See-and-treat in-office hysteroscopy versus operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception: A retrospective study

Legal Lens on Hysteroscopy: A Retrospective Review of Medical Malpractice Claims of Hysteroscopic Procedures

Background: Given the expansiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy, promptly recognizing complications and intervening as necessary to prevent adverse outcomes and minimize legal risk is imperative. We aim to describe the litigious trends in hysteroscopic procedures across the United States; Methods: Publicly available lawsuits published on a well-known legal database, Westlaw, were reviewed. The search term "'hysteroscop!'" was used to filter cases for court opinions containing words with this prefix, including "hysteroscopy", "hysteroscopies", and "hysteroscopic." Adverse events, procedural outcomes, post-procedural surgery urgency, and resultant disabilities were extracted for themes; Results: The primary complication resulting in legal action was uterine perforation (52.9%), followed by claimed technical mistakes (23.5%) and damage to surrounding structures (11.8%). The most common outcome was the need for future corrective surgery (70.6%), and a number of cases resulted in permanent brain damage or death (23.6%). Of the patients that required subsequent corrective surgery (n = 12), 91.7% of them required emergent surgery. Patients sought damages most commonly from individual attending providers (41.2%), attending physician and practice groups/hospitals collectively (41.2%), and additional entities, including resident physicians in training and manufacturers. Awards ranged from $322,308 to $9,387,109; Conclusions: Medical malpractice litigation is challenging to patients and providers alike, often leading to financial, emotional, and professional burden. Our evaluation highlights the variability in adverse events from hysteroscopy which prompt litigation, financial burden of lawsuits, and legal risk of individual providers, in an attempt to improve safety of future procedures.

The efficacy of early office hysteroscopy in preventing intrauterine adhesions after abortion: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine adhesions (IUA) are a challenging clinical problem in reproductive infertility. The most common causes are intrauterine surgery and abortions. We aimed to investigate whether early second-look office hysteroscopy can prevent IUA.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective, two-armed, randomized controlled trial was designed to explore the efficacy of early office hysteroscopy after first-trimester induced abortion (suction dilatation and curettage [D&C]) and to further analyze fertility outcomes. Women aged 20-45 years undergoing suction D&C and desiring to conceive were recruited. Between October 2019 and September 2022, 66 women were enrolled, of whom 33 were allocated to group A (early hysteroscopy intervention). The women in intervention group A were planned to receive 2 times of hysteroscopies (early and late). In group B, women only underwent late (6 months post suction D&C) hysteroscopy.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was the IUA rate assessed using office hysteroscopy 6 months after artificial abortion. Secondary outcomes included menstrual amount/durations and fertility outcomes. In intervention group A, 31 women underwent the first hysteroscopy examination, and 15 completed the second. In group B (late hysteroscopy intervention, 33 patients), 16 completed the hysteroscopic exam 6 months after an artificial abortion. Twenty-one women did not receive late hysteroscopy due to pregnancy. The IUA rate was 16.1% (5/31) at the first hysteroscopy in group A, and no IUA was detected during late hysteroscopy. Neither group showed statistically significant differences in the follow-up pregnancy and live birth rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Early hysteroscopy following suction D&C can detect intrauterine lesions. IUA detected early by hysteroscopy can disappear on late examination and become insignificant for future pregnancies. Notably, the pregnancy outcomes showed a favorable trend in the early hysteroscopy group, but there were no statistically significant differences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT04166500. Registered on 2019-11-10. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04166500 .

Outpatient hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception: evaluation of effectiveness, safety and patient satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

To assess effectiveness, safety and patient satisfaction of hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception using a tissue removal system in the outpatient setting.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital over a 10-month period. Fifty-two women who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy for removal of retained products of conception were included. Effectiveness was evaluated as complete removal of retained products of conception in a one-time procedure. Safety was determined based on the rate of complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Patient satisfaction and pain were assessed using a visual analogue scale survey completed by patients after the procedure.

RESULTS

Complete removal of retained products of conception in a one-time procedure was achieved in 98.1% of cases. The mean morcellation time was 6.0 min. The complication rate recorded in this study was 9.6%; most complications were mild, but there was one case of uterine perforation. A global satisfaction ratio of 8.9 out of 10 was reported by patients. The study did not find any significant differences in complete removal of retained products of conception based on type of hysteroscope, presence of symptoms or Gutenberg classification. Although not significant, a linear relationship was observed between a higher volume of retained products of conception and a higher Gutenberg classification (p=0.229).

CONCLUSION

Outpatient management of retained products of conception using a tissue removal system is effective and safe, and has a high level of patient satisfaction. The results of this study have the potential to alter the standard approach to the management of retained products of conception.

Hysteroscopy in the new media: quality and reliability analysis of hysteroscopy procedures on YouTube™

BACKGROUND

Hysteroscopy plays a crucial role in diagnosing and managing various intrauterine pathologies. However, its execution can be influenced by patients' perception and understanding, which are often shaped by digital resources such as YouTubeTM. Given its popularity and accessibility, YouTubeTM has the potential to greatly influence patients' knowledge and expectations about this procedure, highlighting the need for accurate and reliable information.

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the reliability and quality of hysteroscopy information available to patients on YouTubeTM. Understanding the nature of information patients' access can help address their fears and potential misunderstandings about the procedure, consequently reducing the likelihood of suspension or postponement due to anxiety.

METHODS

A comprehensive analysis of YouTubeTM was conducted, simulating the search process of a patient seeking information about hysteroscopy. The study evaluated the reliability and quality of 90 out of the first 100 hysteroscopy-related videos on YouTubeTM, scored by four gynecologists-two experienced hysteroscopists and two trainees. The videos were assessed for reliability and quality using the mDISCERN and Global Quality Scale (GQS) scores.

RESULTS

The average mDISCERN and GQS scores for the evaluated videos were below the optimal three points, highlighting the lack of fluency, comprehensiveness, and reliability of the available information. Notably, while videos produced by experts, including doctors and professional channels, had higher scores, they still fell short of the minimum score of 3. These videos also were not considered more suitable for either patients or trainees. Videos that were assessed as reliable (mDISCERN ≥ 3) were observed to be longer and were more frequently produced by doctors. These videos were suggested more to trainees rather than patients. Similarly, videos deemed as fluent and comprehensive (GQS ≥ 3) were longer and were more often recommended to patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While YouTubeTM is a widely used source of medical information, the quality and reliability of hysteroscopy videos on the platform are poor. The strategic use of selected, high-quality hysteroscopy videos can enhance procedure success and alleviate patient fears. However, the unsupervised discovery of information by patients could potentially lead to procedure failure or an elevated level of stress due to misleading or incorrect information.

Hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Retained products of conception can occur with induced abortion during early-term pregnancy, induction of labor during mid-term pregnancy, drug-induced abortion, miscarriage, cesarean delivery, or full-term normal delivery. Compared with traditional dilation and curettage, hysteroscopy is a safer and more effective treatment method for retained products of conception. This study aimed to report the efficacy of hysteroscopy for treating retained products of conception and to share our new clinical perspectives.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Chengdu, China. We included 36 patients with retained products of conception who underwent hysteroscopy at our hospital.

RESULTS

Our study reported a complete removal rate of 80.5% (29/36) with one procedure. The normal menstruation recovery rate during 1 year of follow-up was 91.6% (33/36). A low rate of postoperative intrauterine adhesions (2.8% [1/36]) was also reported.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective study elucidated the use of hysteroscopy for retained products of conception. We also shared new perspectives regarding hysteroscopy and optimal surgical methods for treating retained products of conception as well as our experience treating residual products with hysteroscopy. To our knowledge, no other study has shared similar experiences.

Hysteroscopic management of molar pregnancy: A series of 36 cases

Background: Hydatidiform Mole (HM) is the most common form of gestational trophoblastic disease. Dilatation and curettage is the classical treatment of this affection. Hysteroscopic resection (HsR) is an alternative for the treatment of intra-uterine pathology.

Objective: To describe the feasibility of HsR for the management of HM.

Result: Case series of patients who had a complete or partial HM confirmed by histological examination of the trophoblastic tissue resected by operative hysteroscopy between 2007 and 2019. After approval of our ethics committee, we evaluated 36 patients who underwent hysteroscopic resection for molar pregnancy. Histological analysis showed partial HM in 28 patients (77.8%) and complete HM in 8 (22.2%). Main surgical complications were uterine perforation in one patient and glycine resorption in 10 patients with two cases of hyponatremia corrected by standard treatment. We performed an ultrasound control 1 month after the intervention in 19 patients (52.8%) as they had slow decrease of HCG or bleeding complaints and found retained product of conception (RPOC) in six patients (16.7%).

Conclusion: This first report on a small number of patients demonstrate that hysteroscopic resection is a feasible procedure for the management of molar pregnancy. Direct visualization of the procedure helps the surgeon to control the resection. Further studies are mandatory to compare this technique with D&C in term of RPOC and fertility outcomes as it remains the standard treatment.

Pain Management during Office Hysteroscopy: An Evidence-Based Approach

Background and Objectives: Hysteroscopy is a reliable technique which is highly useful for the evaluation and management of intrauterine pathology. Recently, the widespread nature of in-office procedures without the need for anesthesia has been requesting validation of practical approach in order to reduce procedure-related pain. In this regard, we performed a comprehensive review of literature regarding pain management in office hysteroscopic procedures. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), Global Health, Health Technology Assessment Database and Web of Science, other research registers (for example Clinical Trials database) were searched. We searched for all original articles regarding pain relief strategy during office hysteroscopy, without date restriction. Results have been collected and recommendations have been summarized according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. Moreover, the strength of each recommendation was scored following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment (GRADE) system, in order to present the best available evidence. Results: Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for pain management are feasible and can be applied in office setting for hysteroscopic procedures. The selection of strategy should be modulated according to the characteristics of the patient and difficulty of the procedure. Conclusions: Accumulating evidence support the use of pharmacological and other pharmacological-free strategies for reducing pain during office hysteroscopy. Nevertheless, future research priorities should aim to identify the recommended approach (or combined approaches) according to the characteristics of the patient and difficulty of the procedure.