The impact of successful revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

The role of chronic total occlusions in non-infarct-related arteries in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review

Aim: This systematic review evaluated the impact of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA) on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and assessed the benefits of staged revascularization.Methods: We performed a comprehensive systematic review to provide further insight into the impact of a CTO in a non-IRA on clinical outcomes after ACS. Moreover, we review the currently available evidence on the clinical significance of staged revascularization for a CTO in a non-IRA patients with ACS and propose whether prophylactic CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could improve outcomes in patients who subsequently develop an ACS.Results: Our search identified 999 studies, from which 30 were selected and ten were included in the analysis. The results showed a trend of higher all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event rates in the culprit-only-PCI group compared with the multivessel (MV)-PC I group in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients, with varying statistical significance across different outcomes.Conclusion: This review highlights the significant impact of non-IRA CTOs in ACS. Successful CTO revascularization may provide benefits, particularly in ST elevation myocardial infarction, but the optimal management approach remains uncertain. The presence of a non-IRA CTO, especially in cardiogenic shock, predicts worse outcomes. Further research is warranted to determine the effective strategies to improve survival.

A comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy in patients with chronic total occlusion in noninfarct-related artery after PCI of acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a noninfarct-related artery (IRA) is one of the risk factors for mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there are limited data comparing the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with patients having medical therapy (MT) in CTO lesion after AMI PCI.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 330 patients (successful CTO PCI in 166 patients, failed CTO PCI in 32 patients, MT in 132 patients) with non-IRA CTO from a total of 4372 patients who underwent PCI after AMI in our center. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences.

RESULTS

The primary analysis is based on the intention-to-treat population. During a median follow-up period of 946 days, patients in the PCI group (n = 198) had significantly higher cardiac death-free survival (96.6% vs. 82.8%, p = .004) compared with patients in MT group (n = 132). However, no significant difference in the occurrence of cardiac death was observed after PSM. The analysis based on the per-protocol population demonstrated significantly higher cardiac death-free survival in the successful CTO PCI group (n = 166) compared with the occluded CTO group (n = 164) both before and after PSM. In subgroup analysis, successful CTO PCI was associated with less cardiac death in patients over 65 years old, with LVEF < 50%, left anterior descending (LAD) IRA, and non-LAD CTO lesion compared with occluded CTO group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing successful revascularization of non-IRA CTO after AMI might have a better long-term prognosis. Moreover, patients with LVEF < 50% may benefit from successful non-IRA CTO PCI after AMI.

Non-invasive Imaging in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusions of the Coronary Arteries-What Does the Interventionalist Need for Success?

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of coronary arteries is a common finding in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Although tremendous advances have been made in the interventional treatment of CTOs over the past decade, correct patient selection remains an important parameter for achieving optimal results. Non-invasive imaging can make a valuable contribution. Ischemia and viability, two major factors in this regard, can be displayed using echocardiography, single-photon emission tomography, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Although most have been studied in patients with CAD in general, there is an increasing number of studies with positive preselectional factors for patients with CTOs. The aim of this review is to provide a structured overview of the current state of pre-interventional imaging for CTOs.

Both surgical and percutaneous revascularization improve prognosis in patients with a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) irrespective of collateral robustness

The impact of surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization on prognosis in patients with a chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains uncertain. Particularly, whether revascularization of those with robust coronary collaterals improves prognosis is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the predictors and prognostic impact of revascularization of a CTO, and to determine the clinical impact of robust coronary collaterals. Patients with a CTO diagnosed on coronary angiography between Jul 2010 and Dec 2019 were included in this study. Management strategy of the CTO was defined as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or medical management. The degree of collateral robustness was determined by the Rentrop grading classification. Demographic, angiographic and clinical outcomes were recorded. A total of 954 patients were included in the study, of which 186 (19.5%) patients underwent CTO PCI, 296 (31.0%) patients underwent CABG and 472 (49.5%) patients underwent medical management of the CTO. 166 patients (17.4%) had Rentrop grade zero or one collaterals, 577 (60.5%) patients had Rentrop grade two and 211 (22.1%) had Rentrop grade three collaterals. The independent predictors of medical management of the CTO were older age, greater stenosis in the donor vessel, an emergent indication for angiography, a non-LAD CTO and female sex. The degree of collateral robustness was not associated with long-term mortality, while patients who were revascularized either through CABG or PCI had a significantly lower mortality compared to medical management alone (p < 0.0001). In patients with a CTO, the presence of robust collaterals is not associated with prognosis, while both surgical and percutaneous revascularization is associated with improved prognosis. Further research into the optimal revascularization strategy for a CTO is required.

Prognostic Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusion in Acute and Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) has gained increasing clinical attention as the most advanced form of coronary artery disease. Prior studies already indicated a clear association of CTO with adverse clinical outcomes, especially in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and concomitant CTO of the non-infarct-related coronary artery (non-IRA). Nevertheless, the prognostic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CTO in the acute setting during AMI is still controversial. Due to the complexity of the CTO lesion, CTO-PCI leads to an increased risk of complications compared to non-occlusive coronary lesions. Therefore, this review outlines the prognostic impact of CTO-PCI in patients with AMI. In addition, the prognostic impact of periprocedural myocardial infarction caused by CTO-PCI will be discussed.

Prevalence and clinical significance of totally occluded infarct-related arteries in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Background Seemingly conflicting findings exist regarding the prognostic impact of totally occluded infarct-related arteries (oIRA) in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Methods Retrospective analysis of prospective multicenter registry data comprising a single-center NSTE-ACS cohort, aimed at assessing the impact of occluded (TIMI flow 0/1) versus patent culprit vessels (pIRA, TIMI flow 2/3) on the composite endpoint of all-cause death and cardiogenic shock events at 30 days. Results Of 568 patients, 183 (32.5%) had oIRA. Male sex, refractory angina, ECG suggestive of multivessel or left main disease, and larger infarct sizes with inferior/posterolateral wall involvement, were identified as highly specific markers of oIRA. Successful culprit-lesion revascularization occurred more frequently in patent than in oIRA (90% vs. 96%; P = 0.013). Conversely, patients with oIRA more frequently achieved successful revascularization of concurrent non-IRAs including chronic total occlusions than did those with pIRA (28% vs. 3%; P = 0.0005). Multivariate analysis revealed neutral effects of oIRA on outcomes and identified incomplete revascularization as a powerful predictor of mortality. Moderation analysis revealed a significant interaction between completeness of revascularization and IRA patency, whereby among the incompletely revascularized patients, those with oIRA enjoyed a significant survival advantage over their counterparts with pIRA (11.8% vs. 28%, adjusted OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-0.73; P_interaction = 0.012). Conclusions Approximately one third of NSTE-ACS patients in this cohort had oIRA. However, compared with pIRA, the occurrence of oIRA did not portend poor outcomes, likely resulting from the higher rate of incomplete revascularization and increased risk of subsequent mortality in patients with pIRA. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation.