Molecular mechanisms of painful traumatic trigeminal neuropathy-Evidence from animal research and clinical correlates

[Specificities of orofacial neuropathic pain]

Head pain and notably orofacial pain differs from spinal pain on pathophysiological, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic levels. Its high prevalence, important impact on quality of life and significant socio-economical burden justify specific study of such type of pain. Among them, neuropathic orofacial pain resulting from disease or trauma of the trigeminal nervous system is among the most difficult types of pain to diagnose and to treat. Deciphering of underlying peripheral and central mechanisms has allowed numerous conceptual, clinical and therapeutic advances, notably the role of neural and non neural cell types, such as glia, immunocytes, vascular endothelial cells or the role of trigeminal sensory complex neural circuitry reconfiguration in the development of post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain. Cellular interactions within the trigeminal ganglion, allowing a better understanding of several painful dental, ocular or cephalalgic comorbidities, are also described.

Pathophysiology, Clinical Implications and Management of Orofacial Neuropathic Pain- with special attention to Trigeminal neuralgia: A Narrative Review

Background: It is a widely held belief that if the trigeminal nerve is damaged, the victim would experience agonising and unrelenting external pain. A lesion to the trigeminal nerve may have a wide-reaching effect, such as on one side of the face in particular, or it might have a more localised effect, such as on some or all of your gums. The risk of damage increases the likelihood that it will be difficult to speak and swallow. This nerve provides sensation to a part of your face that may be constantly aching or tingling for some people. However, the trigeminal nerve injury-related persistent orofacial pain might be brought on by a wide variety of unknown triggers. Aim: In this study investigate the clinical manifestations of chronic orofacial pain brought on by a damage to the trigeminal nerve, as well as the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches available to treat this condition. Methodology Through the use of search phrases such as "Trigeminal nerve injury," "Trigeminal ganglion," "Trigeminal spinal subnucleus caudalis," "Craniofacial pain," "Oral prognosis," and "treatment," the computerised databases for the last twenty years have been investigated. There are now two hundred objects in total that have been accumulated. There have been around fifty of them that are pertinent to the discussion that is going on in this work. Majority of the patients fair enough with the pharmacology treatment/drugs like the carbamazepine & oxcarbazepine which forms the first line treatment options followed by lamotrigine & baclofen encompassing the second line of drugs along with adjuvant drug support of topiramate, levetiracetam, gabapentin, pregabalin. As the field of science has explored &advanced for the latest treatment options include microvascular decompression, gamma knife radiosurgery, percutaneous rhizotomies variable based on the evidences & guidelines 54 Conclusion: New diagnostic criteria and treatment alternatives have become available for people who suffer from trigeminal neuropathy and orofacial neuropathic pain as a result of recent developments in fundamental animal research that have led to their development. Despite the results, more research needs to investigate a greater variety of distinct non-neuronal cell feature approaches.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5-mediated inhibition of inward-rectifying K+ channel 4.1 contributes to orofacial ectopic mechanical allodynia following inferior alveolar nerve transection in male mice

Inward-rectifying K⁺ channel 4.1 (Kir4.1), which regulates the electrophysiological properties of neurons and glia by affecting K⁺ homeostasis, plays a critical role in neuropathic pain. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) regulates the expression of Kir4.1 in retinal Müller cells. However, the role of Kir4.1 and its expressional regulatory mechanisms underlying orofacial ectopic allodynia remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the biological roles of Kir4.1 and mGluR5 in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) in orofacial ectopic mechanical allodynia and the role of mGluR5 in Kir4.1 regulation. An animal model of nerve injury was established via inferior alveolar nerve transection (IANX) in male C57BL/6J mice. Behavioral tests indicated that mechanical allodynia in the ipsilateral whisker pad lasted at least 14 days after IANX surgery and was alleviated by the overexpression of Kir4.1 in the TG, as well as intraganglionic injection of an mGluR5 antagonist (MPEP hydrochloride) or a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor (chelerythrine chloride); Conditional knockdown of the Kir4.1 gene downregulated mechanical thresholds in the whisker pad. Double immunostaining revealed that Kir4.1 and mGluR5 were co-expressed in satellite glial cells in the TG. IANX downregulated Kir4.1 and upregulated mGluR5 and phosphorylated PKC (p-PKC) in the TG; Inhibition of mGluR5 reversed the changes in Kir4.1 and p-PKC that were induced by IANX; Inhibition of PKC activation reversed the downregulation of Kir4.1 expression caused by IANX (p < .05). In conclusion, activation of mGluR5 in the TG after IANX contributed to orofacial ectopic mechanical allodynia by suppressing Kir4.1 via the PKC signaling pathway.

Treatment of unexplained facial numbness with stellate ganglion blockade: A case report

To date, there is no established treatment for facial numbness or dysesthesia of unspecified causes. Herein, we report a case of unexplained facial numbness and confirmed hypesthesia that achieved clinical response to stellate ganglion blockade (SGB). SGB might be an effective treatment of psychological stress-related facial numbness of unknown origin.

