1
|
Antony KM, McDonald RC, Gaston L, Hetzel S, Li Z. Surgical transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine at cesarean: a pilot randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024; 6:101273. [PMID: 38154599 PMCID: PMC10990562 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postcesarean pain control is challenging. In addition to intrathecal morphine, recent studies have shown that liposomal bupivacaine administered via conventional transversus abdominis plane block reduces postcesarean opioid use. However, whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via a surgical approach also reduces opioid use is unknown. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) reduces the cumulative dose of opioids administered in the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery among participants who also receive intrathecal morphine. STUDY DESIGN This was a pilot single-blind randomized controlled trial of 60 parturients undergoing cesarean delivery at a community tertiary referral hospital staffed by academic physicians. Immediately before fascial closure during cesarean delivery, a total of 80 mL of dilute bupivacaine plus liposomal bupivacaine or dilute bupivacaine alone was administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (40 mL on each side). The primary outcome was a median cumulative opioid dose received within the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery measured in morphine milligram equivalents. In addition, opioid use at other time points, pain scores, and participant satisfaction were assessed. A sample size of 60 was determined to be adequate to inform a potential future adequately powered randomized trial. The primary outcome of morphine milligram equivalents and pain scores were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS Between October 11, 2021, and August 29, 2022, 60 participants were randomized and analyzed: 31 were allocated to liposomal bupivacaine plus regular bupivacaine (intervention group), and 29 were allocated to regular bupivacaine alone (control group). Participants allocated to the intervention group used a median cumulative dose of 2 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids (interquartile range, 0-24) in the first 48 hours compared with 8 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartile range, 0-40) among participants allocated to the control group (P=.236). The percentage of participants who used ≤15 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids was 61% in the intervention arm and 41% in the control arm (P=.123), and the percentage who used zero opioids was 45% in the intervention arm and 34% in the control arm (P=.399). The total number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge was fewer in the intervention arm than in the control arm (P=.029). Patient satisfaction with the intervention group and control group was similar. CONCLUSION Our pilot study suggests that liposomal bupivacaine administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block is worth critical evaluation as an adjunctive analgesic modality in an adequately powered randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen M Antony
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Dr Antony); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Drs Antony, McDonald, and Gaston).
| | - Ryan C McDonald
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Drs Antony, McDonald, and Gaston); Division of Academic Specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Drs McDonald and Gaston)
| | - Luther Gaston
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Drs Antony, McDonald, and Gaston); Division of Academic Specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Drs McDonald and Gaston)
| | - Scott Hetzel
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Mr Hetzel and Dr Li)
| | - Zhanhai Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI (Mr Hetzel and Dr Li)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silverman M, Zwolinski N, Wang E, Lockwood N, Ancuta M, Jin E, Li J. Regional Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review Toward Enhancing Outcomes in Parturients. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3807-3835. [PMID: 38026463 PMCID: PMC10644837 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s428332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction With the current surge on peripheral nerve blocks in post-cesarean pain management and the historical lack of unequivocal evidence supporting its universal use, this review intended to re-examine the extended scope of literature on regional anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in low-transverse cesarean section. Methods A literature search was conducted up to April 2023 using PubMed to identify articles relevant to our search words "cesarean section", "neuraxial morphine", "post-cesarean analgesia", as well as the name of each individual nerve block. The literature search was ultimately narrowed to systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials published between 2012 and 2023. We define, describe, and discuss the evidence surrounding each individual regional anesthetic technique in the presence and absence of intrathecal morphine, which is used as the gold standard when appropriate. Results In the absence of neuraxial morphine, all regional anesthetic techniques have some level of analgesic benefit in the post-cesarean analgesia. Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks continue to have the most studies in their use. Newer fascia plane blocks including the anterior Quadratus Lumborum, and Erector Spinae Plane blocks provide significant analgesia. In addition, direct comparison among peripheral nerve blocks consistently favors the more proximal, centralized techniques. Conversely, in the presence of neuraxial morphine, no peripheral anesthetic technique has reliably and reproducibly demonstrated an added analgesic benefit regardless of the peripheral nerve block technique or location of local anesthetic injection in the post-cesarean population. Conclusion Neuraxial morphine continues to be the gold standard for post-cesarean section analgesia, the benefit of additional single injection regional anesthetic is currently not evidence supported. In cases where neuraxial opioids have not or cannot be given, there is overwhelming evidence that regional anesthetic techniques improve post-cesarean section analgesia and decrease post-operative opioid consumption. Even though there is no consensus on the optimal peripheral nerve block, emerging evidence suggests more centralized abdominal fascia plane block trends towards better analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Silverman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nicholas Zwolinski
