Bayesian deep learning outperforms clinical trial estimators of intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage volume

Unified ICH quantification and prognosis prediction in NCCT images using a multi-task interpretable network

With the recent development of deep learning, the regression, classification, and segmentation tasks of Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) using Non-Contrast head Computed Tomography (NCCT) for spontaneous IntraCerebral Hematoma (ICH) have become popular in the field of emergency medicine. However, a few challenges such as time-consuming of ICH volume manual evaluation, excessive cost demanding patient-level predictions, and the requirement for high performance in both accuracy and interpretability remain. This paper proposes a multi-task framework consisting of upstream and downstream components to overcome these challenges. In the upstream, a weight-shared module is trained as a robust feature extractor that captures global features by performing multi-tasks (regression and classification). In the downstream, two heads are used for two different tasks (regression and classification). The final experimental results show that the multi-task framework has better performance than single-task framework. And it also reflects its good interpretability in the heatmap generated by Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), which is a widely used model interpretation method, and will be presented in subsequent sections.

Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review for understanding the availability and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that could automatically identify and quantify computed tomography (CT) findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

Systematic review, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and SPIRIT-AI extension guidelines, with a search of 4 databases (Medline, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science) was performed to find AI studies that automated the clinical tasks for identifying and quantifying CT findings of TBI-related abnormalities.

RESULTS

A total of 531 unique publications were reviewed, which resulted in 66 articles that met our inclusion criteria. The following components for identification and quantification regarding TBI were covered and automated by existing AI studies: identification of TBI-related abnormalities; classification of intracranial hemorrhage types; slice-, pixel-, and voxel-level localization of hemorrhage; measurement of midline shift; and measurement of hematoma volume. Automated identification of obliterated basal cisterns was not investigated in the existing AI studies. Most of the AI algorithms were based on deep neural networks that were trained on 2- or 3-dimensional CT imaging datasets.

CONCLUSION

We identified several important TBI-related CT findings that can be automatically identified and quantified with AI. A combination of these techniques may provide useful tools to enhance reproducibility of TBI identification and quantification by supporting radiologists and clinicians in their TBI assessments and reducing subjective human factors.