis in the field of dysmenorrhea.

Methods

We retrieved literature on Web of Science from 2001 to 2021, and bibliometric analysis software CiteSpace was used in combination with VOSviewer.

Results

We finally acquired 944 papers and an upward trend in articles continued in this field overall. Through the map, China contributed the most, followed by the USA and Turkey. For institutions, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine in China contributed the most, followed by National Yang-Ming University in Taiwan, China. Hsieh JC and Hellman KM were both the most prolific authors with 14 articles. Five major research groups, respectively, with Hsieh JC, Hellman KM, Zhu J, Liang F and Dun W were the key group. Dawood MY was the most dominant author and most frequently cited author. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Journal was the most productive, and the Fertility and Sterility Journal was the most cited. Advances in pathogenesis and management for primary dysmenorrhea written by Dawood MY was most cited and influential. Pathophysiology, the potential central mechanism, syndrome, evaluation index, diagnosis of adenomyosis-associated dysmenorrhea, treatment, etc., were the main trends and hotspots.

Conclusion

Dysmenorrhea research has received a lot of attention from scholars. Strengthening international cooperation may promote the development of this field. The pathophysiology of dysmenorrhea, its impact on public health and its treatment are current research hotspots and are likely to be the focus of future study.