1
|
Aluh DO, Diaz-Milanes D, Pedrosa B, Silva M, Grigaitė U, Almeida CR, de Almeida Mousinho MF, Vieira M, Cardoso G, Caldas-de-Almeida JM. Coercion in psychiatry: psychometric validation of the Portuguese Staff Attitudes to Coercion Scale (SACS). DISCOVER MENTAL HEALTH 2024; 4:27. [PMID: 39141248 PMCID: PMC11324637 DOI: 10.1007/s44192-024-00083-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing recognition that staff attitudes toward coercion in mental health care may influence its application. This study presents the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Staff Attitudes towards Coercion Scale (SACS) and describes mental health professionals' attitudes towards coercion in Portugal. METHODS Mental health professionals working in five Portuguese mental health services in urban and rural regions of Portugal were invited to complete a questionnaire comprising the SACS and a socio-demographic form. Psychometric analyses including construct validity and internal consistency were carried out using R software. RESULTS A total of 91 out of 119 questionnaires completed were valid for analysis. Fifty-seven (62.64%) respondents were female, with an age range of 24 to 69 years (M = 39.33; SD = 11.09). More than half of them were nurses (52.75%, n = 48), and a third were psychiatrists (36.26%, n = 33). A three-factor structure was confirmed and showed the best fit compared to previously proposed models with a cumulative explained variance of 59%. The Portuguese SACS exhibited adequate internal consistency for both the full-scale and subscales. The highest mean score was in the pragmatic attitude domain (20.60; SD = 3.37). A negative correlation was observed between the critical attitude domain and both age and years of experience (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION A three-factor structure was confirmed and showed the best fit compared to previously proposed models. The Portuguese SACS showed excellent psychometric properties and is acceptable for assessing staff attitudes towards coercion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Oyine Aluh
- Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (Chrc), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka, Nigeria.
| | - Diego Diaz-Milanes
- Department of Quantitative Methods, Universidad Loyola Andalusia, Seville, Spain
- Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Barbara Pedrosa
- Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (Chrc), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Manuela Silva
- Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (Chrc), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ugnė Grigaitė
- Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (Chrc), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carolina Rocha Almeida
- Serviço de Psiquiatria E Saúde Mental de Adultos, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Margarida Vieira
- Centro Hospitalar De Vila Nova De Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.| V. N. Gaia/Espinho Hospital Centre, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Graça Cardoso
- Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (Chrc), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida
- Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (Chrc), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Efkemann SA, Lickiewicz J, Doedens P, Lantta T, Bali P, Husum TL. A Scoping Review on Staff Attitudes towards the Use of Coercion in Mental Healthcare. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1552. [PMID: 39201112 PMCID: PMC11354183 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Attitudes of mental health professionals towards the use of coercion are highly relevant concerning its use coercion in mental healthcare, as mental health professionals have to weigh ethical arguments and decide within a legal frame in which situations to use coercion or not. Therefore, assessment of those attitudes is relevant for research in this field. A vital instrument to measure those attitudes towards the use of coercion is the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. This scoping review aims to provide a structured overview of the advantages and limitations in the assessment of attitudes toward coercion. We conducted a scoping review in Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science, based on the PRISMA-ScR. Inclusion criteria were empirical studies on the attitudes of mental health professionals. We included 80 studies and systematically mapped data about the main results and limitations in assessing attitudes toward coercion. The main results highlighted the relevance and increased interest in staff attitudes towards coercion in mental healthcare. Still, the majority of the included studies relied on a variety of different concepts and definitions concerning attitudes. The data further indicated difficulties in developing new and adapting existing assessment instruments because of the equivocal definitions of underlying concepts. To improve the research and knowledge in this area, future studies should be based on solid theoretical foundations. We identified the need for methodological changes and standardized procedures that take into account existing evidence from attitude research in social psychology, nursing science, and other relevant research fields. This would include an update of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale based on the limitations identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Agnes Efkemann
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany
| | - Jakub Lickiewicz
- Department of Health Psychology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
| | - Paul Doedens
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urban Vitality—Centre of Expertise, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, 1105 BD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland;
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia
| | - Panagiota Bali
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Chaidari, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bachmann L, Ødegård A, Mundal IP. A comprehensive examination of research instruments utilized for assessing the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards the use of restraints in mental healthcare: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:2728-2745. [PMID: 38093475 DOI: 10.1111/jan.16015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
