Comparative analysis of right heart chamber remodeling after surgical and device secundum atrial septal defect closure in adults

Mid-Term Outcome of Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling After Atrial Septal Defect Closure: A Comparison Between Surgical and Device Groups

Right ventricular (RV) volume overload occurs in patients with significant atrial septal defect (ASD II) shunts, which can impair left ventricle (LV) filling, thus decreasing LV indices. However, after ASD II closure, the left ventricle regains near normal dimensions. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of LV reverse remodeling between device and surgical closure. We retrospectively reviewed the echocardiographic data of 222 patients with isolated ASD II who underwent surgical (95 patients) or device closure (127 patients) between January 2012 and December 2017. The ASD II was significantly larger in the surgical closure group (p < 0.001.) leading to a higher degree of paradoxical interventricular septal (IVS) movement. In contrast, the LV volume was larger in the device closure group (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up period of 19.5 months, the maximum LV systolic and diastolic volumes were reached at 1 year in the device closure group and 2 years in the surgical closure group. IVS motion normalized in 91% of the device closure group compared to 57% of the surgical closure group (p =  < 0.001). There was significant improvement in left ventricular indices and IVS motion after ASD II closure in both groups but more favorable in patients after device closure.

Early Right Heart Chambers Reverse Remodeling in Patients Operated in Adulthood for Congenital Lesions Associated with Right Heart Chambers Enlargement

BACKGROUND

Progressive right heart chambers dilatation is frequent in the adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) population. We evaluated the immediate and mid-term response of right heart chambers to surgery performed in adulthood for lesions associated with right heart chambers enlargement.

METHODS

Thirty-six adult patients with lesions associated with right heart chambers enlargement submitted to surgery were studied. We collected echocardiographic data of right ventricle (RV) mid-diameter, right atrial volume indexed, RV systolic pressure, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) prior to surgery (T0), at 2 to 5 days (T1), and 3 to 6 months (T2) after surgery.

RESULTS

At T1, we observed a significant decrease of RV mid-diameter (47.2 ± 8.4 vs. 39.6 ± 7.4 mm, P < .001), right atrial volume indexed (45.6 ± 26.6 vs. 27.2 ± 11 ml/m2, P < .001), and RV systolic pressure (39 ± 14.8 vs. 32.8 ± 11.3 mm Hg, P = .03). At T2, a further significant deviation in the rate of RV diameter (39.6 ± 7.4 vs. 34.5 ± 5.1 mm, P < .001), in RV systolic pressure (32.8 ± 11.3 vs. 25.3 ± 5 mm Hg, P = .03) and TAPSE (13.9 ± 3.2 vs. 15.8 ± 2.6 mm, P < .001) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive right heart chambers remodeling occurs as early as in the immediate post-operative period in most ACHD patients operated for lesions associated with right heart chambers enlargement.

Comparison of the early cardiac electromechanical remodeling following transcatheter and surgical secundum atrial septal defect closure in adults

Background

Secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) closure leads to electrical and mechanical remodeling that occurs early after shunt disappearance. The relationship between electromechanical remodeling using electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) after percutaneous and surgical closure has not yet been recorded in prospective studies.

Objective

We thought to study right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV) changes by CMR 3 months after transcatheter and surgical closure and their comparison with electrical remodeling by ECG.

Results

We prospectively evaluated 30 consecutive adult patients with isolated secundum ASD who were referred for (transcatheter and surgical) ASD closure.

There was significant reduction in all of the electrical parameters within the same group as compared to the baseline values, except P wave dispersion (Pd). (P max was 97.33 ± 16.67 (pre closure) to 76 ± 15.49 (post closure) in the device group and 97.33 ± 12.79 (preclosure) to 73.33 ± 16.32 (post closure) in the surgical group, QRS complex was 104 ± 18.82 (preclosure) to 80 ± 18.51 (post closure) in the device group and 106.67 ± 14.47 (preclosure) to 86.67 ± 17.99 (post closure) in the surgical group. QTc maximum was 478.53 ± 36.79 (preclosure) to 412.53 ± 38.03 (post closure) in the device group and 470.53 ± 65.70 (preclosure) to 405.93 ± 63.08 (post closure) in the surgical group, and QTc dispersion was 70.33 ± 24.04 (preclosure) to 60.26 ± 28.56 (post closure) in the device group and 80.73 ± 30.38 (preclosure) to 60.27 ± 28.57 (post closure) in the surgical group).There was no significant difference between two groups indicating that transcatheter and surgical closure had led to equivalent value of electrical remodeling.

