Assessment of Cervical Joint Position Sense and Head Posture in Individuals With Myogenic Temporomandibular Dysfunctions and Identifying Related Factors: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular dysfunctions (TMDs) have the potential to cause changes in cervical muscle strength, muscle endurance and position sense by changing muscle activation patterns, especially as a result of forward head posture. The effects of TMDs on cervical joint position sense (CJPS) and head posture remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the head posture and CJPS of individuals with TMDs and compare them with healthy individuals.

METHODS

This research, which was designed as a case-control study, was concluded with the inclusion of total of 84 participants (42 individuals diagnosed with myogenic TMDs, 42 controls). The assessment of participants included pain severity, neck and jaw functionality and disability, CJPS, head posture and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

Individuals with TMDs exhibited higher angular deviation in CJPS during flexion and extension (p < 0.001). Additionally, individuals with TMDs demonstrated higher TMJ pain, limitation and dysfunction severity, as well as a more limited TMJ ROM (p < 0.001). Head posture was similar between groups (p > 0.05). There is a significant relationship between VAS-TMJ with VAS-cervical, FAI, NDI, JFLS-8 and TMJ ROM (p < 0.05). Moreover, a significant correlation was observed between NDI with FAI and TMJ ROM (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that in addition to higher pain severity, disability and lower jaw ROM, CJPS of individuals with TMDs is also negatively affected. Also, parameters related to disability and functionality of cervical and TMJ were significantly correlated. Further studies are needed to determine the factors contributing to these results.

3-Dimensional quantitative analysis of mandibular motion in TMD and healthy subjects: Comparison with clinical observations

OBJECTIVES

To establish a quantitative method for objectively assessing 3-dimensional (3D) mandibular trajectories and comparing clinical evaluations with computational analyses.

METHODS

In total, 184 volunteers were recruited and grouped into control (n = 121) and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) groups (n = 63) according to the dual-axis DC/TMD checklist. 3D trajectories were generated by integrating mandibular motion and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) records. Via digitalized data processing, the following 3 outcomes were assessed: (1) smoothness using the best-fitting polynomial curve, (2) open-closure separation by measuring the deviation between open-closure phases, and (3) condylar trajectory symmetry by comparing left and right movements. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were used to determine agreement between expert observations and quantitative results. Reference ranges for each parameter from the normal population were calculated. Mann‒Whitney test was used to analyze the features of the trajectories between the two groups.

RESULTS

ICC confirmed strong consistency between the parametric variations and expert observations (smoothness: 0.797; open-closure separation: 0.820; left-right symmetry: 0.920). Quantitative analyses revealed significant differences (P < 0.043 for smoothness, P < 0.01 for separation, and P = 0.012 for symmetry) in all comparisons between movement trajectories of normal participants and those with TMD, with the latter group exhibiting greater variation and irregularities. The normal range of smoothness was calculated for condylar trajectories between 0 and 0.25 and 0-0.10 for incisal point trajectories. Open-closure separation normal range was computed between 0 and 2.28 mm for incisal point trajectory, 0-1.90 mm for left condylar trajectory, and 0-1.76 mm for right condylar trajectory. The normal range of symmetry between condylar trajectories was calculated to be between 0 and 4.21 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This quantitative analysis was confirmed to be reliable and consistent with expert observations. This allowed for the discovery of substantially quantified differences in smoothness, open-closure separation, and symmetry of the motion trajectories in TMD patients versus controls.

The mouth-opening muscular performance in adults and elderlies with and without dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To characterize mouth-opening muscular performance (MOMP) in adults and elderly individuals with dysphagia and healthy controls.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to Jan. 26, 2023. Two independent researchers considered the titles, abstracts, and full texts of potentially eligible papers from 1451 search results. Twenty-five studies that evaluated mouth-opening maximal strength (MOMS) in healthy adults, elderly individuals, and patients with dysphagia met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We found comparable, reliable values with significant sex differences in maximal mouth opening strength (MMOS) in the meta-analysis for healthy elderly patients (females 5.31 ± 0.47 kg vs. males 7.04 ± 0.70 kg; mean difference of 0.84 kg). Age has also emerged as an essential factor in reducing strength. There was a significant reduction in the MMOS score in the only study that compared dysphagic individuals to healthy elderly individuals. In another study, the MMOS score was comparable to the meta-analysis of healthy elderly individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Both sex and age play significant roles in the MMOS. There is no reliable data on the normal mouth-opening strength and endurance of healthy adults, patients with dysphagia, or individuals with other relevant clinical problems.

