Left atrial anatomy and patient-related factors associated with adverse outcomes with the watchman device-a real world experience

Outcomes With the WATCHMAN FLX in Everyday Clinical Practice From the NCDR Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry

BACKGROUND

PINNACLE FLX (Protection Against Embolism for Nonvalvular AF Patients: Investigational Device Evaluation of the WATCHMAN FLX LAA Closure Technology) demonstrated improved outcomes and low incidence of adverse events with the WATCHMAN FLX device in a controlled setting. The National Cardiovascular Disease Registry's Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry was utilized to assess the safety and effectiveness of WATCHMAN FLX in contemporary clinical practice in the United States.

METHODS

The WATCHMAN FLX Device Surveillance Post Approval Analysis Plan used data from the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry to identify patients undergoing WATCHMAN FLX implantation between August 2020 and September 2022. The key safety end point was defined as all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device or procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or major endovascular intervention between device implantation and hospital discharge. Major adverse events were reported at hospital discharge, 45 days, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 97 185 patients in the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion registry undergoing WATCHMAN FLX, successful implantation occurred in 97.5% (n=94 784) of patients. The key safety end point occurred in 0.45% of patients. At 45 days post-procedure, all-cause death occurred in 0.81% patients, ischemic stroke in 0.23%, major bleeding in 3.1%, pericardial effusion requiring intervention in 0.50%, device-related thrombus in 0.44%, and device embolism in 0.04% patients. No peri-device leak was observed in 83.1% of patients at 45 days. At 1 year, the rate of all-cause death was 8.2%, the rate of any stroke was 1.5% (ischemic stroke, 1.2%), and major bleeding occurred in 6.4% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large contemporary cohort of patients with the WATCHMAN FLX device, the rates of implant success and clinical outcomes through 1 year were comparable with the PINNACLE FLX study, demonstrating that favorable outcomes achieved in the pivotal approval study can be replicated in routine clinical practice.

Left atrial appendage closure in patients with reversed chicken-wing morphology: Anatomical features and procedural strategy

Background

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with the reversed chicken-wing (RCW) LAA is challenging.

Aims

To elucidate the LAAC strategy of the RCW-LAA.

Methods

A total of 802 AF patients who were enrolled in the LAACablation registry for LAAC procedure were included, 55 of whom presented with the RCW-LAA. The WATCHMAN device was implanted using the standard protocol when the sheath depth was no less than the device depth (the simple group). For those with a sheath depth of less than the device depth (the complex group), device deployment was attempted with acceptable protrusion or after a repeated atrial transseptal puncture (re-ATP) at a more inferior and anterior position. The anatomical and procedural features were compared between groups and before and after the re-ATP.

Results

The success rate of LAAC was significantly lower in patients with the RCW-LAA than with the other morphologies (92.7% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.001). Compared with the simple group, the complex group had shorter root depth and shorter neck length, and more LAAs in the complex group were at lower position (all p < 0.05). The sheath depth after the re-ATP was significantly greater than that before the re-ATP (18.8 ± 3.4 mm vs. 14.7 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001). For the patients who underwent re-ATP, the sheath went significantly deeper in successful procedures than in aborted procedures (19.7 ± 3.3 mm vs. 15.8 ± 1.8 mm, p = 0.040).

Conclusions

The anatomical features of the RCW-LAA were related to the complexity of the LAAC procedure. The re-ATP at an inferior and anterior location could increase the success rate of LAAC.

ClinicalTrialsgov

NCT03788941.

Pulmonary artery pressure is associated with mid-term major adverse cardiovascular events and postprocedure pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion

Background

Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are at high risk of stroke or bleeding. However, risk factors for their adverse cardiovascular events remain largely unknown. Pulmonary hypertension has been shown to be related to poor prognosis in many heart diseases. In this study, we determined whether elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) is associated with postprocedure adverse events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in these patients.

Methods

From June 2017 and December 2019, 530 consecutive patients with NAVF at high risk of stroke or bleeding who undergone LAAO were retrospectively enrolled in our study. The preprocecure PASP was obtained by transthoracic echocardiography using the simplified Bernoulli's equation. Patients were followed-up through clinic visits or over the phone at discharge at 1-3 months, 6 months, and annually thereafter. The median follow-up time was 12 months, and clinical data were analyzed. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction, definite heart failure, stroke, or all-cause death. The outcome of postprocedure pericardial effusion included in-hospital pericardial effusion and pericardial effusion detected after discharge.