Orofacial Neuropathic Pain-Basic Research and Their Clinical Relevancies

Trigeminal nerve injury is known to cause severe persistent pain in the orofacial region. This pain is difficult to diagnose and treat. Recently, many animal studies have reported that rewiring of the peripheral and central nervous systems, non-neuronal cell activation, and up- and down-regulation of various molecules in non-neuronal cells are involved in the development of this pain following trigeminal nerve injury. However, there are many unknown mechanisms underlying the persistent orofacial pain associated with trigeminal nerve injury. In this review, we address recent animal data regarding the involvement of various molecules in the communication of neuronal and non-neuronal cells and examine the possible involvement of ascending pathways in processing pathological orofacial pain. We also address the clinical observations of persistent orofacial pain associated with trigeminal nerve injury and clinical approaches to their diagnosis and treatment.

Chronic Orofacial Pain: Models, Mechanisms, and Genetic and Related Environmental Influences

Chronic orofacial pain conditions can be particularly difficult to diagnose and treat because of their complexity and limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying their aetiology and pathogenesis. Furthermore, there is considerable variability between individuals in their susceptibility to risk factors predisposing them to the development and maintenance of chronic pain as well as in their expression of chronic pain features such as allodynia, hyperalgesia and extraterritorial sensory spread. The variability suggests that genetic as well as environmental factors may contribute to the development and maintenance of chronic orofacial pain. This article reviews these features of chronic orofacial pain, and outlines findings from studies in animal models of the behavioural characteristics and underlying mechanisms related to the development and maintenance of chronic orofacial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain in particular. The review also considers the role of environmental and especially genetic factors in these models, focussing on findings of differences between animal strains in the features and underlying mechanisms of chronic pain. These findings are not only relevant to understanding underlying mechanisms and the variability between patients in the development, expression and maintenance of chronic orofacial pain, but also underscore the importance for considering the strain of the animal to model and explore chronic orofacial pain processes.

Acute and Chronic Pain from Facial Skin and Oral Mucosa: Unique Neurobiology and Challenging Treatment

The oral cavity is a portal into the digestive system, which exhibits unique sensory properties. Like facial skin, the oral mucosa needs to be exquisitely sensitive and selective, in order to detect harmful toxins versus edible food. Chemosensation and somatosensation by multiple receptors, including transient receptor potential channels, are well-developed to meet these needs. In contrast to facial skin, however, the oral mucosa rarely exhibits itch responses. Like the gut, the oral cavity performs mechanical and chemical digestion. Therefore, the oral mucosa needs to be insensitive, to some degree, in order to endure noxious irritation. Persistent pain from the oral mucosa is often due to ulcers, involving both tissue injury and infection. Trigeminal nerve injury and trigeminal neuralgia produce intractable pain in the orofacial skin and the oral mucosa, through mechanisms distinct from those seen in the spinal area, which is particularly difficult to predict or treat. The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic chronic pain, such as atypical odontalgia (idiopathic painful trigeminal neuropathy or post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy) and burning mouth syndrome, remain especially challenging. The central integration of gustatory inputs might modulate chronic oral and facial pain. A lack of pain in chronic inflammation inside the oral cavity, such as chronic periodontitis, involves the specialized functioning of oral bacteria. A more detailed understanding of the unique neurobiology of pain from the orofacial skin and the oral mucosa should help us develop novel methods for better treating persistent orofacial pain.

Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy: correlation between objective and subjective assessments and a prediction model for neurosensory recovery

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PTN) can have a substantial effect on patient well-being. However, the relation between the neuropathic symptoms and their effect on psychosocial functioning remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between objective and subjective assessments of neurosensory function in PTN and predict neurosensory outcome using baseline measurements.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study included patients diagnosed with PTN at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium, between April 2018 and May 2020. Standardized objective and subjective neurosensory examinations were recorded simultaneously on multiple occasions during the follow-up period. Correlation analyses and principal component analysis were conducted, and a prediction model of neurosensory recovery was developed.

RESULTS

Quality of life correlated significantly (P < 0.05) with percentage of affected dermatome (ρ = - 0.35), the presence of brush stroke allodynia (ρ = - 0.24), gain-of-function sensory phenotype (ρ = - 0.41), Medical Research Council Scale (ρ = 0.36), and Sunderland classification (ρ = - 0.21). Quality of life was not significantly correlated (P > 0.05) with directional discrimination, stimulus localization, two-point discrimination, or sensory loss-of-function. The prediction model showed a negative predictive value for neurosensory recovery after 6 months of 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a strong correlation of subjective well-being with the presence of brush stroke allodynia, thermal and/or mechanical hyperesthesia, and the size of the neuropathic area. These results suggest that positive symptoms dominate the effect on affect. In patients reporting poor subjective well-being in the absence of positive symptoms or a large neuropathic area, additional attention towards psychosocial triggers might enhance treatment outcome. The prediction model could contribute to establishing realistic expectations about the likelihood of neurosensory recovery but remains to be validated in future studies.