Pain-free bite force in a healthy population: Within-session test-retest reliability in different sitting positions

BACKGROUND

Pain-free bite force (PFBF) is a promising measure to evaluate bite function in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), yet the reliability of the measure is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

Establish the (1) within-session test-retest reliability of PFBF in a healthy population for a single and mean of three trials in supported and unsupported sitting; (2) standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).

METHODS

Thirty healthy participants (n = 15 female, mean [SD] age = 34.4 [11.0] years) completed two sessions (30-60 min apart) comprising three PFBF trials on each side, in both supported and unsupported sitting, to provide data for 60 (30 participants × two sides) test-retest assessments. Test-retest reliability for the first trial and mean of three trials in each position were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), before calculating the corresponding SEM and MDC for males (M) and females (F) respectively.

RESULTS

Within-session reliability was considered excellent for a single trial in supported sitting (ICC = 0.85; SEM M/F = 99/84 N; MDC M/F = 275/232 N) and unsupported sitting (ICC = 0.91; SEM M/F = 72/59 N, MDC M/F = 200/163 N), and for a mean of three trials in supported sitting (ICC = 0.89; SEM M/F = 66/79 N, MDC M/F = 182/220 N) and unsupported sitting (ICC = 0.92; SEM M/F = 64/59 N, MDC M/F = 177/164 N).

CONCLUSION

Single and a mean of three trials in supported and unsupported sitting appear reliable methods to measure PFBF in a healthy population. Testing PFBF using a mean of three trials in unsupported sitting appears superior over other methods though due to higher test-retest reliability, and lower SEM and MDC. Future studies should examine the reliability of PFBF in TMD populations.

Is proprioception affected in those with persistent intra-articular temporomandibular disorders? A cross-sectional study exploring joint position sense and force sense of the jaw

BACKGROUND

Proprioception is an important component of normal jaw function, although to date it is unknown if and how proprioception is affected in those with intra-articular temporomandibular disorders (IA-TMDs). This challenges effective management of this subgroup.

OBJECTIVES

Determine whether differences in local joint position sense and force sense exist between individuals with IA-TMD and those without a jaw problem.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHOD

Sixty age and sex matched participants were recruited (n = 30 IA-TMD, n = 30 healthy controls). Temporomandibular joint position sense was tested to one target (50% of maximal mouth opening) using a ruler. Temporomandibular force sense was tested to two targets (50% and 70% of maximal molar pain-free bite force) using a bite sensor. Constant, absolute and variable errors were calculated for each outcome and compared between groups using p-values and 95% confidence intervals for effect size (d).

RESULTS

Significantly greater degrees of constant, absolute and variable error were seen for force sense testing at the 50% target (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between groups for joint position sense, or for constant or variable force sense error at the 70% target (p > 0.05). Despite this, all joint position sense and force sense measures demonstrated possible clinical significance (upper limits 95% CI d ≥ 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Force sense, particularly at lower levels, appears impaired in those with IA-TMD. Joint position sense and force sense at higher levels appear less affected, although may still be important to consider in the management of IA-TMD in some patients.

