First molar cross-bite is more closely associated with a reverse chewing cycle than anterior or pre-molar cross-bite during mastication

Reverse chewing patterns in patients with bilateral posterior crossbite are related to the occlusal features of the malocclusion

BACKGROUND

Bilateral posterior crossbite (BPXB) is a severe malocclusion associated with maxillary hypoplasia. BPXB may involve the same or a different number of teeth between the sides.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the masticatory function in BPXB and the association between the masticatory alterations and the occlusal features of BPXB.

METHODS

This observational study included 170 participants: 130 patients with BPXB (65 occlusally symmetric BPXB, i.e. same number and type of posterior teeth in crossbite between the sides, F = 33, M = 32, median age 9.6 (8.2-13) [years.months]; 65 patients occlusally asymmetric BPXB, F = 30, M = 35, median age 9.9 (8.3-13.6)) and 40 controls (F = 25, M = 15, median age 10.2 (9.4-11.6)). The masticatory function was evaluated by the detection of the Reverse Chewing Cycles (RCCs) recorded with a kinesiograph using standardised soft and hard boluses.

RESULTS

The frequency of RCCs was significantly increased in all BPXB patients compared to controls (p < .000). In symmetric BPXB patients, there were no significant differences in the frequency of RCCs during chewing on the left or the right side. In asymmetric BPXB patients, the frequency of RCCs was significantly increased during chewing on the side with relatively more teeth in crossbite (p < .000).

CONCLUSIONS

The masticatory function was significantly altered in all BPXB patients and it was differently affected by symmetric or asymmetric occlusal features of the malocclusion.

Interferential effect of the over-erupted third molar on chewing movement

OBJECTIVE

To clarify whether over-eruption of the mandibular third molar can disturb chewing movement.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with a unilateral mandibular over-erupted third molar confirmed by both study cast observation and T-scan occlusal detection were selected from a sample of patients with complaints of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms. A unilateral gum-chewing trace was recorded separately for left and right side chewing by an electrognathography system. The average chewing pattern (ACP) was created based on segments from the recorded chewing trace to represent the chewing movement characteristics of each individual. Two factors, the TMD symptomatic side and the over-eruption side, were analysed for their effects on values of difference in the parameters (Δvalue) regarding the ACP between chewing with right and left side. Three-dimensional amplitudes of ACP and the cross point value of ACP with the vertical axis (termed the cross zero point value) which described the turning point of the chewing cycle from the balancing side to the working side, were compared between sides.

RESULTS

The over-eruption side had an effect on the Δvalue of the medial amplitude, the lateral amplitude, and the cross zero point (P<0.05), but the symptomatic side didn't (P>0.05). When chewing on the over-eruption side, the medial amplitude was shorter, the lateral amplitude was larger, and the cross zero point value was smaller than those when chewing on the other side (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present data indicate an effect of the over-erupted mandibular third molar on the chewing pattern while that from the symptom(s) is limited.

Relationship between molar occlusion and masticatory movement in lateral deviation of the mandible

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between molar occlusion and chewing patterns was examined in subjects with laterally deviated mandibles.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with mandibular deviation from the midline (4 mm or more) and skeletal Class I (0° ≤ANB ≤4°) were divided into 2 groups: normal bite and crossbite. The chewing pattern was classified as normal, reversed, or crossover.

RESULTS

The normal bite group had a normal chewing pattern on the affected side 100% of the time and a reversed chewing pattern on the affected and unaffected sides 0% and 7.2% of the time, respectively. Additionally, the normal bite group showed no evidence of a crossover chewing pattern and also had significantly less axial inclination of the mandibular teeth on the affected side compared with the crossbite group; lingual inclination was also evident. The crossbite group had a normal chewing pattern on the affected and unaffected sides 0% and 55.6% of the time, respectively, and reversed and crossover chewing patterns on the affected side 55.6% and 44.4% of the time, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A normal chewing pattern tends to result in lingual axial inclination of the mandibular molars on the affected side, as well as a more consistent chewing pattern.

Differences between the chewing and non-chewing sides of the mandibular first molars and condyles in the closing phase during chewing in normal subjects

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess differences between the closing paths of the chewing and non-chewing sides of mandibular first molars and condyles during natural mastication, using standardized model food in healthy subjects.

DESIGN

Thirty-two healthy young adults (age: 19-25 years; 22 men, 10 women) with normal occlusion and function chewed on standardized gummy jelly. Using an optoelectric jaw-tracking system with six degrees of freedom, we recorded the path of the mandibular first molars and condyles on both sides for 10 strokes during unilateral chewing. Variables were compared between the chewing side and the non-chewing side of first molars and condyles on frontal, sagittal, and horizontal views during the early-, middle- and late-closing phases.

RESULTS

On superior/inferior displacements, the chewing side first molar and condyle were positioned superior to those on the non-chewing side during the early- and middle-closing phases. Conversely, the first molar and condyle on the non-chewing side were positioned significantly superior to those on the chewing side during the late-closing phase. On anterior/posterior displacements, the chewing side mandibular first molar and condyle were positioned significantly posterior to those on the non-chewing side throughout all closing phases.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed the differences between the mandibular first molars and condyles on both sides with respect to masticatory path during natural chewing of a model food. These differences can be useful for informing initial diagnostic tests for impaired masticatory function in the clinical environment.