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ethan Wang
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nishita Lockwood
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael Ancuta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Evan Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jinlei Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sharma R, Damiano J, Al-Saidi I, Dizdarevic A. Chest Wall and Abdominal Blocks for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgeries: A Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:587-600. [PMID: 37624474 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01158-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date description and overview of the rapidly growing literature pertaining to techniques and clinical applications of chest wall and abdominal fascial plane blocks in managing perioperative pain. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical evidence suggests that regional anesthesia blocks, including fascial plane blocks, such as pectoralis, serratus, erector spinae, transversus abdominis, and quadratus lumborum blocks, are effective in providing analgesia for various surgical procedures and have more desirable side effect profile when compared to traditional neuraxial techniques. They offer advantages such as reduced opioid consumption, improved pain control, and decreased opioid-related side effects. Further research is needed to establish optimal techniques and indications for these blocks. Presently, they are a vital instrument in a gamut of multimodal analgesia options, especially when there are contraindications to neuraxial or para-neuraxial procedures. Ultimately, clinical judgment and provider skill set determine which blocks-alone or in combination-should be offered to any patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Sharma
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - James Damiano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Ibrahim Al-Saidi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Anis Dizdarevic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bloc S, Alfonsi P, Belbachir A, Beaussier M, Bouvet L, Campard S, Campion S, Cazenave L, Diemunsch P, Di Maria S, Dufour G, Fabri S, Fletcher D, Garnier M, Godier A, Grillo P, Huet O, Joosten A, Lasocki S, Le Guen M, Le Saché F, Macquer I, Marquis C, de Montblanc J, Maurice-Szamburski A, Nguyen YL, Ruscio L, Zieleskiewicz L, Caillard A, Weiss E. Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101264. [PMID: 37295649 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs. DESIGN A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. METHODS Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a "formalized expert recommendations" format. RESULTS The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Bloc
- Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France.
| | - Pascal Alfonsi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris Descartes, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, F-75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
| | - Anissa Belbachir
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, UF Douleur, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP.Centre, Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Bouvet
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sébastien Campion
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laure Cazenave
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Groupe Jeunes, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), 75016 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Diemunsch
- Unité de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimations Chirurgicales, Samu-Smur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Sophie Di Maria
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Dufour
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Fabri
- Faculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy, University of Malta, Malta
| | - Dominique Fletcher
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Service d'Anesthésie, 9, Avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marc Garnier
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire Rive Droite, Paris, France
| | - Anne Godier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Huet
- CHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France
| | | | - Morgan Le Guen
- Paris Saclay University, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Frédéric Le Saché
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France; DMU DREAM Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Macquer
- Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - Constance Marquis
- Clinique du Sport, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Médipole Garonne, 45 rue de Gironis - CS 13 624, 31036 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Jacques de Montblanc
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Yên-Lan Nguyen
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Cochin Academic Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Laura Ruscio
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM U 1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurent Zieleskiewicz
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, C2VN, France
| | - Anaîs Caillard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Cavale Blanche Université de Bretagne Ouest, Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Brest, France