Pain-sensorimotor interactions: New perspectives and a new model

How pain and sensorimotor behavior interact has been the subject of research and debate for many decades. This article reviews theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions and considers their strengths and limitations in the light of findings from experimental and clinical studies of pain-sensorimotor interactions in the spinal and craniofacial sensorimotor systems. A strength of recent theories is that they have incorporated concepts and features missing from earlier theories to account for the role of the sensory-discriminative, motivational-affective, and cognitive-evaluative dimensions of pain in pain-sensorimotor interactions. Findings acquired since the formulation of these recent theories indicate that additional features need to be considered to provide a more comprehensive conceptualization of pain-sensorimotor interactions. These features include biopsychosocial influences that range from biological factors such as genetics and epigenetics to psychological factors and social factors encompassing environmental and cultural influences. Also needing consideration is a mechanistic framework that includes other biological factors reflecting nociceptive processes and glioplastic and neuroplastic changes in sensorimotor and related brain and spinal cord circuits in acute or chronic pain conditions. The literature reviewed and the limitations of previous theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions have led us to provide new perspectives on these interactions, and this has prompted our development of a new concept, the Theory of Pain-Sensorimotor Interactions (TOPSMI) that we suggest gives a more comprehensive framework to consider the interactions and their complexity. This theory states that pain is associated with plastic changes in the central nervous system (CNS) that lead to an activation pattern of motor units that contributes to the individual's adaptive sensorimotor behavior. This activation pattern takes account of the biological, psychological, and social influences on the musculoskeletal tissues involved in sensorimotor behavior and on the plastic changes and the experience of pain in that individual. The pattern is normally optimized in terms of biomechanical advantage and metabolic cost related to the features of the individual's musculoskeletal tissues and aims to minimize pain and any associated sensorimotor changes, and thereby maintain homeostasis. However, adverse biopsychosocial factors and their interactions may result in plastic CNS changes leading to less optimal, even maladaptive, sensorimotor changes producing motor unit activation patterns associated with the development of further pain. This more comprehensive theory points towards customized treatment strategies, in line with the management approaches to pain proposed in the biopsychosocial model of pain.

Obesity and temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) is the most common non-dental pain complaint in the maxillofacial region, which presents a variety of symptoms and signs, including temporomandibular joints (TMJ) and masticatory muscle pain, joint noise, tinnitus, headaches, irregular or restricted mandibular function, masticatory difficulty, and restricted mouth opening. When comes to the relationship between obesity and TMD, it has remained controversial and inconsistent, therefore, we first conducted this meta-analysis to estimate the unclear relationship between obesity and TMD.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Subjects were divided into five groups according to BMI level in this study, including the normal weight group: 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25, overweight group: 25 ≤ BMI < 30, obesity group: BMI ≥ 30, control group: BMI < 25, and overweight and obesity group: BMI ≥ 25. Statistics analyses were conducted using Stata (15.0). The number of PROSPERO was CRD42022368315.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this study, and six articles with a total of 74,056 participants were synthesized for meta-analysis. Compared to normal weight individuals, overweight and obesity together decreased the risk of TMD (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.46-0.95), and it was significantly decreased by obesity alone (OR = 0.58). Moreover, it was lower in obesity compared with control subjects (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73-0.94). Furthermore, in overweight and obese individuals, it was much lower in obesity than in overweight (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is not a risk factor for TMD, and maybe a protective factor for TMD, of which patients with larger BMI are less likely to suffer from TMD pain. Therefore, the value of BMI should be taken into consideration in the assessment of TMD.

Cervical Range of Motion Analysis Performed with an Accelerometer: A Study of Intersession Reliability for Dental Practice

During the clinical examination of subjects with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), the dentist sometimes must evaluate the cervical spine, due to the anatomical and functional connections between the cervical portion of the spine and the stomatognathic apparatus. The accelerometer is a device that evaluates the Range of Motion (ROM) of the main movements of the head on the neck. To date, only a few studies have investigated the repeatability of the use of the accelerometer in the assessment of cervical ROM. Therefore, the present longitudinal observational study analyzed the repeatability of acquired cervical movements on a sample of volunteer subjects who underwent accelerometer testing. A sample of 32 subjects was tested twice within 14 days to assess cervical ROM using a standardized protocol based on a review of existing literature. The results show that the examination is reliable for all the positions of the jaw, except for the parameters regarding the asymmetries of rotation and bending. In conclusion, the accelerometer can be considered a reliable tool for evaluating the active cervical ROM. However, further studies will be necessary to make better evaluations.

