1
|
Ferrari P, Venturi G, Campani L, Mariotti F, Becker F, Jansen J, Jovanović Z, Krstić D, Teles P. Medical staff monitoring in interventional cardiology: over apron dosemeter placement based on measurements and simulations. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2024; 200:802-807. [PMID: 38773775 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncae125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Interventional cardiology is characterized by high radiation exposure for both the patient and the operator. Adequate shielding and monitoring of the operator are fundamental to comply with radiation protection principles. In a previous work, the effect on the dose of the dosemeter position on the chest was studied. In this paper, the investigation has been completed, employing an anthropomorphic thorax phantom, equipped with arms. Although there are differences between the Monte Carlo simulations and the measurements, similar trends are observed, showing that the reduction in dose, due to the arms, is between 20 and 60%, compared with the situation without arms. For that reason, considering a dosemeter placed on the chest, the upper position, which is the least affected by the arms, should be preferred while the extreme lateral position, near the armpit, should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Ferrari
- ENEA-Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, IRP-Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna 40129, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Campani
- ENEA-Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, IRP-Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna 40129, Italy
| | - Francesca Mariotti
- ENEA-Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, IRP-Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna 40129, Italy
| | - Frank Becker
- KIT-Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen 76344, Germany
| | - Jan Jansen
- UK Health Security Agency, Oxon OX11 0RQ, United Kingdom
| | - Zoran Jovanović
- Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Dragana Krstić
- Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
| | - Pedro Teles
- Faculty of Science, University of Porto and CI-IPOP (Porto Cancer Institute Research Centre), Porto 4169-007, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilson-Stewart KS, Fontanarosa D, Malacova E, Trapp JV. Fluoroscopically guided vascular and cardiac transcatheter procedures: a comparison of occupational and patient dose by anatomical region. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:353-365. [PMID: 36877360 PMCID: PMC10030543 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01226-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
X-ray guided procedures are being performed by an increasing variety of medical specialties. Due to improvements in vascular transcatheter therapies, there is an increasing overlap of imaged anatomy between medical specialties. There is concern that non-radiology fluoroscopic operators may not have sufficient training to be well informed of the potential implications of radiation exposure and mitigation strategies to reduce dose. This was a prospective, observational, single center study to compare occupational and patient dose levels when imaging different anatomical regions during fluoroscopically guided cardiac and endovascular procedures. Occupational radiation dose was measured at the level of the temple of 24 cardiologists and 3 vascular surgeons (n = 1369), 32 scrub nurses (n = 1307) and 35 circulating nurses (n = 885). The patient dose was recorded for procedures (n = 1792) performed in three angiography suites. Abdominal imaging during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures was associated with a comparatively high average patient, operator and scrub nurse dose despite additional table-mounted lead shields. Air kerma was relatively high for procedures performed in the chest, and chest + pelvis. Higher dose area product and staff eye dose were recorded during procedures of the chest + pelvis due to the use of digital subtraction angiography to evaluate access route prior to/during transaortic valve implantation. Scrub nurses were exposed to higher average radiation levels than the operator during some procedures. Staff should be cognizant of the potentially higher radiation burden to patients and exposed personnel during EVAR procedures and cardiac procedures using digital subtraction angiography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly S Wilson-Stewart
- School of Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
- Cardiovascular Suites, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Ramsay Health Care, Newdegate Street, Greenslopes, Brisbane, QLD, 4120, Australia.
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies (CBT), Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
| | - Davide Fontanarosa
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies (CBT), Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia
| | - Eva Malacova
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Jamie V Trapp
- School of Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Technologies (CBT), Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaatsch HL, Schneider J, Brockmann C, Brockmann MA, Overhoff D, Becker BV, Waldeck S. Radiation exposure during angiographic interventions in interventional radiology - risk and fate of advanced procedures. Int J Radiat Biol 2022; 98:865-872. [PMID: 34982640 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.2020362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advanced angiographic procedures in interventional radiology are becoming more important and are more frequently used, especially in the treatment of several acute life-threatening diseases like stroke or aortic injury. In recent years, technical advancement has led to a broader spectrum of interventions and complex procedures with longer fluoroscopy times. This involves the risk of higher dose exposures, which, in rare cases, may cause deterministic radiation effects, e.g. erythema in patients undergoing angiographic procedures. Against this background, these procedures recently also became subject to national and international regulations regarding radiation protection. At the same time, individual risk assessment of possible stochastic radiation effects for each patient must be weighed up against the anticipated benefits of the therapy itself. Harmful effects of the administered dose are not limited to the patient but can also affect the radiologist and the medical staff. In particular, the development of cataracts in interventionalists is a rising matter of concern. Furthermore, long-term effects of repeated and prolonged x-ray exposure have long been neglected by radiologists but have come into focus in the past years. CONCLUSIONS With all this in mind, this review discusses different efforts to reduce radiation exposition levels for patients and medical staff by means of technical, personal as well as organizational measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julian Schneider
