Assessment of differential item functioning across English and Spanish versions of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale

Revised Chinese resident health literacy scale for the older adults in China: simplified version and initial validity testing

Objective

This study aimed to develop a short version of the Chinese Resident Health Literacy Scale focused on older adults in China, and further assess the reliability and validity of this short version.

Methods

The data was from a cross-sectional community-based older adults health survey conducted in 2020. The total of 5,829 older adults were randomly divided into two parts using for the simplification and assessment of the scale, respectively. Item Response Theory (IRT) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF) were used for item analysis and scale simplification. Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were used to assess the reliability and three factors Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to assess the validity, which were compared to the original version. Moreover, Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MCFA) was used to test the model invariance of the short version across groups of gender, age groups, level of education, and cognitive status.

Results

The simplified version consisted of 27 items taken from 50 original items, of them 11 items from the dimension of knowledge and attitudes, 9 items from the dimension of behavior and lifestyle, and 7 items from the dimension of health-related skills. The overall Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were both 0.87 (95%CI: 0.86-0.88). The goodness-of-fits of CFA in simplified version were still acceptable in CFI, TLI, GFI, and RMSEA, even improved in CFI, TLI, and GFI compared to those of original version. Also, the model was stable and invariant in MCFA across gender, cognitive status, and educational level groups.

Conclusion

In this study, we formed a simplified instrument for measuring health literacy focused on older adults in China. This short version might be more suitable for the priority recommendation in extended tracking of the dynamic changes on the levels of health literacy in the whole life cycle in public health settings. Further research might be to identify the cut-off values to distinguish the older adults with different levels of health literacy.

Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale

OBJECTIVES

Orofacial appearance is increasingly recognized as an important dental patient-reported outcome making instrument development and refinement efforts to measure the outcome better necessary. The aim of this study was to derive a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OES data were collected from a consecutive sample of a total of 2113 adult English- or Spanish-speaking dental patients from HealthPartners dental clinic in Minnesota. Participants with missing data were excluded and analysis were performed using data from 2012 participants. Orofacial appearance was assessed with the English and the Spanish language version of the OES. Linear regression analysis was performed, with the OES item 8 ("Overall, how do you feel about the appearance of your face, your mouth, and your teeth?") as the predictor variable and the OES summary score as the criterion variable, to calculate the adjusted coefficients of determination (R²).

RESULTS

The value of adjusted R² was 0.83, indicating that the OES item 8 score explained about 83% of the variance of the OES summary score. The difference in R² scores between the two language groups was negligible.

CONCLUSION

The OES item 8 can be used for the one-item OES (OES-1). It is a psychometrically sound instrument for measuring orofacial appearance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Due to its easy application and sufficient psychometric properties, the OES-1 can be used effectively as an alternative to longer OES instruments in all areas of dental practice and research.

[Dental and oral health services research in Germany]

In den letzten 8 Jahren wurde in Deutschland nicht nur „mehr Versorgungsforschung in der Zahnmedizin“ gefordert, sondern auch geleistet. Insgesamt finden sich an 12 Medizinischen Fakultäten themenbezogene Aktivitäten der Zahn‑, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde in der Versorgungsforschung; deutschlandweit werden 9 Großprojekte verortet, die vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung oder vom Innovationsfonds gefördert werden. Gleichwohl ist der Bedarf an Versorgungsforschung größer als die jetzige Leistungsfähigkeit der universitären und außeruniversitären Zahnmedizin: Um eine nachhaltige, bedarfsgerechte und zukunftssichere zahnärztliche Versorgung aller Menschen in Deutschland gewährleisten zu können, bedarf es strukturierter, methodisch versierter und in die Versorgung hinein vernetzter Verbünde, die das wissenschaftliche Fundament für erwartete Versorgungsumbrüche legen können.

Der vorliegende Beitrag soll den Stand der Versorgungsforschung in der Zahn‑, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde in Deutschland beschreiben. Die wesentlichen Herausforderungen werden adressiert: Methodenkompetenz, Zugang zu Daten und deren Nutzung sowie die langfristige Perspektive dieses Forschungsbereichs. Derzeitige Forschungsaktivitäten und Infrastruktur inklusive Förder- und Fortbildungsinstrumente werden dargestellt.

Die Erkenntnisse aus der zahnärztlichen Versorgungsforschung in Deutschland können auch für andere Länder richtungsweisend sein; umgekehrt kann Versorgungsforschung Ansätze aus anderen Ländern sinnvoll in das deutsche Gesundheitssystem übertragen. Versorgungsforschende sollten sich professionalisieren und vernetzen. Nachhaltige Strukturen (Professuren, Mittelbau) und Rahmenbedingungen (Datennutzung, Förderung) sollten geschaffen und Forschungsergebnisse zeitnah verwertet werden.