Do intra-articular temporomandibular disorders show an association between physical bite function, self-perceived bite limitation and kinesiophobia? A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the impact of intra-articular temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) on bite function, or how bite impairments in this subgroup relate to self-perceived bite limitation or kinesiophobia. This presents a challenge to practitioners involved in delivering care.

OBJECTIVES

To determine what bite impairments are associated with intra-articular TMDs, and explore how these impairments relate to self-perceived bite limitations and kinesiophobia.

DESIGN

Observational, case-control study.

METHOD

Sixty participants (n = 30 intra-articular TMDs, n = 30 healthy controls) were recruited via convenience sampling. Bite function was explored using pain-free bite force and bite endurance/steadiness (submaximal bite hold) measures. Self-perceived bite function and kinesiophobia were evaluated via the Patient specific functional scale (PSFS) and the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia of Temporomandibular disorders (TSK-TMD) respectively. Between-group data were compared and associations between physical bite impairments, self-perceived bite limitation and kinesiophobia were explored in the intra-articular TMD group.

RESULTS

Pain-free bite force was significantly impaired in the intra-articular TMD group (-108N, p < 0.01, d = 0.9), and this impairment demonstrated moderate association with degree of kinesiophobia (p < 0.01, r = -0.4). No significant between-group difference was observed for bite endurance or force steadiness (p > 0.05). No association was observed between pain-free bite force and self-perceived bite limitation, or self-perceived bite limitation and kinesiophobia (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired pain-free bite force appears to be an important feature of intra-articular TMDs which should be considered within management. Kinesiophobia may be important to consider when assessing bite function in this subgroup. Future research is needed to guide optimal interventions and inform subsequent management guidelines.

Association of Non-carious Cervical Lesions with Oral Hygiene Aspects and Occlusal Force

AIM

The purpose of this case-control (CT) study was to investigate the association between the presence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with occlusal force and other potential risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine participants with NCCLs [cases (CS)] and 39 with no NCCLs [control (CT)] attending the dental clinic of the Faculdades Integradas São Pedro (FAESA), located in Brazil, were enrolled in this study. Information was collected through anamnesis, clinical examination, and a questionnaire addressing aspects related to tooth brushing, dentifrice, and mouthwash use. In clinical examination, patients were submitted to four measurements of occlusal force in the maxillary first premolars and maxillary first molars, using a strain gauge sensor of medium intensity, the Flexiforce (Tekscan, South Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America). The sensor was calibrated for the unit of measurement in Newtons (N). Data were analyzed using a student's t-test and multiple logistic regression, e with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the case and CT groups regarding the bite force in the four measured regions. Logistic regression identified sex as a factor significantly associated with NCCLs (p = 0.020). The odds ratio showed the female sex had more chance (OR = 6.082; CI = 1.332-27.765) of having NCCLs.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that females presented a higher risk factor for NCCLs than men. In contrast, there was no association of occlusal force, as well as aspects related to brushing and deleterious habits.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Females have a higher risk factor for non-carious lesions than men.

The mouth-opening muscular performance in adults with and without temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review

Background

The mouth‐opening muscular performance in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) is unclear. Understanding the impairments of this muscle group within specific TMDs is important to develop proper management strategies.

Objective

To characterise the mouth‐opening muscular performance in adults with and without TMDs.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 12 November 2020. Bibliographies were searched for additional articles, including grey literature. Case‐control, cross‐sectional and interventional studies reporting mouth‐opening muscular strength and/or endurance were included. Risk of bias was assessed by the SIGN checklist for case‐control studies and by the NIH quality assessment tool for cross‐sectional studies. Results were pooled with a random‐effects model. Confidence in cumulative evidence was determined by means of the GRADE guidelines.