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Carolin Brockmann
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marc A Brockmann
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Daniel Overhoff
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Stephan Waldeck
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grau M, Eldergash O, Amin SS, Kowald T, Schnabel J, Wißmann A, Simka S, Chavan A, Mathys C, Poppe B, Schmuck B, Thomas RP. Are X-ray Safety Glasses Alone Enough for Adequate Ocular Protection in Complex Radiological Interventions? HEALTH PHYSICS 2021; 120:641-647. [PMID: 33879646 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The maximum annual radiation ocular dose limit for medical staff has been reduced to 20 mSv in the current European directive 2013/59/Euratom. This multi-centric study aims at reporting the protected and unprotected eye lens doses in different fluoroscopically guided interventions and to evaluate any other factors that could influence the ocular dose. From July 2018 to July 2019, ocular radiation doses of six interventionists of four departments during complex interventions were recorded with a thermoluminescent dosimeter in front of and behind radiation protection glasses to measure the protected and unprotected doses. The position of personnel, intervention type, fluoroscopy time, total body dose and use of pre-installed protection devices like lead acrylic shields were also systematically recorded. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the doses at 2 y and 5 y. The annual unprotected/protected ocular doses of six interventionists were 67/21, 32.7/3.3, 27.4/5.1, 7/0, 21.8/2.2, and 0/0 mSv, respectively. The unprotected dose crossed the 20-mSv annual limits for four interventionists and protected dose for one less experienced interventionist. The estimated 5-y protected ocular dose of this interventionist was 101.318 mSv (95%CI 96.066-106.57), also crossing the 5-y limit. The use of a lead acrylic shield was observed to have a significant effect in reducing ocular doses. The annual unprotected and protected ocular doses for interventionists dealing with complex interventions could cross the present permitted yearly limit. The measurement of significant protected ocular dose behind the radiation protection glasses emphasizes the additional indispensable role of pre-installed radiation protection devices and training in reducing radiation doses for complex procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Osama Eldergash
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - Sandeep Sunder Amin
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - Tobias Kowald
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - Johannes Schnabel
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - Anika Wißmann
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ammerland Klinik GmbH, Westerstede
| | - Sebastian Simka
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ammerland Klinik GmbH, Westerstede
| | - Ajay Chavan
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Christliches Krankenhaus Quakenbrück, Quakenbrück
| | | | - Björn Poppe
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Pius-Hospital, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - Bernhard Schmuck
- Division of Radiology, Clinic for Vascular Medicine, Vascular Centre, Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus, Bremen
| | - Rohit Philip Thomas
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University, Marburg
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilson-Stewart KS, Fontanarosa D, Li D, Drovandi CC, Anderson RK, Trapp JV. Taller staff occupationally exposed to less radiation to the temple in cardiac procedures, but risk higher doses during vascular cases. Sci Rep 2020; 10:16103. [PMID: 32999372 PMCID: PMC7528059 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73101-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of nurse and doctor height on occupational dose to the temple during fluoroscopically guided cardiovascular procedures. Additionally, an evaluation of the relationship between doctor height and table height was performed. Staff exposed during fluoroscopic procedures may be at elevated risk of cardiovascular damage or oncogenesis and have demonstrated a higher incidence of subscapular cataracts. The heads of taller staff may be exposed to reduced levels of radiation due to the increased distance from the area of highest intensity X-ray scatter. Limited research has been performed investigating height as a predictor of head dose to nursing staff. The level of radiation dose at the level of the temple to the doctor (n = 25), scrub (n = 28), and scout nurse (n = 29) was measured in a prospective single-center, observational study using Philips DoseAware badges. Procedural characteristics were recorded for vascular and cardiac cases performed in three dedicated angiography suites. Data were also collected to investigate relationships between doctor height and table height. Data were collected for 1585 cardiac and 294 vascular procedures. Staff height was a statistically significant predictor of temple dose for doctors, scrub, and scout nurses when considering the full data sample. The log temple dose demonstrated an inverse relationship to staff height during cardiac procedures, but a positive relationship for scrub and scout nurses during vascular studies. This observational study has demonstrated that taller staff are exposed to less cranial exposure dose during fluoroscopically guided cardiac examinations but has revealed a positive correlation between height and temple dose during vascular procedures. It was also determined that doctor height was correlated with average procedural table height and that vascular access point influences the choice of table elevation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly S Wilson-Stewart
- School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia. .,Cardiovascular Suites, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Newdegate Street, Greenslopes, Brisbane, QLD, 4120, Australia.