AIM This systematic review aimed to identify, describe and evaluate questionnaires measuring health professionals' attitudes towards restraints in mental healthcare. DESIGN A systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the COSMIN protocol for systematic review and the relevant sections of the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. DATA SOURCES OVID Medline, OVID nursing, Psychinfo, Embase and Cinahl were systematically searched from databases inception, with an initial search in December 2021 and updated in April 2022. REVIEW METHODS The inclusion criteria compromised articles reporting on self-reported instruments of attitudes or perceptions, development or validation of instruments and the evaluation of one or more measurement properties. Articles using multiple instruments in one study or not published in English were excluded. Two researchers independently extracted the data and appraised the methodological quality using the COSMIN guidelines and standards (consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instrument). A narrative synthesis without meta-analysis was performed. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO Protocol ID CRD42022308818. RESULTS A total of 23 studies reporting ten instruments were included. The findings revealed a broad variation in the content of the questionnaires, the use of terms/constructs and the context in which the various instruments measure attitudes towards coercive measures. Many studies lacked sufficient details on report of psychometric properties. Finally, the results were not summarized and the evidence not GRADED. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for updated and adapted instruments with origins in theory and clear joint definitions such that attitudes towards coercive measures can be reliably assessed regarding the validity and reliability of instruments, which will be of importance to facilitate the use of instruments in research and clinical settings. IMPACT Reviews addressing surveys, self-reported attitudes towards restraints in mental healthcare and examination of psychometric properties seem limited. We highlight distinct complexity, psychometric limitations and broad variation in the context and content measuring attitudes towards coercive measures, and their various use of terms/constructs in the existing questionnaires. These findings contribute to further research regarding the development of questionnaires and the need of representing the concept well - carefully denoted by the indicators, likewise the importance of applying questionnaires with properly reported measurement properties in terms of validity and reliability to ensure the use in research and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liv Bachmann
- Faculty of Health Science and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Atle Ødegård
- Faculty of Health Science and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
- Habilitation Services, Clinic of Mental Health, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Molde Hospital, Molde, Norway
| | - Ingunn Pernille Mundal
- Faculty of Health Science and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
- Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare (RKBU), Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norway University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pedersen ML, Gildberg FA, Bogh SB, Birkeland S, Tingleff EB. Staff responses to interventions aiming to reduce mechanical restraint in adult mental health inpatient settings: a questionnaire-based survey. Nord J Psychiatry 2024; 78:328-338. [PMID: 38436663 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2323125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore mental health staff's responses towards interventions designed to reduce the use of mechanical restraint (MR) in adult mental health inpatient settings. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey. The questionnaire, made available online via REDCap, presented 20 interventions designed to reduce MR use. Participants were asked to rate and rank the interventions based on their viewpoints regarding the relevance and importance of each intervention. RESULTS A total of 128 mental health staff members from general and forensic mental health inpatient units across the Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark completed the questionnaire (response rate = 21.3%). A total of 90.8% of the ratings scored either 'agree' (45.2%) or 'strongly agree' (45.6%) concerning the relevance of the interventions in reducing MR use. Overall and in the divided analysis, interventions labelled as 'building relationship' and 'patient-related knowledge' claimed high scores in the staff's rankings of the interventions' importance concerning implementation. Conversely, interventions like 'carers' and 'standardised assessments' received low scores. CONCLUSIONS The staff generally considered that the interventions were relevant. Importance rankings were consistent across the divisions chosen, with a range of variance and dispersion being recorded among certain groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Locht Pedersen
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Frederik Alkier Gildberg
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Søren Bie Bogh
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, /Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Søren Birkeland
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, /Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ellen Boldrup Tingleff