Results

Fourteen studies were included; most were rated as having a moderate risk of bias. Only three studies assessed patients with TMDs and the other 11 assessed healthy adults. Significant sex differences in muscular performance were found for healthy adults in the review (strength deficit for females versus males). There was a significant reduction in maximal mouth opening performance (strength and endurance) in the three studies that assessed patients with temporomandibular disorders.

Conclusion

Sex plays a significant role in maximal mouth opening strength. There is a lack of reliable data on the normal mouth‐opening strength and endurance of healthy adults as well as for patients with TMDs.

Implications

Lack of reliable TMDs patient data and comparable healthy adult data highlight future direction for research.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2020 professional literature in restorative dentistry to inform busy dentists regarding noteworthy scientific and clinical progress over the past year. Each member of the committee brings discipline-specific expertise to this work to cover this broad topic. Specific subject areas addressed include prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; implant dentistry; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs); sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence day-to-day dental treatment decisions with a keen eye on future trends in the profession. With the tremendous volume of dentistry and related literature being published today, this review cannot possibly be comprehensive. The purpose is to update interested readers and provide important resource material for those interested in pursuing greater detail. It remains our intent to assist colleagues in navigating the extensive volume of important information being published annually. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in successfully managing the dental patients they encounter.

"What if it doesn't unlock?": A qualitative study into the lived experiences of adults with persistent intra-articular temporomandibular disorders

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are associated with increased self-reported disability and psychosocial issues, although little is known about those who specifically experience mechanical signs and symptoms such as clicking and locking. Understanding the lived experiences of individuals with persistent intra-articular TMD is an important first step to gaining insight into specific domains of self-reported disability associated with these conditions. This information can be helpful to improve clinical management of this subgroup.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the lived experiences of adults with persistent intra-articular TMD, including its impact on activity, participation and psychological wellbeing, and the influence of contextual factors on disability.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews explored the lived experiences of adults with persistent intra-articular TMD, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from private physiotherapy and dental practices, and the community.

RESULTS

Sixteen participants were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the data: i) The challenge of living with intra-articular TMD, ii) Living with uncertainty, iii) Seeking control, and iv) Learning to live with it. Novel findings included the impact of persistent intra-articular TMD on dreams, work, intimacy and socialising; and the role of non-pain symptoms (e.g. locking) in disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent intra-articular TMD are associated with numerous activity limitations, participation restrictions and psychological issues. Disability is complex and multi-directional, and influenced by various contextual factors including individuals' thoughts, beliefs and support networks. These findings emphasise the need for biopsychosocial and person-centred care in clinical practice.

Changes in jaw and neck muscle coactivation and coordination in patients with chronic painful TMD disk displacement with reduction during chewing

The treatment of a complex temporomandibular disorder (TMD), such as disk displacement with reduction (DDR) associated with arthralgia and myalgia, may depends on understanding the impairments in muscle function. The aim of this study was to investigate the behavior of the anterior temporalis, masseter and sternocleidomastoid muscles in the time and frequency domains during chewing in patients with chronic painful TMD-DDR using electromyographic (EMG) analysis. Thirty-three patients who met the diagnostic criteria for TMD and 32 volunteers without TMD (control group) underwent clinical examination, chewing pattern classification and EMG analysis. For the EMG analyses, the side of habitual unilateral chewing, as determined by the chewing pattern classification, was selected for recording; in cases of bilateral chewing, the recording side was randomly selected. The EMG-EMG coherence function and EMG-EMG transfer function (gain and phase) values were obtained at the first chewing frequency peak, and the working-side masseter signal was used as a reference in the analyses of the other muscles. Compared to the control group, the TMD group showed a longer chewing stroke duration (P = 0.01) as well as changes in the coactivation and coordination strategies of the jaw muscles, evidenced by greater relative energy expenditure (P< 0.01) and impaired differential recruitment (P< 0.05) and coherence (P< 0.01). Delays in peak and temporal asynchrony occurred in the jaw and neck muscles (P< 0.05). Patients with chronic painful TMD-DDR during chewing presented changes in the jaw and neck muscles, with more compromised function of the former, which are specific to chewing.