| | - Emmanuel Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP, Nord, Clichy, France; University of Paris, Paris, France; Inserm UMR_S1149, Centre for Research on Inflammation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun P, Liang XQ, Hong T, Zhang H. Perioperative management of acute myocardial infarction in the 31st week of pregnancy: A case report and literature review. Front Surg 2022; 9:1023551. [DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1023551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy-related acute myocardial infarction (PAMI) is rare but life-threatening. The incidence of PAMI is growing over time for multiple reasons, and the management of parturients with acute myocardial infarction is challenging in terms of diagnosis and treatment. To date, there are still no clear guidelines on the best practice for PAMI. We present a case of a 41-year-old woman with PAMI at 31 weeks of pregnancy. Through multidisciplinary collaboration, successful outcomes were achieved for both the mother and fetus.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abate SM, Mergia G, Nega S, Basu B, Tadesse M. Efficacy and safety of wound infiltration modalities for postoperative pain management after cesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev 2022; 11:194. [PMID: 36071535 PMCID: PMC9450460 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02068-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain after a cesarean section has negative consequences for the mother during the postoperative period. Over the years, various postoperative pain management strategies have been used following cesarean section. Opioid-based analgesics and landmark approaches have negative side effects, while ultrasound-based regional analgesia necessitates resources and experience, but various wound infiltration adjuvants are innovative with few side effects and are simple to use. The efficacy and safety of each adjuvant, however, are unknown and require further investigation. OBJECTIVE This network meta-analysis is intended to provide the most effective wound infiltration drugs for postoperative management after cesarean section. METHOD A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, CINHAL, and LILACS without date and language restrictions. All randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of wound infiltration drugs for postoperative pain management after cesarean section will be included. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two authors. The quality of studies will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the overall quality of the evidence will be determined by GRADEpro software. DISCUSSION The rate of postoperative acute and chronic pain is very high which has a huge impact on the mother, family, healthcare practitioners, and healthcare delivery. It is a basic human right to give every patient with postoperative pain treatment that is realistic in terms of resources, technique, cost, and adverse event profile. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021268774.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semagn Mekonnen Abate
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
| | - Getachew Mergia
- Departemnt of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
| | - Solomon Nega
- Departemnt of Internal Medicine, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
| | - Bivash Basu
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
| | - Moges Tadesse
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burchard PR, Melucci AD, Lynch O, Loria A, Dave YA, Strawderman M, Schoeniger LO, Galka E, Moalem J, Linehan DC. Intrathecal Morphine and Effect on Opioid Consumption and Functional Recovery after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:392-400. [PMID: 35758927 PMCID: PMC9371061 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-shot intrathecal morphine (ITM) is an effective strategy for postoperative analgesia, but there are limited data on its safety, efficacy, and relationship with functional recovery among patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2014 to 2020 as identified by the institutional NSQIP Hepato-pancreato-biliary database. Patients were categorized by having received no spinal analgesia, ITM, or ITM with transversus abdominus plane block (ITM+TAP). The primary outcomes were average daily pain scores from postoperative days (POD) 0 to 3, total morphine equivalents (MEQ) consumed over POD 0 to 3, and average daily inpatient MEQ from POD 4 to discharge. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of opioid related complications, length of stay, and functional recovery. RESULTS A total of 233 patients with a median age of 67 years were included. Of these, 36.5% received no spinal analgesia, 49.3% received ITM, and 14.2% received ITM+TAP. Average pain scores in POD 0 to 3 were similar by mode of spinal analgesia (none [2.8], ITM [2.6], ITM+TAP [2.3]). Total MEQ consumed from POD 0 to 3 were lower for patients who received ITM (121 mg) and ITM+TAP (132 mg), compared with no spinal analgesia (232 mg) (p < 0.0001). Average daily MEQ consumption from POD 4 to discharge was lower for ITM (18 mg) and ITM+TAP (13.1 mg) cohorts compared with no spinal analgesia (32.9 mg) (p = 0.0016). Days to functional recovery and length of stay were significantly reduced for ITM and ITM+TAP compared with no spinal analgesia. These findings remained consistent through multivariate analysis, and there were no differences in opioid-related complications among cohorts. CONCLUSIONS ITM was associated with reduced early postoperative and total inpatient opioid utilization, days to functional recovery, and length of stay among patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. ITM is a safe and effective form of perioperative analgesia that may benefit patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R Burchard
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| | - Alexa D Melucci
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| | - Olivia Lynch
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (Lynch)
| | - Anthony Loria
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| | - Yatee A Dave
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| | - Myla Strawderman
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology (Strawderman), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Luke O Schoeniger
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| | - Eva Galka
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| | - Jacob Moalem
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| | - David C Linehan
- From the Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology (Burchard, Melucci, Loria, Dave, Schoeniger, Galka, Moalem, Linehan)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu H, Li Y, Wu X. Letter to: Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48:1055. [PMID: 35142411 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Yu
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Huzhou central hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yang Li
- Pain Clinic, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaobin Wu
- Pain Clinic, Huzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|