Anterior communicating artery aneurysms: Nonmodifiable morphological parameters associated with rupture risk

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3-Dimensional Morphometric Parameters for Cerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Imaging modalities with increased spatial resolution have allowed for more precise quantification of cerebral aneurysm shape in 3-dimensional (3D) space. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the correlation of individual 3D morphometric measures with cerebral aneurysm rupture status.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed a PRISMA (preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analysis)-guided literature search to identify articles reporting the association between 3D morphometric measures of intracranial aneurysms and rupture status.

RESULTS

A total of 15,122 articles were identified. After screening, 39 studies were included. We identified 17 3D morphometric measures, with 11 eligible for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant association with rupture status for the following measures: nonsphericity index (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.79; P < 0.0001; I2 = 55.2%), undulation index (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85; P = 0.0017; I2 = 68.1%), ellipticity index (SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.77; P = 0.0005; I2 = 70.8%), volume (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02-0.35; P = 0.0320; I2 = 82.3%), volume/ostium ratio (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16-0.71; P = 0.0075; I2 = 90.4%), elongation (SMD, -0.94; 95% CI, -1.12 to -0.76; P = 0.0005; I2 = 0%), flatness (SMD, -0.87; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.71; P = 0.0005; I2 = 0%), and sphericity (SMD, -0.62; 95% CI, -1.06 to -0.17; P = 0.0215; I2 = 67.9%). A significant risk of publication bias was estimated for the ellipticity index (P = 0.0360) and volume (P = 0.0030).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of a meta-analysis containing 39 studies, the nonsphericity index, undulation index, elongation, flatness, and sphericity demonstrated the most consistent correlation with rupture status.

Associations between morphological parameters and ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm: A propensity score-matched, single center, case-control study

BACKGROUND

To identify an association between morphological parameters and the rupture risk of anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms using propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

Data for 109 patients with ACoA aneurysms treated from January 2018 to October 2021 were reviewed; 94 patients were enrolled. The geometrical parameters of the ACoA aneurysms were measured and calculated using three-dimensional reconstructed digital subtraction angiography images. The aneurysms' morphological parameters were analyzed using a propensity score for six factors (age, sex, excess alcohol intake, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between the aneurysms' morphological parameters and rupture risk.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients each with or without ruptured aneurysms were selected. After matching, no statistically significant differences were seen between the groups in their baseline characteristics. Aneurysm neck size (p = 0.038) was higher in the unruptured group than that in the ruptured group, and the dome-to-neck ratio (D/N; p = 0.009) and aspect ratio (AR; p = 0.003) were higher in the ruptured group than those in the unruptured group. Univariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that ACoA aneurysm rupture was associated with AR (odds ratio: 8.047; 95% confidence interval: 1.569-41.213; p = 0.012) and D/N (odds ratio: 4.253; 95% confidence interval: 1.228-14.731; p = 0.022). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for AR and D/N were 0.746 and 0.715, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

After PSM, ACoA aneurysms with higher AR and D/N, and smaller neck size were more likely to rupture. AR may be a much more important predictor of aneurysm rupture than other predictors.

Risk factors for anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although the research on the risk factors of anterior communicating artery (AComA) aneurysm has made great progress, the independent effect of each risk factor on the rupture of AComA aneurysm is controversial among different studies. We will perform a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for AComA aneurysm rupture and quantify their independent effects.

METHODS

A systematic search according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception to August 31, 2021 for published studies concerning risk factors for AComA aneurysm rupture. In the absence of statistical heterogeneity (ie, P > .10 and I2 < 50%), we will use a fixed-effects model to pool the results across sufficient studies. Otherwise, we will present the results employing the random-effects model. Quality assessment of the included studies will be evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Statistical analyses will be performed using Stata16 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) software.

RESULTS

The findings of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide evidence to determine the risk factors that affect the rupture of the AComA aneurysm and quantify their independent effects.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Since the proposed study uses pre-published data, ethical approval is not required.

REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021284262. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).