Results

Univariate analyses indicated that patients who had MACE tended to have elevated PASP (P=0.005). After dividing the cohort according to the cut-off value of PASP, Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that patients with PASP ≥39.5 mmHg had a higher risk of MACE (P=0.007) and heart failure hospitalization (P=0.005) compared to patients whose PASP <39.5 mmHg. Cox regression analysis showed that PASP was a predominant risk factor of MACE (HR =2.337, 95% CI, 1.207-4.526, P=0.012) and heart failure hospitalization (HR =3.701, 95% CI, 1.118-12.251, P=0.032). Furthermore, the PASP cut-off added incremental discriminatory capacity to the MACE risk model of this cohort. In addition, logistic regression showed that PASP had as a significant association with postprocedure pericardial effusion (OR =1.061, P=0.032).

Conclusions

Elevated PASP was associated with postprocedure pericardial effusion and mid-term MACEs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing LAAO.

Left atrial appendage closure in patients with prohibitive anatomy: Insights from PINNACLE FLX

BACKGROUND

Watchman 2.5 (Boston Scientific Inc, Marlborough, MA) implant success approaches 95% in registries, yet many patients are not attempted because of complex left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomy. Watchman FLX can expand the range of ostium width (14-31.5 mm) and depth available for LAA closure.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Watchman FLX in patients with a failed Watchman 2.5 attempt or prohibitive LAA anatomy.

METHODS

The roll-in (n = 58) and primary effectiveness (n = 400) cohorts of the PINNACLE FLX trial comprised the study population. Subjects were identified who previously failed implantation of Watchman 2.5 (n = 11) or were not attempted because of prohibitive LAA anatomy (n = 88). Demographic characteristics, implant procedure details, and TEE follow-up data were compared to controls composed of enrollees not meeting these criteria (n = 359).

RESULTS

Watchman FLX LAA closure was successfully implanted in all subjects with a prior failed Watchman 2.5 attempt (n = 11 of 11). Subjects with previously failed Watchman 2.5 were more likely to receive a 35 mm FLX device than controls (27.3% vs 7.3%; P = .047). Patients with prohibitive anatomy had smaller LAA dimensions than did controls (diameter 18.0 ± 4 mm vs 20.4 ± 3 mm; P < .001 and length 23.7 ± 5 mm vs 28.9 ± 5 mm; P < .001). There was no difference in age, sex, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, HAS-BLED score, or primary efficacy between cohorts. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 12 months showed zero leak in 90.9% in the failed Watchman 2.5 cohort, 91.3% in the prohibitive anatomy cohort, and 89.5% in the control cohort (P = .84). Overall and cardiovascular mortality was lower in the prohibitive anatomy cohort (1.2% vs 8.8% in controls; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Watchman FLX implantation in patients with a prior failed Watchman 2.5 attempt or prohibitive LAA anatomy remained safe and highly effective. The association of reduced overall mortality with smaller LAA dimension warrants future study.

Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in general anaesthesia or conscious sedation: data from the prospective global Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using conscious sedation (CS).

BACKGROUND

Several percutaneous structural heart disease interventions are safely and efficiently performed using CS instead of general anaesthesia (GA). This concept has not been evaluated in a large multicenter cohort of patients undergoing LAAO.

METHODS

Patients from the prospective, global Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study were divided into two groups (GA vs CS). Baseline information, periprocedural and postprocedural efficacy and complications, as well as outcomes through 7 days post implant were compared.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing transesophageal-guided implants were categorised by GA (n=607, 64%) or CS (n=342, 36%) usage. Mean age was 75 years in both groups. LAAO technical success was achieved in 99% of both groups. The procedure duration (GA: 35±22 min vs CS: 27±19 min, p<0.001), total amount of contrast medium (GA: 105±81 mL vs CS: 86±66 mL, p<0.001) and fluoroscopic time (GA: 13±9 min vs CS: 12±13 min, p<0.001) were less in CS cases. Procedure-related or device-related serious adverse events during the first 7 days were numerically higher in the CS group (GA: 4.9% vs CS: 7.6%, p=0.114). Peridevice residual flow was absent or ≤5 mm 1-3 months after the procedure in 99.7% of the GA and in 100% of the CS group (p=1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large global study, LAAO with the Amplatzer Amulet occluder is safe and feasible using CS. Procedure duration and total amount of contrast were less with CS than GA cases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02447081; Results.