In CMR study, we measured RA maximal volume and right ventricle end diastolic volume (RVEDV), RA maximal volume decreased significantly as compared to the base line values post closure in both groups (P value < 0.001). The reduction in RA max volume was more in the transcatheter closure group; however, this difference was not statistically significant when compared with the surgical arm (P value = 0.5).RVEDV decreased significantly in both groups as compared to the baseline values (P value < 0.001). Transcatheter closure resulted in more significant reduction in the RVEDV than the surgical closure (P value = 0.03).

Conclusion

Our study showed early significant electromechanical reverse remodeling in most of the study parameters from the baseline values after ASD closure. We found no significant differences in all of the electrical and RA mechanical remodeling parameters with significantly better mechanical remodeling of RV in the device group.

Impact of additional annuloplasty on tricuspid valve and cardiac functions after atrial septal defect closure in adults

BACKGROUND

Surgical indications for moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during atrial septal defect (ASD) closure are still unclear. Additional tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TVP) can be beneficial to avoid postoperative persistent TR. Therefore, we compared the results of surgical ASD closure with or without additional TVP in patients who presented with moderate-to-severe TR.

METHODS

Between November 2009 and June 2016, 103 patients with ASD and moderate-to-severe TR underwent surgical ASD closure without (n = 76, group 1) and with additional TVP (n = 27, group 2). Clinical outcomes and echocardiographic data were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. Postoperative outcomes were similar despite significantly longer aortic clamping time in group 2 (P = .003). Mean TR grade, right atrial diameter, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, pulmonary artery pressure, and Qp/Qs ratio decreased significantly in both groups (P < .05). Mean follow-up time was 5.3 months (range: 1 month-6.2 years) in group 1 and 6.1 months (range: 1 month-4.1 years) in group 2 (P = .66). Echocardiography results showed significant decrease in TR grade in both groups (P = .93). The incidence of persistent moderate to severe TR was higher in isolated ASD closure group (14.4% vs 3.7%, P = .086). Additional TVP provided greater regression in TR grade (-1.49 ± 0.9 vs -1.89 ± 0.8, P = .041).

CONCLUSION

Despite TVP being associated with longer ischemic time, postoperative outcomes were comparable to ASD closure alone. Both approach demonstrated an effective decrease in TR, but TVP provided greater regression and lower incidence of persistent TR. Therefore, additional TVP should be considered in patients undergoing ASD closure with moderate-to-severe TR.

Here today, gone tomorrow: Outcomes of residual leak following secundum atrial septal defect closure with the GORE CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes and potential predictors of residual leak after implantation of the GORE CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder (GSO) in secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs).

BACKGROUND

The non-self-centering design of the GSO could lead to residual leak at the edge of the device. Outcomes of residual leak are poorly understood.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter review of patients treated with the GSO for the pivotal and continued access study. Procedural, echocardiographic, and follow up data were reviewed. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of leak at implant and outcomes of these leaks.

RESULTS

There were 370 total ASD device closures with the GSO, 65 (17.56%) of which were found to have residual leak at implantation. Patients with residual leak had larger defects (10.33 ± 3.05 mm vs. 9.13 ± 2.89 mm, p = .006) and smaller aortic rims (4.87 ± 3.33 mm vs. 6.17 ± 3.78 mm, p = .019), as compared to those without leak. Larger devices were implanted (p = .008) and more devices per case (p = .007) were utilized in the residual leak cohort as compared to those without leak. Overall, among patients with residual leak, there was a significant decrease in leak size over 1 year, from 1.55 ± 0.75 mm to 0.25 ± 0.74 mm (p < .001), with the majority (87.6%) disappearing by 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual leak at implantation can be seen after ASD device closure with the GSO, more commonly in larger defects with smaller retroaortic rims. The vast majority of these leaks completely resolve by 1 year follow up.