| | - Davide Fontanarosa
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.,Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Q Block, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia
| | - Dan Li
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.,Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Chris C Drovandi
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.,Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Rebecca K Anderson
- Cardiovascular Suites, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Newdegate Street, Greenslopes, Brisbane, QLD, 4120, Australia
| | - Jamie V Trapp
- School of Chemistry and Physics, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Camargo Lourenco JC, Paschuk SA, Schelin HR, Denyak V, Santos CAC. Development of a system to estimate doses in real time. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
7
|
Wilson-Stewart K, Hartel G, Fontanarosa D. Occupational radiation exposure to the head is higher for scrub nurses than cardiologists during cardiac angiography. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75:2692-2700. [PMID: 31144368 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to compare the head dose of a cardiologist to scrub and scout nurses during cardiac angiography. DESIGN A correlational longitudinal quantitative design was used to examine the relationship between the variable of occupational dose to the medical operator when compared with the dose to the scrub and scout nurses. METHODS A quantitative analysis was performed on data collected during coronary angiograms (N = 612) for one cardiologist and 22 nurses performing either the scrub or scout role between May 2015 and February 2017. Analysis was based on log-transformed dose levels and reported as geometric means and associated 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS It was found that scrub nurses received on average 41% more head dose than the cardiologist during diagnostic procedures and 52% higher doses during interventional cases. CONCLUSION Nurses working in fluoroscopic cardiovascular procedures should be provided with appropriate training and protective equipment, notably lead skull caps, to minimize their occupational radiation exposure. IMPACT There is a notable lack of research evaluating the occupational head and eye exposure to nurses involved in fluoroscopic procedures. This study found that during diagnostic coronary angiograms, the scrub nurses received 41% more occupational head dose than the cardiologist and 52% higher head doses during interventional cases. Radial access resulted in higher doses to scrub nurses than femoral artery access. It is advisable that staff wear protective lead glasses and skull caps and use appropriately positioned ceiling mounted lead shields to minimize the risk of adverse effects of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Wilson-Stewart
- Cardiovascular Suites, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.,School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Gunter Hartel
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Davide Fontanarosa
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.,Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wilson‐Stewart K, Shanahan M, Fontanarosa D, Davidson R. Occupational radiation exposure to nursing staff during cardiovascular fluoroscopic procedures: A review of the literature. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:282-297. [PMID: 30294978 PMCID: PMC6236819 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluoroscopy is a method used to provide real time x-ray imaging of the body during medical procedures to assist with medical diagnosis and treatment. Recent technological advances have seen an increase in the number of fluoroscopic examinations being performed. Nurses are an integral part of the team conducting fluoroscopic investigations and are often located close to the patient resulting in an occupational exposure to radiation. The purpose of this review was to examine recent literature which investigates occupational exposure received by nursing staff during cardiovascular fluoroscopic procedures. Articles published between 2011 and 2017 have been searched and comprehensively reviewed on the referenced medical search engines. Twenty-four relevant studies were identified among which seventeen investigated nursing dose comparative to operator dose. Seven researched the effectiveness of interventions in reducing occupational exposure to nursing staff. While doctors remain at the highest risk of exposure during procedures, evidence suggests that nursing staff may be at risk of exceeding recommended dose limits in some circumstances. There is also evidence of inconsistent use of personal protection such as lead glasses and skull caps by nursing staff to minimize radiation exposure. Conclusions: The review has highlighted a lack of published literature focussing on dose to nurses. There is a need for future research in this area to inform nursing staff of factors which may contribute to high occupational doses and of methods for minimizing the risk of exposure, particularly regarding the importance of utilizing radiation protective equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Wilson‐Stewart
- School of Clinical SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQldAustralia
- Cardiovascular SuitesGreenslopes Private HospitalBrisbaneQldAustralia
- Faculty of HealthUniversity of CanberraCanberraACTAustralia
| | | | - Davide Fontanarosa
- School of Clinical SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQldAustralia
- Institute of Health and Biomedical InnovationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQldAustralia
| | - Rob Davidson
- Faculty of HealthUniversity of CanberraCanberraACTAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sciahbasi A, Rigattieri S, Sarandrea A, Cera M, Di Russo C, Fedele S, Patrizi R, Romano S, Pugliese FR, Penco M, Pancholy SB. Determinants of operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures. Am Heart J 2017; 187:10-18. [PMID: 28454793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation exposure is an important issue for interventional cardiologists that is often underevaluated. Our aim was to evaluate determinants of operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures. METHODS The RADIANT (NCT01974453) is a prospective, single-center observational study involving 4 expert operators and 2 fellows performing percutaneous coronary procedures. The operator radiation dose was evaluated using dedicated electronic dosimeters in 2,028 procedures: 1,897 transradial access (TRA; 1,120 right and 777 left TRA) and 131 transfemoral access (TFA). RESULTS In the whole population, operator radiation dose at the thorax did not differ between TFA (9μSv [interquartile range 5-18μSv]) and TRA (9μSv [4-21μSv]), but after propensity score matching analysis, TFA showed lower dose (9μSv [5-18μSv]) compared with TRA (17μSv [9-28μSv], P<.001). In the whole transradial group, left TRA (5μSv [2-12μSv]) was associated with significant lower operator dose compared with right TRA (13μSv [6-26μSv], P<.001).The use of adjunctive protective pelvic drapes was significantly associated with lower radiation doses compared with procedures performed without drapes (P<.001). Among the operators, an inverse relation between height and dose was observed. Finally, left projections and the use of angiographic systems not dedicated for coronary and high frame rates were all associated with a significant higher operator radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS In a high-volume center for transradial procedures, TFA is associated with lower operator radiation dose compared with TRA. The use of adjunctive anti-rx drapes seems a valuable tool to reduce the higher operator radiation exposure associated with TRA.
Collapse
|