Short-Term Antiplatelet Versus Anticoagulant Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare bleeding, thromboembolic, device-related thrombus (DRT), and all-cause mortality events between patients treated with short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) and those treated with short-term antiplatelet therapy (APT) following left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

BACKGROUND

Short-term OAC is recommended for patients following LAAO. However, in practice many patients receive APT rather than OAC because of excessive bleeding risk. However, the safety and efficacy of APT compared with OAC have been debated.

METHODS

A search was conducted of databases for studies comparing OAC with APT following LAAO. The outcomes of interest were all-cause stroke, major bleeding, DRT, and all-cause mortality. Noncomparative studies were pooled into a single study to generate comparisons of the studies' outcomes. Effects measure were pooled using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 83 studies with 12,326 patients (APT, n = 7,900; OAC, n = 4,151) were included. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.1 ± 1.6 and 3.0 ± 1.3, respectively. There were no significance differences between the APT and OAC groups with regard to stroke (risk ratio [RR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54 to 1.98; p = 0.91; I2 = 31%), major bleeding (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.84; p = 0.65; I2 = 53%), DRT (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.74 to 2.39; p = 0.33; I2 = 36%), and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.40 to 4.09; p = 0.18; I2 = 36%). These findings persisted in multiple secondary analyses: 1) excluding studies that reported no events; 2) including comparative studies only; 3) excluding patients who were treated with single APT; and 4) removing one study at a time to assess the effect of each study on the overall effect size. There was also no difference in the studies' endpoints among patients who received different LAAO devices.

CONCLUSIONS

In a meta-analysis of observational data, there were no differences in the occurrence of stroke, major bleeding DRT, and all-cause mortality in patients treated with short-term OAC or APT following LAAO.

Fast Segmentation of the Left Atrial Appendage in 3-D Transesophageal Echocardiographic Images

Left atrial appendage (LAA) has been generally described as "our most lethal attachment," being considered the major source of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Currently, LAA occlusion can be offered as a treatment for these patients, obstructing the LAA through a percutaneously delivered device. Nevertheless, correct device sizing is not straightforward, requiring manual analysis of peri-procedural images. This approach is suboptimal, time demanding, and highly variable between experts, which can result in lengthy procedures and excess manipulations. In this paper, a semiautomatic LAA segmentation technique for 3-D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images is presented. Specifically, the proposed technique relies on a novel segmentation pipeline where a curvilinear blind-ended model is optimized through a double stage strategy: 1) fast contour evolution using global terms and 2) contour refinement based on regional energies. To reduce its computational cost, and thus make it more attractive to real interventions, the B-spline explicit active surface framework was used. This novel method was evaluated in a clinical database of 20 patients. Manual analysis performed by two observers was used as ground truth. The 3-D segmentation results corroborated the accuracy, robustness to the variation of the parameters, and computationally attractiveness of the proposed method, taking approximately 14 s to segment the LAA with an average accuracy of ~0.9 mm. Moreover, a performance comparable to the interobserver variability was found. Finally, the advantages of the segmented model were evaluated, while semiautomatically extracting the clinical measurements for device selection, showing a similar accuracy but with a higher reproducibility when compared to the current practice. Overall, the proposed segmentation method shows potential for an improved planning of LAA occlusion, demonstrating its added value for normal clinical practice.

Cardiac Computed Tomography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Acquisition, Analysis, Advantages, and Limitations

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion is increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. The technique has proven effective and safe in randomized trials and multiple observational studies. The procedure is challenging due to the complex anatomy of the left atrial appendage; accurate cardiac imaging is essential for procedural guidance. Transesophageal echocardiography is the gold standard, but cardiac computed tomography (CT) has gained increasing interest within recent years. Cardiac CT offers high-resolution imaging allowing for preprocedural anatomic evaluation and device sizing, but may also be useful for exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus, and follow-up assessment of residual peri-device leaks.