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flemmerer M, Bühling-Schindowski F, Baumgardt J, Bechdolf A. Predictors of the use of restraint in inpatient psychiatric care among patients admitted via the emergency department. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 162:37-43. [PMID: 37086605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coercive measures are associated with negative consequences for both patients and hospital staff. The aim of the study was to identify predictors for the use of restraints in the emergency department and in subsequent inpatient care. METHOD Retrospective routine clinical data of all patients admitted to the psychiatric departments of Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban in Berlin via the emergency department in 2019 was examined case-wise (n = 2584) as well as patient-wise (n = 2118). RESULTS Of all cases admitted via the emergency department, 195 cases (7.5%) experienced restraints and restraints combined with drug sedation during their inpatient treatment. Of the 2584 cases admitted via the emergency department, 195 cases (7.5%) experienced restraints and restraints combined with drug sedation during their inpatient treatment. These 195 cases experienced a total of 358 restraints and were distributed across 159 individuals. Multivariate regression analyses on patient-level show that age (p < .001), judicial placement (p < .001), and police referral in the presence of others (p < .001) had a statistically significant effect on the use of restraint. DISCUSSION The results indicate that certain patient characteristics increase the risk of restraints. A majority of the findings of this study underline previous research findings. However, ICD-10 diagnosis and gender do not prove to be significant variables, contrary to expectations based on previous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Flemmerer
- Medical School Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Bühling-Schindowski
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Baumgardt
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany; Research Institute of the Local Health Care Funds (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
| | - Andreas Bechdolf
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban und Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Humane and Comprehensive Management of Challenging Behaviour in Health and Social Care: Cross-Sectional Study Testing Newly Developed Instrument. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11050753. [PMID: 36900759 PMCID: PMC10001172 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11050753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of challenging behaviour causes victimization and violates the human rights of service users in psychiatric and long-term settings for people having mental health issues and learning disabilities. The purpose of the research was to develop and test an instrument for measuring humane behaviour management (HCMCB). The research was guided by the following questions: (1) What is the structure and content of the Human and Comprehensive management of Challenging Behaviour (HCMCB) instrument, (2) What are the psychometric properties of the HCMCB instrument, and (3) How do Finnish health and social care professionals evaluate their humane and comprehensive management of challenging behaviour? METHODS A cross-sectional study design and STROBE checklist were applied. A convenience sample of health and social care professionals (n = 233) studying at the University of Applied Sciences (n = 13) was recruited. RESULTS The EFA revealed a 14-factor structure and included a total of 63 items. The Cronbach's alpha values for factors varied from 0.535 to 0.939. The participants rated their individual competence higher than leadership and organizational culture. CONCLUSIONS HCMCB is a useful tool for evaluating competencies, leadership, and organizational practices in the context of challenging behaviour. HCMCB should be further tested in various international contexts involving challenging behaviour with large samples and longitudinal design.
Collapse
|
7
|
Efkemann SA, Scholten M, Bottlender R, Juckel G, Gather J. Influence of mental health professionals' attitudes and personality traits on decision-making around coercion: Results from an experimental quantitative survey using case vignettes. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2022; 146:151-164. [PMID: 35322402 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Research on coercion in mental healthcare has recently shifted to the investigation of subjective aspects, both on the side of the people with mental disorders affected and the staff members involved. In this context, the role of personality traits and attitudes of staff members in decision-making around coercion is increasingly being assessed. This study aimed to examine the role of staff attitudes towards coercion and staff members' personality traits in decision-making around coercion in an experimental setting. METHODS We assessed the attitudes towards coercion and (general) personality traits of mental health professionals in psychiatric hospitals with a quantitative survey. Furthermore, we developed case vignettes representing cases in a 'grey zone' and included them in the survey to assess staff members' decisions about coercion in specific situations. RESULTS A general approving attitude towards coercion significantly influenced decisions around coercion in individual cases-resulting in a more likely approval of applying coercion in the cases described in the vignettes. Personality traits did not seem to be relevant in this regard. CONCLUSION Strategies to reduce coercion in mental healthcare institutions should focus more on the role of staff attitudes and encourage staff members to reflect on them critically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Agnes Efkemann
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Matthé Scholten
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Georg Juckel
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jakov Gather
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany.,Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laukkanen E, Kuosmanen L, Louheranta O, Ryynänen OP, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. A Bayesian network model to identify the associations between the use of seclusion in psychiatric care and nursing managers' attitudes towards containment methods. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2021; 28:815-828. [PMID: 33547840 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT Seclusion is used frequently in psychiatric care, despite its potential adverse effects. Several programmes aiming to reduce the use of seclusion identify leadership and management as key strategies-however, studies concerning leaders and managers are missing. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE Nursing managers' negative attitudes towards seclusion are associated with less use of the measure, and nursing managers' higher age is associated with increased use of seclusion. