May human epididymis 4 protein play a role in the etiopathogenesis of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome?

Administration of corticosteroid therapy for HELLP syndrome in pregnant women: evidences from seven randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

HELLP syndrome, featuring hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and thrombocytopenia, is life-threatening disease of pregnancy that triggers comorbidities in both pregnant women and the fetus/newborn. This study provides an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies to assess the therapeutic efficacy of corticosteroids in maternal and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

Randomized control trials (RCTs) regarding the use of corticosteroids in the HELLP population from three electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, andCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from database inception to 23 March 202323 March 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 485 patients treated with corticosteroids from 7 RCTs were included. Compared to placebo, corticosteroids therapy failed to significantly improve the maternal outcomes regard to maternal morbidity (RR = 1.36, 95%CI [0.45, 4.10]), eclampsia (RR = 1.16, 95%CI [0.76, 1.77]), acute renal failure (RR = 0.71, 95%CI [0.41, 1.22]), pulmonary edema (RR = 0.34, 95%CI [0.10, 1.15]) and oliguria (RR = 1.08, 95%CI [0.75, 1.54]). In addition, pooled data showed that it wasn't significant differences between corticosteroids therapy and placebo regarding neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study compared the efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with HELLP syndrome, revealing that corticosteroids did not provide any significant benefit in clinical outcomes for pregnant women and newborns with HELLP. The conclusions of this study must be verified by a larger sample of high-quality RCTs.

Exploring the relationship between preeclampsia and human epididymis protein 4

Background/Aim: The level of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), a glycoprotein and protease inhibitor, increases under many malignancies and inflammatory conditions. HE4 is also associated with cell invasion, migration, and adhesion. In this study, we compared the HE4 protein levels in pregnant patients with preeclampsia to healthy pregnant and non-pregnant individuals with the aim of finding a biomarker that can be used to recognize preeclampsia. Methods: Our study is a prospective case control study and included 20 pregnant women with preeclampsia, 20 pregnant women without preeclampsia, and 20 healthy non-pregnant women (the control). The participants’ serum HE4 levels were analyzed statistically. Results: Data analysis revealed that the mean HE4 levels were significantly lower in the preeclampsia group than in the other two groups (P = 0.002). Mean HE4 protein levels were also lower in the non-pregnant women than in the pregnant women without preeclampsia; however, this difference was not significant. Conclusion: It is difficult to predict preeclampsia, and there is not any sensitive or specific biomarker for determining the condition. This study may support that HE4 protein may be useful and significant in predicting preeclampsia. The results we achieved provide proof that HE4 levels could be a potential biomarker for preeclampsia. Many more comprehensive studies are needed to support the association between HE4 protein and preeclampsia.