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Nursing managers should be encouraged to guide their staff to reduce the use of seclusion. The negative influences of seclusion and the potential of alternative measures should be highlighted in the education and training of psychiatric nursing managers. ABSTRACT Introduction The use of seclusion in psychiatric care should be reduced. The relationship between nursing management or nursing managers' attitudes and the use of seclusion has not been investigated. Aim To describe the associations between the use of seclusion and psychiatric nursing managers' attitudes to containment methods. Method Register data concerning the use of seclusion in Finnish psychiatric care in 2017 were collected. The Attitudes to Containment Measures Questionnaire was used to illustrate psychiatric nursing managers' attitudes to containment methods. An Augmented Naive Bayes analysis was used to investigate the relationships of the use of seclusion and attitudes. Results Nursing managers' age and their attitudes towards containment methods were related to the use of seclusion. Especially nursing managers' negative perceptions of seclusion were associated with less use of seclusion, and seclusion was used more often on wards with nursing managers who were older than the average. Conclusion Nursing managers' negative attitudes towards seclusion have a potential impact on the use of seclusion, which might even result in a reduction in its use in psychiatric inpatient setting. Implications for practice The results suggest that nursing managers should be encouraged to guide their staff to decrease the use of seclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Laukkanen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Lauri Kuosmanen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Olavi Louheranta
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Olli-Pekka Ryynänen
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,General Practice Unit, Kuopio University Hospital, Primary Health Care, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baar I, Schmitz-Buhl M, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. [Cologne Questionnaire on Attitudes Towards Coercive Measures (KEZ)]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS 2021; 49:322-328. [PMID: 34433213 DOI: 10.1055/a-1515-2268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a psychometric instrument for the assessment of the attitude of psychiatric staff towards the use of coercion. METHODS Based on a literature search, interviews (37 open questions) were carried out by representatives each of doctors and nurses. A first version was developed, all doctors and nurses in a psychiatric clinic were asked to answer the questionnaire anonymously. RESULTS 226 employees took part (response rate 32.3 %). A test-theoretical analysis led to a 39 item set with a high consistency of the overall scale (Cronbach's α =0 .904) and three factors: 1) Acceptance of coercive measures without questioning (Cronbach's α = 0.797); 2) Meaningfulness and legitimation of coercive measures (Cronbach's α = 0.812); and 3) Security and order through coercive measures (Cronbach's α = 0.791). CONCLUSIONS With the KEZ an instrument is available that holistically presents the various aspects of the attitudes of psychiatric staff to the use of coercion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Immanuel Baar
- LVR-Klinik Köln, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität
| | | | - Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
- LVR-Klinik Köln, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität.,LVR-Institut für Forschung und Bildung: LVR-Institut für Versorgungsforschung
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guzman-Parra J, Aguilera-Serrano C, Huizing E, Bono Del Trigo A, Villagrán JM, García-Sánchez JA, Mayoral-Cleries F. A regional multicomponent intervention for mechanical restraint reduction in acute psychiatric wards. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2021; 28:197-207. [PMID: 32667113 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: A relevant number of restraint prevention programmes have been developed internationally. In Spain, there is no harmonized policy to prevent the use of restraint. More studies are necessary to establish which programmes and components are necessary to prevent restraint. WHAT DOES THE PAPER ADD TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: There was a significant decreasing trend in the total number of mechanical restraint hours during the implementation of the intervention. There was no significant decreasing trend in the number of mechanical restraint episodes. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Interventions at a regional level aimed at preventing mechanical restraint are feasible in the Spanish context. All components of the Six Core Strategies could be necessary to prevent episodes of mechanical restraint. ABSTRACT: Introduction Mechanical restraint (MR) is used in many countries, including Spain, where non-harmonized policies between autonomous communities exist. There is a lack of research about interventions at regional levels to reduce their use. Aim To analyse data on key outcomes during the implementation of a multicomponent intervention in Andalusia (Spain) to reduce the use of MR. Method Episodes in a period of 30 months in all wards (N = 20) were analysed. The intervention consisted of five strategies: (a) leadership, (b) analysis of the situation, (c) awareness training for the heads of the wards, (d) unified record of MR and (e) staff training. We analysed the monthly trend of restraint hours and restraint episodes/1,000 bed days using segmented regression. Results There were 206.32 restraint hours and 12.96 restraint episodes/1,000 bed days during the study period. A significant decreasing trend was observed in restraint hours (-1.79%, p < .001), but not in the number of restraint episodes (-0.45%; p = .149). Discussion The results coincide with other international studies; however, studies with better designs are required to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Implications for Practice Interventions at a regional level aimed at preventing MR are feasible in the Spanish context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Guzman-Parra
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Carlos Aguilera-Serrano
- Community Mental Health Unit of Motril, South Health Management Area of Granada, Motril, Spain
| | | | | | - José María Villagrán
- Mental Health Hospitalization Unit, Jerez de la Frontera Hospital, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio García-Sánchez
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|